BETA

4 Amendments of Dominique VLASTO related to 2011/0391(COD)

Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
a) an air carrier requesting, as part of a series of slots, a slot at an airport on any day, where, if the carrier's request were accepted, it would in total hold fewer than fivnine slots at that airport on that day; or
2012/09/17
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b – introductory part
b) an air carrier requesting a series of slots for a non-stop scheduled passenger service between two European Union airports, where at most two other air carriers operate the same non-stop scheduled service between those airports on that day, and where, if the air carrier's request were accepted, the air carrier would nonetheless hold fewer than nine slots at that airport on that day for that non-stop service.deleted
2012/09/17
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. The managing body of a coordinated airport may decide to use the airport charge system with the aim of dissuading air carriers from belatedly returning slots to the pool referred to in Article 9 and to hold them liable for having reserved airport infrastructure without using it. The following principles shall be respected: a) the procedure set out under Article 6 of Directive 2009/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council shall be observed before this decision is taken. The coordinator shall also be consulted. For coordinated airports not covered by Article 1(2) of Directive 2009/12/EC, the airport managing body shall consult the coordination committee and the coordinator; b) this decision shall not affect the non- discriminatory and transparent character of the slot allocation process and the system of airport charges; c) this decision shall not discourage air carriers from developing services or entering the market and it shall be limited to covering the costs incurred by the airport for reserving the airport capacity corresponding to the slots which remained unused; d) air carriers shall not be held liable for having reserved airport infrastructure without using it for slots allocated but returned to the pool before 31 January for the following summer scheduling period or before 31 August for the following winter scheduling period, for slots coinciding with public holidays and returned to the pool before the same dates and for slots for which the non-use can be justified on the basis of Article 10(5); e) this decision shall be communicated to the coordinator, the interested parties and the Commission at least six months before the start of the scheduling season concerned.deleted
2012/09/17
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 262 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Transfers of historical slots for a scheduling period that give rise to financial payments may not be sold on before the end of that scheduling period.
2012/09/17
Committee: TRAN