7 Amendments of Mary HONEYBALL related to 2007/2253(INI)
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the unrestricted concentration of ownership might jeopardise pluralism and cultural diversity and; whereas in certain markets it is approaching a limit whereby pluralism will no longer, particularly where there is a dominant broadcasting platform, media pluralism may not be automatically guaranteed by free market competition,
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital R
Recital R
R. whereas in certain markets the public service media is a dominsignificant player in terms of both quality and market share,
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital U
Recital U
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital X a (new)
Recital X a (new)
Xa. whereas the Council Resolution of 25 January 1999 (1999/C 30/01) concerning public service broadcasting reiterates the vital role of public service broadcasting for pluralism and reaffirms its important role in bringing to the public the benefits of the new audiovisual and information services and new technology,
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital X b (new)
Recital X b (new)
Xb. whereas the UNESCO convention on the protection and promotion of the diversity of cultural expressions attaches considerable importance to the creation of conditions conducive to media diversity,
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital X c (new)
Recital X c (new)
Xc. whereas access to a variety of media platforms is essential to media pluralism,
Amendment 222 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Recommends that the regulations governing state aid are implemented in a way allowing the public service media to fulfil its function in a dynamic environment, while avoiding unfair competition leading to impoverishment of the media landscape, and ensuring that public service media carry out the function entrusted to them by member states in a transparent and accountable manner;