7 Amendments of Jan HUITEMA related to 2015/2092(INI)
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas current innovations that improve the selectivity of fishing gear are frequently hindered by legislation;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas the discard ban involves a radical change of approach to fisheries management, with special attention to demersal fisheries, and hence to technical measures in key areas such as catch composition;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital Q
Recital Q
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital R
Recital R
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Considers that, in order to make CFP rules more acceptable to the fisheries sector and ensure compliance therewith, fishermen must be more involved in decision making, in particular within the RAC, given incentives such as more aid for innovation and encouraged to use more selective fishing gear;
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Considers that the new legislative framework shall facilitate the further use of innovative fishing gears which have scientifically proven to increase the selectivity and simultaneously have a reduced impact on the environment;
Amendment 203 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Maintains that, notwithstanding the discard ban, provisions regarding technical measures in areas such as catch composition must be sufficiently flexible to adapt in real time to progress in the fisheries and more selective fishing techniquesin order to provide more opportunities for the fisheries sector to implement innovations regarding selective fishing methods into practice;