5 Amendments of Nadine MORANO related to 2020/2045(INI)
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the EU Facility for Refugees in Turkey (FRT) was created in 2016 in the framework of the EU-Turkey statement and manages EUR 6 billion; whereas human rights violations have taken place under this agreement which are incompatible with the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the EU Emergency Trust Fund for stability and addressing root causes of irregular migration and displaced persons in Africa (EUTF) was established in 2015; whereas the EUTF makes predominant use (90 %) of Official Development Assistance; whereas it became the main financial instrument for the EU’s political engagement with African partners in the field of migration; whereas the EUTF has funded over 500 projects in more than 25 countries in Africa for a total of over EUR 4.8 billion; whereas the EUTF has raised concerns about contributing to inhumane and degrading treatment and/or financing actors that have committed human rights violations, such as in Libya, Eritrea and Sudabecome a major and flexible tool for achieving stability in third countries and for combating forced displacement and the root causes of irregular migration;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. DeplorWelcomes the fact that bothion and results achieved by the EUTF and the FRT are ad hoc instruments that were set up outside the EU budget, raising concerns over their lack of transparency and democratic accountability; points out that their governance structures deviate from ordinary decision-making and bypass parliament scrutiny; stresses that these instruments must be implemented in accordance with fundamental rights;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Is concerned aboutConsiders the governance of the EUTF: the composition of its board and regional operational committees, the opacity of the process for approving projects, the lack of dialogue with local and human rights CSOs, and the lack of ex ante and ongoing impact assessments on fundamental rights and its adaptability and flexibility to be assets; notes, however, that the EUTF would benefit from improved parliamentary scrutiny;
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Highlights that the EUTF is part of a trend of the securitisation and externalisation of EU border management aimed at reducing irregular migrNotes with satisfaction that the EUTF contributes, in conjunction with the beneficiary States and on the basis of a genuine partnership, to EU border securitisation and management; welcomes the fact thati on toe of the EU; stresses the risks to development objectives and fundamental rights associated with this approach.main aims of the EUTF is to reduce irregular migration to the EU;