BETA

10 Amendments of Charles GOERENS related to 2018/0106(COD)

Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
(3) In certain policy areas, breaches of Union law may cause serious harm to the public interest, in the sense of creating significant risks for the welfare of society. Where weaknesses of enforcement have been identified in those areas, and whistleblowers are in a privileged position to disclose breaches, it is necessary to enhance enforcement by ensuring effective protection of whistleblowers from retaliation and introducing effective and confidential reporting channels.
2018/09/07
Committee: AFCO
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
(5) Accordingly, common minimum legal standards ensuring effective whistleblower protection should apply in those acts and policy areas where i) there is a need to strengthen enforcement; ii) under-reporting by whistleblowers is a key factor affecting enforcement, and iii) breaches of Union law cause serious harm to the public interest.
2018/09/07
Committee: AFCO
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
(10) Evidence-gathering, detecting and addressing environmental crimes and unlawful conduct against the protection of the environment remain a challenge and need to be reinforced as acknowledged in the Commission Communication "EU actions to improve environmental compliance and governance" of 18 January 201840 . Whilst whistleblower protection rules exist at present only in one sectorial instrument on environmental protection41 , the introduction of such protection appears necessary to ensure effective enforcement of the Union environmental acquis, whose breaches can cause serious harm to the public interest with possible spill-over impacts across national borders. This is also relevant in cases where unsafe products can cause environmental harm. _________________ 40 COM(2018) 10 final. 41 Directive 2013/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, of 12 June 2013, on safety of offshore oil and gas operations (OJ L 178, p. 66).
2018/09/07
Committee: AFCO
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
(14) The protection of privacy and personal data is another area where whistleblowers are in a privileged position to disclose breaches of Union law which can seriously harm the public interest. Similar considerations apply for breaches of the Directive on the security of network and information systems45 , which introduces notification of incidents (including those that do not compromise personal data) and security requirements for entities providing essential services across many sectors (e.g. energy, health, transport, banking, etc.) and providers of key digital services (e.g. cloud computing services). Whistleblowers' reporting in this area is particularly valuable to prevent security incidents that would affect key economic and social activities and widely used digital services. It helps ensuring the continuity of services which are essential for the functioning of the internal market and the wellbeing of society. _________________ 45 Directive (EU) 2016/1148 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 2016 concerning measures for a high common level of security of network and information systems across the Union.
2018/09/07
Committee: AFCO
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 29
(29) Effective detection and prevention of serious harm to the public interest requires that the information reported which qualifies for protection covers not only unlawful activities but also abuse of law, namely acts or omissions which do not appear to be unlawful in formal terms but defeat the object or the purpose of the law.
2018/09/07
Committee: AFCO
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 30 a (new)
(30 a) Effective protection implies adequate training and a resource office available to inform whistleblowers on their rights, disclosure options, and limitations so they are aware of their rights and responsibilities.
2018/09/07
Committee: AFCO
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 34
(34) It is for the Member States to identify the authorities competent to receive and give appropriate follow up to the reports on breaches falling within the scope of this Directive. These may be regulatory or supervisory bodies in the areas concerned, law enforcement agencies, anti-corruption bodies and ombudsmen. The authorities designated as competent shall have the necessary capacities and powers to assess the accuracy of the allegations made in the report and to address the breaches reported, including by launching an investigation, prosecution or action for recovery of funds, or other appropriate remedial action, in accordance with their mandate. The staff serving in those agencies shall be specialised and have proper training and formation.
2018/09/07
Committee: AFCO
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. With a view to enhancing the enforcement of Union law and policies in specific areas, this Directive lays down common minimum standards for the protection of persons reporting on the following unlawful activities or abuse of law:
2018/09/07
Committee: AFCO
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Member States shall have specific provisions concerning data and documents covered by secret of defence, classified information, public order, or other exceptions based on their national law, if applicable.
2018/09/07
Committee: AFCO
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point a
a) the conditions under which reporting persons and/or intermediators qualify for protection under this Directive;
2018/09/07
Committee: AFCO