3 Amendments of Ulrike RODUST related to 2010/2002(BUD)
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35 a new
Paragraph 35 a new
35a. Point out that the funds proposed for the development of an integrated Maritime Policy (IMP) are not sufficient to cover the most important aspects of the launch of this new policy; stresses that a new European Union maritime policy could develop to the detriment of the existing priority areas of the CFP in so far as their budgetary funding is concerned; stresses, that in future the IMP should also be financed by means provided from budgetary lines foreseen for transport policies;
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35 b new
Paragraph 35 b new
35b. Expresses its concern that the political importance of the Common Fisheries Policy(CFP) is not adequately reflected in the draft budget for 2011; points out that the funds proposed for the development of an Integrated Maritime policy are not sufficient to cover the most important aspects of the launch of this new policy; stresses that a new European Union maritime policy could develop to the detriment of the existing priority areas of the CFP in so far as their budgetary funding is concerned; stresses, that in future such a policy will require adequate financing under more than one budget line;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35 c new
Paragraph 35 c new
35c. Expresses its concern that the political importance of the Common Fisheries policy (CFP) is not adequately reflected in the draft budget 2011, as the European Commission proposes a decrease in commitment appropriations by 0,6% compared to the 2010 budget;