12 Amendments of Ulrike RODUST related to 2017/2118(INI)
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 22 a (new)
Citation 22 a (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 6 July 2017on promoting cohesion and development in the outermost regions of the EU implementation of Article 349 of the TFEU1a _________________ 1a Texts adopted, P8_TA(2017)0316
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital M a (new)
Recital M a (new)
M a. whereas the EU is also heavily dependent on the importation of fisheries products from third countries for aquaculture feed, and more sustainable, alternative feed has so far been insufficiently researched and promoted;
Amendment 234 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14 a. Stresses that spatial planning does not necessarily have to go through the segregation of activities in certain areas, but rather in the balanced compatibility between them and that can potentially bring benefits to all
Amendment 244 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16 a. Notes that the fisheries sector enjoys a competitive advantage over the aquaculture sector, which in most cases relies on other sources of energy, partly through the exemption from taxation of fuels at national level; calls for such differences of treatment at national level to be eliminated;
Amendment 273 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Calls on the Commission to investigate how best to monitor farming procedures, in respect of environmental, hygiene and social standards, in exporting third countries so that a level playing field can be implemented internationally. At the same time, the results of the monitoring of aquaculture processes in third countries should be decisive for the renewal of export authorizations for products to the EU;
Amendment 332 #
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 10 a (new)
Subheading 10 a (new)
Increasing sustainability of the EU's aquaculture sector
Amendment 337 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37 a (new)
Paragraph 37 a (new)
37 a. Notes that innovative systems aiming at breeding fish as closely as possible in keeping with the ecosystem, using natural feed, have not so far had a sufficient presence on the European market; calls for the framework conditions for such systems to be improved;
Amendment 339 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37 a (new)
Paragraph 37 a (new)
37 a. Notes that types of feed, whose main components are fishmeal and fish oil, have a negative impact on the sustainability of aquaculture; calls, therefore, for the legal framework to be created to increase the use of highly innovative feeds based on plant and insect-protein in aquaculture;
Amendment 341 #
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 11
Subheading 11
Ensuring adequate financing through the EMFF and further structural funds
Amendment 350 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40 a (new)
Paragraph 40 a (new)
40 a. Calls for all schemes that would prevent the promotion of aquaculture, including through other EU financial instruments (such as the ERDF), to be reviewed in a subsidy-oriented manner;
Amendment 356 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41
Paragraph 41
41. Requests that a precondition for Member State access to EMFF funding should be havingMember States that have not fully attained at least 50 % of the goals identified in the national strategic plans should only have access to EMFF funding if they restructure their funding practices and redraft them under particular scrutiny by a (possibly international), competently staffed body of representatives of industry and science;
Amendment 366 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 43 a (new)
Paragraph 43 a (new)
43 a. Notes that the fisheries sector enjoys a competitive advantage over the aquaculture sector, which in most cases relies on other sources of energy, partly through the exemption from taxation of fuels at national level; calls for such differences of treatment at national level to be eliminated;