BETA

8 Amendments of Philippe LAMBERTS related to 2011/2025(INI)

Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that the Commission must consider all aspects, including verified need, net burdens imposed on controllers and probable value with respect to data protection, with respect to any proposalthe feasibility and the financial cost of data protection;
2011/04/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Invites the Commission to carefully consider the impact on SMEs to ensure they are not disadvantaged in particular through avoiding red tape;
2011/04/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Invites the Commission to resist calls for new imprecise broad principles which may cause legal uncertainty, skew competition, erect trade barriers, contravene the presumption of innocence and create additional burdens on controllers without quantifiable benefits in resolving genuine problemsuse the standards and principles laid down in Directive EC/95/46 as a basis to be strengthened;
2011/04/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Believes that any certification or seal scheme could be based on EMAS and must in any event be of ensured integrity and trustworthiness;deleted
2011/04/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on the Commission to encourage self regulation of sectors in the framework of the revised data protection law; recommends to include a mechanism of control and sanctions supervised by data protection authorities, and to ensure that all entities in a given sector are covered by self regulation schemes;
2011/04/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Recommends that any concrete implementation of ‘privacy by design’ is based on the existing EU model with respect to goods, to ensure legal certainty, a level playing field and free movementSupports the principles of ‘privacy by design’ and ‘privacy by default’ so as to reinforce self-determined data protection based on consent and transparency;
2011/04/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Recommends that the Commission considers a possibility for behavioural sanctions in case of infringement, instead of a principle of ‘accountability’;deleted
2011/04/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Invites the Commission to review existing rules for relevance, need, clarity, enforceability and powers, competence and enforcement activities of the authorities; so as to ensure one comprehensive data protection legislation across all Member states of the Union; calls on those new legislative measures to be enforced regardless of the location of the data controller or data processor involved;
2011/04/14
Committee: ITRE