BETA

21 Amendments of Eduard KUKAN related to 2011/2245(INI)

Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 a (new)
– having regard to its resolution of 14 December 2011 on the review of the European Neighbourhood Policy,
2011/12/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 10 a (new)
– having regard to the Foreign Affairs Council Conclusions on the European Neighbourhood Policy adopted on June 20th, 2011 at its 3101st meeting,
2011/12/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 11 a (new)
– having regard to the Foreign Affairs Council Conclusions on the European Endowment for Democracy adopted on December 1st 2011, at its 3130th meeting,
2011/12/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 12 a (new)
– having regard to the letter of support to the establishment of the EED to EP President Jerzy Buzek and HR/VP Catherine Ashton dated November 25, 2011,
2011/12/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the European Parliament welcomed the initiative of establishment of the European Endowment for Democracy in the report by Véronique De Keyser, on behalf of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, on EU external policies in favour of democratisation (2011/2032(INI));
2011/12/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B b (new)
Bb. whereas the establishment of the EED was supported in the letter to EP President Jerzy Buzek and HR/VP Catherine Ashton by several high profile human rights defenders including Sakharov Prize laureates Aung San Suu Kyi and Alaksandr Milinkievic;
2011/12/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas the events of the ‘Arab Spring’ demonstrated the need for a more informed and strategic engagement on the part of the EU with countries striving for democratic reforms, based on a new approach designed to restore credibility; whereas setting up the European Endowment for Democracy could be one of the most tangible responses of the EU to the challenges of democratisation in our neighbourhood and beyond;
2011/12/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas political parties, eminent political persons (such as dissidents, opposition figures, young leaders), social movements, representatives of civil society and the media (including journalists, bloggers, social media activists, etc.) with clear agenda seeking to improve democracy continue to play a central role in each democracy and democratisation process, and whereas, owing to a lack of resources, a restricted mandate and lengthy EIDHR procedures, support for these actors has in the past been limited;
2011/12/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas the Foreign Affairs Council has endorsed the initiative of creating an European Endowment for Democracy (EED); whereas work is proceeding swiftly towards its establishment and there is urgent need to reach agreement on the detailed operational questions;
2011/12/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a
(a) ascertain whether the EED will generate a more strategic and political EU approach to democracy support by providing context-specific, flexible, timely and bottom-up assistance with rapid reprogramming where this is needed to help facilitateing democratic transition in partner countries;
2011/12/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b
(b) ensure that the EED fosters andwhile encouragesing ‘deep and sustainable democracy’ in pre- transition, transition and post- transition countries, with a primary, although not exclusive, focus on the European Neighbourhoodll receive a focused mandate allowing it to complement democracy support measures of other instruments and underlining the added- value of the new entity;
2011/12/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b b (new)
(bb) enable the EED to develop effective ways to deal with pre-transition, transition, and post transition countries;
2011/12/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d
(d) ensure that the EED plays a role which complements and does not curtail the activities of existing funding instruments, particularly the EIDHR and the Civil Society Facility; where appropriate, the EED should launch projects which can later be continued by the EIDHR, creating an interface with the EIDHR so as to ensure coherence and sustainability in the longer term;
2011/12/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point e
(e) enable the EED to act in the early stages ofree stages: pre-transition, transition and post transition, to kick-start projects which thus far could not be supported by the EU owing to bureaucratic restrictions; and model the EED in such a way that it is less risk-averse while respecting the financial regulations and legal restrictions of its donors;
2011/12/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f
(f) address, in the early stages of funding in a specific country, a wide group of potential beneficiaries, including key political players (emerging political actors, fledgling political parties, grassroots movements and non-registered NGOs, trade unions), watchdogs, whistleblowers, individual dissidents, politically involved artists, media outlets and think tanks, etc., in order to enable the EED to support a wide variety of actors striving for democratic reforms; provide support to the above-mentioned in a pluralist manner, while at the same time avoiding any direct political party funding;
2011/12/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f
(f) address, in the early stages of funding in a specific country, a wide group of potential beneficiaries, including key political players (emerging political actors, fledgling political parties, grassroots movements and non-registered NGOs, trade unions), watchdogs, whistleblowers, individual dissidents, media outlets including online media and think tanks, in order to enable the EED to support a wide variety of actors striving for democratic reforms and transformation of their countries into a well-governed and free societies;
2011/12/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
(fa) To ensure that enough focus is placed, at all stages of operation of the EED, to the engagement of women and youth, as well as to innovative ways to use and render available social media;
2011/12/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point g
(g) enable the EED to award grants directly in non discriminatory manner to the intended beneficiaries and re-grant financial resources through non-profit entities, such as foundations and NGOs; particularly at the beginning, re-granting will be an effective mechanism to enable the EED to work with partners on the ground that have the requisite knowledge and local infrastructure and enjoy the trust of local people;
2011/12/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point j
(j) ensure that the EED has robust links and consults regularly with beneficiary groups, but without having regional offices, relying instead on local organisations or independent experts and practitioners;
2011/12/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point m a (new)
(ma) allow for sufficient space of the European Parliament to share its creative power and transnational experience from European Member States in support to democratisation processes beyond Europe's borders;
2011/12/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point o
(o) review after one year of activities the impact and performance of the EED and its complementary and added-value to EU instruments and their new set-up in the forthcoming financial period;
2011/12/20
Committee: AFET