BETA

Activities of Morten MESSERSCHMIDT related to 2011/0817(NLE)

Shadow reports (1)

REPORT on the draft protocol on the application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union to the Czech Republic (Article 48(3) of the Treaty on European Union) PDF (187 KB) DOC (92 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: AFCO
Dossiers: 2011/0817(NLE)
Documents: PDF(187 KB) DOC(92 KB)

Amendments (10)

Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. the Protocols to the TEU and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union form an integral part thereof, and therefore an additional Protocol establishing special rules with regard to the application of parts of the law of the Union to a Member State requires a revision of the Treaties,
2012/06/14
Committee: AFCO
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas it is necessary to respect the conditions under which Member States have acceded to the Treaty of Lisbon,
2012/01/04
Committee: AFCO
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. it should be emphasised that, pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 6(1) TEU, the Charter does not extend in any way the competences of the Union as defined in the Treaties,
2012/06/14
Committee: AFCO
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
J. on the basis of academic evidence and case-law, Protocol No 30 does not exempt Poland and the United Kingdom from the binding provisions of the Charter, it is not an 'opt-out', it does not amend the Charter and it does not alter the legal position which would prevail if it were not to exist . The only effect it has is to create legal uncertainty not only in Poland and the United Kingdom but also in other Member States,deleted
2012/06/14
Committee: AFCO
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital K
K. an important function of the Charter is to increase the prominence of fundamental rights and to make them more visible, but Protocol No 30 gives rise to legal uncertainty and political confusion, thereby undermining the efforts of the Union to reach and maintain a uniformly high level of rights protection,
2012/06/14
Committee: AFCO
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital L
L. if Protocol No 30 were ever to be interpreted as limiting the scope or force of the provisions of the Charter, the effect would be to diminish the protection of fundamental rights afforded to people in Poland, in the United Kingdom and, prospectively, in the Czech Republic,deleted
2012/06/14
Committee: AFCO
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital M
M. the Charter has no effect whatsoever, in terms of Czech, Union or international law, on the validity of the Benes Decrees concerning the expropriation of property after the Second World War,deleted
2012/06/14
Committee: AFCO
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital N
N. the Czech Constitutional Court dismissed two petitions in 2008 and 2009, finding the Treaty of Lisbon to be fully in accordance with Czech constitutional law,deleted
2012/06/14
Committee: AFCO
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital Q
Q. major doubts exist as to whether there is a majority in the Czech Parliament to ensure ratificatthe internal Czech political discussion ofn the new protocol aimed at extending the application of Protocol No 30 to the Czech Republicmatter is not an issue for the Union institutions to judge upon,
2012/06/14
Committee: AFCO
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the European Council to decide not to examine the proposed amendment of the Treaties;
2012/06/14
Committee: AFCO