BETA

Activities of Anna ROSBACH related to 2011/0380(COD)

Shadow opinions (1)

OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund [repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1198/2006 and Council Regulation(EC) No 861/2006 and Council Regulation No XXX/2011 on integrated maritime policy
2016/11/22
Committee: ENVI
Dossiers: 2011/0380(COD)
Documents: PDF(449 KB) DOC(830 KB)

Amendments (29)

Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) It is paramount to better integrate environmental concerns into the CFP which should deliver on the objectives and targets of the Union's environmental policy and the Europe 2020 Strategy. The CFP is aimed at an sustainable exploitation of living marine biological resources that restores and maintains fish stocks at levels which can produce the maximum sustainable yield, not later than 2015. The CFP shall implement the precautionary andan eco- system-based approaches to fisheries and aquaculture management. Consequently the EMFF should contribute to the protection of the marine environment as set out in the Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive).
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
(31) In order to increase the competitiveness and economic performance of fishing activities it is vital to stimulate innovation and entrepreneurship. Therefore the EMFF should support innovative operations and business development which add value to the industry and food production and offer adequate environmental protection. All such operations should be economically viable.
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 262 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37
(37) As a result of the establishment of systems of transferable fishing concessions envisaged in Article 27 of the [CFP Regulation] and iIn order to support Member States in the implementation of these new systems to allocate access to fishing resources, the EMFF should grant support in terms of capacity building and exchange of best practices.
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 286 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
(39) The objective of the Common Fisheries Policy is to ensure a sustainable exploitation of fish stocks. Overcapacity has been identified as a major driver for overfishing. It is therefore paramount to adapt the Union fishing fleet to the resources available. The removal of overcapacity through public aid such as temporary or permanent cessation and scrapping schemes has proven ineffective. The EMFF will therefore support the establishment and management of systems of transferable fishing concessions aiming at the reduction of overcapacity and increased economic performance and profitability of the operators concerned.
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 345 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 48
(48) New forms of income combined with aquaculture activities have already shown their added value for business development. Therefore the EMFF should support these complementary activities outside aquaculture such as angling- tourism, educational or environmental activities. In particular innovations that contribute to the use of waste materials including dissolved nutrients, the production of renewable energy and the integration of different trophic levels (IMTA) such as fish alongside shellfish and algae should be supported.
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 349 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 49
(49) Another important form of increasing the income of aquaculture enterprises is adding value to their products by processing and marketing their own production, as well as introducing new species with good market and environmental prospects and thus diversifying their production.
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 371 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 54
(54) Recognizing the risk of investments in aquaculture activities, the EMFF should contribute to business security by covering access to stock insurance and therefore safeguarding the income of producers in case of abnormal production losses due in particular to natural disasters, adverse climatic events, sudden water quality changes, diseases or pest infestations and destruction of production facilities.deleted
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 391 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 62
(62) Priority should be given to producer organisations and associations of producer organisations by granting them support. The compensation for storage aid and aid for production and marketing plans should gradually be phased out as the importance of this particular kind of support has lost its interest in the light of the evolving structure of the Union market for this kind of products and the growing importance of strong producer's organisations.deleted
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 531 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) promoting sustainable and competitive fisheries and aquaculturfisheries and aquaculture which are competitive, economically viable and socially and environmentally sustainable;
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 641 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – introductory part
(3) Fostering sustainable, innovative, competitive and knowledge based aquaculture through the focus on the following areas:
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 833 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 6
6. EUR 45 000 000 of the resources referred to in paragraph (1) shall be allocated to the storage aid referred to in Article 72 from 2014 to 2018 included.deleted
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 940 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point o – point i – indent 3
– an evaluation of the effects of the fishing and aquaculture sectors on the ecosystem.
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1204 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – title
Support to systems of transferable fishing concessions of the CFPallocation of fishing opportunities
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1212 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. In order toThe EMFF may support the establishment or modify systems of transferable fishing concessions under Article 27 of the [Regulatiication of systems that improve the allocation of fishing opportunities among on the CFP], the EMFF may supportperators, such as:
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1218 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the design and development of technical and administrative means necessary for the creation or functioning of a transferable fishing concessions systeminnovative system for the allocation of fishing opportunities;
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1227 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) stakeholder participation in designing and developing transferable fishing concessions systemsinnovative systems as referred to in paragrahp 1 (a);
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1232 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) the monitoring and evaluation of transferable fishing concessions systemssystems referred to in paragraph 1 (a);
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1236 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) the management of transferable concessions systemssystems referred to in paragraph 1 (a).
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1241 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 2
2. Support under paragraph 1 (a), (b) and (c) shall only be granted to public authorities. Support under paragraph 1 (d) of this Article shall be granted to public authorities legal or natural persons or recognized producer organizations involved in collective management of pooled transferable fishing concessions in accordance with Article 28(4) of the Regulation on Common Fisheries.
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1276 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. In order to reduce the impact of fishing on the marine environment, foster the elimination of discards and facilitate the transition to the exploitation of living marine biological resources that levels capable of restoresing and maintainsing populations of harvested species above levels which can produce the MSY, the EMFF may support research and investments in equipment aimed at:
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1278 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(a a) changing of fishing gear and the related vessel modification, necessary know-how and training, provided that the new gear has demonstrably better size and species selectivity, a limited impact on the marine environment and vulnerable marine ecosystems and does not increase the ability of the fishing vessel to catch fish;
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1523 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 1
1. Support under this Chapter shall be limited to aquaculture enterprises unless otherwise expressly established.that are ecologically sustainable and adhere to European Union environmental legislations
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1612 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) diversification of the income of aquaculture enterprises through the development of new aquaculture species with good market and environmental prospects;
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1700 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 51 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) submit an economically and environmentally viable business plan for the development of their aquaculture activities.
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1719 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 52 – paragraph 1 - point e a (new)
(e a) that promote the research of aquaculture techniques with low environmental impact.
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1736 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 54 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) aquaculture methods that use existing structures like natural ponds, and aim to create an activity that is semi-natural and compatible with specific environmental needs and subject to specific management requirements resulting from the designation of NATURA 2000 areas in accordance with Council Directive 92/43/EEC and Council and European Parliament Directive 2009/147/EC;
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1779 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 57
1. In order to safeguard the income of aquaculture producers the EMFF may support the contribution to an aquaculture stock insurance which shall cover the losses due to: (a) natural disasters; (b) adverse climatic events; (c) sudden water quality changes; (d) diseases in aquaculture or destruction of production facilities. 2. The occurrence of an adverse climatic event or the outbreak of disease in aquaculture shall be formally recognised as such by the Member State concerned. Member States may, where appropriate, establish in advance criteria on the basis of which such formal recognition shall be deemed to be granted. 3. Support shall only be granted for aquaculture stock insurance contracts which cover economic losses under paragraph 1 exceeding 30% of the average annual production of the aquaculture farmer.Article 57 deleted Aquaculture stock insurance
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1984 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) conducting regional, national or transnational promotional campaigns for environmentally sustainable fishery and aquaculture products.
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2206 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 94 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) 100 % of the eligible public expenditure for the support under storage aid referred to in Article 70;deleted
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH