16 Amendments of Louis MICHEL related to 2019/2003(BUD)
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital I a (new)
Recital I a (new)
I a. whereas the Court of Auditors issued an opinion No 5/99 on 16 June 1999 entitled “Pension Fund and Scheme for Members of the European Parliament”;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11 a. Wonders about the added value/cost ratio of the installation of the Europa Experience centers in all Member States within 10 to 15 years; asks the Secretary-General whether such analysis has been carried out and if not, considers that such analysis has to be done before proceeding with this project;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. WelcomNotes the creation of a series of mobile installations, which would tour Member States to bring the Union closer to citizens;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13 a. Is not satisfied by the way Parliament promotes its applications or websites to inform citizens on the Union’s work such as “Citizens’ App” and “What Europe does for me”; regrets that the promotional campaigns put in place seem to be little visible outside the sphere of the European institutions; calls for a more methodical and efficient approach to be put in place;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18 a. Questions the very high costs of certain proposed developments, namely: the installation of the Atrium building visitors' seminar rooms (EUR 8,720 million), the multifunctional space in the Esplanade area (EUR 2,610 million), the creation of a self-service canteen in the SDM building in Strasbourg (EUR 1,9 million); calls on the Secretary-General to provide the Committee on Budgets with any information relating to these decisions before the Parliament's reading of the budget in autumn 2019;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 b (new)
Paragraph 18 b (new)
18 b. Wonders about the opportunity to allocate EUR 2,420 million for the installation of interactive touch-screens at the entrances of a number of small and medium meeting rooms; asks the Secretary-General to explain the elements that led to such decision before the Parliament's reading of the budget in autumn 2019 ;
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 c (new)
Paragraph 18 c (new)
18 c. Is surprised that security cameras are only installed up to the 5th floor of the ASP building; considers that each floor must be equipped with such a camera to allow the "Security Investigations" service of the Parliament to do its work properly, especially in case of theft; considers that the idea is not to make Parliament a “police space”, but rather to guarantee the security of everyone; asks, therefore, to grant the DG safe of the necessary means for the installation of these cameras;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. BelieveConsiders that further savings canshould be achieved as regards the expenditure on furniture for the offices of Members and their assistants, given the complete refurbishment of those offices at the start of the mandate in 2019;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19 a. Is concerned by the intentions of the Parliament to expand its activity and diplomatic presence in Indonesia (Jakarta), Ethiopia(Addis Ababa) and the United States (New York); regrets that despite the absence of a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis and further elaboration on the underlying arguments for the choice of these specific locations, the Bureau agreed with the proposal, as well as with the appointment of the current head of the Parliament’s office in Washington D.C. as the new head of office in Jakarta; urges, therefore, the Secretary-General to identify the affected budget lines and to clarify this non- transparent state of affairs through the explanation of the decision-making process regarding these different locations and the appointment of the new head of office in Jakarta; considers, meanwhile, that this decision must be suspended;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 b (new)
Paragraph 19 b (new)
19 b. Considers that potential savings to the Parliament’s budget can be achieved with a single seat; recalls the 2014 ECA analysis which estimated the costs of the geographic dispersion of Parliament to be EUR 114 million per year; recalls furthermore that due to this Parliament's geographic dispersion, 78 % of all missions by Parliament statutory staff arise and the environmental impact is between 11 000 and 19 000 tonnes of CO2 emissions; calls therefore for a roadmap to a single seat;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Considers that the social and pension rights of Accredited Parliamentary Assistants (APAs) should be respected; in this regard, reiterates its call to find a workable solution for those APAs who, having worked for two parliamentary terms without interruption in the end of the current term, will not be entitled to access the European pension rights scheme when they reach pension age, since they will be lacking some time out of ten years' service needed as set out in the Staff Regulations, due to early elections in 2014 and the delays in the validation of the APAs new contracts because of heavy workload during the period after the elections of 2009; calls, therefore, on the Secretary- General to submit new practical and credible proposals aimed at resolving this problem definitively;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Requests an examination of the voluntary Members´ Pension Fund by the European Court of Auditors, while ensuring full transparencycalls the Statute for Members which states in Article 27(1) and (2) that “The voluntary pension fund set up by Parliament shall be maintained after the entry into force of this Statute for Members or former Members who have already acquired rights or future entitlements in that fund” and that “Acquired rights and future entitlements shall be maintained in full”; requests, in this regard, the Court of Auditors to investigate the ways to ensure a sustainable financing of the Voluntary Pension Fund in accordance with the provisions of the Statute for Members;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28 a. Questions the fact that there are different scales of unemployment benefits depending on whether you are a temporary agent, a contract agent or an accredited parliamentary assistant; considers that the basic allowance of unemployment benefits for former accredited parliamentary assistants and former contract staff must be aligned to the basic allowance for former temporary staff; asks the Secretary-General to put an end to this discrimination;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 a (new)
Paragraph 32 a (new)
32 a. Questions the current call for tenders for canteens and is surprised by the reduction in the appropriations allocated to the line 1652 (expenditure on catering); requests, therefore, the Secretary-General to provide any relevant information relating to this call for tenders and to guarantee that the quality of the service, the working conditions of the staff and the quality of the food served at the various points of the restaurants will not be affected by this decrease in appropriations;