10 Amendments of Marita ULVSKOG related to 2015/2056(BUD)
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Notes that the redundancies are spread across 84 sites in the whole of mainland France; notes that the number of redundancies in the different sites ranges from 2 (Carlos en Champagne and Saint Louis) to 257 (Gonesse); notes furthermore that since the redundancies occurred in many sites but in limited numbers, the impact on local employment and the local economy is also limited;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that only one action from the coordinated package of personalised services is to be co-funded by the EGF: advice and guidance to the redundant workers provided by a team of expert consultants (Cellule d, among the personalised services to be provided, only one action is to be implemented by a one-stop-shop (Cellule de reclassement) which is run by three contracting agencies; notes that France requests only the funding of this one-stop-shop from the EGF; expects the Commission and the Freclassement) from three contractors whonch authorities to strictly follow the principle according to which payments to the agencies will be paidmade by instalments and on the basis of results achieved;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that the coordinated package of personalised services has been drawn up three contractors operating the Cellule de reclassement were selected by the judicial Administrator following consultations with the representatives of the targeted beneficiaries and the social partnredundant workers, the objective being to cover as much as possible of mainland France and to ensure the reintegration of the largest possible number of the targeted workers;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Considers that the monitoring of the activity of the agencies by means of regular written reports ensures the appropriate use of the EGF funding to provide participants a personalised career path, sufficient number of job offers and mentoring for business creation within the framework of the one-stop-shop system;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Reminds that the EGF funding is intended to help the workers to find new employment through training and not in any case to support the agencies and their administrative costs;
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 c (new)
Paragraph 7 c (new)
7c. Notes that the task of the contractors is to assist and guide the redundant workers and help them find solutions enabling them to remain in the labour market and embark on new jobs;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 d (new)
Paragraph 7 d (new)
7d. Considers that workers in the 55-64 age group are at a higher risk of prolonged unemployment and exclusion from the labour market; considers therefore that these workers have specific needs when it comes to providing them with personalised approach;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 e (new)
Paragraph 7 e (new)
7e. Reminds that in line with Article 7 of the EGF Regulation, the design of the coordinated package of personalised services should anticipate future labour market perspectives and required skills and should be compatible with the shift towards a resource-efficient and sustainable economy;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 f (new)
Paragraph 7 f (new)
7f. Welcomes the use of European Social Fund for further active measures (e.g. the longer training courses as such), which are not included in the application submitted byFfrance ;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Expects that the French authorities will comply with the provisions of the EGF Regulation as regards providing information and publicising the funded actions, despite the fact that the they did not request funding for preparatory activities, management and information and publicity;