5 Amendments of Anna Maria CORAZZA BILDT related to 2011/2013(INI)
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas the end product, a European Contract Law, must be properly thought through and subjected to an in-depth impact assessment prior to being amended, if necessary, and formally adopted by the European legislator if this process is to enjoy efficiency as well as political legitimacy and support,
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the open debate on the Green Paper and urges the relevant Commission departments to carry out a thorough analysis of the outcome of this consultation process; calls on the European Commission to provide an in-depth impact assessment of all proposed options, taking into consideration especially an evaluation of the actual needs of the economic actors, the cost incurred as well as the added value of each option;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Takes the view that a European Cif such an optional legal instrument of contract Llaw is set up at EU level, it should constitutes an additional, alternative, separate system governing cross-border contracts, although the that consumers and businesses could choose instead of the applicable national legislation; Member States shcould be given the option of applying it to contracts concluded under their domestic law as well;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Is convinced that a common European CConsiders that EU initiatives related to contract Llaw would makemust have a two-fold objective: efficiency of the internal market more efficient without affecting Member States' national systems of contract law, and a high level of consumer protection;
Amendment 77 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Is convinced that the lawif such an optional instrument is adopted, it should be balanced, simple, clear, transparent and user-friendly and not employ vague legal terms, so that European consumers in particular canitizens could understand it, although due account should be taken of the potential interests of both (or all) parties to a given contract; in any case, the Commission should take due consideration of the findings of the Expert Group;