BETA

7 Amendments of Christian ENGSTRÖM related to 2013/0306(COD)

Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 45
(45) The internet has developed over the past decades as an open platform for innovation with low access barriers for end-users, content and application providers and internet service providers. Fundamentally equal treatment and non- discrimination in forwarding data packages, irrespective of content, service, application, origin or destination, must be safeguarded by law throughout the EU, to provide a lasting guarantee that all internet users can in principle access or provide all online content, services or applications. Access network operators are under a general obligation to forward data packages while providing users with transfer services of suitable quality and constantly adapted to technological progress, regardless of the origin, destination or nature of the content, services and applications to be transferred. The open and non- discriminatory nature of the internet is the key to stimulating innovation and economic efficiency. These essential characteristics help ensure freedom and diversity of expression in the media and in the cultural sector. The existing regulatory framework aims at promoting the ability of end-users to access and distribute information or run applications and services of their choice. Recently, however, the report of the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) on traffic management practices published in May 2012 and a study, commissioned by the Executive Agency for Consumers and Health and published in December 2012, on the functioning of the market of internet access and provision from a consumer perspective, showed that a significant number of end-users are affected by traffic management practices which block or slow down specific applications. These tendencies require clear rules at the Union level to maintain the open internet and to avoid fragmentation of the single market resulting from individual Member States' measures. An open internet operating exclusively on the best-effort principle should not be impaired or restricted by the development of other products and services.
2013/12/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 47 a (new)
(47a) This Regulation is without prejudice to Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications).
2013/12/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 50
(50) In addition, there is demand on the part of content, applications and services providers, for the provision of transmission services based on flexible quality parameters, including lower levels of priority for traffic which is not time- sensitive. The possibility for . For the provision of specialised services in closed networks, it is necessary that content, applications and service providers have the opportunity to negotiate such flexiblea specific quality of service levels with providers of electronic communications to the public is necessary for the provision of specialised services andfor a limited group of users. This is expected to play an important role in the development of new services such as machine-to-machine (M2M) communications. At the same time such arrangements should allow providers of electronic communications to the public to better balance traffic and prevent network congestion. Providers of content, applications and services and providers of electronic communications to the public should therefore be free to concludeSpecial services must neither impair open internet access service quality nor be marketed or used as an internet substitute. They are admissible only if there is a manifest technical and de facto need, over and above economic self-interest, to be able to supply real-time critical applications of a particular quality. If specialised services agreements on defined levels of quality of ser offered or marketed by access network providers, they are also under the obligation to provicde as long as such agreements do not substantially impair the general quality of internet access servicesn open internet access service as referred to in recital (45). All open internet services are subject to the best- effort principle.
2013/12/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 14
(14) 'internet access service' means a publicly available electronic communications service that provides connectivity to the internet, and thereby connectivity between virtually all end points connected to the internet, irrespective of the network technology used; the Member States shall impose reasonable minimum requirements in respect of internet access service quality, which must be constantly adapted to technological progress; an internet access service enables end-users to use any internet-based application in accordance with the best effort principle; the only permissible derogation from this principle is proportional and justified traffic management where the conditions for its use are clearly defined;
2013/12/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 15
(15) 'specialised service' means an electronic communications service or any other service that provides the capability to access specific content, applications or services, or a combination thereof, and whose technical characteristics are controlled from end-to-endd and operated only within a closed, electronic communications networks and not marketed or used as an internet substitute or functionally identical to open internet content, applications or proservidces the capability to send or receive data to or from a determined number of parties or endpoints; and that is not marketed or widely used as a substitute for internet access service;. A special service shall only be only admissible if there is a manifest technical and de facto need, over and above economic self- interest, for particular real-time critical applications or applications requiring special safeguards which meet particular quality criteria.
2013/12/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
End-users shall also be free to agree with either pProviders of electronic communications to the public or with providers of content, applications and services on the provision of specialised services with an enhanced quality of servicemay offer specialized services to a limited number of users granted restricted access, through a closed electronic communications network. Special services may not be marketed or used as an internet substitute or offer content, applications or services functionally identical to those of the open internet.
2013/12/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
In order to enable tThe provision of specialised services to end-users, providersshall not impair the quality of cointent, applications and services and providers of electronic communications to the public shall be free to enter into agreements with each other to transmit the related data volumes or traffic as specialised services with a defined quality of serrnet access services. Neither shall they undermine existing, generally recognised technical standards and their development. Special services shall only be admissible where there is a manifest technical and de facto need for them, over and above economic self-interest, so as to be able to provicde or dedicated capacity. The provisreal time critical applications of specialised services shall not impair in a recurring or continuour applications requiring special safeguards manner the general quality of internet access serviced meeting particular quality standards.
2013/12/20
Committee: JURI