Activities of Carl HAGLUND related to 2010/2005(BUD)
Plenary speeches (1)
Amending budget no 1/2010: Section I - Parliament - Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the year 2011 - Section I - Parliament (debate)
Amendments (4)
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Emphasises that the buildings policy is intimately linked to the 2011 procedure and also to the general question of a sustainable budget; stresses that property needs result fromthere are already existing property needs which may be exacerbated by other decisions, notably those on staffing;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32
32. Welcomes the budgetary annex on environmental management which gives a good technical overview of the budget items involved; would also welcome, in this context, in the same annex to present thea comprehensive study on the carbon footprint of Parliament's buildings in Strasbourg, Brussels and Luxembourg and the impact of travel between those places of work, to present the current results of reducing Parliament's carbon footprint and to illustrate the beneficial impact on the environment as a result of these investments, and indeed any savings achieved in the longer term;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37
Paragraph 37
37. Believes that public procurement directives need to be better adapted to facilitate, where possible and appropriate, the inclusion of environmental and social clauses;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38
Paragraph 38
38. NoteSupports the proposal for an increase of EUR 5,1 million (from 27 million to 32 million) in order to finance 120 annual visitors that members can invite instead of the current 100; takes the view that it may be appropriate to have some time to evaluate the funcadditionally, considers that in conjunction with the proposed increase in visitors, the services responsible for the organisationing of the new visitors' centre before considering such an increase; additionally, considers that the proposed increase is not ideally timed given the budgetary circumstances and thus decides not to approve this increase fos should also take into account that Members may wish to split the visitor groups into different sizes over the year 2011;