3 Amendments of Carl HAGLUND related to 2011/2074(BUD)
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas the Commission's evaluation concludes that the application fulfils the eligibility criteria set up by the EGF Regulation,
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Expresses its doubts that the developments leading to redundancies at General Motors Belgium were solely influenced by the global financial crisis and therefore completely unpredictable; highlights the fact that the situation of General Motors in Belgium has been difficult throughout the last decade, linked to comparably high cost and inflexibility in the labour market as well as other structural problems;
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that, in accordance with the intervention criteria as defined in Article 62 of the EGForiginal Regulation, it should be ensured that (EC) No 1927/2006 allow for clearer differentiation, compared to the revised version of 2008, as to the scope of the EGF supportvis-a-vis othe reintegration of individual redundant workers into employmentr, more long- term, programmes to achieve economic growth and labour market stability; reiterates that assistance from the EGF must not replace actions which are the responsibility of companies by virtue of national law or collective agreements, nor measures restructuring companies or sectors;