4 Amendments of Riikka PAKARINEN related to 2013/2008(INI)
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. Whereas cohesion policy will continue to be the main source of EU public funding in the context of the multiannual financial framework 2014-2020, and whereas cohesion policy new framework is putting all the emphasis on the need to concentrate investment in those few areas deemed to be most important, such as job creation, employment (in particular youth employment), training and education, SMEs, innovation, energy, environment, and urban development and cities;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that there is now enough evidence that policies of budgetary consolidation are in themselves insufficient to enhance growth and promote investments that generate good-quality, sustainable jobs, which require as well measures that support the economy and encourage the progress – still fragile and timid – made towards recovery;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Considers that cohesion policy is best placed to give the Europe 2020 Strategy the necessary territorial dimension needed to try to tackle both the very relevant growth differentials within the Union, and within Member States, and the fact that differences in institutional capacities means that the different regions cannot use the given targets as references in the same way;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Insists on the role of the ESF in reducing the disparities in human capital among regions, and in the context of implementing the social dimension of the Europe 2020 Strategy, as this fund, in parallel with the ERDF, has beensought to contributing significantlye to the fulfilment of some of the current major priorities of the Union, namely boosting youth employment and the labour market, promoting sustainable economy and growth, reducing the number of early school leavers, and combating poverty, discrimination and social exclusion;