Activities of Waldemar TOMASZEWSKI
Plenary speeches (53)
Presentation of the programme of activities of the Finnish Presidency of the Council (debate)
Fight against cancer (topical debate)
Employment and social policies of the euro area (debate)
General budget of the European Union for 2020 - all sections (debate)
Children rights in occasion of the 30th anniversary of the Convention of the Rights of the Child (debate)
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance
2020 budgetary procedure: joint text (debate)
EU disability strategy post 2020 (debate)
Activities of the European Ombudsman in 2018 (debate)
Conclusion of the EU-Viet Nam Free Trade Agreement - Conclusion of the EU-Viet Nam Free Trade Agreement (Resolution) - EU-Viet Nam Investment Protection Agreement - EU-Viet Nam Investment Protection Agreement (Resolution) (debate)
European coordinated response to the COVID-19 outbreak (debate)
70th anniversary of the Schuman Declaration (debate)
Preparation of the European Council meeting of 19 June 2020 - Recommendations on the negotiations for a new partnership with the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (debate)
The European Forest Strategy - The Way Forward (debate)
Common agricultural policy - support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States and financed by the EAGF and by the EAFRD - Common agricultural policy: financing, management and monitoring - Common agricultural policy – amendment of the CMO and other Regulations (debate)
Programme for the Union's action in the field of health for the period 2021-2027 (“EU4Health Programme”) (debate)
Representative actions for the protection of the collective interests of consumers (debate)
Quality of water intended for human consumption – Implementation of the EU water legislation (debate)
Implementation of the Common Foreign and Security Policy - annual report 2020 - Implementation of the Common Security and Defence Policy - annual report 2020 - Human Rights and Democracy in the World and the EU policy on the matter - annual report 2019 (debate)
Safety of the nuclear power plant in Ostrovets (Belarus) (continuation of debate)
Programme for the Union’s action in the field of health for the period 2021-2027 (‘EU4Health programme’) (debate)
Implementation of the Ambient Air Quality Directives (continuation of debate)
Digital Green Certificate - Union citizens - Digital Green Certificate - third country nationals - The accessibility and affordability of Covid-testing (debate)
Impacts of EU rules on the free movements of workers and services: intra-EU labour mobility as a tool to match labour market needs and skills (debate)
European Social Fund Plus (ESF+) 2021-2027 (continuation of debate)
Common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, the Just Transition Fund, the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Instrument for Financial Support for Border Management and Visa Policy 2021-2027 – European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and Cohesion Fund 2021-2027 – Specific provisions for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) supported by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and external financing instruments 2021-2027 (debate)
European Medicines Agency (continuation of debate)
Media freedom and further deterioration of the Rule of law in Poland (debate)
European solutions to the rise of energy prices for businesses and consumers: the role of energy efficiency and renewable energy and the need to tackle energy poverty (debate)
Common agricultural policy - support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States and financed by the EAGF and by the EAFRD - Common agricultural policy: financing, management and monitoring - Common agricultural policy – amendment of the CMO and other regulations (debate)
European framework for employees' participation rights and the revision of the European Works Council Directive (debate)
Digital Services Act (continuation of debate)
Protection of workers from the risks relating to exposure to carcinogens, mutagens and reprotoxins at work (continuation of debate)
MFF 2021-2027: fight against oligarch structures, protection of EU funds from fraud and conflict of interest (debate)
Data Governance Act (debate)
The massacre of Christians in Nigeria (debate)
EU initiatives to address the rising cost of living, including the implementation of the European Pillar of Social Rights (debate)
Radio Equipment Directive: common charger for electronic devices (debate)
Global food security as follow-up to the G20 Agriculture Ministers meeting (debate)
A truly interconnected Energy Single Market to keep bills down and companies competitive (topical debate)
Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter - annual report 2022 (debate)
Preparation of the Special European Council meeting of February, in particular the need to develop sustainable solutions in the area of asylum and migration (debate)
This is Europe - Debate with the President of Lithuania, Gitanas Nausėda (debate)
Combating organised crime in the EU (debate)
Markets in Crypto-assets (MiCa) - Information accompanying transfers of funds and certain crypto-assets (recast) (debate)
Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence (debate)
Ensuring food security and the long-term resilience of EU agriculture (debate)
Recommendations for reform of the European Parliament’s rules on transparency, integrity, accountability and anti-corruption (debate)
Amending the proposed mechanism to resolve legal and administrative obstacles in a cross-border context (debate)
Framework for ensuring a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials (debate)
Automated data exchange for police cooperation (“Prüm II”) (debate)
Tackling the inflation in food prices and its social consequences and root causes (debate)
Internal markets for renewable gas, natural gas and hydrogen (recast) - Common rules for the internal markets for renewable gas, natural gas and hydrogen (recast) - Union’s electricity market design: Regulation - Union’s electricity market design: Directive (joint debate – Reform of the energy and electricity markets)
Shadow reports (1)
REPORT with recommendations to the Commission on amending the proposed mechanism to resolve legal and administrative obstacles in a cross-border context
Shadow opinions (2)
OPINION on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the eighth, ninth, tenth and eleventh European Development Funds for the financial year 2022
OPINION on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2022, section III - Commission
Institutional motions (279)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation at the USA-Mexican border
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Hong Kong
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Hong Kong
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Iran, notably the situation of women's rights defenders and imprisoned EU dual nationals
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Myanmar, notably the situation of the Rohingya
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Turkey, notably the removal of elected mayors
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Iran, notably the situation of women’s rights defenders and imprisoned EU dual nationals
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Myanmar, notably the situation of the Rohingya
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the proposed new Criminal Code of Indonesia
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Egypt
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Haiti
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Cuba, the case of José Daniel Ferrer Garcia
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on situation of freedoms in Algeria
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Bolivia
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of freedoms in Algeria
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on violations of human rights including religious freedoms in Burkina Faso
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of human rights and democracy in Nicaragua
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of the Uyghur in China (China Cables)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Afghanistan, notably the allegations of sexual abuse on boys in Logar Province
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Nigeria, notably the recent terrorist attacks
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the PRC national security law for Hong Kong and the need for the EU to defend Hong Kong’s high degree of autonomy
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the humanitarian situation in Mozambique
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in the Philippines, including the case of Maria Ressa
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of Dr. Denis Mukwege in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of Ethiopian migrants in the detention centres of Saudi Arabia
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Eritrea, the case of Dawit Isaak
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the "Foreign Agents" Law in Nicaragua
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on escalating tensions in Varosha following the illegal actions by Turkey and the urgent need for the resumption of talks
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Ethiopia
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the deteriorating situation of human rights in Algeria, in particular the case of journalist Khaled Drareni
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Iran, in particular the case of 2012 Sakharov Prize laureate Nasrin Sotoudeh
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the deteriorating situation of human rights in Egypt, in particular the case of the activists of the Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights (EIPR)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Forced labour and the situation of the Uyghurs in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the MFF, Rule of Law Conditionality and Own Resources package
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Iran, in particular the case of 2012 Sakharov Prize Laureate Nasrin Sotoudeh
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on forced labour and the situation of the Uyghurs in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Human rights situation in Turkey, notably the case of Selahattin Demirtas and other prisoners of conscience
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Vietnam, in particular the case of human rights journalists Pham Chi Dung, Nguyen Tuong Thuy et Le Huu Minh Tuan
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the crackdown on the democratic opposition in Hong Kong
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the latest developments in the National Assembly of Venezuela
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the arrest of Aleksei Navalny
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Vietnam, in particular the case of human rights journalists Pham Chi Dung, Nguyen Tuong Thuy and Le Huu Minh Tuan
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Turkey, notably the case of Selahattin Demirtaş and other prisoners of conscience
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the crackdown on the democratic opposition in Hong Kong
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Human rights situation in Kazakhstan
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the political situation in Uganda
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Rwanda, the case of Paul Rusesabagina
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the humanitarian and political situation in Yemen
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Myanmar
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Kazakhstan
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the political situation in Uganda
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Rwanda, the case of Paul Rusesabagina
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo and the assassination of the Italian ambassador Luca Attanasio and his entourage
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION On the human rights situation in Bahrain, in particular the cases of death row inmates and human rights defenders
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the mass trials against the opposition and civil society in Cambodia
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in the Kingdom of Bahrain, in particular the cases of death row inmates and human rights defenders
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the mass trials against the opposition and civil society in Cambodia
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo and the assassination of the Italian Ambassador Luca Attanasio and his entourage
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092, the rule-of-law conditionality mechanism
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on blasphemy laws in Pakistan, in particular the case Shagufta Kausar and Shafqat Emmanuel
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Bolivia and the arrest of former President Jeanine Añez and other officials
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the COVID 19 pandemic in Latin America
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the blasphemy laws in Pakistan, in particular the case of Shagufta Kausar and Shafqat Emmanuel
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Bolivia and the arrest of former President Jeanine Añez and other officials
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the COVID-19 pandemic in Latin America
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Chinese countersanctions on EU entities and MEPs and MPs
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Chad
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Situation in Haiti
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on prisoners of war in the aftermath of the most recent conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Chad
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the rule of law situation in the European Union and the application of the Conditionality Regulation 2020/2092
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on The situation in Sri Lanka, in particular the arrests under the Prevention of Terrorism Act
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights and political situation in Cuba
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the systematic repression in Belarus and its consequences for European security following abductions from an EU civilian plane intercepted by the Belarusian authorities
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Afghanistan
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Sri Lanka, in particular the arrests under the Prevention of Terrorism Act
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights and political situation in Cuba
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the systematic repression in Belarus and its consequences for European security following the abductions from an EU civilian plane intercepted by Belarusian authorities
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the death penalty in Saudi Arabia, notably the cases of Mustafa Hashem al-Darwish and Abdullah al-Howaiti
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of Ahmadreza Djalali in Iran
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Hong Kong, notably the case of Apple Daily
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on breaches of EU law and of the rights of LGBTIQ citizens in Hungary as a result of the legal changes adopted by the Hungarian Parliament
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the repression of the opposition in Turkey, specifically the Peoples’ Democratic Party (HDP)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Nicaragua
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Nicaragua
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the death penalty in Saudi Arabia, notably the cases of Mustafa Hashem al-Darwish and Abdullah al-Howaiti
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Hong Kong, notably the case of Apple Daily
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of Ahmadreza Djalali in Iran
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Afghanistan
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of human rights defender Ahmed Mansoor in UAE
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Kakuma refugee camp in Kenya
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Lebanon
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on media freedom and further deterioration of the rule of law in Poland
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Lebanon
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Afghanistan
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the government crackdown on protests and citizens in Cuba
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of human rights defender Ahmed Mansoor in the United Arab Emirates
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of Paul Rusesabagina in Rwanda
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Myanmar, including the situation of religious and ethnic groups
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of the State Law related to abortion in Texas
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the humanitarian situation in Tigray
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Myanmar, including the situation of religious and ethnic groups
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of Paul Rusesabagina in Rwanda
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the humanitarian situation in Tigray
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Tunisia
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the rule of law crisis in Poland and the primacy of EU law
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Tunisia
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the first anniversary of the de facto abortion ban in Poland
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Somalia
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Cameroon
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Somalia
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Cameroon
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Nicaragua
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Nicaragua
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Cuba, namely the cases of José Daniel Ferrer, Lady in White Aymara Nieto, Maykel Castillo, Luis Robles, Félix Navarro, Luis Manuel Otero, Lorenzo Rosales Fajardo, Andy Dunier García and Yunior García Aguilera
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on forced labour in the Linglong factory and environmental protests in Serbia
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on forced labour in the Linglong factory and environmental protests in Serbia
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Cuba, namely the cases of José Daniel Ferrer, Lady in White Aymara Nieto, Maykel Castillo, Luis Robles, Félix Navarro, Luis Manuel Otero, Reverend Lorenzo Rosales Fajardo, Andy Dunier García and Yunior García Aguilera
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the political crisis in Sudan
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on violations of fundamental freedoms in Hong Kong
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the political crisis in Sudan
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on violations of fundamental freedoms in Hong Kong
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the political crisis in Burkina Faso
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION recent human rights developments in the Philippines
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the death penalty in Iran
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the death penalty in Iran
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the political crisis in Burkina Faso
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the recent human rights developments in the Philippines
on the Russian aggression against Ukraine
on the Rule of Law and the consequences of the ECJ ruling
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of journalists and human rights defenders in Mexico
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the destruction of cultural heritage in Nagorno-Karabakh
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Myanmar, one year after the coup
on the situation of journalists and human rights defenders in Mexico
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the destruction of cultural heritage in Nagorno-Karabakh
Myanmar, one year after the coup
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION On human rights situation in North Korea, including the persecution of religious minorities
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Increasing repression in Russia, including the case of Alexey Navalny
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of the rule of law and human rights in the Republic of Guatemala
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the EU Protection of children and young people fleeing because of the war in Ukraine
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Conclusions of the European Council meeting of 24-25 March 2022: including the latest developments of the war in Ukraine and the EU sanctions against Russia
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Afghanistan, in particular the situation of women’s rights
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the conclusions of the European Council meeting of 24-25 March 2022, including the latest developments of the war against Ukraine and the EU sanctions against Russia and their implementation
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Threats to stability, security and democracy in Western and Sahelian Africa
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on reports of continued organ harvesting in China
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of Osman Kavala in Turkey
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the state of play of the EU-Moldova cooperation
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the continuous crackdown of political opposition in Cambodia
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the reports of continued organ harvesting in China
the State of play on the EU-Moldova cooperation
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the fight against impunity for war crimes in Ukraine
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the prosecution of the opposition and the detention of trade union leaders in Belarus
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the fight against impunity for war crimes in Ukraine
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the prosecution of the opposition and the detention of trade union leaders in Belarus
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on violations of media freedom and safety of journalists in Georgia
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the instrumentalisation of justice as a repressive tool in Nicaragua
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Xinjiang, including the Xinjiang police files
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Xinjiang, including the Xinjiang police files
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on violations of media freedom and the safety of journalists in Georgia
on the instrumentalisation of justice as a repressive tool in Nicaragua
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Candidate status of Ukraine, the Republic of Moldova and Georgia
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the candidate status of Ukraine, the Republic of Moldova and Georgia
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the arrest of Cardinal Zen and the trustees of the 612 relief fund in Hong Kong
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Tajikistan’s Gorno-Badakhshan Autonomous Province
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of indigenous and environmental defenders in Brazil, including the killing of Dom Philips and Bruno Pereira
on the arrest of Cardinal Zen and the trustees of the 612 relief fund in Hong Kong
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Tajikistan’s Gorno-Badakhshan Autonomous Province
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in the Strait of Taiwan
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on human rights violations in the context of the forced deportation of Ukrainian civilians to and the forced adoption of Ukrainian children in Russia
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the death of Mahsa Amini and the repression of women’s rights protesters in Iran
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION On the situation of human rights in Haiti in particular as related to gang violence.
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russia’s escalation of its war of aggression against Ukraine
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the recent humanitarian and human rights situation in Tigray, Ethiopia, notably that of children
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the death of Mahsa Jina Amini and the repression of women’s rights protesters in Iran
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russia’s escalation of its war of aggression against Ukraine
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the rule of law in Malta, five years after the assassination of Daphne Caruana Galizia
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Burkina Faso following the coup d’état
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Burkina Faso following the coup d’état
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on recognising the Russian Federation as a state sponsor of terrorism
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Egypt
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The continuing repression of the democratic opposition and civil society in Belarus,
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Afghanistan especially the deterioration of women’s rights and attacks against educational institutions,
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of human rights in the context of the FIFA World Cup in Qatar
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the forced displacement of people as a result of the escalating conflict in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Afghanistan, especially the deterioration of women’s rights and attacks against educational institutions
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the prospects for the two-state solution for Israel and Palestine
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Military Junta crackdown on peaceful demonstrations in Chad
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Chinese government crackdown on the peaceful protests across the People's Republic of China
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of human rights defender Abdulhadi Al-Khawaja in Bahrain
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on 90 years after the Holodomor: recognising the mass killing through starvation as genocide
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on 90 years after the Holodomor: recognising the mass killing through starvation as genocide
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on suspicions of corruption from Qatar and the broader need for transparency and accountability in the European institutions
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the military junta crackdown on peaceful demonstrations in Chad
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Chinese Government crackdown on the peaceful protests across the People’s Republic of China
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the EU response to the protests and executions in Iran
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of journalists in Morocco, notably the case of Omar Radi
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the preparation of the EU-Ukraine Summit
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of the former President of Georgia Mikheil Saakashvili
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the situation of human rights defenders in Eswatini, notably the murder of Thulani Maseko
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on violence against opposition activists in Equatorial Guinea, notably the case of Julio Obama Mefuman
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of human rights defenders in Eswatini, notably the murder of Thulani Maseko
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on further repression against the people of Belarus, in particular the cases of Andrzej Poczobut and Ales Bialiatski
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Tunisia: Recent attacks against freedom of expression and association and trade unions, in particular the case of journalist Noureddine Boutar
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Cambodia: the case of opposition leader Kem Sokha
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Iran: in particular the poisoning of hundreds of school girls
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Iran, in particular the poisoning of hundreds of schoolgirls
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the challenges facing the Republic of Moldova
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the risk of death penalty and execution of singer Yahaya Sharif Aminu for blasphemy in Nigeria
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The crackdown on the right to education and education rights activists in Afghanistan, including the case of Matiullah Wesa
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the risk of the death penalty and the execution of singer Yahaya Sharif-Aminu for blasphemy in Nigeria
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the crackdown on the right to education and education rights activists in Afghanistan, including the case of Matiullah Wesa
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Belarus: the inhumane treatment and hospitalisation of prominent opposition leader Viktar Babaryka
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Myanmar, notably the dissolution of democratic political parties
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Media freedom and freedom of expression in Algeria, the case of journalist Ihsane El-Kadi
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on media freedom and freedom of expression in Algeria – the case of journalist Ihsane El-Kadi
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Myanmar, notably the dissolution of democratic political parties
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the humanitarian situation in Sudan, in particular the death of children trapped by fighting
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The torture and criminal prosecution of Ukrainian minors Tihran Ohannisian and Mykyta Khanhanov by the Russian Federation
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Deterioration of fundamental freedoms in Hong Kong, notably the case of Jimmy Lai
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Nicaragua
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the sustainable reconstruction and integration of Ukraine into the Euro-Atlantic community
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the humanitarian situation in Sudan, in particular the death of children trapped by fighting
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the deterioration of fundamental freedoms in Hong Kong, notably the case of Jimmy Lai
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the torture and criminal prosecution of Ukrainian minors Tihran Ohannisian and Mykyta Khanhanov by the Russian Federation
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION crackdown on the media and freedom of expression in Kyrgyzstan
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The political disqualifications in Venezuela
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION India, the situation in Manipur
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Lebanon
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on India, the situation in Manipur
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the crackdown on the media and freedom of expression in Kyrgyzstan
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the political disqualifications in Venezuela
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Bangladesh, notably the case of Odikhar
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The case of Dr Gubad Ibadoghlu, imprisoned in Azerbaijan
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Guatemala: the situation after the elections, the rule of law and judicial independence
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Bangladesh, notably the case of Odhikar
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of Dr Gubad Ibadoghlu, imprisoned in Azerbaijan
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Guatemala: the situation after the elections, the rule of law and judicial independence
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the case of Egypt, in particular the sentencing of Hisham Kassem
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the case of Zarema Musaeva in Chechnya
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the human rights situation in Afghanistan, in particular the persecution of former government officials
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Nagorno-Karabakh after Azerbaijan’s attack and the continuing threats against Armenia
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of Zarema Musaeva in Chechnya
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Afghanistan, in particular the persecution of former government officials
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the despicable terrorist attacks by Hamas against Israel, Israel’s right to defend itself in line with humanitarian and international law and the humanitarian situation in Gaza
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the despicable terrorist attacks by Hamas against Israel, Israel’s right to defend itself in line with humanitarian and international law and the humanitarian situation in Gaza
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the lack of legislative follow-up by the Commission to the PEGA resolution
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the latest attacks against women and women’s rights defenders in Iran, and Iran’s arbitrary detention of EU nationals
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the latest attacks against women and women’s rights defenders in Iran, and Iran’s arbitrary detention of EU nationals
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the unlawful detention of President Mohamed Bazoum in Niger
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The Maasai Communities in Tanzania
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The abduction of Tibetan children and forced assimilation practices through Chinese boarding schools in Tibet
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The unknown status of Mikalai Statkevich and the recent attacks on Belarusian politicians’ and activists’ family members
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the attempt at a coup d’état in Guatemala
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Maasai Communities in Tanzania
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the abduction of Tibetan children and forced assimilation practices through Chinese boarding schools in Tibet
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the unknown status of Mikola Statkevich and the recent attacks on Belarusian politicians’ and activists’ family members
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Tajikistan: state repression against the independent media
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The threat of famine following the spread of conflict in Sudan
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The ongoing persecution of Falun Gong in China, notably the case of Mr Ding Yuande
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the humanitarian situation in Gaza, the need to reach a ceasefire and the risks of regional escalation
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the ongoing persecution of Falun Gong in China, notably the case of Mr Ding Yuande
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Tajikistan: state repression against the independent media
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the threat of famine following the spread of the conflict in Sudan
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Serbia following the elections
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russiagate: allegations of Russian interference in the democratic processes of the European Union
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the increased number of executions in Iran, in particular the case of Mohammad Ghobadlou
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Recent attacks on Christmas Eve in Plateau State in Nigeria
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on further repression against the democratic forces in Venezuela: attacks on presidential candidate Maria Corina Machado
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the new wave of mass arrests in Belarus of opposition activists and their family members
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Serbia following the elections
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the recent attacks on Christmas Eve in Plateau State in Nigeria
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the increased number of executions in Iran, in particular the case of Mohammad Ghobadlou
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the critical situation in Cuba
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the critical situation in Cuba
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The repressive environment in Afghanistan, including public executions and violence against women
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The case of Rocío San Miguel and General Hernández Da Costa, among other political prisoners in Venezuela
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of Rocío San Miguel and General Hernández Da Costa, among other political prisoners in Venezuela
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the repressive environment in Afghanistan, including public executions and violence against women
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The new security law in Hong Kong and the cases of Andy Li and Joseph John
Oral questions (2)
Alleged conflicts of interest and influence-trafficking by judges of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the Commission
Rebuilding European production capacity for active pharmaceutical ingredients
Written explanations (59)
Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Romania, Italy and Austria (A9-0002/2019 - Siegfried Mureşan)
Pone Pirmininke, palaikiau pranešimą, kuriame prašoma pagalbos dėl ekstremalių oro sąlygų, įvykusių 2018 m. Rumunijoje, Italijoje ir Austrijoje. Manau, kad mūsų pareiga yra remti valstybes nares ištikus stichinėms nelaimėms, kurios daro didelę įtaką gyvenimo sąlygoms, aplinkai ar ekonomikai.2018 m. vasarą dėl nuolatinių liūčių Rumunijos šiaurės rytų regione kilo dideli potvyniai. 2018 m. rudenį ekstremalias oro sąlygas patyrė beveik visi Italijos regionai nuo šiaurės iki pietų, dėl jų įvyko žemės nuošliaužos, potvyniai, virto medžiai. 2018 m. spalio mėn. Pietų Austrijos regionai nukentėjo nuo tų pačių meteorologinių reiškinių kaip ir Italija. Smarkios liūtys ir audros sukėlė potvynius, padarė didelę žalą miškams.Mūsų pagalba, kurią suteiksime, bus Europos solidarumo su trimis valstybėmis narėmis išraiška, bet visų pirma su jų gyventojais, kuriuos paveikė stichinės nelaimės.
Eurojust and Serbia Cooperation Agreement (A9-0009/2019 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar)
Palaikiau susitarimo projektą dėl Eurojusto ir Serbijos bendradarbiavimo, nes tokių susitarimų tikslas – skatinti bendradarbiavimą kovojant su sunkiais nusikaltimais, ypač organizuotu nusikalstamumu ir terorizmu. Siūlomas susitarimas gali taip pat padėti Balkanų gyventojams, nes Serbijos piliečiai ir toliau priklauso tai asmenų grupei, kuri dažniausiai nukenčia nuo iš Vakarų Balkanų regiono vykdomos prekybos žmonėmis. Siūlomo susitarimo dėka šią praktiką galima žymiai sumažinti. Iš kitos pusės, toks susitarimas gali paskatinti glaudesnį bendradarbiavimą kovojant su organizuotu nusikalstamumu ir yra naudingas Serbijai ir ES valstybėms narėms, nes organizuotas nusikalstamumas yra tarpvalstybinė problema. Taip pat reikėtų apsvarstyti galimybę išplėsti tokio tipo susitarimus teisminio bendradarbiavimo srityje.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112: Genetically modified maize MZHG0JG (SYN-ØØØJG-2) (B9-0107/2019)
Palaikiau prieštaravimą, išreikštą Europos Parlamento rezoliucijoje, raginantį Komisiją sustabdyti bet kokius vykdomuosius sprendimus dėl leidimo naudoti GMO iki tol, kol bus persvarstyta leidimų teikimo procedūra ir pašalinti trūkumai bei grėsmes. Tai yra svarbus sprendimas atsižvelgiant į GMO pagrindu pagaminto maisto poveikį žmonių sveikatai. Ypač turint omenyje tai, kad buvo įrodyta, jog auginant herbicidams atsparias genetiškai modifikuotas kultūras naudojama daugiau herbicidų, visų pirma dėl to, kad atsirado herbicidams atsparių piktžolių. Dėl šios priežasties tikėtina, jog GMO kukurūzų pasėliai bus purškiami didesniu glifosato ir gliufozinato kiekiu, o tai yra kancerogeninės medžiagos, ir tai bus daroma dažniau, dėl to derliuje gali kauptis didesnis jų liekanų kiekis. Tai tiesiogiai neigiamai paveiks žmonių ir gyvūnų sveikatą. Todėl būtina panaikinti šią grėsmę taikant oficialias procedūras.
Fishing authorisations for Union fishing vessels in United Kingdom waters and fishing operations of United Kingdom fishing vessels in Union waters (A9-0014/2019 - Chris Davies)
Parėmiau pranešimą dėl leidimo ES žvejybos laivams žvejoti JK vandenyse, nes besiartinantis „Brexit‘as“ reikalauja skubių veiksmų. Nesudarius susitarimo dėl išstojimo ir laukiant galimo būsimo susitarimo dėl žvejybos tarp ES ir Jungtinės Karalystės, Sąjungos žvejybos laivai praras savo žvejybos teises vandenyse, kurie priklauso Jungtinės Karalystės jurisdikcijai. Taip pat ir Jungtinės Karalystės žvejybos laivai nebegalės patekti į ES vandenis nuo pirmosios išstojimo be susitarimo dienos. Kad būtų išvengta komplikacijų žuvininkystės sektoriuje, reikalingi specialūs leidimai, kuriuos remia šis pranešimas.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112: Assessment of the impact of plant protection products on honeybees (B9-0149/2019)
Parėmiau rezoliuciją, kuri teisingai parodo savo prieštaravimą Komisijos reglamento projektui, kuris gali kenkti naminių bičių apsaugai. Ypač turint omenyje tai, kad pastaruoju metu yra smarkiai sumažėję naminių bičių ir daugelio Europos laukinių vabzdžių apdulkintojų, įskaitant laukines bites. Aptarinėjamame Komisijos reglamento projekte neatsižvelgiama į naujausius mokslo ir technikos žinių pokyčius dėl pesticidų toksiškumo ir realaus jų pavojingo poveikio aplinkai. Mes privalome užtikrinti aukštą žmonių ir gyvūnų sveikatos bei aplinkos apsaugos lygį ir pagerinti vidaus rinkos veikimą suderinant augalų apsaugos produktų patekimo į rinką taisykles bei kartu padidinti žemės ūkio produktyvumą. Deja, Komisijos reglamento projekte trūksta šios sąlygos.
Financial assistance to Member States to cover serious financial burden inflicted on them following a UK's withdrawal from the EU without an agreement (A9-0020/2019 - Younous Omarjee)
Balsavau už pranešimą, kadangi manau, jog reikia be jokių abejonių sušvelninti Jungtinės Karalystės išstojimo iš Sąjungos be susitarimo ekonominį ir socialinį poveikį. Šiomis ypatingomis aplinkybėmis privalome parodyti solidarumą su valstybėmis narėmis, ypač naujomis tokiomis kaip Lietuva, kurios ypač pajus šį poveikį. Reikėtų kuo greičiau įvesti atitinkamus ES reglamentų pakeitimus, kad būtų suteikta pagalba susijusi su viešosiomis išlaidomis dėl „Brexit“. Gera mintis yra galimybė Europos Sąjungos solidarumo fondo lėšas panaudoti gaivalinių nelaimių atveju siekiant padėti joms sumažinti pradinį, finansinį „Brexit“ poveikį. O ateityje valstybėms narėms turėtų būti skirtas papildomas biudžetas, kad būtų kompensuotas neigiamas galimo JK pasitraukimo iš ES poveikis. Laiko yra nedaug, todėl Parlamentas turėtų daryti didesnį spaudimą Europos institucijoms šiuo klausimu, kad nebūtų vėluojama išmokėti tikslinę pagalbą valstybėms narėms.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112: Genetically modified cotton LLCotton25 (ACS-GHØØ1-3) (B9-0170/2019)
Pone Pirmininke, palaikiau rezoliuciją, kuri pagrįstai yra Parlamento prieštaravimas Komisijos įgyvendinimo sprendimo projektui dėl leidimo pateikti į rinką produktus, kurių sudėtyje yra genetiškai modifikuotos medvilnės, atnaujinimo.Aštuntosios kadencijos metu Europos Parlamentas iš viso priėmė 36 rezoliucijas, kuriose nepritarė tam, kad į rinką būtų įvedami genetiškai modifikuoti organizmai, kurių naudojimo paskirtis maistui ir pašarui, o taip pat tam, kad genetiškai modifikuoti organizmai būtų auginami visoje Sąjungoje. Vis dėlto, Komisija pradėjo leidimų atnaujinimo procedūrą, kas yra skandalinga. Komisijos įgyvendinimo sprendimo projektas peržengia jos vykdymo įgaliojimus.Palaikau prašymą, kad Komisija neleistų auginti herbicidams atsparios genetiškai modifikuotos kultūros, kol pavojus žmonių ir gyvūnų sveikatai nebus išsamiai ištirtas kiekvienu konkrečiu atveju.
Criminalisation of sexual education in Poland (B9-0166/2019, B9-0167/2019, B9-0168/2019)
Pone Pirmininke, balsavau prieš rezoliuciją, kadangi Europos Parlamentas buvo ciniškai suklaidintas jos iniciatorių. Paaiškėjo, kad nei vyriausybė, nei Lenkijos Parlamentas šiuo metu neplanuoja įvesti įstatymų draudžiančių lytinį švietimą, nei bausti už jo vykdymą. O tokia melaginga informacija buvo pateikta europarlamentarams. Šiuo metu yra aptariamas pilietinis įstatymo projektas, paremtas virš 250 tūkstančių parašų, kuriame besikreipiantys piliečiai siūlo pedofilijos skatinimo tarp vaikų kriminalizavimą. O su tuo turbūt visi šiame Parlamente sutinka, nes pedofilija tai vienas iš sunkiausių nusikaltimų vaikų atžvilgiu, už kurį privalo būti griežtai baudžiama.
Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Greece (A9-0040/2019 - Eva Kaili)
Parėmiau europarlamentarės Eva Kaili pranešimą, kadangi manau, jog valstybės narės nukentėjusios nuo gaivalinių nelaimių turi teisę į Europos Sąjungos pagalbą. Komisija teisingai pasiūlė iš Europos Sąjungos solidarumo fondo suteikti finansinę paramą, susijusią su ekstremaliomis oro sąlygomis, 2019 m. pasireiškusiomis Graikijoje.Juk prisimename, kaip vakarinė Kretos dalis nukentėjo nuo ciklono ir itin smarkių liūčių. Dėl po to kilusių potvynių ir nuošliaužų buvo daug mirtinų aukų. Taip pat buvo padaryta didelė žala infrastruktūrai, ypač kelių tinklui, ir ekonominei veiklai, visų pirma žemės ūkio gamybai. Taip pat labai apgadinti pylimai, drenavimo sistemos, elektros energijos tinklas ir daugiausia finansiškai nepalankioje padėtyje esančių namų ūkių nuosavybėje esantys namai. Todėl pagalba Graikijai yra labai pragrįsta.
EU-Switzerland Agreement on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime (A9-0043/2019 - Roberta Metsola)
Pone Pirmininke, ryžtingai palaikiau pranešimą dėl tarpvalstybinio bendradarbiavimo su Šveicarija gerinimo kovos su terorizmu ir tarpvalstybiniu nusikalstamumu srityje.Naujausi „Eurobarometro“ rezultatai rodo, kad piliečiai vis labiau nerimauja dėl savo saugumo. Žmonių, pripažįstančių terorizmą pagrindiniu saugumo iššūkiu ES, procentas padidėjo nuo 33 % 2013 m. iki 49 % šiandien. Dėl šių priežasčių Europos Komisija sukūrė Europos saugumo darbotvarkę 2015–2020 metams, kad paremtų valstybių narių bendradarbiavimą kovojant su saugumo grėsmėmis ir padidintų mūsų bendrą įsipareigojimą kovoti su terorizmu, organizuotu nusikalstamumu ir elektroniniais nusikaltimais, taip pat konsultuojantis su ES nepriklausančiomis šalimis. Susitarimas su Šveicarija įgyvendina šias nuostatas. Turime bendrą interesą užtikrinti, kad valstybių narių ir Šveicarijos policijos bendradarbiavimas vyktų greitai ir veiksmingai, laikantis pagrindinių nacionalinių teisinių sistemų principų. Mūsų piliečių saugumas visada turi būti prioritetas, taip pat ir tarptautiniuose santykiuose.
Measures to strengthen administrative cooperation in order to combat VAT fraud (A9-0047/2019 - Lídia Pereira)
Pone Pirmininke, balsavau už pranešimą dėl priemonių, kuriomis stiprinamas administracinis bendradarbiavimas kovojant su sukčiavimu PVM. Tai yra labai svarbu kiekvienos Sąjungos valstybės narės požiūriu. Kovos su PVM sukčiavimu strategija turėtų būti plėtojama lygiagrečiai didėjant ekonomikos modernizavimui ir skaitmeninimui, kartu stengiantis kuo labiau supaprastinti PVM sistemą įmonėms ir piliečiams. Šiuo atžvilgiu ypač svarbu, kad valstybės narės toliau investuotų į pažangių technologijų mokesčių surinkimo sistemas, ypač į sistemas, kurios kasos aparatus ir pardavimo sistemas automatiškai derina su PVM deklaracijomis. Be to, mokesčių institucijos turėtų toliau stengtis glaudžiau bendradarbiauti ir keistis geriausia praktika, be kita ko, per ES mokesčių administracijos viršūnių susitikimą ir valstybių narių mokesčių administracijų vadovų tinklą. Šio bendradarbiavimo tikslas turėtų būti geresnis mokesčių administravimo organų veiklos koordinavimas strateginiu lygmeniu.
EU Pollinators Initiative (B9-0233/2019)
Pone Pirmininke,palaikau rezoliuciją ir išreikštą joje ES iniciatyvą dėl apdulkintojų. Vien tik ES 78 proc. laukinių gėlių rūšių, bent iš dalies, yra priklausomos nuo gyvūnų atliekamo apdulkinimo.Apdulkintojų sveikata – tai būtina žemės ūkio veiklos Sąjungoje sąlyga, nes 84 proc. augalų rūšių ir 76 proc. maisto gamybos Europoje priklauso nuo vabzdžių atliekamo apdulkinimo. Siekiant tinkamai apsaugoti apdulkintojus ir atkurti jų populiaciją, reikėtų labai sumažinti pesticidų, kurie kenkia apdulkintojams ir jų maistui, naudojimą.Biologinės įvairovės, taigi ir apdulkintojų buveinių kūrimosi žemės ūkio paskirties žemėje ir jų kokybės, skatinimas turi tapti vienu iš pagrindinių tikslų plėtojant būsimą bendrą žemės ūkio politiką (BŽŪP), kuria visų pirma turi būti siekiama remti didelės gamtinės vertės ūkininkavimo vietovių išsaugojimą ir gamtai atidedamų žemės plotų kūrimą, ir pesticidų ir mineralinių trąšų naudojimo mažinimą, taip pat skatinti mišriųjų kultūrų auginimą ir sėjomainą.
Enabling the digital transformation of health and care (B9-0239/2019)
Pone Pirmininke,palaikiau rezoliuciją, kadangi sveikatos apsauga ir visi su tuo susiję aspektai turėtų tapti prioritetu mūsų Parlamentui. Naujų technologijų atsiradimas sukuria ir galimybių, ir iššūkių tobulinant geresnę sveikatos apsaugą. Senstant gyventojams, Europos sveikatos ir socialinės priežiūros sistemos susiduria su dideliais iššūkiais. Sveikatos priežiūros sistemos turi kuo labiau padidinti prieinamų, atsparių ir tvarių sveikatos priežiūros paslaugų ir ilgalaikės slaugos veiksmingumą ir efektyvumą ir užtikrinti sąžiningą priėjimą prie jų, taip pat teikti naujas paslaugas, kurios atitiktų visuomenės pokyčius. Reikėtų užtikrinti, kad priežiūra, nepriklausomai nuo paslaugos rūšies ir paslaugų teikėjo, būtų teikiama nenutrūkstamai, taip pat reikia pristatyti svarbius tobulinimus pacientams ir jų besikeičiantiems bei augantiems sveikatos ir priežiūros poreikiams. O skaitmeninis sveikatos ir socialinės priežiūros pertvarkymas turi remti į piliečius orientuotas paslaugas ir suteikti piliečiams galimybę aktyviau dalyvauti užkertant kelią ligoms ir skatinant sveikatą.
Protocol to the Agreement between the EU, Iceland and Norway concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Iceland or Norway regarding the access to Eurodac for law enforcement purposes (A9-0053/2019 - Jadwiga Wiśniewska)
Balsavau už Europos Parlamento narės J. Wiśniewskos pranešimą, nes jame yra teigiamas Sąjungos ir Norvegijos bei Islandijos bendradarbiavimo aspektas. Visų pirma, tai suteikia teisę teisėsaugos institucijoms tikrinti duomenų bazes siekiant užkirsti kelią teroristiniams nusikaltimams ir kitiems sunkiems nusikaltimams, ypač tarpvalstybinio pobūdžio. Tai taip pat padės juos aptikti ir atlikti parengiamuosius veiksmus per daug trumpesnį laiką nei dabar.Iš dalies pakeistas reglamentas taip pat leis teisėsaugos institucijoms prašyti palyginti pirštų atspaudų duomenis su duomenimis, saugomais centrinėje „Eurodac“ duomenų bazėje. Tai bus taikoma tais atvejais, kai šios institucijos siekia nustatyti tikslią susijusio asmens tapatybę arba gauti papildomos informacijos nusikalstamumo prevencijos tikslais, daugiausia teroristinio ar kitų sunkių nusikaltimų, nustatymui ar tyrimui.
Implementing and monitoring the provisions on citizens’ rights in the Withdrawal Agreement (B9-0031/2020)
Parėmiau rezoliuciją, kadangi nuostatų dėl piliečių teisių įgyvendinimas ir stebėjimas Jungtinės Karalystės Išstojimo susitarime yra labai svarbus Jungtinėje Karalystėje gyvenantiems ES piliečiams. „Brexitas“ neturėtų ir negali apriboti jų įgytų teisių nuo tos dienos, kai jie gyvena JK.Būtų gerai, jei ES ir Jungtinė Karalystė pagal Išstojimo susitarimą įsipareigotų pateikti išsamų ir abipusį požiūrį į Jungtinėje Karalystėje gyvenančių ES piliečių ir JK piliečių, gyvenančių 27 ES valstybėse narėse, teises.Tai suteiktų mūsų piliečiams didesnį pasitikėjimą savimi ir saugumo jausmą. Pasibaigus pereinamajam laikotarpiui, jie taip pat turėtų gauti fizinį dokumentą, patvirtinantį jų teisę gyventi Jungtinėje Karalystėje. Fizinių įrodymų apie teisę apsigyventi neturėjimas tik padidins būsimų darbdavių 27 ES valstybių narių piliečių diskriminaciją iš būsimų darbdavių pusės. Europos Komisija turėtų užtikrinti, kad šie klausimai būtų išspręsti teigiamai.
Financial assistance to Member States and countries negotiating their accession to the Union that are seriously affected by a major public health emergency
Palaikiau reglamentą, nes Sąjunga turėtų parodyti solidarumą su valstybėmis narėmis ir mūsų piliečiais, šiuo sunkiu kovos su maru metu teikdama Sąjungos finansinę paramą. Mūsų priimtos nuostatos padės išgelbėti žmonių gyvybes ir sveikatą bei greitai atkurti normalias gyvenimo sąlygas regionuose. Naudojant esamas priemones nebuvo įmanoma tinkamai reaguoti į ES masto ekstremalias situacijas, tokias kaip COVID-19 epidemija. Todėl reglamentas išplečia ES solidarumo fondo taikymo sritį, kad apimtų rimtas visuomenės sveikatos ekstremalias situacijas ir numatytų specialią greitos pagalbos sistemą. Dėl šios priežasties buvo paleistas ARGUS – krizių operacijų koordinavimo mechanizmas, kuris yra tinkama reakcija į susidariusią tragišką situaciją.
EU coordinated action to combat the COVID-19 pandemic and its consequences
Pone Pirmininke,palaikiau balsavime skubos procedūrą šiuo klausimu - nenumatytoms išlaidoms skirto rezervo mobilizavimas 2020 m., užtikrinantis pagalbą valstybėms narėms nepaprastųjų situacijų metu reaguojant į COVID-19 pandemiją. Šiandien Komisija pateikė taisomojo biudžeto projektą, kuriame numatyti įsipareigojimų asignavimų padidinimas piliečių saugumui ir parama nepaprastosios padėties metu Sąjungos teritorijoje. Šios veiklos tikslas yra teisingas. Esmė tame, kad reiktų padėti valstybėms narėms sušvelninti pandemijos padarinius ir suteikti papildomą finansavimą ES civilinės saugos mechanizmui, kad būtų sudarytos palankesnės sąlygos didesnio masto atsargų kaupimui ir reikiamų išteklių paskirstymo visoje Europoje koordinavimui. Didelis ir plataus masto poveikis visuomenės sveikatai jau atsirado tose valstybėse narėse, kurias labiausiai paveikė pandemija, ir tos valstybės tampa vis pažeidžiamesnės kai pandemija tampa vis rimtesnė daugelyje valstybių narių. Šio iššūkio mastas ir apimtis reikalauja veiksmingos Sąjungos reakcijos į pandemijos sukeliamus humanitarinius padarinius Sąjungoje, susijusius su visuomenės sveikata. Ir tam Sąjunga turi skirti papildomų finansinių išteklių.
EU-Belarus Agreement on facilitation of issuance of visas (A9-0090/2020 - Ondřej Kovařík)
Aš palaikiau sprendimą dėl supaprastinto vizų režimo tarp Europos Sąjungos ir Baltarusijos sudarymo. Kaip Europos Parlamento Delegacijos ryšiams su Baltarusija pirmininko pavaduotojas, laikau šį sprendimą geru ir būtinu žingsniu gerinant tarpusavio santykius. Šiandien Parlamento priimtame susitarime įvedama abipusiškumo pagrindu supaprastinti vizų ne ilgesniam kaip 90 dienų buvimo laikotarpiui išdavimo tvarka Sąjungos ir Baltarusijos piliečiams. Be to, nuo vizos mokesčio bus atleidžiami vaikai iki 12 metų, neįgalieji, artimi giminaičiai, gyvenantys abipus sienos, bei oficialių delegacijų nariai. Tvarka susijusi su dokumentų, reikalingų patvirtinti kelionės tikslą, pristatymu, taip pat buvo supaprastinta vizų prašymą pateikiantiems asmenims, tarp kita ko, artimiems giminaičiams, verslininkams, žurnalistams, pradinės ir vidurinės mokyklos moksleiviams, studentams ir , dalyvaujantiems mokslo, kultūros ir sporto renginiuose. Tai gera žinia Lietuvos piliečiams, ypač Vilniaus krašto gyventojams. Tai svarbu ne tik dėl tiesioginės Lietuvos ir Baltarusijos kaimynystės, bet ir dėl to, kad daugybė Vilniaus krašto, padalinto valstybių siena, gyventojų turi giminaičių kitoje sienos pusėje. Vizų režimo supaprastinimas tikrai palengvins šeimos ryšius abipus sienos.
Competition policy - annual report 2019 (A9-0022/2020 - Stéphanie Yon-Courtin)
Pone Pirmininke,parėmiau pranešimą dėl konkurencijos politikos, nes manau kad vienodos sąlygos visame pasaulyje pagal daugiašalę, taisyklėmis pagrįstą prekybos sistemą, suteikiančią valstybėms laisvę vykdyti savo politiką, yra labai svarbūs Europai, įskaitant Europos verslus, ypač mažus ir vidutinius. Tai yra taip pat labai svarbu Europos darbuotojams ir vartotojams. Vis labiau globalėjančiame pasaulyje tarptautinis bendradarbiavimas turi reikšti veiksmingą konkurencijos teisės įgyvendinimą.Komisija turi vienodai vykdyti ES ir ne ES ekonominės veiklos vykdytojams teikiamos valstybės pagalbos kontrolę, siekiant išvengti asimetrijos su užsienio konkurentais, ir daugiau dėmesio skirti ne ES valstybinėms įmonėms, gaunančioms subsidijas iš savo vyriausybių, teikiamas tokiais būdais, kuriuos pagal ES bendrosios rinkos taisykles taikyti uždrausta. Pirmiausia turime apsaugoti savo ES rinką, savo vartotojus, darbuotojus ir verslą. Tai ypač svarbu koronaviruso krizės metu. Bet svarbiausia yra tai, kad ES prekybos politika ir konkurencijos politika turėtų skatinti prekybos aplinkos, palankios naujų darbo vietų steigimui, kūrimą Europoje.
Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States (A9-0124/2020 -José Gusmão)
. – Palaikiau pranešimą dėl užimtumo politikos, kadangi manau, kad šios politikos tikslas turėtų būti dalyvavimo darbo rinkoje didinimas ir rėmimas, geresnis prisitaikymas prie darbo rinkos ir pokyčių darbo rinkoje skatinimas, ypač kalbant apie jaunus žmones. Jų tarpe, deja, vis dar yra didelis nedarbas, su kuriuo turėtume kovoti koordinuotai, pasikliaudami Sąjungos pagalba valstybėms narėms.Teisinių sprendimų tikslas visų pirma turi būti užimtumo didinimas nepalankiose regionuose. Valstybės narės turėtų veiksmingai skatinti tuos, kurie gali dalyvauti darbo rinkoje, susirasti vertingą darbą. ES narės turėtų padidinti aktyvios darbo rinkos politikos veiksmingumą plėsdamos tikslinę auditoriją, padidindamos jų poveikį ir apimtį ir teikdamos deramą paramą bedarbiams ieškantiems darbo.Siekiant ženkliai sumažinti ilgalaikio bei struktūrinio nedarbo riziką ir užkirsti jam kelią, turėtų būti taikomos visapusiškos strategijos, apimančios kuo skubesnį išsamų kiekvieno bedarbio padėties įvertinimą. Valstybės narės turėtų užtikrinti, kad visiems darbuotojams iš tikrųjų būtų sudarytos teisingos darbo sąlygos, suteiktos socialinės teisės ir galimybė gauti tinkamą socialinę apsaugą.
The EU’s role in protecting and restoring the world’s forests (A9-0143/2020 - Stanislav Polčák)
Parėmiau ataskaitą, nes miškų svarba pasaulinei ekosistemai ir miškų valdymui Europos Sąjungoje yra labai didelė, ypač Vidurio ir Rytų Europoje, kur apželdinimas miškais yra gana didelis ir vaidina didelį vaidmenį žmonėms ir ekonomikai. Miškai turi ypatingą socialinę vertę ir tuo pačiu metu atlieka daugybę funkcijų, tiek susijusių su gamyba, tiek ne gamybinių, bet aplinkosauginių. Be kita ko, jie reguliuoja hidrologinį ciklą, gerina oro kokybę ir yra daugelio augalų ir gyvūnų rūšių buveinė. Tačiau svarbu yra tai, kad miškai taip pat yra svarbūs ūkininkams ir vaidina svarbų vaidmenį patenkinant pagrindinius žemės ūkio ir maisto poreikius, o jų veikla priklauso nuo tokių gamtos išteklių, kaip dirvožemis, vanduo ir miškai. Todėl, norint tinkamai valdyti žemės ūkį ir miškus, būtina pripažinti miškų daugiafunkciškumą. Tokiems aspektams reikalingas visapusiškas ir nuoseklus požiūris į miškų apsaugą, atkūrimą ir tvarkymą bei miškų kirtimo problemų sprendimą. Miškų išteklių apsaugos ir atkūrimo srityje reikia racionalaus ES požiūrio, atitinkančio valstybių narių ekonominius poreikius.
Amending Decision No 1313/2013/EU on a Union Civil Protection Mechanism (A9-0148/2020 - Nikos Androulakis)
Parėmiau ES civilinės saugos mechanizmą, nes COVID-19 krizė parodė, kad Sąjunga ir valstybės narės nėra tinkamai pasirengusios reaguoti į didelio masto ekstremalias situacijas ir kad dabartinė teisinė sistema tokiomis aplinkybėmis neveikia gerai. Ši krizė taip pat išryškino precedento neturintį mastą, kurį žmonių sveikatai, aplinkai, visuomenei ir ekonomikai gali sukelti tokios nelaimės. Atsižvelgiant į būtinybę stiprinti Sąjungos ir valstybių narių veiksmų pajėgumus sveikatos ir civilinės saugos srityje, rescEU mechanizmas turėtų būti stipresnis, ankstesnis, greitesnis ir geriau koordinuojamas su nacionalinių civilinės saugos institucijų veikla. Valstybės narės turėtų gauti iš Sąjungos išsamią informaciją apie krizių prevenciją ir pasirengimą. Atsižvelgiant į COVID-19 pandemijos patirtis ir į poreikį padidinti Sąjungos reagavimo pajėgumus sveikatos ir civilinės saugos srityje, reikia stiprinti prevencijos, pasirengimo ir reagavimo politiką. Norint užtikrinti didesnį pasirengimą panašiems įvykiams ateityje, reikia imtis skubių veiksmų stiprinant ES pagalbos mechanizmą. ES mechanizmo stiprinimas turėtų papildyti ES politiką ir visų pirma skirti finansavimą valstybėms narėms atsparumui nelaimėms stiprinti.
Digital Finance: emerging risks in crypto-assets - regulatory and supervisory challenges in the area of financial services, institutions and markets (A9-0161/2020 - Ondřej Kovařík)
Parėmiau pranešimą, kadangi ES vidaus rinkai yra būdinga atvira konkurencija ir joje siekiama sudaryti vienodas sąlygas taikant suderintą reglamentavimo sistemą, remiantis tarptautiniais standartais ir priežiūros institucijoms bendradarbiaujant tarpusavyje. Todėl tie patys principai visoms finansų įstaigoms turėtų tapti ir ES strategijos pagrindu ir skaitmeninių finansų srityje.Dėl to svarbu, kad Komisija, rengdama tarptautinius standartus, glaudžiai bendradarbiautų su reguliavimo institucijomis, nepakenkiant Sąjungos prerogatyvai priimti Sąjungos aplinkybes atitinkančių reglamentavimo ir priežiūros nuostatų. Taigi nepamirškime, kad visos naujos teisinės priemonės turi kruopščiai ir žiūrint į ateitį įvertinti rizikas ir naudas, visų pirma vartotojams, nes jie yra labiausiai paveikti finansų ar bankų sistemos pokyčių. Todėl visuose naujuose teisės aktuose pirmiausia reikia atsižvelgti į klientų gerovę. Šis principas turi būti mūsų prioritetas.
Civil liability regime for artificial intelligence (A9-0178/2020 - Axel Voss)
Parėmiau pranešimą, nes šiuolaikiniai iššūkiai, susiję su skaitmeniniu pasauliu ir ypač dirbtiniu intelektu, reikalauja iš mūsų, kaip įstatymų leidėjų, naujų veiksmų. Nors Atsakomybės už gaminius direktyva jau daugiau nei 30 metų yra veiksminga priemonė atlyginti žalą, atsiradusią dėl brokuoto gaminio, ją vis tiek reikia peržiūrėti, kad ji būtų pritaikyta šiuolaikiniam skaitmeniniam pasauliui ir spręstų problemas, susijusias su naujomis technologijomis. Mūsų tikslas turėtų būti aukštos, veiksmingos vartotojų apsaugos lygio, teisinio tikrumo, efektyvumo ir skaidrumo užtikrinimas tiek vartotojams, tiek įmonėms.Visi teisės aktų pasiūlymai turi būti pagrįsti išsamia taikomų teisės aktų analize, kad būtų išvengta teisės aktų dubliavimo ar prieštaravimo.Kadangi Europos Sąjunga ir jos valstybės narės nereikalauja radikalių galiojančių atsakomybės įstatymų pakeitimų, dirbtinio intelekto sistemos taip pat neturėtų mūsų atitraukti nuo tradicinių draudimo sistemų. Valstybės finansuojami žalos atlyginimo mechanizmai nėra tinkamas atsakas į dirbtinio intelekto plėtrą. Tokios kompensavimo sistemos sukuria nereikalingą finansinę naštą mokesčių mokėtojams ir, visų pirma, klientams. Todėl prievolė apdrausti nuo žalos, kurią sukelia gaminys, kuriame yra dirbtinio intelekto, pirmiausia turėtų tekti gaminio gamintojui ir subjektui, įvedančiam jį į komercinę apyvartą.
Addressing product safety in the single market (A9-0207/2020 - Marion Walsmann)
Pritariau pranešimui, nes nepriimtina, kad Europos Sąjungoje vartotojams gali būti tiekiami produktai, kurie neatitinka ES saugos reikalavimų arba yra kitaip yra nesuderinami su teisinėmis nuostatomis, pradedant pavojingų cheminių medžiagų naudojimu gaminiuose, baigiant pavojinga programine įranga ir kitokio pavidalo pavojumi saugai. Reikia teisinės sistemos, kuri veiktų kaip komercinis saugumo kodeksas ir pagerintų vartotojų apsaugą, kad būtų pasiekta aukšto lygio vartotojų sveikatos apsauga ir saugumas. Manau, kad vartotojų apsaugos lygis neturėtų priklausyti nuo to, ar vartotojas perka internetu, ar tradicinėje parduotuvėje. Vartotojų apsauga turi būti vienoda. Reikia imtis veiksmų, kad būtų užtikrinta pakankama vartotojų apsauga, nes daugelis internetinėse prekyvietėse parduodamų produktų neatitinka ES saugos taisyklių. Be to, Komisija turėtų atlikti trečiųjų šalių produktų saugos tyrimus, aktyviau stebėti internetines prekyvietes ir padidinti jų atsakomybę už produktų pardavimą.Todėl Komisija, bendradarbiaudama su vartotojų organizacijomis ir valstybėmis narėmis, turi gerinti būdą kaip yra teikiama vartotojams informacija apie galimą, reikalavimų neatitinkančių ir atvežamų iš trečiųjų šalių produktų, perkamų internetinėse prekyvietėse, riziką. Mūsų vartotojų saugumas reikalauja tokių konkrečių veiksmų.
Additional resources in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: REACT-EU (A9-0150/2020 - Andrey Novakov, Constanze Krehl)
Parėmiau pranešimą. Dėl COVID-19 pandemijos valstybės narės patyrė precedento neturinčią socialinę, ekonominę ir sveikatos krizę. Dabartinė krizė stabdo ekonomikos augimą, o tai dar labiau padidina didelį likvidumo stygių dėl staigaus ir reikšmingo valstybės investicijų, reikalingų jų sveikatos sistemoms ir kitiems ekonomikos sektoriams, padidėjimo; taip pat pablogina žmonių, kuriems gresia skurdas, padėtį, didina socialinį susiskaldymą ir didina nedarbą. Vidaus sienų uždarymas turėjo rimtą neigiamą poveikį ekonominiam bendradarbiavimui pasienio zonose ir paveikė keliaujančių darbuotojų padėtį. Be to, nerimaujama, kad pacientų galimybės naudotis sveikatos priežiūros paslaugomis bus ribotos vidutiniu arba ilguoju laikotarpiu. Turime padaryti viską, kad pašalintume sveikatos skirtumus, egzistuojančius ES šalyse, kurie didina medicinos poreikius ir mažina bendrą socialinę sanglaudą valstybėse narėse. Dėl to iškilo unikali problema, kurios išsprendimui reikia konkrečių, neatidėliotinų ir nepaprastų finansinių priemonių, kurios greitai parems ekonomiką ir sveikatos tarnybas, kad mūsų piliečių sveikata būtų apsaugota ir būtų skatinamos investicijos, ekonomikos augimas, darbo vietų atkūrimas ir išlaikymas. Todėl būtina dalinai pakeisti šiuos reglamentus, kad būtų užtikrintas didesnis lankstumas įgyvendinant Europos regioninės plėtros fondo (ERPF), Europos socialinio fondo (ESF), ir Sanglaudos fondo remiamas programas. Tai suteiks papildomą finansinę pagalbą, leidžiančią valstybėms sutelkti dėmesį į būtiną atsaką į beprecedentinę krizę, kad galutiniai naudos gavėjai gautų finansavimą, kurio anksčiau nebuvo galima gauti.
European Citizens' Initiative - Minority Safepack (B9-0403/2020, B9-0405/2020)
Kaip Europos piliečių iniciatyvos „Minority SafePack“ bendraautorius, tvirtai palaikiau rezoliuciją šiuo klausimu. Visų teisių užtikrinimas autochtoninėms tautinėms mažumoms privalo būti ES prioritetu. „Minority SafePack“ yra Europos teisės pakeitimų pasiūlymų paketas. Šiais pasiūlymais siekiama garantuoti vietos tautinių mažumų apsaugą ir pateikti daugybę ES teisės aktų, leidžiančių geriau ir efektyviau išsaugoti kultūrą, tradicijas ir švietimą tam tikrame regione. 2018 m. kartu su FUEN visoje Europoje vykdėme kampaniją, skirtą parašams rinkti „Minority SafePack“ iniciatyvai paremti. Tai iniciatyva, kurios pagalba remiamos mažumų teisės, teisės į kalbą ir kultūros apsaugą. Lietuvoje, Vilniaus regione, efektyvaus LLS ir LLRA-KŠS darbo dėka buvo surinkta daugiau nei 256 procentai Lietuvai reikalingo balsų skaičiaus.Pagrindinius iniciatyvos tikslus galima apibendrinti taip - tautinių mažumų saugumas, visų pirma užtikrinant mažumų kalbos vartojimą mokyklose, valstybės ir vietos valdžios įstaigose, balsavimo biuleteniuose, informaciniuose užrašuose ir viešajame gyvenime. Esmė tame, kad Sąjungos sanglaudos politikoje ypatingas dėmesys turėtų būti skiriamas regionams, kurie dėl savo nacionalinių, etninių, kultūrinių, religinių ar kalbinių ypatumų skiriasi nuo aplinkinių regionų. Taip pat turėtų būti užtikrinta tinkama jų ekonominė plėtra, siekiant tęsti jų plėtrą ir išlaikyti Europos Sąjungos kultūrinę įvairovę. Dėka to, tradicinėms vietinėms tautinėms mažumoms priklausantys asmenys turės teisinę apsaugą ES.
Decent and affordable housing for all (A9-0247/2020 - Kim Van Sparrentak)
Pritariau europarlamentarės Sparrentak pranešimui, nes galimybė gauti padorų ir prieinamą būstą yra labai svarbi, ypač jauniems žmonėms, kurie žengia į suaugusiųjų gyvenimą. Tinkamos gyvenimo sąlygos yra pagrindinė teisė, kuri turi būti vertinama kaip prielaida naudotis kitomis pagrindinėmis teisėmis bei sąlyga oriam gyvenimui. Valstybių narių nacionalinės valdžios institucijos privalo apibrėžti savo būsto politiką ir imtis būtinų priemonių užtikrinti, kad jų būsto rinkose ši pagrindinė teisė būtų gerbiama ir suteikiama visiems tiems, kuriems to reikia. Atsižvelkime į tai, kad padidėjus baigtų butų skaičiui, nepastebimas žymus jų prieinamumo pagerėjimas žmonėms, kurių pajamos yra per mažos, norint išsinuomoti butą rinkos sąlygomis, o kartu ir per didelės, kad galėtų kreiptis dėl socialinio būsto. Ši problema dažniausiai liečia vienišus tėvus, daugiavaikes šeimas ir į darbo rinką žengiantį jaunimą. Būtent jiems reikia paramos ir naujų teisinių sprendimų, kurie palengvintų jų galimybes gauti būstą ir užtikrintų orų gyvenimą. Yra dar vienas svarbus dalykas šiame kontekste, susijęs su pandemijos sukelta krize. Išeitis iš krizės neturėtų būti grįžimas prie klaidingo scenarijaus būsto rinkoje. Reikia užtikrinti, kad nepasikartotų iškeldinimo banga, kurią stebėjome po pasaulinės finansų krizės, įvykusios praėjusį dešimtmetį. Todėl būtina sukurti geresnę nuomininkų apsaugą siekiant apsaugoti šeimas ir tuos, kuriems labiausiai reikia apsaugos nuo stogo virš galvos praradimo.
The right to disconnect (A9-0246/2020 - Alex Agius Saliba)
Pritariu dėl teisės atsijungti, nes tai yra labai svarbu darbuotojų atžvilgiu visuotinio darbo skaitmeninimo laikais. Būtina įdiegti apsaugos priemones Sąjungos lygmeniu tam, kad būtų užtikrinta minimali darbuotojų apsauga naujame skaitmeniniame darbo pasaulyje ir pasiūlyta tinkama direktyva dėl teisės būti neprisijungus.Platus skaitmeninių įrankių naudojimas suteikė darbuotojams didesnę nepriklausomybę darbo laiko atžvilgiu ir lankstumą organizuojant darbą. Tačiau, kita vertus, dėl to gali būti panaikintos ribos tarp darbo ir laisvalaikio. Dėl tokio gyvenimo būdo darbuotojai dažnai nebegali atsijungti nuo darbo, o tai ilgainiui sukelia fizinės ir psichinės sveikatos problemas, tokias kaip stresas, nerimas, depresija ir perdegimas, taip pat turi neigiamą poveikį darbo ir asmeninio gyvenimo pusiausvyrai. Tai taip pat neigiamai veikia šeimos ryšius ir netgi veda link šeimų iširimo. Todėl direktyva turėtų būti taikoma visiems darbuotojams, kurie savo darbe naudojasi skaitmeninėmis priemonėmis, ir visuose veiklos sektoriuose, tiek viešajame, tiek privačiame. Europos teisė būti neprisijungus yra būtina norint pagerinti darbuotojų apsaugą ir sustiprinti jų teises į sąžiningas darbo sąlygas, teisingą atlyginimą, profesinio ir asmeninio gyvenimo pusiausvyrą, poilsio laikotarpius ir sveiką bei saugią darbo vietą.
Implementation of the Anti-Trafficking Directive (A9-0011/2021 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos)
Pritariau pranešimui dėl prekybos žmonėmis prevencijos direktyvos įgyvendinimo, nes XXI amžiuje toks barbarizmas negali vykti. Prekyba žmonėmis – tai rimtas nusikaltimas, dažnai įvykdomas organizuoto nusikalstamumo (dažniausiai migracijos srautų) kontekste. Moterims ir vaikams ypač dažnai kyla pavojus tapti prekybos žmonėmis aukomis. O didžiausią nerimą kelia tai, kad beveik ketvirtadalis visų prekybos žmonėmis aukų Europos Sąjungoje yra vaikai. Todėl labai skubu įgyvendinti šią direktyvą, nes direktyva plečia prekybos žmonėmis apibrėžimą, o tai palengvins šios nežmoniškos praktikos vykdytojų patraukimą baudžiamojon atsakomybėn.Pagal šią direktyvą prekyba žmonėmis – tai „asmenų verbavimas, vežimas, perdavimas, laikymas ar priėmimas, grasinant arba panaudojant jėgą ar kitokią prievartą.“ Tai svarbus apibrėžimas. Ši problema yra rimta, nes daugelis aukų ir prekybos žmonėmis vykdytojų lieka nesurasti ir nėra įtraukti į oficialią statistiką. Todėl daug statistinių duomenų ir ataskaitų nepakankamai atspindi situaciją. Valstybės narės turi įdėti daugiau pastangų kovojant su prekyba žmonėmis migracijos kontekste, atsižvelgdamos į naujus iššūkius, pvz., į neproporcingą moterų ir mergaičių, prekiaujamų seksualinio išnaudojimo tikslais, skaičių. Reikėtų dėti daugiau pastangų kovojant su nusikaltėlių nebaudžiamumu.
Reducing inequalities with a special focus on in-work poverty (A9-0006/2021 - Özlem Demirel)
Pritariau šiam pranešimui dėl nelygybės mažinimo, ypatingą dėmesį skiriant dirbančiųjų skurdui. Pranešimas yra labai svarbus šiuo krizės metu. Ekonominė nelygybė egzistuoja visose valstybėse narėse ir ji yra labai skirtingo pobūdžio. Atotrūkis tarp turtingiausių ir likusios visuomenės vis didėja. Nerimą kelia tai, kad, anot Eurostato, neturtingiausių 20 % namų ūkių gryna vertė Eurogrupės šalyse pastaraisiais metais sumažėjo, o tai pagilino skurdą.Greitesnis darbuotojų pajamų atskirties reiškinio pagilėjimas gresia ne tik žemos kvalifikacijos žmonėms, bet ir į darbo rinką patenkantiems jaunuoliams, įskaitant aukštus mokslus baigusius žmones. Privalome tam skirti ypatingą dėmesį, nes jauniems žmonėms sunku rasti stabilų, aukštos kokybės darbą pagal neterminuotą darbo sutartį ir jie dažnai ilgą laiką praleidžia be darbo. Deja, nemažai valstybių narių leidžia darbdaviams mokėti jaunesniems darbuotojams mažesnį darbo užmokestį, o tai diskriminuoja juos darbo rinkoje. Europos Sąjunga ir valstybės narės yra įpareigotos suteikti visiems darbuotojams darbo sąlygas, kurios gerbtų jų sveikatą, saugą ir orumą, ir atkreipti dėmesį į tai, kad skurdas ir atskirtis nuo darbo rinkos ir visuomenės tik didina socialinę nelygybę. Valstybės narės privalo užtikrinti nuoseklią visų darbuotojų socialinės apsaugos sistemą, o Komisija turėtų tai įgyvendinti.
Equal treatment in employment and occupation in light of the UNCRPD (A9-0014/2021 - Katrin Langensiepen)
Palaikiau šį svarbų pranešimą apie neįgalių žmonių teises darbo srityje. Žmonės su negalia turi teisę į visišką dalyvavimą darbo rinkoje ir visuomenėje, tačiau Sąjungoje dažnai pažeidžiamos jų pagrindinės teisės, jie taip pat yra išstumti iš atviros darbo rinkos ir atimama jų teisė dirbti lygiomis teisėmis su kitais darbuotojais. Todėl reikėtų užkirsti kelią bet kokiai diskriminacijai dėl negalios. Mūsų – parlamentarų – pareiga yra priimti įstatymus, kurie apsaugotų labiausiai pažeidžiamas žmonių grupes, tarp kurių tikrai yra ir neįgaliųjų.Parlamentas turi paraginti valstybes nares užtikrinti racionalų ir veiksmingą nemokamą darbo vietų pritaikymą neįgaliems žmonėms. O Europos Komisija turi parengti aiškias ir konkrečias gaires visai Europos Sąjungai dėl pagalbos formų, kurių galima imtis, atsižvelgiant į konkretaus asmens poreikius ir neįgalumo laipsnį. Šios rekomendacijos turėtų būti perkeltos į kiekvienos valstybės nacionalinę teisę. Be to, valstybės narės turėtų užtikrinti darbdaviams tinkamus mokymus, kad jie galėtų įgyti reikiamas žinias, įgūdžius ir sąmoningumą praktiškai įgyvendinant naujus sprendimus, pritaikant darbo vietas neįgaliųjų įdarbinimui.
Reversing demographic trends in EU regions using cohesion policy instruments (A9-0061/2021 - Daniel Buda)
Pritariau pranešimui, nes Europos Sąjunga susiduria su dideliu demografiniu iššūkiu, kurį būtina suprasti ir spręsti kaip visumą, siekiant pašalinti neigiamą pastarųjų metų gimstamumą. Nuo 2015 m. ES gyventojų skaičius natūraliai mažėja dėl mirčių, viršijančių gimstamumą. Tikimasi staigaus gyventojų skaičiaus mažėjimo, ypač Rytų ir Pietų Europoje; taip yra dėl mažo gimstamumo ir ES vidaus migracijos. Europos visuomenė akivaizdžiai sensta, mažėja gimstamumas, o tai turi įtakos demografinės naštos lygiui ir daro neigiamą poveikį darbo jėgos augimui, kuris yra daug mažesnis nei per pastaruosius dešimt metų. Demografinis senėjimas taip pat turi įtakos būsto ir transporto planavimui, infrastruktūros ir paslaugų poreikiams, taip pat fiskalinės ir socialinės apsaugos tvarumui. Šiuo atžvilgiu Sąjungoje būtina įvesti aktyvią politiką, kuri palaikytų šeimas, ypač daugiavaikes. Privalome sustiprinti pagalbą šeimoms auginančioms jaunąją kartą. Tik tokiu būdu galima greitai ištaisyti demografinį nuosmukį. Todėl Europos Sąjungos prioritetas turėtų būti dabartinių neigiamų demografinių tendencijų Europoje panaikinimas priemonėmis, kurios nukreiptos į jų priežastis, o ne tik į pasekmes.
Competition policy – annual report 2020 (A9-0168/2021 - Johan Van Overtveldt)
Balsavau už pranešimą dėl konkurencijos politikos, nes konkurencingos rinkos yra naudingos vartotojams, ypač kai jos yra nulemtos mažesnių kainų ir didesnio geros kokybės produktų pasirinkimo. ES konkurencijos politika visada turėtų būti siekiama išlaikyti atvirą rinkos ekonomikos pobūdį, sudarant galimybę laisvai, sąžiningai ir veiksmingai konkurencijai, kuri padėtų sukurti vienodas galimybes ir sąlygas visiems ES piliečiams. Kad taip būtų, nepriklausomos konkurencijos institucijos turi griežtai ir nešališkai vykdyti ES konkurencijos taisykles. Tai labai svarbu Europos įmonėms, veikiančioms vidaus rinkoje ir tarptautiniu mastu. Bet kokių šios srities teisinių reglamentų tikslas turi būti vienodų sąlygų užtikrinimas įmonėms veikti bendrojoje rinkoje, o tai ypač svarbu norint sukurti tinkamas ir tvarias darbo vietas Europos Sąjungoje.Taip pat verta atkreipti dėmesį į Europos Komisijos rekomendacijas skirti daugiau dėmesio vartotojų teisių apsaugai, ypač skaitmeninėje rinkoje. Šiame kontekste svarbu padėti vartotojams geriau kontroliuoti savo duomenis ir tapatybę bei prisiimti atsakomybę už juos. Būtent Komisija turi užtikrinti aukštą asmens duomenų apsaugos lygį ir tuo pačiu padaryti skaitmenines paslaugas skaidresnes ir sąžiningesnes, kurios turėtų būti kuo saugesnės vartotojams.
Sexual and reproductive health and rights in the EU, in the frame of women’s health (A9-0169/2021 - Predrag Fred Matić)
Griežtai balsavau prieš skandalingą Matić pranešimą, nes tai yra išpuolis prieš tradicinę šeimą, santuoką ir kiekvieno pradėto vaiko teisę į gyvybę; tai taip pat visų „gender“ aktyvistų klaidų, susijusių su reprodukcinėmis ir seksualinėmis teisėmis, įtvirtintomis Stambulo konvencijoje, kartojimas. Tai taip pat apima vaikų seksualizavimo skatinimą visuose švietimo lygmenyse, o tai yra nepriimtinas vaikų mąstymo iškreipimas, ir atima iš tėvų teisę auklėti savo vaikus pagal savo įsitikinimus. Šis pranešimas tai dar vienas kraštutinių kairiųjų ideologinis dokumentas, kurio tikslas yra pasėti visuomenėje destruktyvią neomarksistinę pasaulėžiūrinę revoliuciją, kuri šiandien naikina tikrą krikščioniškomis vertybėmis paremtą Europos civilizaciją. Nei aš, nei Lietuvos Lenkų rinkimų akcijos – Krikščioniškų šeimų sąjunga, kuriai atstovauju Europos Parlamente, su tuo nesutinka. Be to, šis pranešimas ir Sąjungos veiksmai etiniais ir moraliniais klausimais peržengia Sutarčių ir kompetencijos ribas, nes pagal Sutarties 5 straipsnį Europos Sąjunga visų pirma turi vadovautis subsidiarumo ir proporcingumo principais, taigi ir Sąjungos kompetencijos suteikimo principu. Netgi remiantis siaubingomis ES sutarčių nuostatomis pagal Lisabonos sutartį išeina, kad Sąjunga turi tiek kompetencijos, kiek jai suteikia valstybės narės. O pasaulėžiūros klausimai nepriklauso šioms kompetencijoms, nes tai yra išskirtiniai valstybių narių reikalai. Sakau tvirtą „ne“ šeimos ir gyvenimo naikinimui.
Breaches of EU law and of the rights of LGBTIQ citizens in Hungary as a result of the adopted legal changes in the Hungarian Parliament (B9-0412/2021, B9-0413/2021)
Tai dar viena skandalinga diskusija Europos Parlamente bei nepagrįstas puolimas prieš Lenkiją bei Vengriją vien dėl to, kad tos valstybės, vykdydamos savo visuomenės daugumos norą, priima įstatymus, saugančius vaikus nuo tvirkinimo ir pedofilijos, ir saugo tradicinę šeimą bei santuoką, suprantamą kaip moters ir vyro sąjungą. Būtent Lenkija ir Vengrija palaiko tikrąsias europines vertybes, kilusias iš mūsų žemyno krikščioniškų šaknų. Aš palaikau tokią Europą. Deja, neomarksizmo šalininkai puola viską, kas susiję su tradicijomis ir krikščionybe. Šiandien parlamento dauguma parengė rezoliuciją, kuria stigmatizuojamas įstatymas, remiantis šeimą ir vaikų priežiūrą. Tai keista kairiųjų rezoliucija, kurios aš nepalaikau. Europa, norėdama išlikti, turi išsaugoti savo tapatybę, apie kurią kalbėjo Europos bendrijos steigėjai, o Robertas Schumanas aiškiai pasakė, kad „Europos demokratija bus krikščioniška arba jos nebus visai“. Šią citatą skiriu Komisijos narei Jourovai, kad ji susivoktų ir sustabdytų ideologinius išpuolius prieš Lenkiją ir Vengriją.
Fair working conditions, rights and social protection for platform workers - New forms of employment linked to digital development (A9-0257/2021 - Sylvie Brunet)
Palaikiau pranešimą, nes manau, kad visi darbuotojai, įskaitant tuos, kurie dirba per internetines platformas, nusipelno sąžiningų darbo sąlygų ir jiems turi būti suteiktos teisės ir socialinė apsauga kaip ir darbuotojams, besinaudojantiems kitomis įdarbinimo formomis. Be abejo, darbas per internetines platformas taip pat kelia susirūpinimą dėl nesaugumo ir prastų darbo sąlygų, dėl tinkamos socialinės apsaugos trūkumo ar prieinamumo, nesąžiningos konkurencijos, nedeklaruoto darbo, suskaidytų ir nenuspėjamų pajamų. Visa tai reikalauja ypatingo mūsų, kaip įstatymų leidėjų, dėmesio, kad ateityje pašalintume šias grėsmes ir nepatogumus. Galų gale, darbas internetu gali būti labai įvairus ir jam būdingas didelis atliekamos veiklos nevienalytiškumas.Reikėtų pažymėti, kad dabartinė Europos sistema yra nepakankama, o ES teisinės priemonės dažnai netaikytinos daugeliui žmonių, dirbančių per internetines platformas, dėl netinkamo jų klasifikavimo ir dėl to, jog neužtektinai atsižvelgiama į naujas darbo pasaulio realijas. Taip vadinamas darbo rinkos susiskaidymas daugelį žmonių pastato į keblią teisinę situaciją, todėl šie darbuotojai turi mažiau ar daugiau ribotų teisių, nei turėtų būti garantuota visiems darbuotojams. Todėl pirmiausia reikia keisti teisinę sistemą darbuotojų naudai.
The protection of persons with disabilities through petitions: lessons learnt (A9-0261/2021 - Alex Agius Saliba)
Pone Pirmininke,pritariu pranešimui dėl neįgaliųjų apsaugos peticijų pagalba, nes tai padės geriau spręsti jų problemas, susijusias su teisės aktais ir įstatymais. O problemų mastas yra didelis. Europos pajamų ir gyvenimo sąlygų tyrimo duomenimis, Europos Sąjungoje gyvena apie 90 milijonų žmonių su negalia. Nors jie sudaro didelę grupę, daugeliu atvejų jie vis dar jaučiasi izoliuoti ir negali visiškai naudotis savo teisėmis ES.Peticijos negalios klausimais yra reikalingos, nes parodo, kokius sunkumus patiria neįgalieji. Taip pat parodom kad jie susiduria su diskriminacija ir kliūtimis kasdieniame gyvenime ir negali naudotis tokiomis Neįgaliųjų Teisių Konvencijos nustatytomis pagrindinėmis laisvėmis ir teisėmis, kaip prieiga prie viešojo transporto ir apstatytos aplinkos, gestų kalbų vartojimas ar lygios galimybės siekiant dalyvauti švietimo ir profesinio mokymo veikloje. Todėl būtina visais lygmenimis didinti informuotumą apie neįgaliųjų teises, įtvirtintas NTK, siekiant apsaugoti jų teises ir orumą.Kita vertus, valstybės narės turėtų labiau stengtis padėti neįgaliesiems svarbiausiose sveikatos, švietimo, užimtumo sąlygų ir socialinės apsaugos srityse. Taip pat svarbu užtikrinti neįgaliesiems visišką prieinamumą visose viešose Europos vietose, nes daugelyje šalių vis dar kyla problemų.
Cooperation on the fight against organised crime in the Western Balkans (A9-0298/2021 - Lukas Mandl)
Pone Pirmininke,pritariau pranešimui dėl bendradarbiavimo kovojant su organizuotu nusikalstamumu Vakarų Balkanuose, nes organizuotas nusikalstamumas tapo pagrindine tarptautinių santykių problema ir kelia grėsmę taikai bei ekonominiam vystymuisi, todėl reikia bendro ir koordinuoto Europos Sąjungos, jos valstybių narių ir tarptautinių partnerių atsako. Juolab kad organizuoto nusikalstamumo tinklai yra glaudžiai susiję tarpusavyje ir įsitvirtinę ES valstybėse narėse ir ES nepriklausančiose šalyse.Toks bendradarbiavimas yra svarbus kai kurioms Vakarų Balkanų šalims kalbant apie prisijungimą prie ES, o organizuotas nusikalstamumas ir korupcija kenkia šiam procesui, o visų pirma – Vakarų Balkanų šalių piliečiams. Jos sudaro kliūtis demokratinėms reformoms ir trukdo prisijungimo procesui, taip pat turi potencialų ir faktinį neigiamą poveikį ES valstybių narių saugumui bei stabilumui. Pritariu, kad reikia skirti daugiau dėmesio prevenciniams veiksmams ir švietimui, ypač atsižvelgiant į neigiamą nusikalstamumo, prekybos žmonėmis, narkotikų ir ginklų poveikį visuomenei; taip pat būtina didinti atsparumą ir tuo pačiu skirti daugiau dėmesio socialinėms ir ekonominėms sąlygoms, ypač priemiesčių ir kaimo vietovėse. Taip pat turėtų būti įgyvendinamos specializuotos programos ir bandomieji projektai siekiant stiprinti ES valstybių ir Vakarų Balkanų šalių saugumą.
European Medicines Agency (A9-0216/2021 - Nicolás González Casares)
Parėmiau N. Casareso pranešimą, kadangi precedento neturinti COVID-19 pandemijos patirtis išryškino Sąjungos ir valstybių narių sunkumus sprendžiant šią visuomenės sveikatos ekstremalią situaciją ir parodė, kad Sąjungos ir valstybių narių vaidmuo turėtų būti stiprinamas siekiant veiksmingiau valdyti vaistinių preparatų ir medicinos prietaisų prieinamumą. Taip pat svarbu remti medicininių atsakomųjų priemonių kūrimą, siekiant nuo ankstyvo etapo suderintai kovoti su grėsmėmis visuomenės sveikatai, užtikrinant ES, nacionalinių ir regioninių kompetentingų institucijų, pramonės ir kitų veikėjų bendradarbiavimą ir koordinavimą farmacijos ir medicinos tiekimo grandinėse, įskaitant sveikatos priežiūros specialistus.Sąjunga turi teikti pirmenybę sveikatai, užtikrinti nenutrūkstamą kokybiškų sveikatos priežiūros paslaugų teikimą ir pasirengti kovai su epidemija ir kitomis grėsmėmis sveikatai. Sąjungos galimybės imtis tokių veiksmų buvo labai apribotos dėl to, kad nėra aiškiai apibrėžtos teisinės bazės, kaip toliau veikti reaguojant į pandemiją, ES sveikatos agentūrų įgaliojimai ir ištekliai yra nepakankami, kaip ir Sąjungos bei valstybių narių pasirengimas visuomenės sveikatos ekstremaliajai situacijai. Todėl būtina skubiai sukurti teisinę bazę, kuria būtų siekiama išspręsti vaistų trūkumo problemą tais atvejais, kai kyla masinė grėsmė piliečių sveikatai ir gyvybei.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3): Genetically modified soybean GMB151 (BCS-GM151-6) (B9-0095/2022)
Pritariu prieštaravimui dėl leidimo prekiauti maistu, maisto sudedamosiomis dalimis ir pašarais, kurių sudėtyje yra genetiškai modifikuotų sojų. Daugelis tyrimų parodė, kad auginant genetiškai modifikuotus augalus, toleruojančius herbicidus, dažniau naudojami papildomi herbicidai, o tą daugiausia lemia herbicidams atsparių piktžolių atsiradimas. Tačiau svarbiausia yra tai, kad pagal suderintą Europos Sąjungos patvirtintą klasifikaciją ir ženklinimą modifikuotos sojos yra kenksmingos negimusiems vaikams.Pasipiktinimą kelia tai, kad Komisija ir toliau leidžia įvedinėti GMO, nesulaukusi kvalifikuotos valstybių narių daugumos palaikymo. Kai kalbama apie leidimų gaminiams išdavimą, tokia veikla apskritai turėtų būti išimtis, bet sprendimų dėl leidimo įvežti genetiškai modifikuotą maistą ir pašarus priėmimo procese tai, deja, tapo norma. Tokia situacija yra nepriimtina.Komisijos įgyvendinimo sprendimo projektas prieštarauja Sąjungos teisei, nes neatitinka reglamento tikslo – sudaryti pagrindą užtikrinti aukšto lygio žmonių gyvybės ir sveikatos apsaugą, gyvūnų sveikatos ir gerovės apsaugą, aplinkos ir vartotojų interesų apsaugą ryšium su genetiškai modifikuotu maistu ir pašarais. Turime įkalbėti Komisiją neleisti naudoti GMO, kol kiekvienu konkrečiu atveju nebus išsamiai išnagrinėta rizika žmonių ir gyvūnų sveikatai.
Empowering European youth: post-pandemic employment and social recovery (B9-0091/2022)
Praėję metai ir su pandemija susijusi krizė labai blogai paveikė jaunimo užimtumą ir socialinę padėtį, nes sumažino arba laikinai sustabdė tobulėjimo galimybes ir užimtumo lygį. Dėl to išaugo jaunimo bedarbių skaičius. Be to, gerokai sumažėjo jaunų žmonių asmeninės pajamos, išaugo skurdo ir socialinės atskirties rizika.Todėl reikia nedelsiant imtis veiksmų siekiant apsaugoti ir pagerinti jaunimo ateitį, ypač naujosiose valstybėse narėse, tokiose kaip Lietuva, kurių ekonomikai, palyginus su Senąja ES, reikia daugiau paramos. Tegul paskatinimui Europos Komisijai tampa nerimą keliantis jaunimo nedarbo lygis, kuris siekia 15,9 proc. – du su puse karto viršija bendrą nedarbo lygį.Pirmiausia reikia užtikrinti, kad jaunimas turėtų galimybę gauti socialinę apsaugą ir tinkamą atlyginimą. Jaunimas turi atlikti pagrindinį vaidmenį formuojant užimtumo ir socialinę politiką Europoje.Valstybės narės privalo ir toliau investuoti pakankamai išteklių į jaunimo užimtumo rėmimo priemones. O Komisija turi užtikrinti, kad naujosios iniciatyvos padėtų jauniems žmonėms integruotis į savo kilmės šalies darbo rinką, padėtų jiems susirasti stabilų darbą. Viešieji ir privatūs subjektai privalo būti kartu atsakingi už jaunimo gerovę, todėl remkime jaunimo užimtumą Sąjungoje.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers - application EGF/2022/000 TA 2022 - Technical assistance at the initiative of the Commission (A9-0037/2022 - José Manuel Fernandes)
Ponia Pirmininke,palaikau europarlamentaro Fernandes pranešimą, nes pagalbos suteikimas atleistiems darbuotojams, ypač sunkios pandemijos sukeltos ekonominės krizės metu, yra mūsų moralinė pareiga. Europos Sąjungos pagalba atleistiems darbuotojams turėtų būti dinamiška ir turėtų būti teikiama kuo greičiau ir efektyviau, be nereikalingo administracinio delsimo.Kurdama naujus teisės aktus, Europos Komisija turėtų parengti įstatymines ir biudžetines priemones, kurios teiktų papildomą paramą darbuotojams, nukentėjusiems nuo globalizacijos ir technologinių bei aplinkos pokyčių, pvz. pasaulio prekybos struktūros ar vidaus rinkos struktūros, poveikio. Taip pat reikėtų atsižvelgti į neigiamus finansų ir ekonomikos krizės padarinius, taip pat į valstybių narių perėjimą prie mažai anglies dioksido į aplinką išskiriančių technologijų ekonomikos. Didelę įtaką darbo rinkai taip pat turi pokyčiai, atsirandantys dėl skaitmeninimo ar automatizavimo prekyboje ir pramonėje.Tačiau prisiminkime, kad apie visas problemas ir darbo rinkos poreikius geriausiai yra informuotos valstybės narės. Ir tai jos privalo turėti didesnį poveikį į tai, kaip veiksmingai teikti pagalbą atleistiems darbuotojams.
Protection of the rights of the child in civil, administrative and family law proceedings (A9-0033/2022 - Adrián Vázquez Lázara)
Ponia Pirmininke,palaikau pranešimą dėl vaiko teisių apsaugos civilinėse, administracinėse ir šeimos teisės bylose. Manau, kad priimant visus susijusius su vaikais sprendimus teismuose, administracinėse institucijose ir socialinės rūpybos institucijose pirmenybė turi būti teikiama vaiko interesams ir būtinai reikia atsižvelgti į tėvų teises auklėti vaiką pagal savo pasaulėžiūrą. Visi sprendimai turi būti priimami individualiai, atsižvelgiant į vaiko amžių, vaiko ir jo šeimos poreikius ir konkrečią situaciją, tai labai svarbu.Be to, dalyvavimas teismo ir administraciniuose procesuose turi vykti vaikui palankiomis sąlygomis, kad vaikui nebūtų sukeltas papildomas stresas, o psichologinis bei emocinis tokių aplinkybių poveikis būtų kuo mažesnis. Tai ypač svarbu kalbant apie labiausiai pažeidžiamus vaikus, pavyzdžiui, vaikus su negalia arba iš migrantų šeimų.O valstybės narės turėtų laikytis daugiadalykio požiūrio ir sukurti lengvai prieinamas, aukštos kokybės, individualiai pritaikytas, nemokamas ir valstybės finansuojamas konsultavimo ir paramos paslaugas vaikams ir jų tėvams, tiek teisme, tiek už jo ribų, kad prireikus būtų teikiama apmokytų specialistų, tokių kaip gydytojai ir psichologai, pagalba. Turėtume prisiminti, kad visuose proceso etapuose turi būti atsižvelgiama į vaiko interesus.
Persecution of minorities on the grounds of belief or religion (A9-0071/2022 - Karol Karski)
Palaikiau pranešimą, nes teisė į minties, sąžinės laisvę ir, kas svarbiausia, teisė į tikėjimo laisvę yra viena iš svarbiausių pilietinių laisvių.Deja, įvairūs valstybiniai ir nevalstybiniai subjektai diskriminuoja žmones ir persekioja juos dėl jų tikėjimo įvairiais būdais: žmogžudystėmis, kankinimais, fiziniais išpuoliais, masiniais sulaikymais, savavališkais areštais, priverstiniais dingimais, neteisminėmis mirties bausmėmis, priverstine gimstamumo kontrole ir abortais, kulto vietų, kapinių ir kultūros paveldo naikinimais bei neapykantos kurstymu internete ir ne tik. Tokia praktika vis dar plačiai paplitusi pasaulyje, tačiau pasitaiko ir Europos Sąjungoje. Didžiausios religinio persekiojimo aukos yra krikščionys visame pasaulyje. Kiekvienais metais pasaulyje dėl savo tikėjimo nužudoma apie 100 000 krikščionių. Būtent krikščioniškos vertybės yra Europos kultūros, kuri susiformavo per pastaruosius du tūkstančius metų, pagrindas. Dėl šios priežasties turime panaikinti visas krikščionių diskriminacijos formas Europoje. Be to, turime stebėti persekiojimo mastą visame pasaulyje ir tvirtai ginti krikščionis, kuriems gresia diskriminacija, įskaitant teisę praktikuoti savo religiją, kartu gerbdami lygybės ir nediskriminavimo principus. Turime ryžtingai reaguoti į smurtą, ir labai svarbu, kad žmogaus teisių pažeidėjai prieš religinėms bendruomenėms priklausančius asmenis būtų ryžtingai patraukti atsakomybėn.
Ongoing hearings under Article 7(1) TEU regarding Poland and Hungary (B9-0262/2022, B9-0263/2022, B9-0264/2022)
Šiuo metu vyksta nuolatinė kampanija, nukreipta prieš Lenkiją, kurioje dalyvauja ir Europos Komisija bei Europos Parlamentas. Lenkija kaltinama neva pažeidusi teisinės valstybės principą teisingumo srityje. Suvereniai valstybei draudžiama reformuoti teismų sistemą pagal Lenkijos parlamento priimtą aktą. Tai absurdiški ir nepriimtini ES institucijų veiksmai, pažeidžiantys Lenkijos suverenitetą. Be to, Komisijos ir Parlamento kišimasis į Lenkijos teismų sistemą viršija šių institucijų kompetencijų ribas, kurias jie sau priskiria už sutarties ribų, nes teisingumo vykdymas valstybėse narėse nepriklauso išimtinei Sąjungos kompetencijai. Veiksmai prieš Lenkiją tiesiogiai pažeidžia 5-ąjį ESS straipsnį, kuriame nurodyta, kad ES kompetencijų ribos nustatomos suteikimo principu. Šių įgaliojimų įgyvendinimas priklauso nuo subsidiarumo ir proporcingumo principų. Pagal suteikimo principą Sąjunga gali veikti tik neperžengdama valstybių narių Sutartyse jai suteiktų įgaliojimų tol, kol pasiekia jose nustatytus tikslus. Bet kokios kompetencijos, nesuteiktos Sąjungai Sutartyse surašytais aktais, priklauso valstybėms narėms. Dėl šios priežasties ES institucijų puolimas prieš Lenkiją yra nepagrįstas ir yra politinio pobūdžio. Lenkija yra puolama, nes nepripažįsta Sąjungos kairiųjų liberalų ideologijos ir pasisako ne už ES supervalstybę, o už Tėvynių Europą, į ką turi teisę ir ko nori dauguma Lenkijos piliečių. Kai kuriems ES politikams praverstų išklausyti demokratijos pamoką.
Strengthening Europol’s mandate: entry of alerts in SIS (A9-0287/2021 - Javier Zarzalejos)
Pritariau europarlamentaro Javiero Zarzalejoso pranešimui, nes Šengeno informacinė sistema (SIS) – tai svarbi priemonė, skirta išlaikyti aukštą saugumo lygį Sąjungos laisvės, saugumo ir teisingumo erdvėje remiant operatyvų bendradarbiavimą tarp kompetentingų nacionalinių institucijų, ypač sienos apsaugos, policijos, muitinės, imigracijos institucijų ir nusikalstamumo prevencijos institucijų.Atsižvelgiant į sunkių nusikaltimų ir terorizmo tarptautinį pobūdį, trečiųjų šalių ir tarptautinių organizacijų gauta informacija apie sunkių nusikaltimų ir teroro aktų vykdytojus arba asmenis, įtariamus įvykdžius sunkų nusikaltimą ar terorizmo aktą, gali turėti vis didesnę reikšmę mūsų piliečių saugumui. Dalis šios informacijos, ypač, jei konkretus asmuo yra trečiosios šalies pilietis, prieinama tik Europolui, kuris apdoroja šią informaciją ir pateikia analizės rezultatus visoms valstybėms narėms per Europolo informacinę sistemą ir stebėjimo sąrašą. Todėl Europolui turėtų būti suteikti įgaliojimai daryti įrašus SIS sistemoje pagal bendruosius Sąjungos ir valstybių narių interesus atitinkantį reglamentą taip, kad būtų visiškai gerbiamos pagrindinės teisės ir Sąjungos acquis dėl duomenų apsaugos ir būtų gerbiamos valstybių narių kompetencijos užtikrinti vidaus saugumą. Sistema turi būti nuosekli ir veiksminga. Ji taip pat turi papildyti nacionalinę veiklą, o ne kurti konkurencingas saugumo sistemas.
Addressing food security in developing countries (A9-0195/2022 - Beata Kempa)
Palaikiau Europos Parlamento narės B. Kempos pranešimą dėl aprūpinimo maistu problemos sprendimo besivystančiosiose šalyse. Nuo 2020 m. dėl konfliktų, ekonominių sukrėtimų ir ekstremalių oro sąlygų arba visų šių veiksnių derinio didėja maisto krizių gilumas ir mastas. Tai yra labai rimta problema, kadangi vien tik 2021 m. beveik 193 mln. asmenų stipriai trūko maisto ir jiems reikėjo skubios pagalbos maistu, – tai yra didžiausias visame pasaulyje maisto stingančių asmenų skaičius, užregistruotas Pasaulinėje maisto krizių ataskaitoje per šešerius metus. Ypač didelį nerimą kelia skaičius, bylojantis, kad visame pasaulyje badauja apie 811 milijonų žmonių.Dėl šių priežasčių Europos Sąjunga savo tarptautinėse plėtros programose turi teikti pirmenybę maistui ir žemės ūkio paramai bei užtikrinti vietos bendruomenėms ir pagalbos organizacijoms galimybę gauti finansavimą šiems tikslams. Šiame pranešime ES pagrįstai raginama bendradarbiaujant su besivystančiomis šalimis investuoti į priemones ir veiksmus, kurie užtikrina geresnę prieigą prie maisto. ES taip pat turi įtraukti tinkamas aprūpinimo maistu programas į ES ir nacionalinius mitybos tikslus ir strategijas. . Taip pat pritariu raginimui skirti daugiau finansinės paramos kuriant stiprias ir atsparias sveikatos sistemas, kad būtų nutrauktas užburtas netinkamos arbe nepakankamos mitybos ratas.
Statistics on agricultural input and output (A9-0285/2021 - Petros Kokkalis)
Europarlamentaro Kokkaliso pranešimas vertas paramos, nes norint veiksmingai stiprinti Europos žemės ūkį, ypač tokiose šalyse kaip Lietuva, reikalingas faktinės analizės, pagrįstos tikrais ir konkrečiais žemės ūkio sektoriaus duomenimis, atlikimas. Statistinių duomenų rinkimas, ypač žemės ūkio sąnaudų ir produkcijos, turėtų vykti taip pat tam, kad priimant sprendimus būtų galima naudotis atnaujintais, kokybiškais, lengvai prieinamais duomenimis, kurie būtini agrarinės aplinkosaugos rodikliams parengti, kad būtų galima įvertinti visų pirma dabartinės krizės poveikį ir paremti bei įvertinti pažangą įgyvendinant naują strategiją „Nuo ūkio iki stalo“. Tokia statistika taip pat gali padėti išsaugoti biologinę įvairovę ir kovoti su aplinkos tarša. Ir kas dar atrodo labai svarbu, ši statistika gali parodyti BŽŪP reformos privalumus ir trūkumus. Pagrindinė sąlyga siekiant užsibrėžtų tikslų numatomame reglamente turėtų būti perėjimas prie daugiafunkcio žemės ūkio, kuris galės pagaminti pakankamą kiekį saugaus maisto, o kartu teigiamai veiks aplinką. Taip pat turėtų būti sukurta visapusiškai veikianti ir skaidri sistema, skirta reguliariai rinkti statistinius duomenis apie pesticidų ir kitų žemės ūkyje naudojamų cheminių medžiagų naudojimą. To dėka bus galima geriau panaudoti Vidurio ir Rytų Europos šalių privalumus gaminant taip vadinamą sveiką maistą.
Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States (A9-0243/2022 - Alicia Homs Ginel)
Pritariu europarlamentarės Homs Ginel pranešimui dėl valstybių narių užimtumo politikos gairių. Tai yra labai svarbu mūsų piliečiams dabartinės didžiulės ekonomikos ir energetikos krizės metu. Užimtumo politika visoje Sąjungoje, o ypač mažesnėse šalyse, tokiose kaip Lietuva, kurios yra labiau pažeidžiamos neigiamų krizės padarinių, taip pat turi būti remiama Sąjungos lygmeniu. Sąjunga turėtų siekti parengti suderintą aukšto užimtumo lygio strategiją ir ypač skatinti teigiamą ekonominę ir socialinę politiką, kokybišką užimtumą ir gerinti darbo sąlygas, remdama ir papildydama valstybių narių veiksmus, taip pat darbo rinkas, orientuotas kovoti su dabartine krize, reaguojančias į pokyčius, skatinančias socialinę įtrauktį ir siūlančias profesinio tobulėjimo galimybes. Bet svarbiausios yra turbūt priemonės, kuriomis artimiausiu metu būtų išsaugotos darbo vietos, kad nebūtų nekontroliuojamo nedarbo didėjimo, galinčio destabilizuoti valstybių narių, o vėliau ir Europos Sąjungos, ekonomiką.Sąjunga taip pat turi veiksmingai reaguoti į didėjančias pragyvenimo išlaidas, nes tai turi tiesioginės įtakos atlyginimams ir pinigų perkamajai galiai. Tuo tarpu valstybės narės turėtų skatinti padorų atlyginimą ir užtikrinti, kad darbo rinkos skatintų socialinės apsaugos jausmą. Šiuo atžvilgiu ypatingas dėmesys turėtų būti skiriamas vaikų turinčių darbuotojų, neįgaliųjų ir vienišų tėvų apsaugai.
The accession of Romania and Bulgaria to the Schengen area (B9-0462/2022, B9-0463/2022)
Pritariau rezoliucijai dėl Bulgarijos, Kroatijos ir Rumunijos prisijungimo prie Šengeno erdvės, nes šios valstybės įvykdė visas būtinas sąlygas, kad joms būtų galima visapusiškai taikyti Šengeno nuostatas. Be to, laisvo asmenų judėjimo erdvės išplėtimas bus naudingas visiems Europos Sąjungos gyventojams. Šengeno erdvė yra unikalus sprendimas ir vienas didžiausių palengvinimų Europos Sąjungoje, leidžiantis žmonėms laisvai judėti be kontrolės Sąjungos viduje. Tai neabejotinai didina valstybių narių tarpusavio pasitikėjimą, o taip pat teigiamai įtakoja Europos piliečių ir visų asmenų, kurie naudojasi judėjimo laisve ES, gyvenimus.Bet reikia paminėti dar kai ką. Vidaus sienų kontrolė turėjo neigiamos įtakos lygybės ir nediskriminavimo principui ES, taip pat prekių eksportui ir importui valstybėse narėse, transporto operacijoms iš kai kurių didžiausių Europos pietinių civilinių ir krovininių uostų, dėl to mažėjo pelnas ir didėjo klientų išlaidos. Laimei, šie nepatogumai jau tapo istorija ir visiems Sąjungos nariams atsiveria naujos galimybės.
30th Anniversary of the Single Market (B9-0004/2023)
. – Palaikau rezoliuciją dėl bendrosios rinkos sukūrimo 30-mečio. Bendros ES institucijų, bet visų pirma valstybių narių, kurios glaudžiai bendradarbiavo su Europos Sąjungos vartotojais, įmonėmis, darbuotojais ir pilietine visuomene, pastangos ir ryžtas paskatino sukurti ES bendrąją rinką, kurioje saugomi socialiniai ir darbo standartai. ES bendroji rinka šiuo metu yra didžiausia vidaus rinka pasaulyje, kurioje yra 56 mln. darbo vietų, sukuriama 25 % ES bendrojo vidaus produkto ir kuriami aukšti vartotojų apsaugos standartai.Bendrosios rinkos politikos tikslas turėtų būti ne tik kliūčių sumažinimas, bet ir ES nukreipimas į tolesnę plėtrą, pagrįstą bendromis vertybėmis, visų pirma aiškiai nurodant, ką reikia padaryti siekiant palengvinti įmonių ir darbuotojų transformaciją, nukreiptą į vartotojų apsaugą.Remdama įmones ir piliečius bei gindama vartotojus tiek trumpuoju, tiek ilgalaikiu laikotarpiu bei skatindama konkurencingumą ir ekonominį vystymąsi visoje ES, bendroji rinka taip pat padeda ES šalių vystymuisi. Tačiau turėkime omenyje, kad „bendrosios rinkos“ politika negali nustatyti sudėtingų įpareigojimų valstybėms narėms, ribojančių nacionalinius teisės aktus. Ji veikiau turi papildyti nacionalinius aktus, t. y. remti nacionalinių rinkų plėtrą, kad jos galėtų kurti panašaus lygio bendrą Europos rinką. Ekonominė, o ne politinė institucijų ir valstybių narių partnerystė ateityje turėtų tapti Europos Sąjungos prioritetu.
Protection of the EU’s financial interests - combating fraud - annual report 2021 (A9-0299/2022 - Sabrina Pignedoli)
Pritariau pranešimui, nes kova su sukčiavimu ES turi tapti svarbia ES institucijų veiklos dalimi, ypač pastaruoju metu iškilusių korupcijos skandalų fone. ES pareigūnai negali švaistyti Europos mokesčių mokėtojų pinigų, įskaitant ir mano atstovaujamų Lietuvos piliečių pinigus. Sąžiningas Sąjungos lėšų valdymas turi būti ES finansų ir ekonominės politikos prioritetas. Taip pat reikėtų atsiminti, kad pagal Sutartyse įtvirtintą subsidiarumo ir solidarumo principą ES institucijos turi tarnauti piliečiams ir padėti valstybėms narėms įgyvendinti savo ekonominę ir socialinę politiką, o ne atvirkščiai. Šiandien susidaro įspūdis, kad ES institucijos ir pareigūnai dažnai pamiršta apie šiuos sutartinius įsipareigojimus ir vykdo politiką, atitrūkusią nuo tarnybos funkcijos piliečiams ir valstybėms narėms. Iš to kyla Europos lygmeniu korupciją keliantis elgesys. Be to, Komisija turėtų laikytis nuoseklaus požiūrio į skaidrumą, neteisėtą lobizmą, interesų konfliktus ir stiprinti vidaus kontrolę, kad galėtų veiksmingai kovoti su korupcija ir apsaugoti ES finansinius interesus. O ES lėšos negali būti naudojamos tik bendriems Sąjungos tikslams siekti, bet visų pirma turi užtikrinti kuo geresnį indėlį į valstybių narių vystymąsi, o krizės metu – didinti ekonominį piliečių saugumą.
Adequate minimum income ensuring active inclusion (B9-0099/2023, B9-0116/2023)
Ponia Pirmininke, palaikau teisėkūros darbą dėl tinkamo dydžio minimalių pajamų Sąjungoje. Šiuo metu visose valstybėse narėse egzistuoja įvairių tipų minimalių pajamų schemos, tačiau jų poveikis teigiamai paramos skurdžiausiems asmenims ir skurdo mažinimo politikai nėra pakankamas. Minimalias pajamas svarbu traktuoti kaip išmoką, užtikrinančią, kad neturintys pakankamai pajamų ir atitinkantys nacionalinius tinkamumo kriterijus, galėtų uždirbti orų atlyginimą ir pragyventi. Toks požiūris turėtų būti laikomas neatskiriama visapusiškos socialinės apsaugos sistemos, pagrįstos konkrečiais teisiniais sprendimais, dalimi. Minimalių pajamų sistemos taip pat turėtų būti apibrėžtos taip, kad jos turėtų išmokų ar paslaugų statusą, kurios galėtų užtikrinti saugumą žmonėms, kurie, nepriklausomai nuo to ar dirba, ar ne, neturi pakankamai finansinių išteklių, kad galėtų užtikrinti orų gyvenimą sau ir savo išlaikytiniams.Skurdas ir socialinė atskirtis yra daugialypė problema, kurią reikia spręsti taikant visapusišką požiūrį, įskaitant priemones, užtikrinančias prieigą prie prekių ir paslaugų, tokių kaip švietimas, mokymas ir įgūdžių ugdymas. Toks požiūris turėtų būti sutelktas į asmenį ir jo gyvenimo situaciją ir turėtų būti veiksmingos kovos su skurdu strategijos dalis. Tai negali būti tik bedvasis įstatymas. Šiandien trūksta tinkamo koordinavimo tarp pajamų rėmimo, aktyvios darbo rinkos politikos ir socialinių paslaugų. Tai reikia pakeisti.Todėl Sąjunga ir valstybės narės turi kovoti su dirbančiųjų skurdu, pageidautina, taikydamos padorų atlyginimą.
Social Climate Fund (A9-0157/2022 - David Casa, Esther de Lange)
Pirmininke, pritariau pranešimui dėl Socialinio klimato fondo įkūrimo, nes jis atsvers finansinius ir socialinius sunkumus, kylančius iš taip vadinamų klimato paketų Europos Sąjungoje, kurie, deja, tiesiogiai įtakoja kuro, energijos ir maisto kainų augimą. Tikėkimės, kad šis fondas bent iš dalies sušvelnins neigiamus Europos žaliojo kurso padarinius, kurie jau dabar labiausiai pasijaučia kalbant apie paprastų žmonių pajamas ir namų ūkių biudžetus. Todėl fondas taip pat turėtų remti vietinę veiklą bei vietos paramos gavėjus, kai kalbama apie klausimus, susijusius su socialinėmis ir darbo teisėmis, įskaitant, be kita ko, darbo užmokestį ir darbo sąlygas, tame tarpe ir tvarių darbo vietų skatinimą.Fondas taip pat turėtų būti sukurtas taip, kad galėtų kovoti su energijos ir mobilumo skurdu visoje Sąjungoje. To siekdamas, naujasis Socialinis klimato fondas turėtų prisidėti prie pažeidžiamiausių namų ūkių apsaugos ir įgalinimo. Valstybėms narėms skirtos lėšos turėtų būti naudojamos investicijoms į pastatų atnaujinimą, kokybiškų ir saugių darbo vietų kūrimą. Komisija, tuo tarpu, turėtų užtikrinti prevencinius žingsnius tam, kad sumažintų nelygybę, susijusią su prieiga prie įperkamos energijos. Ypatingas dėmesys turėtų būti skiriamas pažeidžiamiausioms grupėms ir namų ūkiams, kenčiantiems nuo energijos nepritekliaus, kad jie gautų naudos iš šių finansavimo priemonių įgyvendinimo ir kad niekas nebūtų paliktas nuošalyje.
Schools scheme for fruit, vegetables, milk and dairy products (A9-0096/2023 - Carmen Avram)
Ponia Pirmininke, palaikau Carmen Avram pranešimą, nes sveikos, įvairios ir subalansuotos mitybos ir sveikos gyvensenos, įskaitant reguliarų fizinį aktyvumą, propagavimas tampa vis svarbesnis ir turėtų tapti mūsų visuomenės, ypač vaikų ir jaunimo, prioritetu. Švietimas apie sveiką gyvenseną, skatinantis įvairią, subalansuotą ir sveiką mitybą, yra būtinas sveikos mitybos įpročiams skatinti, todėl turėtų būti tobulinamas visoje Europos Sąjungoje.Visiems be išimties vaikams, nepaisant jų socialinės ir ekonominės padėties, turi būti sudaryta galimybė visuotinai ir nemokamai gauti sveiką maistą. Toks požiūris padės panaikinti, deja, vis dar egzistuojantį netinkamos mitybos ir alkanų vaikų reiškinį visose Europos Sąjungos mokyklose. Tačiau šios programos potencialas šiuo metu yra menkinamas dėl nepakankamo biudžeto. Vien tik valstybės narės šios užduoties neatliks. Todėl reikia nedelsiant supaprastinti ir racionalizuoti administracines procedūras. Mokymo programa turi būti paprasta, kad būtų patraukli mokykloms. Žinoma, Europos Komisija taip pat turi padidinti bendrą biudžetą vaisių, daržovių, pieno ir pieno produktų pristatymo mokyklose programai.Ponia Pirmininke, vaikai yra pasaulio ateitis, todėl labai svarbu investuoti į jų sveikatą ir vystymąsi.
Implementation of the Regulations on the European citizens' initiative (A9-0182/2023 - Loránt Vincze)
Pritariu europarlamentaro Lorant-Vincze pranešimui, nes kiekvienas pilietis turi teisę dalyvauti demokratiniame Europos Sąjungos gyvenime, o sprendimai turi būti priimami kuo atviriau ir kiek įmanoma arčiau piliečio.Europos piliečių iniciatyva (EPI) yra svarbi dalyvavimo priemonė Europos Sąjungos lygmenyje, suteikianti Europos Sąjungos piliečiams galimybę teikti teisės aktų pasiūlymus Europos Komisijai. Deja, kol kas bendras svarbių iniciatyvų skaičius ir šios priemonės įtaka Europos Sąjungos sprendimų priėmimo procesui vis dar yra labai menki. Todėl būtina sustiprinti Europos piliečių iniciatyvos priemonę, tiek reglamentavimo rėmus, tiek institucinę sistemą ir gerinti jos taikymą didinant jos matomumą, prieinamumą ir teisinį veiksmingumą. Taip pat svarbu gerokai padidinti piliečių, ypač jaunimo, dalyvavimą Europos Sąjungos demokratiniame gyvenime.Labai gerai, kad pranešime pabrėžiami Komisijos pasiūlymai pratęsti Europos piliečių iniciatyvų rinkimo, priėmimo laikotarpį. Tai svarbu, nes Europos piliečių iniciatyvos organizavimas yra sudėtingas ir brangus procesas, o piliečiams, veikiantiems pavieniui, labai sunku valdyti iniciatyvą be asociacijų, turinčių gerai išvystytus organizacinius gebėjimus ir finansinius išteklius, paramos. Todėl reguliavimo, administracinės ir finansinės kliūtys, su kuriomis susiduria piliečiai, turėtų būti sumažintos iki minimumo. Todėl būtina finansinė parama iniciatyvoms organizuoti, kad demokratija reikštų realią piliečių įtaką įstatymų leidybai.
Generational renewal in the EU farms of the future (A9-0283/2023 - Isabel Carvalhais)
Dauguma ūkių valdytojų ES yra bent 55 metų amžiaus ir tik apie 12 proc. ūkių valdytojų yra jaunesni nei 40 metų. Tai nėra pati geriausia prognozė šiam ūkio sektoriui. Kartų kaitos problema ypač aktuali tose valstybėse narėse, kuriose jaunųjų ūkininkų dalis yra mažesnė nei vidutinė ir ūkininkų, sulaukusių pensinio amžiaus, dalis didesnė nei vidutinė. Nepamirškime, kad ūkininkavimas išlieka daugiausia šeimos veikla, nes ES beveik devyni iš dešimties nuolat žemės ūkyje dirbančių asmenų buvo vieninteliai žemės savininkai (ūkininkai) arba ūkininkų šeimos nariai. Taip pat turėkime omenyje faktą, kad kartų kaitos stoka gali lemti žemės ūkio paskirties žemės apleidimą. Turime tam užkirsti kelią. Kartų kaita, kuri yra labai svarbi kaimo vietovių plėtrai ir tradiciniams šeimos ūkininkavimo modeliams, reikalauja, kad jauni žmonės iš ūkininkų šeimų liktų profesijoje ir kad nauji žmonės būtų skatinami imtis ūkininkavimo veiklos. Mažas kartų kaitos mastas žemės ūkyje gali įtakoti Europos žemės ūkio konkurencingumo mažėjimą. Kitas svarbus klausimas yra tai, kad visi ES ūkininkai būtų traktuojami vienodai, be jokios diskriminacijos ar skirstymo į naująją ir senąją Sąjungą. Be to, Komisija, bendradarbiaudama su valstybėmis narėmis, turi reguliuoti žemės ūkio paskirties žemės rinką, kad jauniesiems ūkininkams būtų lengviau įsigyti žemės ūkio paskirties žemę.
Limit values for lead and its inorganic compounds and diisocyanates (A9-0263/2023 - Nikolaj Villumsen)
Pritariu pranešimui dėl švino ir jo neorganinių junginių ribinių verčių, nes tai svarbu dabartinių ir būsimų kartų sveikatai. Švinas ir jo neorganiniai junginiai yra pagrindinės toksiškos medžiagos, galinčios turėti įtakos vaisingumui ir vaisiaus vystymuisi, taip pat atitinka klasifikavimo kaip toksiškų reprodukcijai kriterijus.Moksliniai tyrimai rodo, kad švinas yra atsakingas už maždaug pusę visų reprotoksiškų medžiagų poveikį darbe, o lygis, žemiau kurio švino ir jo neorganinių junginių poveikis sveikatai neturėtų neigiamo poveikio vaisingo amžiaus dirbančių moterų palikuonių vystymuisi, negali būti moksliškai nustatytas. Todėl švino ir jo junginių atveju turėtų būti įtraukta formuluotė „beribė reprotoksinė medžiaga“, o darbdaviai turėtų užtikrinti, kad darbuotojų patiriamas profesinis poveikis sumažėtų iki kiek įmanoma techniškai žemesnio lygio.Mūsų piliečių, įskaitant darbuotojus, sveikatos ir saugos apsauga turi tapti pagrindiniu ES ekonomikos, kuri turi tarnauti žmonėms, elementu.
Written questions (17)
True cross-border access to online content in the EU
Supporting European primary care systems
Implementing the EU4Health programme to ensure better health preparedness
Written question on data accessibility and harmonisation concerning COVID‑19 vaccination administration, logistics and planning in the Member States
The distribution of excess COVID-19 vaccines and Europe’s long-term vaccination strategy
Establishment of HERA and the outcomes of the meeting of 31 January 2021
European Citizens’ Initiative as a tool for citizens’ participation in the EU decision-making process
The EU vaccine certificate proposal
Implementation of hepatitis C screening programmes in the EU
Transparency and funding of the Conference on the Future of Europe
Time to address extreme left‑wing violence in Europe
Erasmus4Ukraine
Ukrainian refugees with disabilities
Child oncological refugees from Ukraine
Gazprom cuts off the gas supply to Poland and Bulgaria
Severe sanitary conditions in Bahraini prisons for political prisoners and prisoners of conscience
Delegated act with restrictions on coking coal mines
Individual motions (5)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on European Optimism Day
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the urgent launch of wide-reaching Australia-style communication campaigns targeting diaspora communities, transit countries and countries of origin to deter illegal migration and people smuggling
Motion for a resolution on urgent solidarity with Ukraine
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on reversing the European demographic trend
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION for the recognition of the Pontian Greek Genocide
Amendments (451)
Amendment 1 #
2023/2183(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that the implementationmain objective of the European Development Funds (EDFs) concerns countries that are facing aggravating impacts of climate change andis to reduce poverty and eradicate it in the long term in the African, Caribbean and Pacific (OACPS) region and to achieve sustainable development of overseas countries and territories that are weakened by the consequences of the COVID pandemic, Russia’s war in Ukraine, as well as rising debtunjustified and unprovoked aggression in Ukraine, rising debt, as well as new and forgotten crises and conflicts; insists, therefore, that the remaining projects under the EDFs should focus on advancing the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goalsactivities in the area of economic and social development and security as well as cooperation on migration control and regional integration;
Amendment 6 #
2023/2183(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Highlights the role of local implementing partners and the need to ensure their support and capacity building; notes that with the phasing out of EDF projects, local know-how on dealing with EU funds should be maintained, with a view to using them for projects under the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument (NDICI) - Global Europe instrument; points out that the significant diversity of needs and specific circumstances among the ACP group of countries and overseas countries and territories covered by the EDF calls for an individual and tailored approach;
Amendment 2 #
2023/2129(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Is alarmed about the rising number of crises worldwide and the highest-ever humanitarian funding gap, exacerbated by Russia’s unjustified and unprovoked aggression in Ukraine, the growing political and economic influence of China in Africa and Russian interference on that continent, as well as new factors driving mass migration and leading to asylum-seeking, such as the Taliban takeover in Afghanistan and coups in the Sahel region, which have exacerbated instability across Africa and Asia; is worried that Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument (NDICI) - Global Europe (GE) is stretched to its limits and is not sufficient to address existing needs;
Amendment 14 #
2023/2129(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Underlines the need to speed up progress on achieving the NDICI-GE spending targets for human development, gender and climate objectives; is worried, in particular, about the Commission’ capacity to ensure reach and migration control objectives; considers that aid should be suspended in the event of a degradation in democracy, human rights or the rule of law ing the Instrument’s climate target and calls for concrete actions outlining how the climate target is going to be metird countries, as well as in the event of a lack of cooperation in the fight against illegal migration and in the event of a serious conflict with shared values, such as supporting a war of aggression;
Amendment 66 #
2022/2194(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – subheading 2
Annex I – subheading 2
Amendment 86 #
2022/2194(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Article 1 – point 1
Article 1 – point 1
1. This RegulationDirective sets up a coordination framework that lays down general provisions and procedural arrangements for Member States to address an obstacle that hampers the planning, development, staffing, financing or functioning of a joint project in a cross- border context.
Amendment 90 #
2022/2194(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2
(2) 'joint project' means any item of infrastructure with an impact in a given cross-border region or any service of general economic interest provided in a given cross-border region, regardless of whether this impact appears on both sides of the border or only on one side;
Amendment 91 #
2022/2194(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3
(3) 'obstacles in a cross-border context' means any legal or administrative provision with regard to the planning, development, staffing, financing or functioning of a joint project that obstructs the inherent potential of a border region when interacting across the border; [for the sake of legal consistency of this legislative act and motion for a resolution, the concerned definition should apply consequently and precisely throughout the entirety of the text whenever any form of 'obstacles' are adressed]
Amendment 105 #
2022/2194(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Article 4 – point 2
Article 4 – point 2
2. The Member States shall inform the Commission of the identity of the Cross- border Coordination Point within threnine months of the date of entry into force of this RegulationDirective.
Amendment 107 #
2022/2194(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Article 5 – point 1 – introductory part
Article 5 – point 1 – introductory part
1. Each Cross-border Coordination Point shall carry out the tasks andabide to procedures established in Chapter II, and in particularcarry out at least the following tasks:
Amendment 123 #
2022/2194(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Article 6 – point 3
Article 6 – point 3
3. Cross-border Committees shall be composed of representatives of the national, regional or local authorities designated by the Cross-border Coordination Pointrespective authorities of the Member States concerned. The Cross- border Coordination Points shall make all necessary efforts to allow the participation of regional and local authorities to the Cross-border Committee where the removal of the obstacle falls within their competences or within their territory.
Amendment 127 #
2022/2194(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Article 8 – point 1
Article 8 – point 1
1. The initiator shall identify anyrelevant cross-border obstacles with regard to the planning, development, staffing, financing or functioning of a joint project.
Amendment 133 #
2022/2194(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Article 10 – point 2
Article 10 – point 2
2. Within onesix month of receipt of an initiative document, the Cross-border Coordination Point of the bordering Member State concerned shall send its preliminary reaction to the Cross-border Coordination Point of first contact.
Amendment 138 #
2022/2194(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Article 10 – point 3 – point c
Article 10 – point 3 – point c
(c) inform the initiator within three months about its assessment that there is no obstacle, while setting out in writing the reasons for its decision, the means of review available at national level to challenge its decision, and, where relevant, recommendations on how to proceed.
Amendment 139 #
2022/2194(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Article 11 – point 1 – introductory part
Article 11 – point 1 – introductory part
1. Following the receipt of an initiative document complying with the requirements set out by Article 9, and the notification of its positive preliminary analysis pursuant to Article 10(3), points (a) and (b), the Cross-border Coordination Point of first contact shall, within threesix months of that receipt, take one of the following actions:
Amendment 141 #
2022/2194(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Article 11 – point 1 – point d
Article 11 – point 1 – point d
(d) expresses its commitment to do utmost, withe in itiators competence, to remove the obstacles by triggering the procedures to formulate an ad-hoc solution with the relevant authorities of the bordering Member State concerned by setting up a Cross-border Committee; the Cross-border Coordination Point of first contact shall inform in writing the Cross-border Coordination Point of the bordering Member States, listing the national, regional and local authorities of the Member State of first contact which would take part in the preparation of the ad-hoc solution;
Amendment 148 #
2022/2194(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Article 12 – point 1
Article 12 – point 1
1. Upon notification of the Cross- Border Coordination point of first contact of its request to draft an ad-hoc solution in the context of a Cross-border Committee pursuant to Article 11(1), point (c), the Cross-border Coordination Point of the bordering Member State concerned shall decide whether to initiate the procedures referred to in Article 13 within onefour months of that notification, and communicate its decision in writing to the Cross-border Coordination Point of first contact. If the Cross-border Coordination Point of the bordering Member State concerned decides to follow the procedures referred to in Article 13, it shall list the national, regional and local authorities which shall take part in the preparation of the ad-hoc solution.
Amendment 151 #
2022/2194(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Article 13 – point 1 – point c
Article 13 – point 1 – point c
(c) the proposed ad-hoc solution, including all necessary actions to be taken by the competent authorities of they or authorities of the Member States or Member States concerned;
Amendment 152 #
2022/2194(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Article 13 – point 1 – point g
Article 13 – point 1 – point g
Amendment 155 #
Amendment 156 #
2022/2194(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Article 17 – paragraph 2
Article 17 – paragraph 2
Amendment 17 #
2022/2051(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Calls for the introduction of a provision for the Union’s ratification of the Council of Europe's Charter for Regional or Minority Languages and the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities1a; _________________ 1a COFOE Conclusions 48.
Amendment 21 #
2022/2051(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. Calls for the introduction of a legal basis to adopt legislation on the rights of people belonging to minorities2a; _________________ 2a COFOE Conclusions 48.
Amendment 279 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Title 1
Title 1
Proposal for a REGULATIONDIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the sustainable use of plant protection products and amending Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 The word "Regulation" should be replaced throughout the whole text with the word "directive".
Amendment 289 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1 a (new)
Recital 1 a (new)
(1a) Article 39 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union sets out the clear objective that supplies should be secured and that food should be available to consumers at reasonable prices.
Amendment 291 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) Directive 2009/128/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council37 established a framework to achieve a sustainable use of pesticidelant protection products by reducing the risks and impacts of the use of pesticidelant protection products on human health and the environment. The evaluation38 of that Directive found that it has not achieved its overall objectives and that the Member States did not implement it in a satisfactory manner. This conclusion was confirmed in reports from the Commission to the European Parliament and Council in 201739 and 202040 . (This amendment applies throughout the text. Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout.) __________________ 37 Directive 2009/128/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for Community action to achieve the sustainable use of pesticides (OJ L 309, 24.11.2009, p. 71). 38 [Reference to be inserted.] 39 Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on Member State National Action Plans and on progress in the implementation of Directive 2009/128/EC on the sustainable use of pesticides COM(2017)587 final. 40 Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the experience gained by Member States on the implementation of national targets established in their National Action Plans and on progress in the implementation of Directive 2009/128/EC on the sustainable use of pesticides COM(2020) 204 final.
Amendment 292 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) Directive 2009/128/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council37 established a framework to achieve a sustainable use of pesticides by reducing the risks and impacts of the use of pesticides on human health and the environment. The evaluation38 of that Directive found that it has not achieved its overall objectives and that the Member States did not implement it in a satisfactory manner. This conclusion was confirmed in reports from the Commission to the European Parliament and Council in 201739 and 202040 . __________________ 37 Directive 2009/128/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for Community action to achieve the sustainable use of pesticides (OJ L 309, 24.11.2009, p. 71). 38 [Reference to be inserted.] 39 Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on Member State National Action Plans and on progress in the implementation of Directive 2009/128/EC on the sustainable use of pesticides COM(2017)587 final. 40 Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the experience gained by Member States on the implementation of national targets established in their National Action Plans and on progress in the implementation of Directive 2009/128/EC on the sustainable use of pesticides COM(2020) 204 final.
Amendment 301 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) The European Parliament resolution of 12 February 2019 on the implementation of Directive 2009/128/EC on the sustainable use of pesticides41 noted that the Union must act without delay to transition to a more sustainable use of pesticides and called on the Commission to propose an ambitious Union-wide binding target for the reduction of pesticide use. The European Parliament re-affirmed its call for binding reduction targets in its resolution of 20 October 2021 on a Farm to Fork Strategy for a fair, healthy and environmentally- friendly food system42 . __________________ 41 P8_TA(2019)0082, 12 February 2019. 42 P9_TA(2021)0425, 20 October 2021.
Amendment 302 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3 a (new)
Recital 3 a (new)
(3a) The European Parliament resolution of 21 March 2022 on the need for an urgent EU action plan to ensure food security inside and outside the Union in light of Russian invasion in Ukraine noted that the Union must act to implement measures and use available tools to strengthen their food supply chains.
Amendment 305 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
Amendment 314 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) The rules concerning biocidal products are laid down in Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council46 , and an evaluation of that Regulation is planned. It is therefore not appropriate to introduce new rules on the use of biocidal products in this Regulationn order to achieve the goals, it is necessary that the regulation mentioned should be revised, especially with regard to the approval period and test mechanism. __________________ 46 Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products (OJ L 167, 27.6.2012, p. 1).
Amendment 336 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
Amendment 346 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) In the final report of the Conference on the Future of Europe, published on 9 May 2022, when it comes to the proposals on agriculture, food production, biodiversity and ecosystems, pollution, citizens ask the Union in particular to significantly reduce the use of chemical pesticides and fertilizers, in line with the existing targets, while still ensuring food security, and support for research to develop more sustainable and natural- based alternatives. Citizens ask for more research and innovations, including in technological solutions for sustainable production, plant resistance, and precision farming, and more communication, advisory systems, and training for and from farmers as well as asking the Union to protect insects, in particular indigenous and pollinating insects.55 __________________ 55 Conference on the Future of Europe – Report on the Final Outcome, May 2022, Proposals 1 and 2, pp. 43-44.
Amendment 360 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) Biological control agents are aplant protection products are a possible sustainable control alternative to the use of chemical products for the control of harmful organismlant protection products. As noted in Council Decision (EU) 2021/110257 , biological control agenplant protection products have a growing importance in sustainable agriculture and forestry and have an instrumental role to play in the success of integrated pest management and organic farming. Access to biological controlplant protection products facilitates moving away from chemical plant protection products. It is appropriate to encourage farmers to switch to low input agricultural methods including organic farming. It is therefore appropriate to define the concept of biological control as a basis for Member States to set indicative targets to increase the percentage of crops on which biological control agents are used. __________________ 57 Council Decision (EU) 2021/1102 of 28 June 2021 requesting the Commission to submit a study on the Union’s situation and options regarding the introduction, evaluation, production, marketing and use of invertebrate biological control agents within the territory of the Union and a proposal, if appropriate in view of the outcomes of the study (OJ L 238, 6.7.2021, p. 81).
Amendment 366 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
Amendment 383 #
Amendment 405 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) Member States should draft and publish national action plans. In order for the Member State national action plans to be effective, they should contain quantitative objectives, references to binding national 2030 reduction targets as , outlining possible ways to reduce the uset out in national law, together with related indicative targets set out in the national action plans, measures, timetables and indicators to reduce risks and impacts of pesticide use on human health and the environment. This will allow for a structured approach to the setting of quantitative objectives and targets, with a clear link to the national 2030 reduction targets. In order to monitor comf plant protection products in a sustainable manner. The national action pliance with the provisions of this Regulation, Member States should also be required to report annually on targets and precise quantitative data relating to compliance with provisions on use, training, application equipment and integrated pest managements shall be submitted to the European Commission.
Amendment 425 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) In order to achieve the Union-wide reduction targets (‘Union 20305 reduction targets’) as well as national 2030 reduction targets, it is necessary to increase the availability and use of biological control and other non-chemical alternatives. Availability of these alternativelow hazardous plant protection products as wiell incentivise the adoption of low pesticide-input pest management practices such as organic farmingas in precision farming and new types of application.
Amendment 439 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) The implementation of policies and measures in the areas of sustainable use of plant protection products has an impact on the environment, public health and working conditions. Member States should therefore ensure that the public and social partners are given sufficient opportunities to participate in and to be consulted on the preparation of Member State national action plans in accordance, where applicable, with Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council58 shall be informed on the national action plans. __________________ 58 Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment (OJ L 197, 21.7.2001, p. 30).
Amendment 444 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) In order to ensure consistency and complementarity with related legislation, Member State national action plans should take into account Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council59 , Council Directive 92/43/EEC60 , Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council61 , Council Directive 91/676/EEC62 , Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council63 , Directive (EU) 2016/2284 of the European Parliament and of the Council64 and Regulation xxx/xxx on nature restoration [reference to adopted act to be inserted] and should be consistent with the Common Agricultural Policy (“CAP”) Strategic Plans drawn-up in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 of the European Parliament and of the Council65 . __________________ 59 Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds (OJ L 20, 26.1.2010, p. 7). 60 Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p. 7). 61 Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy (OJ L 327, 22.12.2000, p. 1). 62 Council Directive 91/676/EEC of 12 December 1991 concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources (OJ L 375, 31.12.1991, p. 1). 63 Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe (OJ L 152, 11.6.2008, p. 1). 64 Directive (EU) 2016/2284 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2016 on the reduction of national emissions of certain atmospheric pollutants, amending Directive 2003/35/EC and repealing Directive 2001/81/EC (OJ L 344, 17.12.2016, p. 1). 65 Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 2 December 2021establishing rules on support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States under the common agricultural policy (CAP Strategic Plans) and financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and repealing Regulations (EU) No 1305/2013 and (EU) No 1307/2013 (OJ L 435, 6.12.2021, p. 1).
Amendment 453 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) Economic instruments, including those unaccess to new financial instruments outsider the CAP that provide support to farmers, can play a crucial role in the achievement of objectives relating to the sustainable use of plant protection products and, in particular, reducing the use of chemical plant protection products. Member States have to show in their national CAP Strategic Plans that their implementation of the CAP contributes to and supports other relevant Union legislation and their objectives, including objectives under this Regulation.
Amendment 466 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) An approach to pest controllant protection that follows integrated pest management in ensuring careful consideration of all available means that discourage the development of populations of harmful organisms, while keeping the use of chemical plant protection products to levels that are economically and ecologically justified and minimising risks to human health and the environment is necessary for the protection of human health and the environment. ‘Integrated pest management’ emphasises the growth of a healthy crop with the least possible disruption to agro-ecosystems, encourages natural pest control mechanisms and uses chemical control only when all other control means are exhausted. To ensure that integrated pest management is implemented consistently on the ground, it is necessary to lay down clear rules in this Regulation. In order to comply with the obligation to follow integrated pest management, a professional user should consider and implement all methods and practices that avoid the use of plant protection products. Chemical plant protection products should only be used when all other control means have been exhausted. In order to ensure and monitor compliance with this requirement, it is important that professional users keep a record of the reasons why they apply plant protection products or the reasons for any other action taken in line with integrated pest management and of advice received in support of their implementation of integrated pest management from independent advisors or there is a risk of a significant loss of yield or quality. These records are also required for aerial applications.
Amendment 481 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) To avoid unnecessary duplication, the Commission should establishmay provide a standard template for Member States to integrate records kept by professional users of actions taken in line with integrated pest management with those kept under Article 67 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009.
Amendment 484 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
Recital 22
(22) In order to facilitate compliance with integrated pest management, it is necessary to lay down crop-specific rulguidelines that a professional user mustay follow in relation to the specific crop and region in which the professional user operates. Such rulguidelines should convert the requirements of integrated pest management into verifiable criteria that apply to the specific crop. To ensure that the crop-specific rules are in accordance with the requirements of integrated pest management, detailed rules should be laid down as to what they should contain and the Commission should verify their development, implementation and enforcement on the grounddetermine the requirements of integrated pest management.
Amendment 491 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
Recital 23
(23) In order to verify compliance by professional users with integrated pest management, an electronic integrated pest management and plant protection product use register should be maintained with the aim of verifying compliance with the rules on integrated pest management set out in this Regulation and supporting the development of Union policy. Access to the register should also be granted to national statistical authorities for the development, production and dissemination of official statistics in accordance with Chapter V of Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council66 . This register should record any preventative measure or intervention and the reasons for that preventative measure or intervention. This will provide the competent authorities with the information necessary to verify whether a professional user has carried out a decision-making process, in accordance with integrated pest management, before determining the specific preventative measure or intervention. The register should also contain details in relation to advice required annually in support of integrated pest management in order to verify that such strategic longer term planning in relation to integrated pest management is taking place. __________________ 66 Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2009 on European statistics and repealing Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1101/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the transmission of data subject to statistical confidentiality to the Statistical Office of the European Communities, Council Regulation (EC) No 322/97 on Community Statistics, and Council Decision 89/382/EEC, Euratom establishing a Committee on the Statistical Programmes of the European Communities (OJ L 87, 31.3.2009, p. 164).
Amendment 500 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
Recital 24
(24) In order to ensure that plant protection products and related application equipment are used in a manner that protects human health, the health of a professional user and the environment, it is necessary to provide for general requirements on professional users in relation to the training required to use certain plant protection products or application equipment, the use of more hazardous plant protection products and the need to comply with inspection requirements for application equipment in professional use.
Amendment 521 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
Recital 26
(26) The aquatic environment and drinking water supplies are especially sensitive to plant protection products. In order to protect the aquatic environment, the use of plant protection products in and around surface waters areas should therefore be prohibited. Member States should have in place appropriate measures to avoid deterioration of surface and groundwater as well as coastal and marine waters and allow achievement of good surface and groundwater status, to protect the aquatic environment and drinking water supplies from the impact of plant protection products. In addition, ibe restricted as far as possible and only permitted under clearly defined exceptions. It is important that professional users, during compulsory training, are trained in how to minimise or eliminate applications of certain plant protection products classified as “harmful to aquatic life with long lasting effects”, “very toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects” or “toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects”. It is also important that professional users arshall be trained during compulsory training on the importance of giving preference to low risk plant protection products or non-chemical alternatives, use of drift reducing technology and risk mitigation measures.
Amendment 529 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
Recital 27
(27) Precision farming refers to agricultural management systems carefully tailoring crop managementsuch as cultivation, crop protection or fertilization to fit localised conditions such as those found within land parcels. The application of existing technology, including the use of Union space data and services (Galileo and Copernicus), has the potential to significantly reduce pesticide usage. It is therefore necessary to provide for a legislative framework that incentivises the development of precision farming. Application of plant protection products from an aircraft, including application by planes, and helicopters and drones, is usually less precise than other means of application and may therefore potentially cause adverse impacts on human health and the environment. Aerial manned application should therefore be prohibited, with limited derogations on a case-by-case basis where it has a less negative impact on human health and the environment than any alternative application method or there is no viable alternative application method. It is also necessary to record the numbers of aerial applications carried out on the basis of permits granted for aerial application in order to have clear data on how many aerial applications for which permits were granted actually took place.
Amendment 536 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
Recital 28
(28) It is however likely that certain unmanned aircraft (including drones) will allow for the targeted aerial application of plant protection products. Such unmanned aircraft are likely to help reduce the use of plant protection products due to targeted application and consequently help reduce the risks to human health and the environment compared to use of land- based application equipment. It is therefore appropriate to set criteria in this Regulation for an exemption of certain unmanned aircraft from the prohibition of aerial application. It is also appropriate to defer the application of this exemption for 3 years given the current state of scientific uncertainty.
Amendment 544 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
Recital 30
(30) Given the importance of advice on the use of plant protection products as a means to support their use in a manner that protects human health and the environment in accordance with integrated pest management, it is important that advisors are adequately and continuously trained.
Amendment 548 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
Recital 31
(31) Sale of a plant protection product is an important element in the distribution chain because it allows distributors to provide the necessary information to support its proper use. Specific advice on safety instructions for human health and the environment should be available to the purchaser or end user at the time of sale in order to allow questions to be answered that will facilitate the correct use of the relevant plant protection product. For non- professional users, general information should be available under applicable law at point of sale on safe use, handling and storage of plant protection products and on disposal of the packaging of such products, since those users do not generally have the same practical knowledge as professional users.
Amendment 551 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
Recital 32
(32) It is essential that Member States establish and maintain systems of both initial and follow-up training for distributors,systems for advisors and professional users of plant protection products and certification systems to record such training, in order to ensure that those operators are fully aware of the potential risks to human health and the environment and of the appropriate measures to reduce those risks as much as possible. The training for advisors should be more extensive than that of distributors and professional users since they need to be able to support the proper implementation of integrated pest management and crop- specific rulguidelines. The use or purchase of a plant protection product authorised for professional use must be limited to persons in possession of a training certificate. In addition, in order to ensure safe use of plant protection products for human health and the environment, distributors should be required to provide both professional and non- professional purchasers of plant protection products with product specific information at point of sale.
Amendment 556 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
Recital 33
(33) In order to ensure a planned approach to harmful organism control techniquesplant protection control across a number of growing seasons with a view to minimising the use of chemical plant protection products as much as possible and to ensure a proper implementation of integrated pest management, professional users should be required to regularly consult trained, independent advisors on pest management, so that plant protection products are only used as a last resort.
Amendment 563 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34
Recital 34
(34) Considering the possible risks to human health and the environment from the use of plant protection products, the public should have access to better information on the overall impacts of the use of such products through awareness- raising programmes, information passed on through distributors and other appropriate measures.
Amendment 565 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35
Recital 35
Amendment 572 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36
Recital 36
(36) In order to minimise the adverse impacts of plant protection products on human health and the environment, it is necessary to provide for systems for regular technical inspection of application equipment in professional use. Given the potentially reduced impact of application equipment in professional use which represents a very low scale of use, it is also appropriate to allow Member States to lay down less stringent inspection requirements and provide for different inspection intervals in relation to such equipment. In addition, due to the relatively low cost of purchasing new handheld application equipment and knapsack sprayers compared to the costs of inspection, it is appropriate to provide for the possibility of national derogations from the mandatory inspection of such equipment, subject to the carrying out of a risk assessment covering the risks to human health and the environment posed by such equipment. That assessment should include an estimation of the scale of use of the equipment. To ensure compliance with the inspection requirements, it is necessary to require that each Member State establish a register of application equipment in professional use and keep that register up to date. As some of the application equipment does not have unique IDs, it is necessary to make provision for the supply of a unique ID to such application equipment to ensure that all equipment is physically identified. The member states are required to ensure through regular checks that the application devices are subject to ongoing testing.
Amendment 578 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37
Recital 37
(37) In order to monitor progress achieved in the reduction of risks and adverse impacts to human health and the environment from the use of plant protection products it is necessary to continue using the system of harmonised risk indicators established under Directive (EU) 2009/128/EC and ensure that an ongoing evaluation of the system is carried out.
Amendment 579 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
Recital 38
Amendment 595 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
Recital 39
Amendment 609 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
Recital 40
Amendment 618 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
Recital 41
(41) The EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 recognises the need for urgent action to protect biodiversity. There is evidence of a widespread reduction of species, in particular insects and pollinators, in the Union. Biodiversity loss is, amongst other factors, driven by the use of plant protection products, while Member States actions under current Union policy instruments have not yet been able to stop this trend of biodiversity loss and globally. It is therefore essential to ensure that plant protection products are used in such a way as to mitigate the risk of harmful effects of such products on wildlife, through a number of measures including training, inspection of application equipment in professional use and protection of the aquatic environment and sensitive areas.
Amendment 625 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43
Recital 43
(43) In order to enforce the obligations set out in this Regulation, Member States should lay down rules on penalties applicable to infringements of this Regulation and ensure that those rules are enforced. The penalties should be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. It is also important to provide for Member States to recover costs related to carrying out obligations under this Regulation by means of fees or charges in order to ensure that adequate financial resources are available to competent authorities.
Amendment 633 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 44
Recital 44
Amendment 638 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 46
Recital 46
Amendment 641 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 47
Recital 47
(47) In order to assess whether this Regulation reaches its objectives effectively and efficiently, is coherent and still relevant and provides added value at Union level the Commission should carry out an evaluation in 2027, with a special focus on the required points of the Council Decision (EU) 2022/2572 of 19 December 2022 by which the Commission has been requested to submit a study complementing the impact assessment of the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the sustainable use of plant protection products, and amending Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘SUR proposal’) of this Regulation.
Amendment 644 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 48
Recital 48
Amendment 656 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 49
Recital 49
(49) The implementation of this Regulation by Member States will result in new and enhanced obligations for farmers and other pesticides users. Some of them constitute statutory management requirements and standards of good agricultural and environmental conditions of land as listed in Annex III to Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 of the European Parliament and of the Council78 , which, in accordance with that Regulation, farmers must comply with to receive CAP payments, whereas other requirements, which go beyond the baseline of mandatory requirements, may be rewarded with additional payments under voluntary regimes like eco-schemes pursuant to Article 31 of Regulation (EU) 2021/2115. Article 31(5), points (a) and (b), and Article 70(3), points (a) and (b), of Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 provide that the CAP funding is only available for practices implemented under an eco- scheme or agri-environmental-climate commitment which go beyond the relevant statutory management requirements and the standards of good agricultural and environmental conditions of land established under that Regulation and the relevant minimum requirements for the use of fertiliser and plant protection products, animal welfare, as well as other relevant mandatory requirements established by national and Union law. Since farmers and other users need to be financially supported in their transition toward a more sustainable use of pesticides, Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 needs to be amended to allow the financing of requirements imposed in accordance with this Regulation during a transitional periodit is necessary to provide access to new financial resources and also ensure that no CAP funding should be used in this context. This exceptional option for Member States to provide additional funding for measures taken in implementing this Regulation should apply to any obligation for farmers and other users resulting from the application of this Regulation, including compulsory farming practices imposed by the crop-specific rules for integrated pest management. Further, pursuant to Article 73(5) of Regulation (EU) 2021/2115, investments by farmers to comply with new requirements imposed by Union law may be supported for a maximum of 24 months from the date on which they become mandatory for the holding. Similarly, a longer transition period should be set out for investments complying with requirements imposed on farmers in accordance with this Regulation. Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 should therefore be amended accordingly. __________________ 78 Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 2 December 2021 establishing rules on support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States under the common agricultural policy (CAP Strategic Plans) and financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and repealing Regulations (EU) No 1305/2013 and (EU) No 1307/2013, OJ L 435, 6.12.2021, p. 1.
Amendment 662 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 50
Recital 50
(50) The application of this Regulation should be deferred in order to allow competent authorities and operators to prepare for the requirements introduced by it, and shall enter into force the earliest after 18 months.
Amendment 2147 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
Article 18 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. By way of derogation from paragraph 12a, a competent authority designated by a Member State may permit a professional user to use a plant protection product in a sensitive area for a limited period with a precisely defined start and end date that is the shortest possible but does not exceed 60 days, provided that all of the following conditions are met:
Amendment 2159 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 4
Article 18 – paragraph 4
Amendment 2166 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 5
Article 18 – paragraph 5
Amendment 2176 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 6
Article 18 – paragraph 6
Amendment 2181 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 7
Article 18 – paragraph 7
Amendment 2187 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 8
Article 18 – paragraph 8
Amendment 2195 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 8 a (new)
Article 18 – paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. The measures referred to in Article 18 remain Union and national law as well as the restrictions of the competent authorities in the field of control and containment of quarantine pests, pests referred to in Articles 29 and 30 of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031, vectors of the above pests and invasive species unaffected.
Amendment 2204 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1
Article 19 – paragraph 1
1. The use of all plant protection products is prohibited on all surface waters and within 3 metres of such waters. This 3 metre buffer zone shall not be reduced by using alternative risk-mitigation techniques; Along water bodies which, according to the national water management plan, have a "moderate", "unsatisfactory" or "poor" ecological status as a result of substance pollution in accordance with the EU Water Framework Directive (Directive 2000/60/EC), the use of all plant protection products is prohibited on a width of at least 10 m to standing water bodies and at least 5 m to flowing water bodies.
Amendment 2236 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2 – point b – introductory part
Article 20 – paragraph 2 – point b – introductory part
(b) the aerial application has a less negative impact on human health and the environment than any alternative application method either because the aerial application equipment can be deployed on the relevant terrain in a faster timescale than land-based equipment and avoids a situation where the number of plant pestathogens increases due to the longer time period required for land-based deployment or because it minimizes soil erosiondamages to the soil structure when adverse weather conditions make the land unsuitable for land vehicles, and all of the following conditions are met:
Amendment 2240 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii
Article 20 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii
(ii) the aircraft is equipped with accessories that constitute the best available technology to accurately applyies the plant protection products and to reduces spray drift;
Amendment 2242 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2 – point b – point iii
Article 20 – paragraph 2 – point b – point iii
Amendment 2251 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 4 – point c
Article 20 – paragraph 4 – point c
Amendment 2253 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 4 – point d
Article 20 – paragraph 4 – point d
(d) the name of the plant protection product or products or the active ingredient;
Amendment 2255 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 4 – point e
Article 20 – paragraph 4 – point e
Amendment 2256 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 5
Article 20 – paragraph 5
Amendment 2268 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1
Article 21 – paragraph 1
1. Where certain categories of unmanned aircraft fulfil the criteria set out in paragraph 2, a Member State may exempt aerial application by such unmanned aircraftircrafts pursuant to Article 2 shall be exempted from the prohibition laid down in Article 20(1) prior to any aerial application of plant protection products.
Amendment 2271 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. An aerial application by an unmanned aircraft may be exempted by the Member State from the prohibition laid down in Article 20(1) where factors related to the use of the unmanned aircraft demonstrate that the risks from its use are lower than the risks arising from other aerial equipment and land-based application equipment. These factors shall include criteria relating toMember states may create a register listing makes of unmanned aerial vehicles available for the application of plant protection products up to 6 months after the entry into force of this regulation. Member States can use the following criteria for the register:
Amendment 2277 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the weather conditions, including wind speed in which the unmanned aerial vehicle can be operated;
Amendment 2279 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – point d
Amendment 2282 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – point e
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) potential use of unmanned aircraft in conjunction with real time kinematic precision farming in certain cases;
Amendment 2283 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – point f
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – point f
Amendment 2286 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – point g
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – point g
Amendment 2287 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 21 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Member States have the possibility to set criteria for the use of unmanned aerial vehicles, for example: (1) to set the level of training required for pilots operating an unmanned aircraft;
Amendment 2292 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 3
Article 21 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 40 supplementing this Regulationcan supplement this Regulation and inform the Member States to specify precise criteria in relation to the factors set out in paragraph 2 once technical progress and scientific developments allow for the development of such precise criteria.
Amendment 2295 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1
Article 22 – paragraph 1
1. By … [OP: please insert the date of application of this Regulation], Member States shall have in place effective measures and establish the necessary structures to facilitate in a manner that does not endanger human health or the environment, the safe disposal of any unused plant protection products, any dilute solupreparations containing plant protection products and any packaging of plant protection.
Amendment 2300 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 3
Article 22 – paragraph 3
Amendment 2303 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Article 22 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Manufacturers, distributors and professional users shall ensure that plant protection products are stored in specific storage facilities for plant protection products that are constructed in such a way as to prevent unwanted releases and are marked as storage facilities for plant protection products.
Amendment 2305 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Article 22 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Manufacturers, distributors and professional users shall ensure that location, size, ventilation and construction materials of the storage facility are suitable to prevent unwanted releases and to protect human health and the environment.
Amendment 2312 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1
Article 23 – paragraph 1
Advice on the use of a plant protection product to a professional user may only be given by an advisor for whom a training certificate has been issued for following courses for advisors in accordance with Article 25 or who has a proof of entry in a central electronic register for following such courses in accordance with Article 25(5).
Amendment 2325 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1
Article 24 – paragraph 1
1. A distributor shall only sell a plant protection product authorised for professional use to a purchaser or his or her representative when that distributor has checked, at the time of purchase, that the purchaser or representative is a professional user and holds a training certificate for following courses for professional users issued in accordance with Article 25 or has a proof of entry in a central electronic register for following such courses in accordance with Article 25(5).
Amendment 2333 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 2
Article 24 – paragraph 2
2. Where a purchaser is a legal person, a distributor may sell a plant protection product authorised for professional use to a representative of the purchaser of the plant protection product when that distributor has checked, at the time of purchase, that the representative is the holder of a training certificate for following courses for professional users issued in accordance with Article 25 or has a proof of entry in a centraln electronic register for following such courses in accordance with Article 25(5).
Amendment 2336 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 3
Article 24 – paragraph 3
3. A distributor shall direct a purchaser of a plant protection product to read its label prior to use and to use the product in accordance with the instructions on the label and shall inform the purchaser of the website referred to in Article 27.
Amendment 2346 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 5
Article 24 – paragraph 5
5. Each distributor shall ensure that it has sufficient staff that hold a training certificate for following courses for distributors issued in accordance with Article 25 or has a proof of entry in a central electronic register for following such courses in accordance with Article 25(5) available at the time of sale to provide adequate responses to purchasers of plant protection products at the moment of sale on their use, related health and environmental risks and the appropriate safety instructions to manage those risks if questioned.
Amendment 2349 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 6
Article 24 – paragraph 6
Amendment 2354 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 a (new)
Article 24 a (new)
Amendment 2365 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – point b
Amendment 2369 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) extensive tTraining for advisors on the subjects listed in Annex III with particular emphasis on the application of integrated pest management.
Amendment 2376 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 2
Article 25 – paragraph 2
2. Each Member State shall designate a competent authority or authorities responsible for the implementation of the system for the training and certification of all training referred to in paragraph 1 and for issuing and renewing training certificates, updating the central electronic register, providing proof of entry in the central electronic registerproviding proof and overseeing that the tasks referred to in paragraph 1 are carried out by the body that provided the training.
Amendment 2382 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
Article 25 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. A training certificate or an entry in a central electronic register shall contain the following information:
Amendment 2385 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 4 – point b
Article 25 – paragraph 4 – point b
Amendment 2395 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 4 – point g
Article 25 – paragraph 4 – point g
(g) the validity period of the training certificate or entry in the central electronica register.
Amendment 2401 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 5
Article 25 – paragraph 5
5. A competent authority designated in accordance with paragraph 2 shall provide electronic proof of entry in a central electronic register to a professional user, distributor or advisor at the time the entry is made. Such electronic proof shall include a record of the period of validity of the entry in the central electronic register.
Amendment 2404 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 6
Article 25 – paragraph 6
6. A training certificate or an entry in a centraln electronic register shall be valid for 106 years in the case of an independent distributor or professional user and for 5 years in the case of an advisor. Trainings may at last partially also be delivered in a virtual format, where appropriate and feasible.
Amendment 2410 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 7
Article 25 – paragraph 7
7. Subject to paragraph 6, a training certificate or an entry in a central electronic register shall only be made or renewed if the holder of the certificate or the person whose name has been entered in the central electronic register demonstrates satisfactory completion of an initial and follow up training or extensive training referred to in paragraph 1, point (a) or (c).
Amendment 2414 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 9
Article 25 – paragraph 9
9. A competent authority designated in accordance with paragraph 2 or an appointed body referred to in paragraph 1 shall withdraw a training certificate if it was incorrectly issued or renewed or shall correct an entry in the central electronica register if it was incorrectly introduced.
Amendment 2417 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 10
Article 25 – paragraph 10
Amendment 2425 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1
Article 26 – paragraph 1
1. EWithin 6 months after entering into force, each Member State shall designate a competent authority to establish, oversee and monitor the operation of a system of independent advisors for professional users. That system may make use of the impartial farm advisors referred to in Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 2021/2115, who must be regularly trained and can be funded under Article 78 of the same regulation.
Amendment 2429 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2
Article 26 – paragraph 2
2. The competent authority referred to in paragraph 1 shall ensure that any advisor registerindependent advisor must be able to demonstrate, if requested inby the system referred to in that paragraph (‘competent authority in accordance with paragraph 1, that the independent advisor’) is free from any conflict of interest and, in particular, is not in a situation which, directly or indirectly, could affect their ability to carry out their professional duties in an impartial manner.
Amendment 2438 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 3
Article 26 – paragraph 3
3. Each professional user shall consult an independent advisor at least once aevery 6 years for the purposes of receiving the strategic advice referred to in paragraph 4.
Amendment 2448 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 4 – point c
Article 26 – paragraph 4 – point c
(c) precision farming techniques, including use of space data and services;
Amendment 2451 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 4 – point e
Article 26 – paragraph 4 – point e
(e) where chemical plant protection products are necessary, mMeasures to effectively minimise risks to human health and the environment, in particular to biodiversity, including pollinators, from such use, including risk mitigation measures and techniques.
Amendment 2458 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1
Article 27 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall designate a competent authority to provide information to the public, in particular through awareness-raising programmes, on the occurrence of harmful organisms and the associated risks for food quality and in relation to the risks associated with the use of plant protection products.
Amendment 2463 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2
Article 27 – paragraph 2
2. The competent authority referred to in paragraph 1 shall establish a website or websites dedicated to providing information on the appearance of harmful organisms and on risks associated with the use of plant protection products. That information may be provided directly or by providing links to relevant websites of other national or international bodies.
Amendment 2468 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 3 – point a
Article 27 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) the potentialrisk assessments that plant protection products must undergo before authorization and in the event of an extension or re-authorisation, and the scientific arguments for the safe use of plant protection products and the risks to human health and the environment throug, with acute or chronic effects relatingwhich may be due to the use of plant protection products;
Amendment 2475 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 3 – point a a (new)
Article 27 – paragraph 3 – point a a (new)
(aa) The occurrence and spread of the most important pests and their impact on plants and crops.
Amendment 2489 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 3 – point e
Article 27 – paragraph 3 – point e
Amendment 2494 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 3 – point g
Article 27 – paragraph 3 – point g
Amendment 2497 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – title
Article 28 – title
Information on acute and chronic poisoning and occupational diseases
Amendment 2500 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Each Member State shall designate a competent authority to maintain or put in place systems for gathering and keepingThe European Commission is developing, maintaining and setting up a system within the framework of the European Occupational Diseases Statistics (EODS) to collect the following information on acute and chronic cases of poisoning incidents arising fromand occupational diseases as a result of exposure of persons to plant protection products: within 2 years of the entry into force of this regulation includes the following points:
Amendment 2512 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(ea) Medical certificate on the case of poisoning
Amendment 2513 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 28 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. By 31 AugustDecember every year, each Member State shall submit to the Commission shall publish a report containing the following information:
Amendment 2516 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 28 – paragraph 2 – point b
Amendment 2518 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 3
Article 28 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission shall adopt implementing acts to establish the format for the submission of the information and data referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 41(2)is obligated to guarantee that sensitive data is collected with due regard to data protection and only entered into the system with explicit consent from the data subject.
Amendment 2519 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 28 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. The Member States may refer to the system for recording acute and chronic poisoning and occupational diseases on a publicly accessible website.
Amendment 2524 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – title
Article 29 – title
Amendment 2531 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1
Article 29 – paragraph 1
1. By … [OP please insert the date = first day of the month following 9 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation], an owner of application equipment in professional use shall enter the fact that he or she is the owner of the application equipment in the electronic register of application equipment in professional use referred to in Article 33, using the form set out in Annex V, unless the Member State in which the owner uses the equipment has exempted that equipment from inspection in accordance with Article 32(3).
Amendment 2533 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 2
Article 29 – paragraph 2
2. If application equipment in professional use is sold, the seller and the buyer shall enter the fact of the sale, within 360 days after the sale, in the electronic register of application equipment in professional use referred to in Article 33, using the form set out in Annex V, unless the application equipment in professional use has been exempted from inspection in the relevant Member State(s) in accordance with Article 32(3). A similar obligation to enter a transfer of ownership in the electronic register applies in the case of any other changes of ownership of application equipment in professional use that has not been exempted from inspection in the relevant Member State(s) in accordance with Article 32(3). An exception to the recording of application devices in the register within 60 days applies in the context of a family farm takeover and must be made no later than the next due inspection for plant protection devices.
Amendment 2538 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 3
Article 29 – paragraph 3
Amendment 2540 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 4
Article 29 – paragraph 4
Amendment 2542 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 5
Article 29 – paragraph 5
5. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegatedimplementing acts in accordance with Article 40 amending Annex V in order to take into account technical progress and scientific developments.
Amendment 2545 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 30 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) establish and maintain a central electronic register to record information on all application equipment in professional use in the Member State;
Amendment 2549 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 30 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) use the central electronic register to receive and process third party entries regarding ownership, transfer of ownership, sale, withdrawal from use and return to use of application equipment in professional use;
Amendment 2563 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 2
Article 30 – paragraph 2
2. Each Member State shall carry out official controls to verify compliance by operators with the provisions of this Regulation relating to application equipment. Member States shall take appropriate follow-up measures to remedy any specific or systemic shortcomings identified through controls performed by the Commission experts in accordance with paragraphs 3 and 4. They shall give the necessary assistance to ensure that the Commission experts have access to all premises or parts of premises, and goods, and to information, including computer systems, relevant for the execution of their duties.
Amendment 2570 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 3
Article 30 – paragraph 3
Amendment 2573 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 4
Article 30 – paragraph 4
Amendment 2583 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 6
Article 31 – paragraph 6
Amendment 2590 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 7 – point b
Article 31 – paragraph 7 – point b
(b) recorded by that competent authority in the central electronic register of application equipment in professional use referred to in Article 33.
Amendment 2595 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 10
Article 31 – paragraph 10
10. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegatedimplementing acts in accordance with Article 40 amending this Article and Annex IV in order to take into account technical progress and scientific developments.
Amendment 2601 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a
Article 32 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a
(a) spraying equipment mounted on trains or aircraft according to Article 20;
Amendment 2603 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 2
Article 32 – paragraph 2
2. Before laying down less stringent inspection requirements and different inspection intervals as referred to in paragraph 1, a Member State shall carry out a risk assessment on their potential impacts on human health and the environment. The competent authority referred to in Article 30 shall maintain a copy of the risk assessment for control by the Commission.
Amendment 2605 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 32 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Hand-held application devices or knapsack sprayers with a volume of up to 100 litres are generally excluded from Chapter VIII (application equipment).
Amendment 2606 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 3
Article 32 – paragraph 3
Amendment 2609 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 4
Article 32 – paragraph 4
Amendment 2616 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – title
Article 33 – title
Amendment 2618 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Each competent authority designated by a Member State pursuant to Article 30 shall establish and maintain a central electronic register to record:
Amendment 2620 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) records of inspections and certificates as set out in Article 31(6) and (7)(b);
Amendment 2624 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point e
Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) where there has been a transfer of ownership, the date of each transfer and the name and address of previous owners within the last five yearsthe transfer;
Amendment 2625 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point f
Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point f
(f) the tank sizeVolume of the tank in litres for containers for application of plant protection products in liquid form;
Amendment 2626 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point g
Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point g
(g) the work width of the horizontal spray boom, if applicable;
Amendment 2629 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point i
Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point i
(i) in the case of boom sprayers, whether section and/or nozzle control through geospatial localisation technology is present or absent on the application equipment;
Amendment 2631 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point j
Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point j
(j) for equipment older than three years, the date of eachthe last inspection carried out in accordance with Article 31;
Amendment 2632 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point k
Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point k
Amendment 2637 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – title
Article 34 – title
Methodology for calculating progress towards achieving the two national and two Union wide 20305 reduction targets
Amendment 2641 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1
Article 34 – paragraph 1
1. The methodology for calculating progress towards achieving the two Union 2030 reduction targets and the two nationalwide 20305 reduction targets until and including 2030 is laid down in Annex I. This methodology shall be based on statistical data collected in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1185/2009.
Amendment 2650 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 2
Article 34 – paragraph 2
2. Using the methodology set out in Annex I, the Commission shall calculate the results of progress towards achieving the two Union and two national 2030 reduction targets annuallywide until and including 20305 and publish those results on the website referred to in Article 7.
Amendment 2657 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1
Article 35 – paragraph 1
1. The methodology for calculating progress in relation to harmonised risk indicators 1, 2 and 2a, at both Union and Member StateUnion level, is laid down in Annex VI. This methodology shall be based on statistical data collected in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1185/2009.
Amendment 2658 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 3
Article 35 – paragraph 3
Amendment 2670 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 5
Article 35 – paragraph 5
5. By… [OP please insert the date = first day of the month following 12 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation], the Commission shall complete an evaluation of harmonised risk indicators 1, 2 and 2a. This evaluation shall be based on scientific research from the Joint Research Centre and extensive consultation of stakeholders, including Member States, scientific experts and civil society organisations. The evaluation shall include the methodologies tomay be used in formulating new and modifying existing harmonised risk indicators in accordance with paragraph 4.
Amendment 2675 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36
Article 36
Amendment 2680 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 1
Article 36 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall evaluate the results of each calculation of (a) progress towards achieving each of the two nationalUnion wide 20305 reduction targets as referred to in Article 34 and (b) harmonised risk indicators at Member State level, as referred to in Article 35, each time the calculations are performed.
Amendment 2694 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 38 – paragraph 1
Article 38 – paragraph 1
Member States shallmay lay down the rules on penalties applicable to infringements of this Regulation and shall take the measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. The penalties provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. Member States shall without delay notify the Commission of those rules and of those measures and shall notify it, without delay, of any subsequent amendment affecting them.
Amendment 2695 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 39
Article 39
Amendment 2746 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – subheading 1
Annex I – subheading 1
METHODOLOGY FOR CALCULATING PROGRESS TOWARDS ACHIEVING THE TWO UNION AND TWO NATIONAL 20305 REDUCTION TARGETS
Amendment 2747 #
Amendment 2757 #
Amendment 2794 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point 4
Annex I – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point 4
4. The baseline for reduction target 1 shall be set at 100, and is equal to the average result of the above calculation for the period 20151-20178.
Amendment 2799 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point 6
Annex I – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point 6
6. The Commission shall calculate the progress towards achieving reduction target 1 in accordance with Article 34(2) of this Regulation for each calendar year and at the latest 20 months after the end of the year for which progress towards the reduction target 1 is being calculated.
Amendment 2806 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point 3
Annex I – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point 3
3. The baseline for reduction target 2 shall be set at 100, and is equal to the average result of the above calculation for the period 20151-20178.
Amendment 2810 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point 5
Annex I – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point 5
5. The Commission shall calculate progress towards achieving reduction target 2 in accordance with Article 34(2) of this Regulation for each calendar year and at the latest 20 months after the end of the year for which progress towards reduction target 2 is being calculated.
Amendment 2817 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – subheading 1
Annex II – subheading 1
DATA TO BE PROVIDED IN ANNUAL PROGRESS AND IMPLEMENTATION REPORTS BY 31 AUGUSTDECEMBER OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR
Amendment 2824 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Annex II – Part 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Amendment 2827 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Annex II – Part 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
2. the percentage of professional users failing to comply with the obligation to keep electronic records on integrated pest management implementation;
Amendment 2828 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Annex II – Part 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Amendment 2832 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Annex II – Part 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Amendment 2833 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Annex II – Part 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Amendment 2836 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 2 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point b
Annex II – Part 2 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point b
Amendment 2839 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 2 – paragraph 2 – point 11
Annex II – Part 2 – paragraph 2 – point 11
Amendment 2841 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 2 – paragraph 3 – point 12
Annex II – Part 2 – paragraph 3 – point 12
Amendment 2842 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 2 – paragraph 3 – point 13
Annex II – Part 2 – paragraph 3 – point 13
13. the percentagenumber of registered application equipment in professional use and due for inspection that has been inspected;
Amendment 2843 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 2 – paragraph 3 – point 14
Annex II – Part 2 – paragraph 3 – point 14
Amendment 2844 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 2 – paragraph 4
Annex II – Part 2 – paragraph 4
Amendment 2853 #
Amendment 2887 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III a (new)
Annex III a (new)
Amendment 2888 #
Amendment 2894 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV a (new)
Annex IV a (new)
Amendment 2918 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex VI – Section 2 – point 6
Annex VI – Section 2 – point 6
6. The Commission shall calculate and publish the results of harmonised risk indicator 1 at Union level in accordance with Article 35(2) of this Regulation for each calendar year and at the latest 20 months after the end of the year for which harmonised risk indicator 1 is being calculated.
Amendment 2920 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex VI – Section 2 – point 7
Annex VI – Section 2 – point 7
7. The Member States shall calculate and publish the results of harmonised risk indicator 1 at national level in accordance with Article 35(3) of this Regulation for each calendar year and at the latest 20 months after the end of the year for which harmonised risk indicator 1 is being calculated.
Amendment 2938 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex VI – Section 3 – point 6
Annex VI – Section 3 – point 6
6. The Commission shall calculate and publish the results of harmonised risk indicator 2 at Union level in accordance with Article 35(2) of this Regulation for each calendar year and at the latest 20 months after the end of the year for which harmonised risk indicator 2 is being calculated.
Amendment 2940 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex VI – Section 3 – point 7
Annex VI – Section 3 – point 7
7. The Member States shall calculate and publish the results of harmonised risk indicator 2 at national level in accordance with Article 35(3) of this Regulation for each calendar year and at the latest 20 months after the end of the year for which harmonised risk indicator 2 is being calculated.
Amendment 2943 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex VI – Section 3 – point 8
Annex VI – Section 3 – point 8
8. With effect from 1 January 2027, the methodology of harmonised risk indicator 2 shall be eventually replaced by the methodology of harmonised risk indicator 2a referred to in section 4 of this Annex.
Amendment 2958 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex VI – Section 4 – point 6
Annex VI – Section 4 – point 6
6. The Commission shall calculate and publish the results of harmonised risk indicator 2a at Union level in accordance with Article 35(2) of this Regulation. This shall be done for the first time in 2027 using data from calendar years 2022 to 2025, and subsequently for each calendar year, at the latest 20 months after the end of the year for which harmonised risk indicator 2a is being calculated.
Amendment 2959 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex VI – Section 4 – point 7
Annex VI – Section 4 – point 7
7. The Member States shall calculate and publish the results of harmonised risk indicator 2a at national level in accordance with Article 35(3) of this Regulation. This shall be done for the first time in 2027 using data from calendar years 2022 to 2025, and subsequently for each calendar year, at the latest 20 months after the end of the year for which harmonised risk indicator 2a is being calculated.
Amendment 145 #
2021/2244(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Urges Albania to swiftly adopt and effectively implement the by-laws that ensure full implementation of the 2017 framework on the protection of National Minorities and the related rights to free self-identification, the use of minority languages and the right to education in minority languages;
Amendment 266 #
2021/2244(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
Paragraph 36
36. Commends the fact that Albania remains a reliable and committed external policy partner, fully aligning to the EU’s foreign, security and defence policy, and actively contributing to EU crisis- management missions and operations, but it regrets its continuous alignment with authoritarian regimes, like Turkey's;
Amendment 16 #
2021/2100(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas, under Article 168 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Member States are responsible for defining their health policy and for organising and delivering health services and medical care; whereas in this context the European Union may support the Member States, but with the utmost respect for their responsibilities in this area;
Amendment 22 #
2021/2100(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the standards ofpolicy on healthcare provision in the EU are not harmonised, as significant differences exist between regions, whereby less- developed regions, which are not able to devote anything close to the amount of resources on healthcare per capita as their more developed counterparts, may face problems in this respectis not harmonised;
Amendment 28 #
2021/2100(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the EU instruments aimed at compensating for some of these problems are mostly limited to ‘soft’ law, which adequately reflects the applicable principles of complementarity and subsidiarity, and respect for Member States’ competence in this area, and is therefore compatible with the Treaties;
Amendment 63 #
2021/2100(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Highlights that certain less- developed regions are a long way fromdo not uniformly matching the standards of healthcare provision in comparison with the services available in more developed parts of the EU, and that convergence in this sense is unlikely to be achieved without help; stresses that further convergence and cooperation in this sense are necessary between the Member States and at EU level, particularly through its cohesion policy;
Amendment 76 #
2021/2100(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Recommends that, when defining healthcare policies at regional and national level, there should be a willingness to overcome siloailored and adaptive approaches between health, social and economic policies should be sought, with the goal of improving dialogue, synergies and planned investments from the structural funds and other relevant EU programmes, which are able to cater for citizens’ unmet health and social needs in cross-border areas;
Amendment 88 #
2021/2100(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Points out that, while evaluating funded structural projects and benchmarks in the context of health, it is necessary to review the subsequent health outcomes of individual projects, to enable their results to be tracked and ongoing analyses of their effectiveness and results to be trackconducted, in order to gauge the extent to which a given project has been successfuldraw the correct conclusions to improve the programming and implementation of these projects in future;
Amendment 116 #
2021/2100(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Calls for bolddue consideration and subsequent adoption of cohesion policy measures, in accordance with the legal provisions in force in the EU, in order to attempt to mitigate the lack of healthcare workers in rural areas, and aimed at motivating them to commence or resume practice there;
Amendment 3 #
2021/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 15
Citation 15
— having regard to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the European Social Charter, the case law of the European Court of Human Rights and the European Committee of Social Rights, the Council of Europe Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities (FCNM) and the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages (ECRML) and the conventions, recommendations, resolutions, opinions and reports of the Parliamentary Assembly, the Committee of Ministers, the Human Rights Commissioner, the European Commission Against Racism and Intolerance, the Steering Committee on Anti- Discrimination, Diversity and Inclusion, the Venice Commission, the Advisory Committee on the FCNM, the Committee of Experts of the ECRML and other bodies of the Council of Europe,
Amendment 31 #
2021/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
C a. whereas respect for the rights of minorities is a part of the political criteria an accession-candidate country must fulfil at the time of accession; whereas while the Union has an important role in ensuring respect for the rights of national and linguistic minorities in candidate- countries, it so far hasn't yet adopted any benchmarks for its Member States in this area, thus making possible that Member States backtrack on their commitments; whereas the 2020 report, too, misses to cover the rights of national and linguistic minorities;
Amendment 32 #
2021/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C b (new)
Recital C b (new)
C b. whereas the European Parliament has already called on the European Commission to adopt a common framework of Union minimum standards for the protection of rights of persons belonging to minorities, which are strongly embedded in a legal framework guaranteeing democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights throughout the Union1a; _________________ 1aEuropean Parliament Resolution of 13 November 2018 on minimum standards for minorities in the EU (OJ C 363, 28.10.2020, p. 13)
Amendment 209 #
2021/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17 a. Calls on the Commission to include in its next reports detailed analyses and recommendations on the situation of the rights of autochthonous national and linguistic minorities, including through the involvement of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights; stresses that this is an area where it should establish strong links and synergies with the Council of Europe, and in particular with its Advisory Committee on the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities and the Committee of Experts of the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages;
Amendment 5 #
2020/2140(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that more than half of EU expenditure in 2019 may be considered as high-risk, including reimbursement-based payments for investments in the areas of cohesion and rural development; notes that the increase in the estimated rate of material error from 4,5 % in 2018 to 4,9 % in 2019 can result in auditors giving an adverse opinion on EU expenditurthe estimated error rate for the section 'Cohesion' drops from 5% (for 2018) to 4.4%, which is in line with the downward trend of the error rate in this area (in 2015 and 2016 it was 5.2% and 4.8% respectively); recalls that for the 2000-2006 programming period, this section of the EU budget recorded a double digit error rate;
Amendment 7 #
2020/2140(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Is of the opinion that the level of error estimated by the European Court of Auditors (ECA) for 2019 expenditure in this area should be assessed in the context of the multiannual nature of the programmes, in which case further corrections are exercised at a later stage which would lead to a significant reduction of the risk at the programme closure;
Amendment 8 #
2020/2140(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1 b. Addresses the European Court of Auditors with a request to produce a report with an estimated error rate after the closure of the 2007-2013 Cohesion Policy programmes;
Amendment 11 #
2020/2140(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 18 #
2020/2140(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that the main reasons for this error rate are project ineligibility, infringement of internal market rules, and ineligible expenditure; recalls that these areas have high inherent risk of error and that checks by managing authorities and audit institutions are not always effective;
Amendment 27 #
2020/2140(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes efforts to simplify requirements to be made of project managers and management authorities in the Member States under the 2021-2027 programming period of the Common Provisions Regulation; however, as also noted by the European Court of Auditors, a number of provisions lack clarity as to their implementation and many procedures risk being complex depending on the rules of the different Member States. To this end, the Commission is invited, in a structured dialogue with Member States, to analyse administrative practices and procedures at Member State level in order to eliminate inefficiencies and to disseminate examples of effective administrative practices and procedures to all competent authorities of the Member States;
Amendment 35 #
2020/2140(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Shares the Court's conclusions stating that the change in the rules for the implementation of ESI Funds (Cohesion Policy and Agriculture / Fisheries), due to the crisis related to the COVID-19 pandemic, should further accelerate the implementation process;
Amendment 40 #
2020/2140(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Notes with concern that, at the end of the sixth year of implementation, absorption rates for the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and Cohesion Fund (CF) are 6,6% lower than at the same stage in the previous programming period; and draws attention to the risk that, as the eligibility period draws to an end and given the circumstances of the COVID-19 crisis, Member States may prioritise spending over performance and regularity.
Amendment 42 #
2020/2140(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Notes with concern that, at the end of the sixth year of implementation, absorption rates for the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and Cohesion Fund (CF) are 6,6% lower than at the same stage in the previous programming period; and draws attention to the risk that, as the eligibility period draws to an end and given the circumstances of the COVID-19 crisis, Member States may prioritise spending over performance and regularity.; stresses, however, that the absorption rate of ESI Funds in 2019 was higher than in any other year of MFF 2014-2020 period;
Amendment 48 #
2020/2140(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Amendment 50 #
2020/2140(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 b (new)
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7 b. Calls on the Commission to identify the regions have a low funding take-up rates and to help them to improve it through the identification of the rules that can improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the Cohesion Funds;
Amendment 52 #
2020/2140(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 c (new)
Paragraph 7 c (new)
7 c. Urges the Commission to propose clear and easily applicable definitions and criteria for monitoring the funds available to fight the consequences of the COVID- 19 crisis;
Amendment 53 #
2020/2140(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 d (new)
Paragraph 7 d (new)
7 d. Invites the Commission to interrupt or suspend payments in case of fraud, but where serious deficiencies in management and control systems have been identified, to use the block as last resort, when all other options have been exhausted, because suspending payments could have serious consequences for the regions severely hit already by the COVID-19 crisis;
Amendment 4 #
2020/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF), established by Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 in order to provide financial assistance to Member States and accession countries undergoing major disasters or major public health emergencies, represents true European added value and the materialisation of a will, that has sometimes been insufficient or lacking, to provide mutual assistance and solidarity at Union level;
Amendment 20 #
2020/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. noting the usefulness of the EUSF, highlighted by the Commission’s evaluation, in particular as regards reducing the burden on local authorities facing significant damage as a result of natural disasters or health emergencies;
Amendment 50 #
2020/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Expresses its deep concern that extreme weather events and natural disasters will only increase and intensify alongside climate change;
Amendment 58 #
2020/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Draws attention to events such as COVID-19, which is severely affecting all of Europe, forest fires across the continent, including in unusual places such as the Arctic, and the series of violent earthquakes in Europe, particularly in Italy in 2016-2017, causing hundreds of deaths and some EUR 22 billion in damage, and in Croatia in March 2020; points out, moreover, that storms, extreme rainfall and flooding have caused considerable damage in many cities and valleys, and that increasingly violent hurricanes have caused devastation in the outermost regions, such as Hurricane Irma in 2017 in Saint-Martin, and Hurricane Lorenzo in 2019 in the Azores, which were particularly destructive; also recalls that it is necessary not to underestimate the problem of infectious plant diseases, such as xylella fastidiosa, which cause considerable damage to the environment and regional economies;
Amendment 66 #
2020/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Points out that it is vital that aid and funds be sent every more rapidly and easily to affected regions, and that links with the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM) and the ERDF climate-change adaptation component are essential in order to create a comprehensive package;
Amendment 97 #
2020/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to strengthen their research and education in order to put in place a system to ensure better preparedness to prevent and manage disasters and to minimize the impact of such crises;
Amendment 98 #
2020/2087(INI)
12b. Calls for increased coordination and cooperation between the research and development institutions of Member States, especially those facing similar risks; calls for enhanced early warning systems in Member States and the creation and strengthening of links between the various early warning systems;
Amendment 99 #
2020/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 c (new)
Paragraph 12 c (new)
12c. Suggests that Member States identify investments, projects and tools in their National Recovery and Resilience Plans in order to prevent and limit damage from natural and health disasters;
Amendment 122 #
2020/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Considers that the establishment of a SEAR may have the advantage of some flexibility, but notes that, in its current form, the EUSF allocation remains uncertain, since it depends on the amounts mobilised by the EAR; undertakes, accordingly, closely to monitor the management of the SEAR in order to see whether the funding amount and allocation key provided for in this new financial instrument meet the needs of the EUSF, in view of the extension of its scope and the scale and proliferation of emergencies resulting, in particular, from climate changenatural disasters, climate change and the health emergency;
Amendment 133 #
2020/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Notes with regret that it takes on average one year for the entire grant to reach the beneficiary and that the Fund cannot therefore, under the current conditions, claim to act as an instrument for rapid intervention; calls on the Commission to expedite payment procedures and to explore ways tof simplifying and make flexible, as much as possible, the administrative procedures required to access aid, in order to relieve disaster- stricken regions or countries from unnecessary administrative burdens;
Amendment 138 #
2020/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Believes that, in the future, the EUSF budget will have to be increased in order to make it a real tool for EU solidarity; to this end, believes that the EUSF is not only used for damage repair but also for resilience in relation to climate change, natural disasters and public health emergencies in order to exit stronger from the disaster situation;
Amendment 142 #
2020/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Calls on the Commission to strengthen synergies between the EUSF and cohesion funds, as well as with the UCPM, with a view to effective and structured risk management in the short, medium and long term, not only through the construction of sustainable, energy- and resource-efficient infrastructure, but also through the deployment of preventive measures; also calls on the Commission to demonstrate flexibility with programming and amending of nationals operational programmes when they comes to dealing with natural disasters;
Amendment 38 #
2020/2039(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas cohesion policy is an appropriate instrument for preventing differences in the treatment of women and men, particularly in areas facing problems associated with demographic change;
Amendment 46 #
2020/2039(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
D a. whereas the crisis triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic and the extraordinary measures taken in response by the European Union, the Member States and the regional and local authorities, as well as the direct and indirect effects of these measures, will have a short-term and long-term impact on demographic trends that is difficult to estimate with any accuracy;
Amendment 49 #
2020/2039(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
Recital D b (new)
D b. whereas preliminary studies suggest that the COVID-19 pandemic has worsened existing inequalities between men and women, in part because of the increased burden of unpaid care in households, which in turn also leads to an increased likelihood of job losses or resignations necessitated by the circumstances; whereas this phenomenon has a disproportionate impact on women, which should be taken into account when considering demographic change as an aspect of cohesion policy;
Amendment 52 #
2020/2039(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas innovation and investment in human capital, which also occur as part of the corresponding process of socialisation within the family as well as through education, are the main drivers of socio-economic and employment growth for Member States and their regions over the medium to long term;
Amendment 90 #
2020/2039(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that in general rural, and post- industrial and remotereas and towns that are remote from major metropolitan areas are facing a number of specific situations: a considerable decline in population numbers, lower than national or EU average levels of income and difficulties of territorial integration with other regions, making them more exposed to the risk of depopulation; points out that rural regions currently account for 28 % of Europe’s population but this is predicted to fall significantly in the future;
Amendment 96 #
2020/2039(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Draws attention to some of the drivers of demographic change, forcing inhabitants from the abovementioned areas to leave and discouraging others from moving there: poor infrastructure, including a lack of fast broadband internet and missing transport networks, fewer job opportunities, particularly in occupations requiring higher education, and also in general for women owing to the widespread masculinisation of the labour market in peripheral areas, lack of public services and difficult access to health services, fewer education opportunities, making it more difficult to adapt to technological change, and a lack of cultural venues and leisure activities;
Amendment 108 #
2020/2039(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Is of the view that urban areas are also exposed to depopulation, with one in five cities in Europe facing population losses since 1990, whereby depopulation is not adequately reflected in the records kept by statistical offices and agencies because the figures for people leaving areas are delayed by many years; emphasises in this regard that this phenomenon means that the actual scale of depopulation in rural areas and in small and medium-sized towns and cities is underestimated; notes also that this problem affects the majority of non- metropolitan towns and cities, in particular small towns and cities; notes, however, that urban shrinkage is not always a continuous linear process and can be episodic or temporary, depending on the territorial context;
Amendment 114 #
2020/2039(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Underlines a pattern of ‘inner peripheralisation’, in the sense that central, eastern and southern European regions report a substantially negative net population migration rate, while northern and western European regions report a substantially positive rate, receiving constantly large numbers of economic migrants;
Amendment 118 #
2020/2039(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Acknowledges that the metropolitan areas around major cities register a positive migration rate, with characteristic rural-to-urban population movements, as a consequence ofnd therefore experience an influx of young people with enormous growth potential without previously having had to incur the costs of their care, upbringing and primary and/or secondary education, which results in an increasingly urbanised concentration in employment growth patterns;
Amendment 121 #
2020/2039(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Notes also that regions presenting a high share of people with high levels of education and providing more employment opportunities for people with high levels of education are less exposed to the depopulation process;
Amendment 142 #
2020/2039(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Stresses that local and regional authorities, with the support of the central and EU authorities, should play a decisive role in developing territorial strategies, taking into consideration the development needs and the potential of the areas concerned, including the economic, social and demographic trends; points out that community-led local development strategies are a useful tool that can be used to create jobs and increase accessibility to services at local level;
Amendment 155 #
2020/2039(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Recalls the need for strategies aimed at reversing labour migration; calls on local and, regional, central and EU authorities to tackle the brain drain in ‘sending’ regions through prevention, mitigation and appropriate responses; underlines in this context that there are already several initiatives in various Member States, such as incentives for workers with highly specialised skills, aimed at turning the brain drain into a brain gain for the regions in question;
Amendment 161 #
2020/2039(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Stresses that the COVID-19 health crisis has affected all Member States and regions to different extents, and is likely to lead to new trends as regards demographic flows; recalls in this context that the additional resources provided through REACT-EU in order to ensure a sound and robust recovery of the EU’s economy from the crisis could significantly help to keep people in employment, including through support for small and medium-size enterprises and for short-time work schemes and the self-employed and create new jobs for educated individuals in areas at risk of depopulation, including through support for small and medium-size enterprises and the self-employed, and through the introduction of flexible working arrangements, including remote or short- time work;
Amendment 174 #
2020/2039(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Recalls that the Recovery and Resilience Facility will provide large-scale financial support to make Member States’ economies more resilient and better prepared for the future, and insists that Member States should propose and implement measures for addressing adverse demographic change; highlights the importance of the instruments f, for example by putting in place more widespread telework a trransition to sustainability such as the Just Transition Fund and its implementation mechanism, which aim to support the communities affected by the energy transition and avoid thegements that allow remote working, thereby making it possible for young educated people to stay in areas which they might previously have left and which are at particular risk of depopulation;
Amendment 201 #
2020/2039(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Calls on the Member State to include differentiated demographic challenges in their national development policies and long- term strategies for sustainable development correlated with the European Semester, thus ensuring proper financing for demographic issues;
Amendment 209 #
2020/2039(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Calls on the regions at risk of depopulation to focus investments on the creation of jobs, in particular for young people, including those who have completed higher education, as well as on ways of encouraging young families to settle in those regions and on universal accessibility to quality services and infrastructure and job creation; insists on investment in education, reskilling of workers, creating entrepreneurial conditions and supporting SMEs;
Amendment 244 #
2020/2039(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Recommends developing the so- called ‘oasis strategies’ focusing on the most successful, vibrant and growing sectors, by exploiting the local potential for development of the region; calls on the local and regional authorities to focus on attracting young, trained and talented workers and retaining any such workers who are currently employed, encouraging entrepreneurship, using local, national and EU incentives; underlines the role of the ‘silver economy’ as a policy shift for rural areas, turning the issue of population ageing into an opportunity for the development of rural areas;
Amendment 272 #
2020/2039(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
Paragraph 33
33. Recommends, where appropriate, the reform of education and training systems in the Member States, inter alia by developing educational pathways to occupations that are compatible with remote working, combined with policies to prevent a permanent brain drain from the ‘sending’ regions; insists on using local at regional advantages, as well as the development of economic and social facilities, not only to prevent the brain drain, but also to reverse this phenomenon;
Amendment 59 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) The evaluation of Regulation (EU) No 347/2013 has clearly shown that the framework has effectively improved the integration of Member States’ networks, stimulated energy trade and hence contributed to the competitiveness of the Union. Projects of common interest in electricity and gas have strongly contributed to security of supply. For gas, the infrastructure is now well connected and supply resilience has improved substantially since 2013. Regional cooperation in Regional Groups and through cross-border cost allocation is an important enabler for project implementation. However, in many cases the cross-border cost allocation did not result in reducing the financing gap of the project, as intended. While the majority of permitting procedures have been shortened, in some cases the process is still long. The financial assistance from the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) has been an important factor as grants for studies have helped projects to reduce risks in the early stages of development, while grants for works have supported projects addressing key bottlenecks that market finance could not sufficiently address.
Amendment 67 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) Security of supply, as one main driver behind Regulation (EU) No 347/2013, has been significantly improved through projects of common interest. Moreover, the Commission’s climate target impact assessment27 expects the consumption of natural gas to be reduced significantly because its non-abated use is not compatible with carbon-neutrality. On the other hand, the consumption of biogas, renewable and low-carbon hydrogen and synthetic gaseous fuels will increase significantly towards 2050. Therefore, the natural gas infrastructure no longer needs support through the TEN-E policy. The planning of energy infrastructure should reflect this changing gas landscape. However, in some Member States natural gas projects represent substantial potential for reduction of CO2 emissions, including by facilitating transition from solid fossil fuels, in particular coal, lignite, peat and oil shale, to natural gas. The revision of Regulation (EU) No 347/2013 should not negatively affect not yet completed natural gas infrastructure projects which were already included in the fourth or fifth Union list of projects of common interest established pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 347/2013. Those projects should therefore be able to maintain their previous status and be eligible as projects of common interest to be established under this Regulation. _________________ 27 SWD(2020) 176 final
Amendment 80 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) Moreover, a new infrastructure category should be created for smart gas grids to support investments which integrate renewable and low carbon gases such as biogas, biomethane, and hydrogen, in the network and help manage a resulting more complex system, building on innovative digital technologies as well as technological, mechanical or engineering solutions for aiming to improve gas quality and grid management.
Amendment 83 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) Regulation (EU) No 347/2013 requires a candidate project of common interest to prove a significant contribution to at least one criterion from a set of criteria in the process for the elaboration of the Union list, which may, but does not need to, include sustainability. That requirement, in line with the specific needs of the internal energy market at the time, enabled development of projects of common interest which addressed only security of supply risks even if they did not demonstrate benefits in terms of sustainability. However, given the evolution of the Union infrastructure needs and the decarbonisation goals, the Conclusions of the 2020 July European Council, according to which “Union expenditure should be consistent with Paris Agreement objectives and the "do no harm" principle of the European Green Deal, sustainability in terms of the integration of renewable energy sources into the grid or the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, as relevant, should be assessed in order to ensure that TEN-E policy is coherent with energy and climate policy objectives of the Union taking into account the various specificities of each Member State and the needs to follow different pathways towards decarbonisation, as to leave no one behind in the end. The sustainability of CO2 transport networks is addressed by their purpose to transport carbon dioxide.
Amendment 108 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43
Recital 43
Amendment 113 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation lays down guidelines for the timely development and interoperability of the priority corridors and areas of trans-European energy infrastructure set out in Annex I (‘energy infrastructure priority corridors and areas’) that contribute to the integration of the Union's energy markets, security of energy supply, affordability of energy carriers and that are also in line with the Union’s 2030 climate and energy targets and the climate neutrality objective by 2050.
Amendment 115 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) addresses the identification of projects of common interest necessary to implement priority corridors and areas falling under the energy infrastructure categories in electricity, smart gas grids, hydrogen, electrolysers, and carbon dioxide and natural gas projects set out in Annex II (‘energy infrastructure categories’);
Amendment 129 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 9
(9) ‘smart gas grid’ means a gas network that makes use of innovative digital solutions to, technological, engineering or mechanical solutions in the view of integrateing in a cost efficient manner a plurality of low-carbon and renewable gas sources and their blends with methane in accordance with consumers’ needs and, gas quality requirements in order to reduceand system's safety requirements enabling the reduction of the carbon footprint of the related gas consumption, enableand an increased share of renewable and low-carbon gases,, ands well as createing links with other energy carriers and sectors;
Amendment 142 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 16 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 16 a (new)
(16 a) 'repurposing / retrofitting' means the technical upgrade or modification of existing natural gas infrastructure for use of pure hydrogen or of blending of methane with hydrogen at a pre-defined level.
Amendment 144 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 16 b (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 16 b (new)
(16 b) 'blending' means the admixture of methane with hydrogen at a pre-defined level.
Amendment 146 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 155 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 20 of this Regulation amending annexes to this Regulation in order to establish the Union list of projects of common interest (‘Union list’), subject to the second paragraph of Article 172 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Amendment 161 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii
(ii) is located on the territory of one Member State and has a significant cross- border impact or potential to create such an impact, as set out in point (1) of Annex IV.
Amendment 165 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) the project contributes significantly to the decarbonisation objectives of the Union andor those of the third country and to sustainability, including through the integration of renewable energy and low- carbon into the grid and the transmission of renewable and low-carbon generation to major consumption centres and storage sites, and;
Amendment 173 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) for the part located on Union territory, the project is in line with Directives 2009/73/EC and (EU) 2019/944 where it falls within the infrastructure categories described in points (1) and (3) of Annex II;
Amendment 179 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point e – point ii
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point e – point ii
ii) security of energy supplies based on a diversification of energy sources, cooperation and solidarity;
Amendment 182 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point a – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point a – introductory part
(a) for electricity transmission and storage projects falling under the energy infrastructure categories set out in points (1)(a), (b), (c) and (e) of Annex II, the project ishas potential to contribute significantly to sustainability through the integration of renewable and low-carbon energy into the grid and the transmission of renewable and low-carbon generation to major consumption centres and storage sites, and at least one of the following specific criteria:
Amendment 191 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point d – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point d – introductory part
(d) for hydrogen projects falling under the energy infrastructure categories set out in point (3) of Annex II the project is to contribute significantly to sustainability, including by reducing greenhouse gas emissions, by enhancing the deployment of renewable and low-carbon hydrogen and supporting variable renewable power generation by offering flexibility and/or storage solutions. Furthermore, the project is to contribute significantly to at least one of the following specific criteria:
Amendment 198 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point e – point i
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point e – point i
(i) sustainability, including by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and enhancing the deployment of renewable hydrogen.
Amendment 202 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point f – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point f – introductory part
(f) for smart gas grid projects falling under the energy infrastructure category set out in point (2) of Annex II, the project is to contribute significantly to sustainability byin the view of enabling and facilitating the integration of renewable and low-carbon gases, such as biomethane, or renewable hydrogen, into the gas distribution and transmission networks in order to reducehydrogen, or synthetic gas and their blends with methane into the gas distribution and transmission networks, as well as storage systems, enabling the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Furthermore, the project is to contribute significantly to at least one of the following specific criteria:
Amendment 206 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point f – point i
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point f – point i
(i) network security and quality of supply by retrofitting, repurposing, increasing the capacity or improving the efficiency and interoperability of gas transmission and distribution or storage systems in day-to-day network operation by, among others, addressing challenges resulting from the injection of gases of different qualities through the deployment of innovative technologies andsolutions in at least one of the following areas: innovative technologies, technological, mechanical, engineering improvements or cybersecurity;
Amendment 211 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point f – point iii
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point f – point iii
(iii) facilitating smart energy sector integration through the creation of reverse flows or links to other energy carriers and sectors and enabling demand response.
Amendment 215 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point f – point iii a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point f – point iii a (new)
(iii a) enabling transport of renewable decarbonised gases from production units to transmission or distribution network;
Amendment 216 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point f a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point f a (new)
Amendment 232 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
Article 5 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. By 31 December of28 February, each year following the year of inclusion of a project of common interest on the Union list pursuant to Article 3, project promoters shall submit an annual report, for each project falling under the categories set out in points (1) to (4) of Annex II, to the competent authority referred to in Article 8.
Amendment 235 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 5
Article 5 – paragraph 5
5. By 31 JanuaryMarch, each year, the competent authorities referred to in Article 8 shall submit to the Agency and to the respective Group the report referred to in paragraph 4 of this Article supplemented with information on the progress and, where relevant, on delays in the implementation of projects of common interest located on their respective territory with regard to the permit granting processes, and on the reasons for such delays. The contribution of the competent authorities to the report shall be clearly marked as such and drafted without modifying the text introduced by the project promoters.
Amendment 244 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 8 a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Provisions set out in this Article should be without a prejudice to any national legislation which provides more favorable treatment, particularly in terms of the time limits and the requirements for a given type of investment than those set out in this Article. Competent authorities shall ensure that the most favorable treatment applies to the projects of common interest.
Amendment 255 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 6
Article 11 – paragraph 6
6. Where the changes to the methodologies are considered to be of incremental nature, not affecting the definition of benefits, costs and other relevant cost-benefit parameters, as defined in the latest Energy system wide cost- benefit analysis methodology approved by the Commission, the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENTSO for Gas shall adapt their respective methodologies taking due account of the Agency’s opinion, as set out in paragraph 2, and submit them for the AgencyCommission’s approval together with a document providing explanatory basis to justify the proposed changes.
Amendment 258 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 8
Article 11 – paragraph 8
8. Within two weeks of the approval by the Agency or the Commission in accordance with paragraphs 5 and 6, the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENTSO for Gas shall publish their respective methodologies on their websites. They shall publish the corresponding input data and other relevant network, load flow and market data in a sufficiently accurate form in accordance with national law and relevant confidentiality agreements.
Amendment 259 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 9
Article 11 – paragraph 9
9. The methodologies shall be updated and improved regularly upon request from the Commission following the procedure described in paragraphs 1 to 6. The Agency, on its own initiative or upon a duly reasoned request by national regulatory authorities or stakeholders, and after formally consulting the organisations representing all relevant stakeholders and the Commission, may request such updates and improvements with due justification and timescales. The Agency shall publish the requests by national regulatory authorities or stakeholders and all relevant non-commercially sensitive documents leading to a request from the Agency for an update or improvement.
Amendment 265 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. By [31 July 2022], the Agency, after having conducted an extensive consultation process involving the Commission, the Member States, and at least the organisations representing all relevant stakeholders, including the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas, Union DSO entity, and relevant hydrogen sector stakeholders, shall publish the framework guidelines for the joint scenarios to be developed by ENTSO for Electricity and ENTSO for Gas. Those guidelines shall be regularly updated as found necessary.
Amendment 267 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The guidelines shall include the energy efficiency first principle and ensure that the underlying ENTSO for Electricity and ENTSO for Gas scenarios are fully in line with the latest medium and long-term European Union decarbonisation targets and the latest available Commission scenarios.
Amendment 282 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3
Article 13 – paragraph 3
3. Within threewo months following receipt of the infrastructure gaps report together with the input received in the consultation process and a report on how it was taken into account, the Agency shall submit its opinion to the ENTSO for Electricity or ENTSO for Gas and the Commission.
Amendment 286 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. By [31 July 2022], Member States, with the support of the Commission, within their specific priority offshore grid corridors, set out in point (2) of Annex I, taking into account the specificities and development in each region, shall jointly define and agree to cooperate on the amount ofindicative goals for offshore renewable generation to be deployed within each sea basin by 2050, with intermediate steps in 2030 and 2040, in view of their national energy and climate plans, the offshore renewable potential of each sea basin, environmental protection, climate adaptation and other uses of the sea, as well as the Union’s decarbonisation targets. That agreement shall be made in writing as regards each sea basin linked to the territory of the Union.
Amendment 287 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2
Article 14 – paragraph 2
2. By [31 July 2023] the ENTSO for Electricity, with the involvement of the relevant TSOs, the national regulatory authorities and of the Commission and in line with the agreement referred to in paragraph 1, shall develop and publish integrated offshore network development plans starting from the 2050 objectives, with intermediate steps for 2030 and 2040, for each sea-basin, in line with the priority offshore grid corridors referred to in Annex I, taking into account environmental protection and other uses of the sea. Those integrated offshore network development plans shall thereafter be updated every threefour years.
Amendment 309 #
2020/0360(COD)
2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 3 shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of sevenfour years from [1 January 2022]. The Commission shall draw up a report in respect of the delegation of power not later than nine months before the end of the seven-year period. The delegation of power shall be tacitly extended for periods of an identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council opposes such extension not later than three months before the end of each period.
Amendment 310 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 20 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Report must take into consideration results of cost-benefit analysis drawn up pursuant to Article 11 for Union-wide ten-Year Network Development Plans and Projects of Common Interest falling under the categories set out in points (1)(a), (b), (c), (e) and point (3) of Annex II.
Amendment 319 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Part 3 – point 8 – introductory part
Annex I – Part 3 – point 8 – introductory part
(8) Hydrogen interconnections in Western Europe (‘HI West’): hydrogen infrastructure enabling the emergence of an integrated hydrogen backboneincluding the transitional use of blending with gas, the repurposing of gas infrastructure or any other specific solutions for disadvantaged, less connected, peripheral or isolated regions and Member States, such as islands, enabling the emergence of an integrated hydrogen backbone directly or indirectly (including through third countries) connecting the countries of the region and addressing their specific infrastructure needs for hydrogen supporting the emergence of an EU-wide network for hydrogen transport.
Amendment 321 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Part 3 – point 8 – paragraph 1
Annex I – Part 3 – point 8 – paragraph 1
Power to gas facilities including Electrolysers: supporting the deployment of power-to-gas applications aiming to enable greenhouse gas reductions and contributing to secure, efficient and reliable system operation and smart energy system integration. Member States concerned: Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Portugal, and Spain;
Amendment 323 #
2020/0360(COD)
(9) Hydrogen interconnections in Central Eastern and South Eastern Europe (‘HI East’): hydrogen infrastructure enabling the emergence of an integrated hydrogen backboneincluding the transitional use of blending with gas, the repurposing of gas infrastructure or any other specific solutions for disadvantaged, less connected, peripheral or isolated Member States and regions, such as islands enabling the emergence of an integrated hydrogen backbone, directly or indirectly (including through third countries) connecting the countries of the region and addressing their specific infrastructure needs for hydrogen supporting the emergence of an EU-wide network for hydrogen transport.
Amendment 325 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Part 3 – point 9 – paragraph 1
Annex I – Part 3 – point 9 – paragraph 1
Power to gas facilities including Electrolysers: supporting the deployment of power-to-gas applications aiming to enable greenhouse gas reductions and contributing to secure, efficient and reliable system operation and smart energy system integration. Member States concerned: Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia;
Amendment 326 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Part 3 – point 10 – introductory part
Annex I – Part 3 – point 10 – introductory part
(10) Baltic Energy Market Interconnection Plan in hydrogen (‘BEMIP Hydrogen’): hydrogen infrastructure and the repurposing of existing natural gas infrastructure with a view of enabling the emergence of an integrated hydrogen backbone connecting the countries of the region and addressing their specific infrastructure needs for hydrogen supporting the emergence of an EU-wide network for hydrogen transport.
Amendment 331 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Part 4 – point 13 – introductory part
Annex I – Part 4 – point 13 – introductory part
(13) Smart gas grids: Adoption of smart gas grid technologies across the Union to efficiently integrate a plurality of renewable and low-carbon gas sources into the gas network, in particular through their blends with methane, support the uptake of innovative digital, technological, mechanical or engineering solutions for network management and facilitating smart energy sector integration and demand response.
Amendment 333 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Part 4 – point 13 a (new)
Annex I – Part 4 – point 13 a (new)
(13 a) Natural gas infrastructure:Completion of gas infrastructure projects for the purpose of enhancing market integration, security of supply, and competition and which contribute to sustainability. Member States concerned: all.
Amendment 334 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Part 4 – point 13 b (new)
Annex I – Part 4 – point 13 b (new)
(13 b) Gas grid deployment: development of selected gas infrastructure projects that have already been granted the PCI status according to the previous Regulation or can prove their advanced implementation level or mature stage or can contribute, for a transitional period until 2040, to the promotion of hydrogen and renewable and low-carbon gases.
Amendment 338 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point e
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point e
(e) any equipment or installation falling under category referred to in point (a) having dual functionality: interconnection andallowing for transmission of offshore renewable electricity from the offshore generation sites to twoone or more countries, as well as any offshore adjacent equipment or installation essential to operate safely, securely and efficiently, including protection, monitoring and control systems, and necessary substations if they also ensure technology interoperability inter alia interface compatibility between different technologies, (‘offshore grids for renewable energy’).
Amendment 342 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
(a) any of the following equipment or installation aiming at enabling and facilitating the integration of renewable and low-carbon gases (including biomethane or hydrogen)gas, biomethane, synthetic gas or hydrogen) and their blends with methane into the network: digital systems and components integrating ICT, control systems and sensor technologies to enable the interactive and intelligent monitoring, metering, quality control and management of gas production, transmission, distribution, storage and consumption within a gas network. Furthermore, such projects may also include equipment to enable reverse flows from the distribution to the transmission level and related necessary upgrades to the existing networkconnections from renewable and low-carbon gases production units into the transmission and distribution grid, equipment to enable reverse flows from the distribution to the transmission level as well as from pipelines of different capacities and related necessary upgrades to the network, such as upgrades of various gas infrastructure parts to repurpose the grid to be fully compatible to transport pure hydrogen or to retrofit the existing network to be fully compatible to transport blends of hydrogen and methane.
Amendment 346 #
2020/0360(COD)
(a) transmission pipelines for the transport of hydrogen, and transitional blending with natural gas, giving access to multiple network users on a transparent and non-discriminatory basis, which mainly contains high-pressure hydrogen pipelines, excluding pipelines for the local distribution of hydrogen;
Amendment 349 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b
(b) underground storage facilities connected to the high-pressure hydrogen pipelines and pipelines that transfer for a transitional period blending of hydrogen and natural gas referred to in point (a);
Amendment 350 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c
(c) reception, storage and regasification or decompression facilities for liquefied hydrogen or hydrogenfor a transitional period liquefied hydrogen blended with liquefied natural gas and embedded in other chemical substances with the objective of injecting the hydrogen or its blending with natural gas into the grid;
Amendment 356 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point d – paragraph 1
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point d – paragraph 1
Any of the assets listed in points (a), (b), (c), and (d) may be newly constructed assets or assets convertrepurposed from natural gas dedicated to hydrogen, or a combination of the two.
Amendment 358 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point d a (new)
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point d a (new)
(d a) steam methane reforming (SMR) installations, combined with CCS/CCUS and methane pyrolysis installations.
Amendment 364 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new)
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new)
(5 a) concerning natural gas: (a) transmission pipelines for the transport of natural gas and biogas that form part of a network which mainly contains high-pressure pipelines, excluding high-pressure pipelines used for upstream or local distribution of natural gas;and transmission pipelines which will physically end the isolation of a Member State from the EU gas network; (b) underground storage facilities connected to the above-mentioned high- pressure gas pipelines; (c) reception, storage and regasification or decompression facilities for liquefied naturalgas (LNG) or compressed natural gas (CNG); (d) any equipment or installation essential for the system to operate safely, securely and efficiently or to enable bi-directional capacity, including compressor stations;
Amendment 380 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – point 1 – introductory part
Annex IV – point 1 – introductory part
(1) a project with significant cross- border impact or potential to create such is a project on the territory of a Member State, which fulfils the following conditions:
Amendment 381 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – point 1 – point a
Annex IV – point 1 – point a
(a) for electricity transmission, the project increases the grid transfer capacity, or the capacity available for commercial flows, at the border of that Member State with one or several other Member States, having the effect of increasing the cross- border grid transfer capacity at the border of that Member State with one or several other Member States, by at least 500 Megawatt compared to the situation without commissioning of the project. This criterion is not applicable only in case the project ensures the improvement of energy security of the region by providing additional balancing capacity and regulation services;
Amendment 385 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – point 1 – point c
Annex IV – point 1 – point c
(c) for smart electricity grids, the project is designed for equipment and installations at high-voltage and medium- voltage level. It involves transmission system operators, transmission and distribution system operators or distribution system operators from at least two Member States. Distribution system operators can be involved only with the support of the transmission system operators, of at least two Member States, that are closely associated to the project and ensure interoperability. A project covers at least 530000 users, generators, consumers or prosumers of electricity, in a consumption area of at least 30120 Gigawatthours/year, of which at least 210 % originate from variable renewable resources;
Amendment 386 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – point 1 – point c
Annex IV – point 1 – point c
(c) for smart electricity grids, the project is designed for equipment and installations at high-voltage and medium- voltage level. It involves transmission system operators, transmission and distribution system operators or distribution system operators from at least two Member States. Distribution system operators can be involved only with the support of the transmission system operators, of at least two Member States, that areprovided they ensure interoperability and their investments have a significant clrosely associated to the project and ensure interoperabilitys- border impactor potential to create such. . A project covers at least 50000 users, generators, consumers or prosumers of electricity, in a consumption area of at least 300 Gigawatthours/year, of which at least 20 % originate from variable renewable resources;
Amendment 387 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – point 1 – point f
Annex IV – point 1 – point f
(f) for electrolysers, the project provides at least 1020 MW installed capacity and the brings benefits directly or indirectly to at least twoone Member States;
Amendment 390 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – point 1 – point g
Annex IV – point 1 – point g
(g) for smart gas grids, a project involves transmission system operators, transmission and distribution system operators or distribution system operators from at least two Member States. Distribution system operators can be involved only with the support of the transmission system operators, of at least two Member States, that are closely associated to the project and ensure interoperability.
Amendment 392 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – point 2 – point a
Annex IV – point 2 – point a
(a) for projects of mutual interest in the category set out in point (1)(a) and (e) of Annex II, the project increases the grid transfer capacity, or the capacity available for commercial flows, at the border of that Member State with one or more third countries and brings significant benefits, under the specific criteria listed in in Article 4(3), to at least twoone Member States. The calculation of the benefits for the Member States shall be performed and published by the ENTSO for Electricity in the frame of Union-wide ten-year network development plan;
Amendment 398 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – point 5 – point a
Annex IV – point 5 – point a
(a) Sustainability measured as the contribution of a project to: greenhouse gas emission reductions in different end-use applications, such as industry or transport; flexibility and seasonal storage options for renewable electricity generation; or the integration of renewable hydrogen.
Amendment 401 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – point 6 – point a
Annex IV – point 6 – point a
(a) level of sustainability measured by assessing the share of renewable andor low- carbon gases integrated into the gas network, the related greenhouse gas emission savings towards total system decarbonisation, air pollution mitigation and the adequate detection of leakage.
Amendment 405 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – point 6 – point b
Annex IV – point 6 – point b
(b) quality and security of supply measured by assessing the ratio of reliably available gas supply and peak demand, the share of imports replaced by localdomestic renewable andor low-carbon gases, the stability of system operation, the duration and frequency of interruptions per customer, avoided curtailment of renewable electricity generation.
Amendment 407 #
2020/0360(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – point 6 – point c
Annex IV – point 6 – point c
(c) facilitation of smart energy sector integration measured by assessing the cost savingsand greenhouse gas emission reduction savings and efficient use of energy enabled in connected energy sectors and systems, such as the heat and power system, transport and industry.
Amendment 46 #
2019/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 23 a (new)
Citation 23 a (new)
– having regard to its resolution of 23 November 2016 on EU strategic communication to counteract propaganda against it by third parties (2016/2030(INI)) and its recommendation of 13 March 2019 to the Council and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy concerning taking stock of the follow-up taken by the EEAS two years after the EP report on EU strategic communication to counteract propaganda against it by third parties (2018/2115(INI)),
Amendment 87 #
2019/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas, according to the recent report commissioned by UK government, Christians are the most persecuted religious group in the world, constituting 80% of persecuted religious believers in the world; whereas this persecution range from routine discrimination in education, employment and social life, through limitations on all forms of expression up to physical attacks against Christian communities, which come close to meeting the international definition of genocide, according to that adopted by the UN;
Amendment 173 #
2019/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Stresses that freedom of speech and expression, as well as media pluralism, are at the heart of resilient democratic societies; urges that the best possible safeguards against ongoing disinformation campaigns and hostile propaganda originating from authoritarian states and non-state actors, such as terrorist groups be put in place by developing a legal framework both at EU and international level for tackling hybrid threats, including cyber and information warfare;
Amendment 269 #
2019/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Calls on the VP/HR and the Council to pay special attention to the human rights situation in the illegally- occupied territories in the Eastern Partnership countries, and take effective measures with the aim to prevent grave human rights abuses on the ground, including the violation of right to life, restriction of freedom of movement, and discrimination on the ground of ethnicity;
Amendment 270 #
2019/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 b (new)
Paragraph 19 b (new)
19b. In this regard recalls its resolution of 14 June 2018 on Georgian occupied territories 10 years after the Russian invasion (2018/2741(RSP)) and reiterates the necessity of imposing the restrictive measures by the EU and its Member States on the persons included in the “Otkhozoria-Tatunashvili List”, the individuals responsible for grave human rights violations in Georgian regions of Abkhazia and Tskhinvali region/South Ossetia;
Amendment 392 #
2019/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Urges the Commission, the EEAS and the Member States to step up advocacy in relation to FoRB, and to launch interreligious dialogue with states and representatives of civil society and faith groups in order to prevent acts of violence and discrimination against persons on the grounds of thought, conscience, religion or belief; calls for the EU to continue to forge alliances and to enhance cooperation with a broad range of countries and regional organisations, in order to deliver positive change in relation to FoRB; reminds the Council and Commission of the need to adequately support the institutional mandate, capacity and duties of the Special Envoy for the promotion of FoRB outside the EU; underlines the need to pay special attention to the situation of the persecuted Christians around the world, who make up the vast majority of the religious groups facing discrimination, violence and death;
Amendment 480 #
2019/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Stresses that the EU should continue to actively support democratic and effective human rights institutions and civil society in their efforts to promote democratisation; positively notes, in this context, the European Endowment for Democracy’s consistent engagement in the eastern and southern neighbourhoods of the EU to promote democracy and respect for fundamental rights and freedoms; calls on the Council to consider expanding the EED’s mandate also to the countries of Central and Latin America and making sufficient funds available to do so; recalls that the experience gained and the lessons learned from transitions to democracy in the framework of the enlargement and neighbourhood policies could make a positive contribution to the identification of best practices that could be used to support and consolidate other democratisation processes worldwide;
Amendment 19 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) Therefore, in order to ensure that support can be granted to farmers and other beneficiaries from the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) in 2021, the Union should continue to grant such support for onetwo more years under the conditions of the existing legal framework, which covers the period 2014 to 2020. The existing legal framework is laid down in particular in Regulations (EU) No 1303/20137 , (EU) No 1305/20138 , (EU) No 1306/20139 , (EU) No 1307/201310 , (EU) No 1308/201311 , (EU) No 228/201312 and (EU) No 229/201313 of the European Parliament and of the Council. In addition, to facilitate the transition from existing support schemes to the new legal framework which covers the period starting on 1 Januarya transition period of two years should be introduced until December 31 2022, rules should be laid down to regulate how certain support granted on a multiannual basis will be integrated into the new legal framework. __________________ 7Regulation (EU) No1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 320). 8Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 487). 9Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 352/78, (EC) No 165/94, (EC) No 2799/98, (EC) No 814/2000, (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 485/2008 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 549). 10Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing rules for direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 637/2008 and Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 608). 11Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671). 12Regulation (EU) No 228/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 March 2013 laying down specific measures for agriculture in the outermost regions of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 247/2006 (OJ L 78, 20.3.2013, p. 23). 13Regulation (EU) No 229/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 March 2013 laying down specific measures for agriculture in favour of the smaller Aegean islands and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1405/2006 (OJ L 78, 20.3.2013, p. 41).
Amendment 22 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) In light of the fact that the Union should continue to support rural development in 2021, Member States, that demonstrate the risk to run out of funds and not to be able to undertake new legal commitments in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013, should have the possibility to extend their rural development programmes or certain of their regional rural development programmes supported by the EAFRD to 31 December 20212 and to finance those extended programmes from the corresponding budget allocation for the year 2021 and 2022. The extended programmes should aim at maintaining at least the same overall level of environment and climate ambition.
Amendment 24 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) Since certain Member States may still have funds provided by the Union in previous years, Member States should also have the possibility not to extend their rural development programmes or not to extend certain of their regional rural development programmes. Those Member States should have the possibility to transfer the EAFRD budget allocation for 2021 and 2022 or the part of the EAFRD budget allocation corresponding to the regional rural development programmes that have not been extended, to the financial allocations for the years 20223 to 2025, in accordance with the Council Regulation (EU) …/…[Regulation laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2021 to 2027]14 . __________________ 14 Regulation MFF OJ L , , p. .
Amendment 26 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) In order to allow the Commission to provide the necessary financial planning and the corresponding adjustments of the annual breakdowns of the Union support set out in the Annex to Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013, Member States should inform the Commission soon after the entry into force of this Regulation whether they decide to extend their rural development programmes and, in case of regional rural development programmes, which of those programmes they decide to extend, and consequently which corresponding amount of the budget allocation for 2021 and 2022 is not to be transferred to the following years.
Amendment 27 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 lays down common rules applicable to the EAFRD and some other Funds, which operate under a common framework. That Regulation should continue to apply to programmes supported by the EAFRD for the 2014–2020 programming period as well as to those programmes supported by the EAFRD for which Member States decide to extend that period to 31 December 20212. For those Member States, the Partnership Agreement drawn up for the period from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020 in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 should continue to be used as a strategic document by Member States and the Commission with regard to the implementation of support granted by the EAFRD for the programming year 2021.
Amendment 29 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) Regulation (EU) No 1310/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council15 and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 807/201416 provide that expenditure for certain long-term commitments undertaken pursuant to certain regulations that granted support for rural development before Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 should continue to be paid by the EAFRD in the 2014-2020 programming period under certain conditions. That expenditure should also continue to be eligible for the duration of their respective legal commitment under the same conditions in the programming year 2021 and 2022. For reasons of legal clarity and certainty, it also should be clarified that the legal commitments undertaken under measures that correspond to measures of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 to which the integrated administration and control system applies, should be subject to this integrated administration and control system and that payments related to these legal commitments have to be made within the period from 1 December to 30 June of the following calendar year. __________________ 15 Regulation (EU) No 1310/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 laying down certain transitional provisions on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), amending Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards resources and their distribution in respect of the year 2014 and amending Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 and Regulations (EU) No 1307/2013, (EU) No 1306/2013 and (EU) No 1308/2013of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards their application in the year 2014 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 865). 16Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 807/2014 of 11 March 2014 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and introducing transitional provisions (OJ L 227, 31.7.2014, p. 1).
Amendment 32 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) In light of the fact that the CAP Strategic Plans to be prepared by Member States in accordance with the new legal framework are to be applicable as of 1 January 20223, transitional rules should be laid down to regulate the transition from existing support schemes to the new legal framework, in particular Regulation (EU) …/… of the European Parliament and of the Council18 [CAP Strategic Plan Regulation]. __________________ 18Regulation (EU) …/… of the European Parliament and of the Council [CAP Strategic Plan] (OJ L …, …, p. …).
Amendment 36 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) With the view to ensuring continuity as regards the aid schemes in the fruit and vegetable sector, wine sector and the apiculture sector, rules need to be laid down that allow those aid schemes to continue to be implemented until the end of their respective programming periods. For this period certain provisions of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 should therefore continue to apply in relation to expenditure incurred and payments made for operations implemented pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 after 31 December 20212 and until the end of those aid schemes.
Amendment 39 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) The EAFRD should be able to support Community-led local development set up in accordance with the new rules laid down by Regulation (EU) XXXX/XXXX [New CPR]. However, in order to avoid unspent funds for Community-led local development in the programming year 2021 and 2022, Member States that decide to extend their rural development programmes to 31 December 2021 and that also make use of the possibility to transfer amounts from direct payments to rural development, should be able to apply the 5% minimum allocation for Community-led local development only to the EAFRD contribution to the rural development extended to 31 December 20212 calculated before the transfer of amounts from direct payment has been done.
Amendment 42 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) In order to ensure continuity in the transitional period, the reserve for crises in the agricultural sector should be maintained for 2021, 2022 and the relevant amount of the reserve for 2021 and 2022 should be included.
Amendment 44 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
Recital 22
(22) As regards prefinancing arrangements from the EAFRD, it should be made clear that where Member States decide to extend the 2014–2020 period to 31 December 20212, this should not lead to any additional prefinancing granted for the programmes concerned.
Amendment 47 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
Recital 23
(23) Article 11 of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 currently only provides for a notification obligation for Member States as regards their decisions and the estimated product related to the reduction of the part of the amount of direct payments to be granted to a farmer for a given calendar year exceeding EUR 150 000 for the years 2015 to 2020. With a view to ensuring a continuation of the existing system, Member States should also notify their decisions and the estimated product of reduction for calendar year 2021 and 2022.
Amendment 49 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
Recital 24
(24) Article 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 allows Member States to transfer funds between direct payments and rural development as regards calendar years 2014 to 2020. In order to ensure that Member States may keep their own strategy, the flexibility between pillars should be made available also for calendar year 20212 (i.e. financial year 20223).
Amendment 51 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
Recital 25
(25) In order to allow the Commission to be able to set the budgetary ceilings in accordance with Articles 22(1), 36(4), 42(2), 47(3), 49(2), 51(4) and 53(7) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013, it is necessary that Member States notify their decisions on financial allocations by scheme for calendar year 2021 and 2022 by 1 August 2020 and 2021.
Amendment 54 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
Recital 27
(27) In accordance with the current legal framework, Member States notified in 2014 their decisions up to calendar year 2020, on the division of the annual national ceiling for the basic payment scheme between the regions and the possible annual progressive modifications for the period covered by Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013. It is necessary that Member States also notify those decisions for calendar year 2021 and 2022.
Amendment 60 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
Recital 29
(29) Article 30 of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 provides for the annual progressive modifications in the value of the payment entitlements allocated from the reserve to reflect the annual steps of the national ceiling set in Annex II to that Regulation, reflecting a “multiannual” management of the reserve. Those rules should be adapted so to reflect that it is possible to amend both the value of all allocated entitlements and of the reserve to adjust to a change in the amount in that Annex II between two years. Moreover, in some Member States not having reached a flat rate by 2019, internal convergence is implemented on an annual basis. For calendar years 2020, 2021 and 2021,2 only the value of the payment entitlement of the current year needs to be determined in the year of allocation. The unit value of entitlements to be allocated from the reserve in a given year should be calculated after possible adjustment of the reserve in accordance with Article 22(5) of that Regulation. In any subsequent year, the value of the payment entitlements allocated from the reserve should be adapted in accordance with that Article 22(5).
Amendment 62 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
Recital 30
(30) Article 36 of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 provides the application of the single area payment scheme (SAPS) until 31 December 2020. The CAP Strategic Plan Regulation (EU) …/… [CAP Strategic Plan Regulation] allows Member States to implement a basic income support with the same modalities, i.e. without the allocation of payment entitlements based on historic references. Therefore, it is appropriate to allow the prolongation of SAPS in 2021 and 2022.
Amendment 68 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34 a (new)
Recital 34 a (new)
(34a) Irrespective of the date of adoption of the proposal for a Council Regulation determining the multiannual financial frame work for the years 2021–2027 and related to it the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council [regulation on the plan Strategic CAP] and publication date in the Official Journal of The European Union, a transitional period of two years, until December 31, 2022.
Amendment 70 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
For programmes supported by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), Member States that risk, due to the lack of financial resources, not to be able to undertake new legal commitments in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013, may extend the period laid down in Article 26(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 to 31 December 20212.
Amendment 73 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Member States that decide to make use of the possibility provided in the first subparagraph shall notify the Commission of their decision within 10 days after the entry into force of this Regulation. Where Member States have submitted a set of regional programmes in accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013, that notification shall also contain information on which of the regional programmes are to be extended and on the corresponding budgetary allocation within the annual breakdown for the year 2021 and 2022 as set out in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013.
Amendment 78 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4
The notification referred to in the second subparagraph shall be without prejudice to the need to submit a request to amend a rural development programme for the year 2021 and 2022 as referred to in Article 11(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013. Such an amendment shall aim at maintaining at least the same overall level of the EAFRD expenditure for the measures referred to in Article 59(6) of that Regulation.
Amendment 80 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
For Member States that do not decide to make use of the possibility provided in paragraph 1 of this Article, Article [8] of Regulation (EU) …/…[Regulation laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2021 to 2027] shall apply to the allocation not used for the year 2021 and 2022 as set out in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013.
Amendment 82 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Where a Member State decides to make use of the possibility provided in paragraph 1 only with regard to certain regional programmes, the allocation referred to in the first subparagraph of this paragraph shall be the amount set out for that Member State for 2021 and 2022 in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 minus the budgetary allocations notified in accordance with the first subparagraph of paragraph 2 for the regional programmes that are extended.
Amendment 86 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2
Article 2 – paragraph 2
2. For programmes for which Member States decide to extend the 2014–2020 period in accordance with Article 1(1) of this Regulation, the references to time periods or deadlines in Articles 50(1), 51(1), 57(2), 65(2) and (4), and the first paragraph of Article 76 of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 shall be extended for onetwo years.
Amendment 88 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3
Article 2 – paragraph 3
3. For Member States that decide to extend the 2014–2020 period in accordance with Article 1(1) of this Regulation, the Partnership Agreement drawn up for the period from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020 in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 shall continue to be used as a strategic document by Member States and the Commission with regard to the implementation of support granted by the EAFRD for the years 2021 and 2022.
Amendment 90 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – title
Article 3 – title
Eligibility of certain types of expenditure in 2021 and 2022
Amendment 92 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Without prejudice to Article 65(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013, to Article 2(2) of this Regulation and to Article 38 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013, the expenditure referred to in Article 3(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1310/2013 and in Article 16 of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 807/2014 shall be eligible for an EAFRD contribution from the 2021 and 2022 allocation for programmes supported by the EAFRD for which Member States decide to extend the 2014–2020 period in accordance with Article 1(1) of this Regulation, subject to the following conditions:
Amendment 94 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) such expenditure is provided for in the respective rural development programmes for 2021 and 2022;
Amendment 96 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Title I – chapter II – title
Title I – chapter II – title
Amendment 97 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1
For programmes supported by the EAFRD in the 2014–2020 period and for the programmes for which Member States decide to extend the 2014-2020 period in accordance with Article 1(1) of this Regulation, the EAFRD may support mono or multi-funded community-led local development in accordance with Articles 25 to 28 of Regulation (EU) [NEW CPR].
Amendment 101 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) such expenditure is provided for in the respective CAP Strategic Plan for 2022- 2027 in accordance with Regulation (EU) [CAP Plan Regulation] and complies with Regulation (EU) [HzR];
Amendment 103 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
The first subparagraph shall also apply to legal commitments to beneficiaries undertaken under corresponding measures provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999, which are receiving support under Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013.
Amendment 104 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Expenditure relating to legal commitments to beneficiaries incurred under the multiannual measures referred to in Articles 16, 22, 27, 28, 29, 33 and 34 of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 and expenditure relating to legal commitments for a time period going beyond 1 January 2024, or beyond 1 January 2025 in Member States that have decided to extend the 2014-2020 period in accordance with Article 1(1) of this Regulation, under Articles 14 to, Article 15, Article 17, Article 18, points (a) and (b) of Article 19(1), Article 20, Articles 223 to 276, 35, 38, 39 and 39a of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 and under Article 35 of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 shall be eligible for an EAFRD contribution in the period 2022-2027 covered by the CAP Strategic Plan, subject to the following conditions :
Amendment 106 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) such expenditure is provided for in the respective CAP Strategic Plan for 2022-2027 in accordance with Regulation (EU) [CAP Strategic Plan Regulation] and complies with Regulation (EU) [HzR];
Amendment 108 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the EAFRD contribution rate of the corresponding intervention set in the CAP Strategic Plan in accordance with Regulation (EU) [CAP Strategic Plan Regulation], applies;
Amendment 110 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. The work programmes to support the olive oil and table olives sector referred to in Article 29 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, drawn up for the period running from 1 April 2018 until 31 March 2021, shall be extended and shall end on 31 December 20212. The relevant producer organisations recognised under Article 152 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the relevant associations of producer organisations recognised under Article 156 of that Regulation and the relevant interbranch organisations recognised under Article 157 of that Regulation shall modify their work programmes to take account of this extension. The modified work programmes shall be notified to the Commission by 31 December 2020.
Amendment 112 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b and point b a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b and point b a (new)
(b) be replaced by a new operational programme approved under Regulation (EU) [CAP Strategic Plan Regulation]. or (ba) continue to operate until its end under the conditions applicable on the basis of the provisions in force on the date of its approval.
Amendment 116 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. The support programmes in the wine sector referred to in Article 40 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 shall end on 15 October 2023. Articles 39 to 54 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 shall continue to apply after 31 December 20212 as regards expenditure incurred and payments made for operations implemented pursuant to that Regulation before 16 October 2023 within the aid scheme referred to in Articles 39 to 52 of that Regulation.
Amendment 118 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4
Article 7 – paragraph 4
4. The national programmes in the apiculture sector referred to in Article 55 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 shall end on 31 July 2022. Articles 55, 56 and 57 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 shall continue to apply after 31 December 20212 as regards expenditure incurred and payments made for operations implemented pursuant to that Regulation before 1 August 2022 within the aid scheme referred to in Article 55 of that Regulation.
Amendment 121 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 6
Article 7 – paragraph 6
6. With regard to the aid schemes referred to in paragraphs 3 and 4 of this Article, Articles 7(3), 9, 21, 43, 51, 52, 54, 59, 67, 68, 70 to 75, 77, 91 to 97, 99, 100, 102(2), 110 and 111 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 and the relevant provisions of delegated and implementing acts related to those Articles shall continue to apply after 31 December 20212 in relation to expenditure incurred and payments made for operations implemented pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 after that date and until the end of the aid schemes referred to in paragraphs 3 and 4 of this Article.
Amendment 126 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013
Article 28 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 a
Article 28 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 a
For new commitments to be undertaken from 2021 Member States shall determine a shorter period of one to threefive years in their rural development programmes. If Member States provide for an annual extension of commitments after the termination of the initial period in accordance with the first subparagraph, from 2021 the extension shall not go beyond one year. As from 2021, for new commitments directly following a commitment performed in the initial period, Member States shall determine a period of one year to five years in their rural development programmes.;
Amendment 129 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013
Article 29 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 a
Article 29 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 a
For new commitments to be undertaken from 2021, Member States shall determine a shorter period of one to threfive years in their rural development programmes. If Member States provide for an annual extension for the maintenance of organic farming after the termination of the initial period in accordance with the first subparagraph, from 2021 the extension shall not go beyond one year. As from 2021, for new commitments concerning maintenance that directly follow the commitment performed in the initial period, Member States shall determine a period of one to five years in their rural development programmes.;
Amendment 133 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013
Article 51 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 51 – paragraph 2 a (new)
(5a) in Article 51, after paragraph 2 the following paragraph is inserted: ‘2a. In transitional period of the 2021 year, the Member States may finance tasks related to implementation of EAGF measures concerning the programming period 2021-2027 by EAFRD technical assistance of the programming period 2014-2020.’
Amendment 136 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point a
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point a
Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013
Article 58 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a
Article 58 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a
Without prejudice to paragraphs 5, 6 and 7, the total amount of Union support for rural development under this Regulation for the period from 1 January 2021 to 31 December 20212 shall be maximum EUR 11 258 707 816, in current prices, in accordance with the multiannual financial framework for the years 2021 to 2027.;
Amendment 153 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point 10 a (new) – point a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point 10 a (new) – point a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013
Article 37 – paragraph 1
Article 37 – paragraph 1
(10a) Article 37 is amended as follows: (a) paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: ‘1. Member States applying the single area payment scheme in accordance with Article 36 may decide to grant transitional national aid in the period 2015-2020.1.’
Amendment 156 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point 10 a (new) – point b (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point 10 a (new) – point b (new)
Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013
Article 37 – paragraph 11 – subparagraph 4 – indent 6
Article 37 – paragraph 11 – subparagraph 4 – indent 6
Amendment 161 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas it is essential to ensure a level playing field for farmers in all Member States, fair standard of living across regions and Member States, affordable prices for citizens and consumers, and access to quality food and healthy diets, while delivering on the commitments for environmental care, climate action, and animal and plant health and welfare;
Amendment 365 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the intention to simplify and modernise the CAP, but emphasisunderlines that the integrity of the sSingle mMarket and a truly common and adequately financed by the EU policy must be the overriding priorities of reform;
Amendment 415 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Considers that subsidiarity for Member States should only be granted within a common general set of rules and tools agreed at EU level as part of a uniform approach to all programming efforts and eligibility criteria, should cover both of the CAP’s pillars and ensure, in particular, a European approach in Pillar I without national co-financing and thus a level playing field;
Amendment 499 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to avoid renationalisation of CAP and grant more flexibility to Member States and regions within the framework of the agricultural de minimis rules ;
Amendment 535 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Considers it necessary to maintain the current two-pillared architecture, particularly Pillar I, which is dedicated to income support for farmers; considers it necessary, at the same time, to compensate for the provision of public goods on the basis of uniformgeneral criteria, while allowing Member States to take specific approaches to reflect local conditions;
Amendment 553 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Considers that the current CAP architecture can only deliver its objectives if sufficiently funded; calls, therefore, for the CAP budget to be maintained in the nextonly if it remains a common, modern and well- funded EU policy which supports sustainable development of agriculture and is crucial for providing safe, high quality and diverse food, jobs and growth in rural areas; which contributes to further levelling of developmental gaps in agriculture and rural areas and which reflects social and economic cohesion in its financial and programming dimension as well as proposed instruments and thus calls for maintaining the CAP budget in the post-2020 MFF at at least athe current levels in order to achieve the ambitions of a revised and efficient CAP beyondafter 2020;
Amendment 619 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Believes that more targeted support for family farms is necessary and that this can be achieved by introducing a compulsory higher support rate for small farms; considers, moreover, that and, at the same time and reflecting economies of scale considering different agricultural structures, support for larger farms should be digressive, reflecting economies of scale, with the possibility for capping to be decided by the Member States;
Amendment 673 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Calls forStresses that the existing system for calculating direct payments in Pillar I, which is often based on historic entitlements, to and not most recent data, should be replaced by an EU-wide uniform method of calculating payments, in order to based on support paid per hectare, in order to ensure a level playing field for farmers in all Member States and make the system simpler and more transparent;
Amendment 740 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Stresses the need for a fair and equal distribution of direct payments between Member States, which must take into account socio-economic differences, different production costs and the amounts received by Member States under Pillar II;
Amendment 761 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Amendment 764 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13b. Underlines that all EU farmers have to meet the same standards and requirements and are facing the same challenges;
Amendment 780 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Believes that, provided that a level playing field in the single market can be guaranteed, voluntary coupled support (VCS) payments should be maintained, and used as a tool to address needs of sensitive sectors and in a wider scope to address specific objectives related to environment, climate or quality and marketing of agricultural products, counteract specific difficulties, particularly those arising from the structural competitive disadvantage of less- favoured and mountainous regions, as well as those which are more temporary in nature and arise from a shift away from the old entitlement scheme, for example;
Amendment 795 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. In case of direct payments related to voluntary coupled support (VCS), more support should be given to small and medium-sized farms, and socio-economic considerations, that could be used in addition to statistical production figures, need to be taken into account;
Amendment 822 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Recalls that generational renewal is a challenge faced by farmers in many Member States and that consequently each nNational sStrategy must therefore address this issue through a comprehensive approach, including top-ups in Pillar I1 and targeted measures in Pillar II, as well as by means of new financial instruments and national measures, in ordernd also via national measures and wider use of new financial instruments as a tool to grant access to capital in the circumstances of limited resources, to incentivise famers to pass on their farming operations;
Amendment 857 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Recalls that the investment support(non-repayable) should primarily be used in areas of EU-level added value;
Amendment 878 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Underlines the importance of rural development, including the LEADER initiative, in, to improve the synergy of different policies and to enhance competitiveness, promotes effective and sustainable economies and enhances development of rural areas, to supporting multi-functional agriculture and in fostering additional entrepreneurial activities and opportunities, in order to generate income from agri-tourism, and to secure community-supported agricultureby financially strengthening Pillar II, thus increasing potential to generate income, to tackle depopulation, unemployment, poverty and theo provision of social services in rural areasmote social inclusion;
Amendment 940 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Calls on the Commission to introduce a new and comprehensive legal framework which allows the integration of the various types of environmental actions at present, such as cross compliance, greening and the good agricultural and environmental conditions (GAEC) standards, as well as agri-environment measures (AEMs) for rural development, so that farmers can deliver effectively and with less bureaucracy on environmental care, biodiversity and climate action, receiving equal awards for provision of comparable services of public interest, while ensuring that Member States have adequate control and taking into account local conditions;
Amendment 1252 #
2018/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25a. Believes that the compliance of farming in partner states with good and sustainable farming practices, climate measures and other means to minimise environmental impact of farming, which are applied in the EU, shall become an obligatory threshold for allowing access of goods manufactured in the third states to enter the EU market;
Amendment 101 #
2018/0169(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) any well-founded additional conditions set by the competent authority in the relevant permit pursuant to points (b) and (c) of Article 7(3), as regards water quality.
Amendment 117 #
2018/0169(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. The reclamation plant operator shall draw-up a Water Reuse Risk Management Plan based on the key risk management tasks set out in Annex II for which he is responsible. The Water Reuse Risk Management Plan shall propose any additional requirements to those specified in Annex I necessary to further mitigate any risks, and shall, inter alia, identify hazards, risks and appropriate preventive measures.
Amendment 123 #
2018/0169(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. Any supply of water reclaimed waterfor commercial purposes and destined for a use specified in section 1 of Annex I, shall be subject to a permit.
Amendment 130 #
2018/0169(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. National water authorities, together with the Commission, shall organise specialist training and information sessions for national agency staff that will be responsible for assessing permit applications from operators; alternatively, the Commission shall undertake to draw up and disseminate to the national authorities information brochures and possibly online content concerning the rules and requirements governing minimum standards for water reuse.
Amendment 134 #
2018/0169(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. TBefore issuing a permit, the competent authority shall verify compliance of the reclaimed water with the conditions set out in the permit, at the point of compliance. The compliance check shall be performed using the following means:
Amendment 137 #
2018/0169(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. In the event of non-compliance detected after issue of a permit, the competent authority shall require the reclamation plant operator to take anyhalt the supply of reclaimed water until the necessary measures to restore compliance without delayhave been taken.
Amendment 141 #
2018/0169(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4
Article 8 – paragraph 4
4. If an incident affecting compliance with the permit's conditions occurs, the reclamation plant operator shall immediately inform the competent authority and theall end-user(s) which may be potentially affected, and communicate to the competent authority the information necessary for assessing the impacts of such an incident.
Amendment 146 #
2018/0169(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. The Commission shall undertake to review once every 10 years, or whenever the situation so requires, the minimum reclaimed water quality standards on the basis of studies conducted in the EU rather than third countries.
Amendment 7 #
2017/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas in the 2007-2013 period, the number of young farmers in the EU as a whole decreased from 3.3 to 2.3 million, and the area of farms cultivated by young farmers decreased during that period from 57 to 53 million hectares;
Amendment 11 #
2017/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas in the 2007-2013 period in the EU as a whole, as well as in most Member States, there were no positive generational changes in agriculture, with the percentage of young farmers shrinking and the percentage of older farmers rising;
Amendment 13 #
2017/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A c (new)
Recital A c (new)
Ac. whereas the generational situation in agriculture varies significantly from one Member State to another and thus calls for a flexible and diversified approach;
Amendment 94 #
2017/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 – point 1 (new)
Paragraph 2 – point 1 (new)
(1) Expects the Commission to present a clear intervention logic for agricultural generational change instruments, based on a sound assessment of young farmers' needs, including an analysis of the reasons why young people interested in taking up farming face barriers and an analysis of the extent to which such obstacles have become widespread depending on the particular geographical areas, agricultural sectors or other specific farm characteristics;
Amendment 95 #
2016/2225(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Points out that Union law for the protection of privacy and personal data, as well as the rights to equality and non- discrimination, are applicable to data processing even when that processing is preceded by pseudonymisation and anonymisation techniques, insofar as there are risks of re-identification, or, in any case, when use of non-personal data might impact on individuals’ private lives or other rights and freedomcivil liberties;
Amendment 128 #
2016/2225(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Takes the view that anonymisation techniques should comprise technical measures and contractual obligations which ensure non-re-identification; calls on corporations to regularly review such risks in light of new technologies and to document the appropriateness of measures adopted, allowing independent supervisory authorities to monitor practices and provide audit recommendations, which should be implemented without delay;
Amendment 164 #
2016/2225(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Union and the Member States to identify and minimise algorithmic discrimination and bias and to develop a strong and common ethics framework for the processing of personal data and automated decision-making;
Amendment 80 #
2016/2223(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Considers that increased research and information is needed on enabling access to secondary market opportunities and alternative uses for products which would otherwise be ploughed back into the soil or wasted, wasted or disposed of;
Amendment 7 #
2016/2163(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the fact that, during 2015, the Agency strongly focused on fundamental rights challenges arising from the significant increase in refugees and migrants – including refugees crossing borders illegally – coming to the Union; acknowledges especially that the Agency considerably stepped up its activities in the area of immigration and integration of migrants, visa and border control and asylum procedures;
Amendment 796 #
2016/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 a (new)
Paragraph 30 a (new)
30 a. Calls on the governments of the Member States to condemn practices which, by means of linguistic discrimination or enforced or concealed assimilation, have in the past been – or are now – directed against the identity and language use of endangered linguistic communities or their cultural institutions;
Amendment 801 #
2016/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 b (new)
Paragraph 30 b (new)
30 b. In the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities (FCNM) adopted by Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe in 1994, calls on the European Commission to elaborate a European level Directive in order to tackle language discrimination, as there are Directives on how to tackle racism and xenophobia;
Amendment 806 #
2016/2009(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 c (new)
Paragraph 30 c (new)
30 c. Calls on the European Commission to strengthen its plan to promote the teaching and use of regional languages, as a potential way to tackle language discrimination in the EU;
Amendment 29 #
2016/0284(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) The development of digital technologies and internet has transformed the distribution of and access to television and radio programmes. Users increasingly expect to have access to television and radio programmes both live and on- demand, using traditional channels such as satellite or cable and also through online services. Broadcasting organisations are therefore increasingly offering, in addition to their own broadcasts of television and radio programmes, online services ancillary to their broadcast, such as simulcasting and catch-up services. Retransmission services operators, which aggregate broadcasts of television and radio programmes into packages and provide them to users simultaneously to the initial transmission of the broadcast, unaltered and unabridged, use various techniques of retransmission such as cable, satellite, digital terrestrial, closed circuit IP-based or mobile networks as well as the open internet. On the part of users, there is a growing demand and need for access to broadcasts of television and radio programmes, including catch-up services, not only originating in their Member State but also in other Member States of the Union, includingespecially from members of linguistic minorities of the Union as well as from, persons who live in another Member State than their Member State of origin as well as persons who study other languages than their mother tongue.
Amendment 40 #
2016/0284(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) A number of barriers hinder the provision of online services which are ancillary to broadcasts and the provision of retransmission services and thereby the free circulation of television and radio programmes within the Union. Broadcasting organisations transmit daily many hours of news, cultural, political, documentary or entertainment programmes. These programmes incorporate a variety of content such as audiovisual, musical, literary or graphic works, which is protected by copyright and/or related rights under Union law. That results in a complex process to clear rights from a multitude of right holders and for different categories of works and other protected subject matter. Often the rights need to be cleared in a short time-frame, in particular when preparing programmes such as news or current affairs. In order to make their online services available across borders, broadcasting organisations need to have the required rights to works and other protected subject matter for all the relevant territories which further increases the complexity of the rights' clearance.
Amendment 61 #
2016/0284(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) Council Directive 93/83/EEC17 facilitates cross-border satellite broadcasting and retransmission by cable of television and radio programmes from other Member States of the Union. However, the provisions of that Directive on transmissions of broadcasting organisations are limited to satellite transmissions and therefore do not apply to online services ancillary to broadcast while the provisions concerning retransmissions of television and radio programmes from other Member States are limited to simultaneous, unaltered and unabridged retransmission by cable or microwave systems and do not extend to such retransmissions by means of other technologies. _________________ 17 Council Directive 93/83/EEC of 27 September 1993 on the coordination of certain rules concerning copyright and rights related to copyright applicable to satellite broadcasting and cable retransmission OJ L 248, 6.10.1993, p. 15– 21.
Amendment 70 #
2016/0284(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) Therefore, cross-border provision of online services ancillary tof broadcasters and retransmissions of television and radio programmes originating in other Member States should be facilitated by adapting the legal framework on the exercise of copyright and related rights relevant for those activities.
Amendment 78 #
2016/0284(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) The ancillary online services covered by this Regulation are those services offered by broadcasting organisations which have a clear and subordinate relationship to the broadcast. They include services giving access to television and radio programmes in a linear manner simultaneously to the broadcast and services giving access, within a defined time period after the broadcast, to television and radio programmes which have been previously broadcast by the broadcasting organisation (so-called catch- up services). In addition, ancillary online services include services which give access to material which enriches or otherwise expands television and radio programmes broadcast by the broadcasting organisation, including by way of previewing, extending, supplementing or reviewing the relevant programme's content. The provision of access to individual works or other protected subject matter that have been incorporated in a television or radio programme should not be regarded as an ancillary online service. Similarly, the provision of access to works or other protected subject matter independently of broadcast, such as services giving access to individual musical or audiovisual works, music albums or videos, do not fall under the definition of ancillary online service.
Amendment 164 #
2016/0284(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) In order to prevent circumvention of the application of the country of origin principle through the extension of the duration of existing agreements concerning the exercise of copyright and related rights relevant for the provision of an ancillary online service as well as the access to or the use of an ancillary online service, it is necessary to apply the principle of country of origin also to existing agreements but with a transitional period.
Amendment 203 #
2016/0284(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) "ancillary online service" means an online service consisting in the provision to the public, by or under the control and responsibility of a broadcasting organisation, of linear and non-linear radio or television programmes before, simultaneously with or for a defined period of time after their broadcast by the broadcasting organisation as well as of any material produced by or for the broadcasting organisation which is ancillary to such broadcast;
Amendment 236 #
2016/0284(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – title
Article 2 – title
Application of the principle of ‘country of origin’ to ancillary online services
Amendment 247 #
2016/0284(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1
(1) The acts of communication to the public and of making available occurring when providing an ancillary online service by or under the control and responsibility of a broadcasting organisation as well as the acts of reproduction which are necessary for the provision of, the access to or the use of the ancillary online service shall, for the purposes of exercising copyright and related rights relevant for these acts, be deemed to occur solely in the Member State in which the broadcasting organisation has its principal establishment.
Amendment 272 #
2016/0284(COD)
Exercise of the rights in retransmission and in re-use of broadcasting organisations' on-demand services by right holders other than broadcasting organisations
Amendment 300 #
2016/0284(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 5 a (new)
(5 a) The principles of paragraphs 1 to 5 shall apply also to the integral re-use of the broadcasting organisation’s on- demand services by a party other than the broadcasting organisation under whose control and responsibility such services were primarily made available.
Amendment 9 #
2016/0282(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 105
Recital 105
(105) It is appropriate that different cases usually referred to as situations of conflict of interest be identified and treated distinctly. The notion of a ‘conflict of interest’ should be solely used for cases where an entity or person with responsibilities for budget implementation, audit or control or an official or an agent of a Union institution is in such a situation. All persons or entities potentially subject to conflict of interest should be encouraged to publish their declarations of interest, instead of a declaration of absence of conflict of interest. A self-evaluation of conflict of interest is a conflict of interest in itself. Therefore, the evaluation of conflict of interest should be done by an independent third party. In cases where an economic operator attempts to unduly influence a procedure or obtain confidential information, this should be treated as grave professional misconduct. In addition, economic operators may be in a situation where they should not be selected to implement a contract because of a professional conflicting interest. For instance, a company should not evaluate a project in which it has participated or an auditor should not be in a position to audit accounts it has previously certified. A record of all cases of conflict of interest and revolving door identified in the Union institutions should be published on a regular basis.
Amendment 10 #
2016/0282(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 108
Recital 108
(108) Union public procurement should ensure that Union funds are used in an effective, transparent, and appropriate way. In that regard, electronic procurement should contribute to the better use of Union funds and enhance access to contracts for all economic operators. All Union institutions conducting public procurement should publish clear rules on their websites regarding acquisition, expenditure and monitoring, as well as all contracts awarded, including their value.
Amendment 11 #
2016/0282(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 113
Recital 113
(113) A contracting authority should be able to cancel a procurement procedure before the contract is signed, including on grounds of suspicion of conflict of interest, revolving doors or grave professional misconduct, without the candidates or tenderers being entitled to claim compensation. This should be without prejudice to situations where the contracting authority has acted in such a way that it may be held liable for damages in accordance with the general principles of Union law.
Amendment 23 #
2016/0282(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 131 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 131 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. In order to have an efficient early detection and exclusion system, clear rules shall be put in place for a real protection of whistle-blowers. Regular reports on whistle-blowers cases handled and finalised shall be published by relevant bodies.
Amendment 24 #
2016/0282(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 165 – paragraph 1
Article 165 – paragraph 1
The contracting authority may, before the contract is signed, cancel the procurement procedure, including on grounds of suspicion of conflict of interest, revolving doors or grave professional misconduct, without the candidates or tenderers being entitled to claim any compensation.
Amendment 28 #
2016/0282(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 183 – paragraph 2
Article 183 – paragraph 2
2. All grants awarded in the course of a financial year shall be published in accordance with paragraphs 1 to 4 of Article 36. In addition, all Union institutions conducting public procurement shall publish on their websites clear rules regarding acquisition, expenditure and monitoring, as well as all contracts awarded, including their value.
Amendment 54 #
2016/0231(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) In order to ensure efficient, transparent and cost-effective reporting and verification of greenhouse gas emissions and of other information necessary to assess progress with Member States’ annual emissions allocations, the requirements for annual reporting and evaluation under this Regulation are integrated with the relevant Articles under Regulation (EU) No. 525/2013, which should therefore be amended accordingly. The amendment of that Regulation should also ensure that progress of Member States in making emission reductions continues to be evaluated annually, taking into account progress in Union policies and measures and information from Member States. Every two years, the evaluation should include the projected progress of the Union towards meeting its reduction commitments and of Member States towards fulfilling their obligations. However, the application of deductions should only be considered at five-year intervals, so that the potential contribution from deforested land, afforested land, managed cropland and managed grassland taking place pursuant to Regulation [ ] can be considered. This is without prejudice to the duty of the Commission to ensure compliance with the obligations of Member States resulting from this Regulation or to the power of the Commission to initiate infringement proceedings for this purpose.
Amendment 57 #
2016/0231(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) As a means to enhance the overall cost-effectiveness of total reductions, Member States should be able to transfer part of their annual emission allocation to other Member States. The transparency of such transfers should be ensured and may be carried out in a manner that is mutually convenient, including by means of auctioning, the use of market intermediaries acting on an agency basis, or by way of bilateral arrangements.
Amendment 224 #
2015/2062(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on Member States to abide by the recommendations in force concerning the treatment of foreign prisoners, based on their right not to suffer discrimination on the grounds of origin or nationality;
Amendment 139 #
2014/2254(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas article 22 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union obliges the Union to "respect cultural, religious and linguistic diversity",
Amendment 148 #
2014/2254(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G b (new)
Recital G b (new)
Gb. whereas fundamental freedoms, human rights and equal opportunities shall be provided for all citizens of the European Union including persons belonging to national and linguistic minorities;
Amendment 402 #
2014/2254(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Deplores the fact that even today people belonging to minorities are still victims of discrimination; calls for more consistency of the European Union in the field of minority protection; strongly believes that all Member States as well as candidate countries shall be bound by the same principles and criteria in order to avoid the application of double standards; Calls therefore, as a part of resolving the so- called Copenhagen dilemma, for the establishment of an effective mechanism to monitor and ensure fundamental and acquired rights of national and linguistic minorities both in candidate countries and in countries already admitted to the European Union;
Amendment 173 #
2012/2043(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 – point b
Paragraph 20 – point b
b. the principle of duty of care for all animal owners and handlers, so that at every step of the chain there is a natural or legal person responsible for the animal and its wellbeing, whereas stray animals should be the responsibility of the Member States’ local authorities because of the public health and safety related risks;
Amendment 188 #
2012/2043(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 – point d
Paragraph 20 – point d
d. a certificate or other proof of competence for any unqualified person with no farm work experience handling animals in the course of their professional duties, along with adequate training requirements for specific animal welfare responsibilities when needed, and a system for pre-testing permits for the construction or reconstruction of animal premises;
Amendment 11 #
2011/2284(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. believes that international cooperation beyond the EU is indispensable, as the nature of cyber-threats is global, requiring global responses that comply with the provisions of international law;
Amendment 3 #
2011/2069(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 a (new)
Citation 5 a (new)
- having regard to Article 10 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Amendment 4 #
2011/2069(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 b (new)
Citation 5 b (new)
- having regard to the Council of Europe Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities,
Amendment 5 #
2011/2069(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 c (new)
Citation 5 c (new)
- having regard to the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages,
Amendment 23 #
2011/2069(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) founds the Union on a community of indivisible and universal values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, solidarity, the rule of law and respect for human rights, for all persons on the territory of the EU, including those belonging to minorities, which includes national, ethnic and linguistic minorities,
Amendment 88 #
2011/2069(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – indent 2
Paragraph 5 – indent 2
– the lack of transparency in the EU agencies, which makes it difficult to ascertain whether or not their actions comply with the principles of transparency, good administration, data protection and antidiscrimination,opposing discrimination – including discrimination affecting national, ethnic and linguistic minorities – as well as of necessity and proportionality;
Amendment 176 #
2011/2069(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Stresses that the principles of human dignity and equality before the law are foundations of democratic society; deems incomprehensible the current blockage of Council negotiations on the Commission’s proposal for a horizontal directive extending comprehensive protection against discrimination on all grounds, including religion or belief, disability, age, membership of national or ethnic minorities, or sexual orientation, and urges efforts to ensure adoption as soon as possible;
Amendment 187 #
2011/2069(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. urges the Member States not to discriminate against persons belonging to national or ethnic minorities, and to ensure that such people enjoy the rights conferred on them by international and EU law;
Amendment 410 #
2011/2069(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 43 a (new)
Paragraph 43 a (new)
43a. Calls on Member States to remove the barrier created by electoral thresholds applied to national minorities during elections in a given country;
Amendment 183 #
2011/0280(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) Due to the successive integration of various sectors into the single payment scheme and the ensuing period of adjustment granted to farmers, it has become increasingly difficult to justify the presence of significant individual differences in the level of support per hectare resulting from use of historical references. Therefore direct income support should be more equitably distributed between Member States, by reducing the link to historical references and having regard to the overall context of the Union budget. To ensure a more equal distribution of direct support, while taking account of the differences that still exist in wage levels and input costs, the levels of direct support per hectare should be progressively adjusted. Member States with direct payments below the level of 90 % of the average should close one third of the gap between their current level and this level. This convergenceA single payment scheme leading to a certain level of redistribution of funds should be financed proportionally by all Member States with direct payments above the Union average. In addition, all payment entitlements activated in 2019 in atroduced in the interests of the fair distribution of direct payments across the EU, with every Member State or receiving a region should have a uniform unit value following a convergence towards this value that should take place durt least 90% of the average for direct payments ing the transition period in linear steps. However, in order to avoid disruptive financial consequences for farmers, Member States having used the single payment scheme, and in particular the historical model, should be allowed to partially take historical factors into account when calculating the value of payment entitlements in the first year of application of the new scheme. The debate on the next Multiannual Financial Framework for the period startEU and no Member State receiving more than 110% of the average for direct payments. A new direct payment system should be implemented, but it should come with an assurance that the transition period will be appropriately shorter – but ending inby 2021 should also focus on the objective of complete convergence through the equal distribution of direct support across the European Union during that15 at the latest – for those Member States receiving direct payments below the EU average during the current funding period.
Amendment 21 #
2011/0231(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) In the interest of consumers, this Regulation should apply to all aromatised wine products marketed in the Union, whether produced in the Member States or in third countries. In order to maintain and improve the reputation of Union’s aromatised wine products on the world market, the rules provided for in this Regulation should also apply to such drinks produced in the Union for export.
Amendment 22 #
2011/0231(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) Moreover, the ethyl alcohol used for the production of aromatised wine products should be exclusively of agricultural origin, so as to meet consumer expectations and conform to traditional quality practices. This will help bring fallow fields into use, particularly in the new Member States. It will also ensure an outlet for basic agricultural products.
Amendment 23 #
2011/0231(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) Member State authorities should be responsible for ensuring compliance with this Regulation, and arrangements should be made for the Commission to be able to monitor and verify such compliance in conjunction with the Member States.
Amendment 36 #
2011/0231(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8
Article 8
In applying a quality policy for aromatised wine products with geographical indications protected under this Regulation which are produced on their own territory or for the establishment of new geographical indications, Member States may lay down rules on production and description which are stricter than those referred to in Article 3 and in Annexes I and II in so far as they are compatible with the recommendations of the International Organisation of Vine and Wine (OIV) and with Union law.
Amendment 39 #
2011/0231(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
The Member State shall, by means of a national procedure, ensure the adequate publication of the application and providing for a period of at least twohree months from the date of publication within which any natural or legal person having a legitimate interest and resident or established on its territory may object to the proposed protection by lodging a duly substantiated statement with the Member State.