BETA

17 Amendments of Elena Oana ANTONESCU related to 2010/2153(INI)

Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 23
– having regard to the report by the French Senate's committee of inquiry into influenza A entitled ‘Influenza A (H1N1)v: reflections on the first pandemic of the 21st Century’, published on 29 July 201012 , 12 http://www.senat.fr/notice- rapport/2009/r09-685-1-notice.htmldeleted
2010/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas, under the International Health Regulations (IHR) – a legal instrument binding on the states parties to it – the remit of the WHO includes public health surveillance, coordinating international public health measures and, in relation to potentially pandemic viruses, determining current phases of alert on a scale of one to six,
2010/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas the phases of a global pandemic are determined in accordance with the provisions of the IHR and in consultation with other organisations and institutions and with the Member States affected,
2010/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 1
INDEPENDENCECOOPERATION
2010/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Emphasises the need to reinforce cooperation between Member States within the EU in the management of the response to a pandemic, within the framework of WHO, according to the International Health Regulation of 2005 ;
2010/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Wants to reinforce the collaboration between Member States by ensuring coherent risk assessment and risk management for fast evolving threats at EU level by putting in place, where necessary, additional structures and coordination mechanisms;
2010/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 e (new)
1e. Urges the WHO to revise the definition of a pandemic, taking into consideration, when a virus is detected, not only its geographical spread but also its severity;
2010/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 f (new)
1f. Claims that work on the legal basis relating to the implementation of the joint buying guarantee to the Member States an equitable access and a reasonable price to the most effective vaccines as well as the respect of the European legislation in terms of the manufacturer responsibility;
2010/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 g (new)
1g. Calls on the Member States to involve health professionals more closely at every stage in the preparation and application of strategies for preventing and combating pandemics;
2010/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Underscores the need for studies independent of the pharmaceutical companies on vaccines and antiviral medications, including with regard to the monitoring of vaccination coverage;
2010/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Calls in particular on the European Commission and the EMA to review the accelerated authorisation procedures for the placing on the market of medicinal products designed to respond to a health crisis, in order to ensure correcta full assessment of the benefit-risk profile associated with the use of those medicinal products;
2010/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Wants to ensure that the scientific experts have no financial or other interests in the pharmaceutical industry that could affect their impartiality; Request the development of a European code of conduct relating to the exercise of the scientific function of expert in any European authority in charge of safety, of the management and the anticipation of the risks ; require that each expert subscribe to the ethical principles of this code of conduct before any taking up the duties ;
2010/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Asks that experts who are involved in the pharmaceutical sector could be consulted but should be excluded from decision-making ;
2010/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5c. Requests the installation of a definition of the conflict of interest which is common to all the European agencies ;
2010/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Is aware of the need to communicate more clearly and transparently to help the publics to facilitate the risk communication; Underlines the necessity to arrive to only one and single message bound for the citizens as soon as the health hazard was evaluated ; insists on the importance of consistent communication of the Member States regarding the informative contents of the message (as for the nature of the virus, with the nature of the risk and in the manner of securing and curing);
2010/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 d (new)
10d. Stresses the need for accountability of information professionals and the prudence required in the processing of health information messages a fortiori in the context of a pandemic;
2010/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Demands precise definition ofRequests to specify and clarify the roles, duties, remits, limits, relations and responsibilities of the key actors and the structures of management of the medical threats at the level of the EU which are the European Commission, the ECDC, the EMA and the Member States and also of more informal entities such as the Health Security Committee, the HEOF and the ‘public health’ group, composed of senior officials able to intervene in the decision- making process regarding the management of a health crisis;
2010/12/20
Committee: ENVI