BETA

21 Amendments of João FERREIRA related to 2018/0349M(NLE)

Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas Western Sahara is currently a Non-Self-Governing Territory under the foreign military occupation of Morocco, divided by a military wall of more than 2,700 kilometres and that access to the natural resources of Western Sahara is one of the keys of the conflict and its exploitation without consent of the Saharawi people supposes a violation of Article 73 of the Charter of the United Nations;
2018/12/04
Committee: PECH
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital I a (new)
Ia. Whereas 83.7% of the catches obtained in the waters occupied by Morocco come from the area of Dakhla, in the Saharawi fishing ground, being Saharawi less than 5% of the workers in the sector and none work in the port, but precarious workforce, and that in the area 3188 Moroccan boats operate in front of 312 Saharawi;
2018/12/04
Committee: PECH
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital M a (new)
Ma. Whereas it is estimated that 92% of the catches made by European fleets under the EU-Morocco Fisheries Agreement take place precisely in the waters of Western Sahara;
2018/12/04
Committee: PECH
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital M b (new)
Mb. whereas under the EU-Morocco Agreement, the fleet of European Union countries has captured 324584 tonnes of fish in four years worth more than 300 million euros;
2018/12/04
Committee: PECH
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital M c (new)
Mc. considering, taking into account the judgment of the CJEU of 27 February 2018, EU has committed a fraud of 95.8 million euros to the EU budget, since the EU-Morocco Fisheries Agreement is no applicable to the waters of Western Sahara and the European Union has paid 58.8 million euros of access to fishery resources based on this Agreement, and 37 million for sectoral support:
2018/12/04
Committee: PECH
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital M d (new)
Md. whereas, due to the illegal application of the EU-Morocco Fisheries Agreement to Western Sahara, the Saharawi people have stopped receiving 58.8 million access to fishery resources, 34 million in canon, 300 million in value of catches and 37million in sectoral support, the economic damage caused reaches 430 million euros;
2018/12/04
Committee: PECH
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital M e (new)
Me. whereas the people of Western Sahara have not given their consent to this agreement, an indispensable requirement for it to be applied in Western Sahara as established in the judgment of the CJEU, a consent that must be expressed through its legitimate representative, the Polisario Front, in application of Resolution34/37 of the General Assembly of the United Nations:
2018/12/04
Committee: PECH
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Takes note of the two conditions set in the Court’s judgment, to explicitly mention Western Sahara in the Agreement text and to obtain the consent of the people, and of the third criterion added by the Council, which is the need to ensure that the Agreement benefits the local population;deleted
2018/12/04
Committee: PECH
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Urges the European Commission to enter into negotiations with the Polisario Front whenever it wishes that an agreement could be applicable to Western Sahara;
2018/12/04
Committee: PECH
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Reiterates the illegality of this new agreement between the Union and Morocco by including fishing exploitation from Western Sahara and highlights the doubts that some Member States, social organizations, the Polisario Front or the European Parliament's Legal Service have expressed in regarding its possible legal and political repercussions on the question of the exercise of the right to self-determination of Western Sahara;
2018/12/04
Committee: PECH
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Stresses the consent of the legitimate representative of the Saharawi people, the Polisario Front, has not been obtained, since the talks have been limited to a "consultation" related to trade in Western Sahara without there having been a real process of consent;
2018/12/04
Committee: PECH
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes this clarification and the legal certainty that it provides for EU operators fishing in the waters in question;deleted
2018/12/04
Committee: PECH
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that the European External Action Service (EEAS) and the Commission conducted a process of consultations with the local populations affected by the SFPA and with interested parties;deleted
2018/12/04
Committee: PECH
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Takes note of the Commission report on the evaluation of the benefits of the SFPA for the population of Western Sahara;deleted
2018/12/04
Committee: PECH
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Requests the European Commission to demand from Morocco precise information on the number of Sahrawi people benefited by the EU- Morocco Fisheries Agreement
2018/12/04
Committee: PECH
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Underlines that in order to credibly support and fully encourage the ongoing peace process under the auspices of the Personal Envoy of the Secretary- General Horst Köhler, the EU should abstain to ratify any amended Agreement between the EU and Morocco applicable to Western Sahara as it would imply EU support for one of the two parties in the conflict and hinders the efforts of the Special Envoy of the Secretary General of the United Nations to reach a political solution; especially when the parties are expected to meet in Geneva under the auspices of the UN in December in the first direct negotiations between the Polisario Front and Morocco since 2012;
2018/12/04
Committee: PECH
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Points out that the sectoral support provisions in the SFPA can facilitate structural investment in the sector, particularly in the construction of infrastructure and plant to help boost competitiveness and employment;deleted
2018/12/04
Committee: PECH
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Highlights the inclusion in the SFPA of new provisions for closer monitoring of the allocation, in financial terms, of fishing activities in the waters in question, with a view to ensuring that the populations concerned benefit proportionately from them;deleted
2018/12/04
Committee: PECH
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Points out that the SFPA provides for strengthening sustainable fishing practices, combating illegal fishing and ensuring better economic governance of the sector;deleted
2018/12/04
Committee: PECH
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Highlights, too, the provision in the SFPA for stepping up scientific cooperation and conservation and management measures to ensure the sustainability of fishing activities and the renewal of the stocks;deleted
2018/12/04
Committee: PECH
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Warns that failure to conclude the new agreement would have negative financial repercussions on the local economy and on the prospects for future development;deleted
2018/12/04
Committee: PECH