Activities of Ágnes HANKISS related to 2010/2308(INI)
Plenary speeches (1)
European Union’s internal security strategy (short presentation)
Shadow reports (1)
REPORT on the European Union’s Internal Security Strategy PDF (183 KB) DOC (112 KB)
Amendments (15)
Amendment 3 #
4. Reiterates the need for the EU to integrate a wide-ranging human security perspectiveapproach into its relationships with third countries, particularly on border management, migration, maritime security, fighting organised crime, state failure andterrorism and trafficking in human beings, and combating state fragility or underdevelopment;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 a (new)
Citation 5 a (new)
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 7 a (new)
Citation 7 a (new)
– having regard to the Commission communication to Parliament and the Council on Strengthening Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Security in the European Union – an EU CBRN Action Plan (COM(2009)273),
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 11 a (new)
Citation 11 a (new)
– having regard to Europol's EU Terrorism Situation and Trend Report ('TE-SAT 2011') ,
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 11 b (new)
Citation 11 b (new)
– having regard to Europol's EU Organised Crime Threat Assessment ('OCTA 2011'),
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 14 a (new)
Citation 14 a (new)
– having regard to its resolution of 14 September 2011 on the EU's efforts to combat corruption,1 __________________ 1 (P7_TA(2011)0388)
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Reiterates the need for the EU to integrate a wide-ranging human security perspective into its relationships with third countries, particularly on border management, migration, fighting organised crime and terrorism, state failure and underdevelopment;
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Takes the view that a comprehensive EU evidence- and knowledge-based analysis of the threats to be addressed based on common standards for threat assessment is an essential prerequisite for an effective ISS, and is concerned that such EU-wide analysis is still lacking at present; highlights the need for additional efforts to improve the coherence of the information and data on which the threat assessments undertaken by EU bodies are based, including additional efforts to ensure transparency as regards the methodology used6;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Emphasises the contribution of CSDP missions and operations to building stable institutions, fighting against organised crime and, corruption and terrorism, fostering respect for the rule of law, and maintaining peace and security, thus helping to prevent state failure and eliminate safe havens for international criminal and terrorist activity; urges the Member States to recognise this contribution of the CSDP to internal security by adopting national strategies in their police and justice systems to promote the participation of their experts in CSDP missions;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses the need for the EEAS to work together with Europol to incorporate internal security experts, in particular police and rule of law experts, and, where appropriate, to also post them in EU delegations, as a means of effectively putting into practice the need for better coordination between the internal and external dimensions of EU security strategies;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. UrgesRegrets that the Vice-President/High Representative and the Commission have noto presented their proposal yet – planned for 2011 – on the implementation of the solidarity clause,; urges in this context the VP/HR to present the proposal which must not duplicate existing initiatives, but define the framework for the use and coordination of available EU and national instruments, including the CSDP, in situations referred to in Article 222 of the TFEU;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Calls for a greater monitoring and oversight role for the EP in the framework of the EU's Internal Security Strategy; recalls, in this regard, the role played by the EP in uncovering the gross breaches of security and legality arising from EU governments' cooperation with the extraordinary renditions programme operated by the George W. Bush Administration, and the crucial democratic scrutiny that the EP can play in matters of internal and external security in general, in articulation with national parliaments.
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Takes note of the definition of five key areas for which different concrete actions have been proposed at EU and Member State level; takes the view that these objectives are not exhaustive, and that the order of priorities could have been better structured; observes that, while the fight against terrorism and organised crime is, and must remain, a key priority, it does not seem to be fully justified or appropriate to take action in fields such as man-made disasters and the enforcement of intellectual property rights within the framework of the ISS;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Believes that organised crime in all its forms constitutes a major threat to freedom, security and justice for EU citizens, and calls on the Commission and the Council to prioritise it further in the light of the recommendations set out in its resolution of 25 October 2011 on organised crime in the European Union, on the basis of specific data and information on existing cooperation between the EU and the Member States in the fight against the mafias, money laundering, corruption, white-collar crime and other forms of organised crime;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Calls on the Commission and the Council to prioritise the fight against corruption in the context of the EU security agenda, as well as allocate the appropriate resources, considering that the Stockholm Programme (4.1) lists corruption among the trans-national threats that continue to challenge the internal security of the Union, which require a clear and comprehensive response;