10 Amendments of Morten LØKKEGAARD related to 2012/2132(INI)
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the AVMSD guarantees a free flow of audiovisual media services as an internal market instrument reflecting the right to freedom of expression and access to information, and protecting public interest objectives, including press and media freedom;
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas technological convergence means that consumers will in future distinguish less and less between linear and non-linear services;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
Recital D b (new)
Db. whereas the goal should be a level playing field, as the different levels of regulation for linear and non-linear services are no longer recognisable for consumers and this can therefore lead to distortions of competition;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas the on-going technological changeonvergence means thave madet controlling the protection of minors can even more pressing and challenging issueno longer be guaranteed without the unreasonable curtailment of Internet freedom; relies therefore on players to commit themselves to ensuring a high level of protection for minors, which can also serve as an indication of quality for consumers;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Recital H a (new)
Ha. whereas the fragmentation of intellectual property right in the EU restricts access to audiovisual media services and content;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital K
Recital K
K. whereas the expansion of the audiovisual media services markets with the development of hybrid services has amplified concerns over a wide range ofgives cause to review issues, such as competition, intellectual property rights, the evolution of existing and the emergence of new forms of audiovisual commercial communications, and overlay advertising which challenges programme integrity and puts into questionachieving a level playing field, the protection of intellectual property, new forms of audiovisual commercial communications, advertising restrictions and the protection of minors; the adequacy and effectiveness of the AVMSD, as well as its relationship with other instruments of EU law must be called into question;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to address this deficit by providing an overview of measures taken by the Member States and an assessment of their efficacy, so as to ensure that audiovisual media services are continually made more accessible and act in accordance with fundamental rights;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls for the reform and harmonization of IPR laws in the EU to ensure cross border access to audiovisual media services´ content, opportunities for independent works, and innovative concepts to be viable;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Commission to reflect on how the basic requirements of the AVMSD applicable to non-linear services can be extended to other online content and services which are currently out of its scope, andor what steps need to be taken to create a level playing field for all operators; calls on the Commission to present to Parliament the results of its reflections no later than 31 December 2013;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Encourages the Member States to integrate media literacy and e-skills in their respective school curricula;