BETA

27 Amendments of Evžen TOŠENOVSKÝ related to 2011/0172(COD)

Amendment 247 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 23
(23) High-efficiency cogeneration (CHP) and district heating and cooling has significant potential for saving primary energy which is largely untapped in the Union. Member States should draw up national plans to develop high-efficiency CHP and district heating and cooling and assess the socio-economic and commercial grounds for this. These plans should cover a sufficiently long period to provide investors with information concerning national development plans and contribute to a stable and supportive investment environment. New electricity generation installations and existing installations which are substantially refurbished or whose permit or licence is updated should be equipped with high- efficient CHP units to recover waste heat stemming from the production of electricity where it is technically, socio- economically and commercially feasible. This waste heat could then be transported where it is needed through district heating networks. To this end, Member States should adopt authorisation criteria to ensure the location of installations in sites close to heat demand points. Member States should however be able to lay down conditions for exemption from these obligations where certain conditions are met.
2011/11/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 277 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 29
(29) Member States should establish, on the basis of objective, transparent and non- discriminatory criteria, rules governing the bearing and sharing of costs of grid connections and grid reinforcements and for technical adaptations needed to integrate new producers of electricity produced from high efficiency cogeneration, taking into account guidelines and codes developed in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 714/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on conditions for access to the network for cross-border exchanges in electricity and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 and Regulation (EC) 715/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on conditions for access to the natural gas transmission networks and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1775/2005. It should be ensured that costs are fairly distributed between the involved actors. Producers of electricity generated from high-efficiency cogeneration should be allowed to issue a call for tender for the connection work. Access to the grid system for electricity produced from high- efficiency cogeneration, especially for small scale and micro-cogeneration units, should be facilitated.
2011/11/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 685 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall set up an energy efficiency obligation scheme. This scheme shall ensure that either all energy distributors or all retail energy sales companies operating on the Member State's territory achieve annual energy savings equal to 1.5%set by Member state equal to 1.5% as a percentage of their energy sales, by volume, in the previous year in that Member State excluding energy used in transport. This amount of energy savings shall be achieved by the obligated parties among final customers. distributors and final customers. This annual energy savings shall lead to achievement of the target set in Article 3(2).
2011/11/17
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 708 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Member States shall ensure that the costs of energy savings can be adequately recovered among final customers and shall avoid discrimination, crosssubsidisation and distortion of competition.
2011/11/17
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 720 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. Measures that target short-term savings, as defined in Annex V(1), shall not account for more than 10% of than excessive amount of energy savings required from each obligated party and shall only be eligible to count towards the obligation laid down in paragraph 1 if combined with measures to which longer- term savings are attributed.
2011/11/17
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 807 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 2
Member States opting for this option shall notify to the Commission, by 1 January 2013 at the latest, the alternative measures that they plan to adopt, including the rules on penalties referred to in Article 9, and demonstrating how they would achieve the required amount of savings. The Commission may refuse such measures or make suggestions for modifications in the 3 months following notification. In such cases, the alternative approach shall not be applied by the Member State concerned until the Commission expressly accepts the resubmitted or modified draft measuresThe Member States shall take these suggestions or modifications into account.
2011/11/17
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1022 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. This Article shall not apply when a cost-benefit analysis shows that the costs of individual meters installation outweigh the benefits determined by potential savings of final customers. When the economic assessment of roll-out of smart meters according to Directive 2009/72/EC results in favour of their implementation, time provision set by paragraph 2 shall not apply.
2011/11/17
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1062 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. By 1 January 2014, Member States shall establish and notify to the Commission a national heating and cooling plan for developing the potential for the application of high-efficiency cogeneration and efficient district heating and cooling including the upgrade of existing district heating and cooling networks, containing the information set out in Annex VII. The plans shall be updated and notified to the Commission every five years. Member States shall ensure by means of their regulatory framework that national heating and cooling plans are taken into account in local and regional development plans, including urban and rural spatial plans, and fulfil the design criteria in Annex VII.
2011/11/17
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1090 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall take the necessary measures to develop efficient district heating and cooling infrastructure including the upgrade of existing infrastructure, to accommodate the development of high- efficiency cogeneration and the use of heating and cooling from waste heat and renewable energy sources in accordance with paragraphs 1, 3, 6 and 7. When developing district heating and cooling, they shall to the extent possible opt for high-efficiency cogeneration rather than heat-only generation.
2011/11/17
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1098 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Member States shall ensure that all, where it is technically, socio-economically and commercially feasible, new thermal electricity generation installations with a total thermal input exceeding 20 MW:, are provided with equipment allowing for the recovery of waste heat by means of a high-efficiency cogeneration unit.
2011/11/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1112 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Member States shall ensure that all new thermal electricity generation installations with a total thermal input exceeding 20 MW, excluding nuclear installations:
2011/11/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1116 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) are provided with equipment allowing for the recovery of waste heat by means of a high-efficiency cogeneration unit; andeleted
2011/11/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1132 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) are sited in a location where waste heat can be used by heat demand points.deleted
2011/11/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1149 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Member States shall adopt authorisation criteria as referred to in Article 7 of Directive 2009/72/EC, or equivalent permit criteria, to ensure that the provisions of the first subparagraph are met. They shall in particular ensure that the location of new installationsoperators of new thermal electricity generation installations with a total thermal input exceeding 20 MW takes into account, amongst other criteria, the availability of suitable heat loads for cogeneration in accordance with Annex VIII when deciding on the location of thermal electricity generation installations.
2011/11/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1161 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
4. Member States mayshall lay down conditions for exemption from the provisions of paragraph 3 when:
2011/11/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1167 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) the threshold conditions related to the requirement is technically not feasible due to e.g. the non-availability of heat load set out in point 1 of Annex VIII are not met;
2011/11/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1170 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) the requirement in point (b) of paragraph 3 related to the location of the installation cannot be met due to the need to locate an installation is located close to a geological storage site permitted under Directive 2009/31/EC; or
2011/11/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1180 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) a cost-benefit analysis shows that the costs outweigh the benefits in comparison withproject is not cost-effective taking into account the full life-cycle costs, including infrastructure investment, of providing the same amount of electricity and heat with separate heating or cooling.;
2011/11/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1183 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new)
(c a) the application of CHP does not have a positive socio-economic outcome;
2011/11/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1212 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall ensure that, whenever an existing electricity generation installation with a total rated thermal input exceeding 20 MW, excluding nuclear installation, is substantially refurbished or when, in accordance with Article 21 of Directive 2010/75/EC, its permit is updated, conversion to allow its operation as a high-efficiency cogeneration installation is set as a condition in the new or updated permit or licence, provided that the installation is sited in a location where the waste heat can be used by heat demand points in accordance with point 1 of Annex VIII.
2011/11/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1218 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall ensure that, whenever an existing electricity generation installation with a total rated thermal input exceeding 20 MW, is substantially refurbished or when, in accordance with Article 21 of Directive 2010/75/EC, its permit is updated, conversion to allow its operation as a high-efficiency cogeneration installation is set as a condition in the new or updated permit or licence, provided that the installation is sited in a location where the waste heat can be used by heat demand points in accordance with point 1 of Annex VIIIsuch a project with high-efficient cogeneration is technically, socio- economically and commercially feasible.
2011/11/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1231 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Member States mayshall lay down conditions for exemption from the provisions of paragraph 6 when:
2011/11/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1236 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) the threshold conditions related to the requirement is technically not feasible due to e.g. the non-availability of heat load set out in point 1 of Annex VIII are not met; or
2011/11/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1243 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) a cost-benefit analysis shows that the costs outweigh the benefits in comparison withproject is not cost-effective taking into account the full life-cycle costs, including infrastructure investment, of providing the same amount of electricity and heat with separate heating or cooling.;
2011/11/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1245 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point b a (new)
(b a) the application of CHP does not have a positive socio-economic outcome;
2011/11/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1304 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 9
9. The Commission shall establish by 1 January 2013 by means of a delegated act in accordance with Article 18 a methodology for the cost-benefit analysis referred to in paragraphs 4 (c), 7 (b) and 8(b). The methodology shall be prepared in consultation with the concerned actors Such a methodology has to take into account both socio-economic and business finance perspectives
2011/11/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1774 #
Proposal for a directive
Annex VIII – section 1 – subparagraph 1
Where a heat demand point of the capacity given in the column C exists or there is a potential heat demand point, the power plant mustcould be located at less than the corresponding distance in column A. A potential heat demand point is defined as one where it can be shown that one can reasonably be created, for example by constructing a district heating network. For example, using standard estimation techniques, if an aggregate heat load in excess of 15 MW / km2 can be shown to exist, this is deemed to be a heat demand point. The total sum of such connectible km square loads shall be deemed to be the demand capacity of such heat demand points.
2011/11/22
Committee: ITRE