Activities of Evžen TOŠENOVSKÝ related to 2020/2016(INI)
Shadow opinions (1)
OPINION on artificial intelligence in criminal law and its use by the police and judicial authorities in criminal matters
Amendments (5)
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the functioning of the digital single market should be improved by reinforcing legal certainty for providers of artificial intelligence (AI) systems, and reinforcing users’ trustpublic trust and security by strengthening safeguards to ensure the rule of law and fundamental rights;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Calls on the Commission to scrutinize the application of existing legislation and its enforcement, as well as self-regulatory measures, prior to initiating any possible new legislative proposals;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that AI should help to ease the administrative burden on public authorities and increase the efficiency of their decision-making, without ever replacing human decisions, and that AI systems should rely on human oversight;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Considers that such tools should be released as open sosoftware under the public procurement procedurce with software under the public procurement proceduredocumentation and algorithms fully accessible to the responsible Member State authorities, allowing also the supervision or appeal authorities to review how the AI system arrived at a certain conclusion, and that a fundamental rights audit should be part of a prior conformity assessment; believes that – while ensuring the respect of EU law and values and the applicable data protection rules, and without jeopardising investigations or criminal prosecutions – training data must be open dataaccessible for periodic auditing;
Amendment 63 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Recalls the high risk of abuse of certain types of AI, including facial recognition technologies in public spaces, automated behaviour detection and profiling to divide people into risk categories at borders, and calls on the Commission to ban themnd calls on the Commission in this regard to strictly apply a risk-based approach;