BETA

4 Amendments of Zuzana BRZOBOHATÁ related to 2012/2064(INI)

Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
31. Takes the view that the present geographic representation rule relating to high-level management, according to which there may be one member per Member State, has by far outlived its initial usefulness and credibility and that it could be replaced by a light management structure tailored to a broader accountability mandate, with proper provisions to guarantee independence in all of the Court’s activities, and complemented by a governing board which could be based on Member State representation;Deleted
2013/11/14
Committee: CONT
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. Proposes, therefore, that the Court should be composed of the following bodies: – a governing board consisting of the 28 heads of the national SAIs, which would meet three times per year to define the Court’s annual and multiannual work programme, the possible improvement in the Court’s functions and methodology, and the follow-up required on activities; the board should be chaired by the rotating Presidency of the Council of the European Union; – a management board, of not more than nine members, composed of a representative sample of large and small Member States, with an appropriate gender balance, which would decide on how the mandate should be aligned with the Commission’s term of office; the management board should be headed by the president of the Court and eight vice- presidents; – the management board should be diverse and broad in its composition, and board members should have professional experience in management or auditing, in academic life or experience in political bodies; members of the Court should be especially qualified for their function and their independence must be assured beyond doubt;Deleted
2013/11/14
Committee: CONT
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33 – point d
d) Parliament will take its decisions based on the majority of the votes cast at the plenary sitting, and its opinion must be respectedtaken into account by the Council;
2013/11/14
Committee: CONT
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35 – point g
g) respectake into account, if such a case as the above arises, Parliament’s unfavourable opinion of the situation, and to propose a new candidate(s);
2013/11/14
Committee: CONT