4 Amendments of Andrea ČEŠKOVÁ related to 2013/2173(INI)
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. RegretsIs concerned by the fact that in the OPs, the definition of ‘older workers’ is not used consistently; notes that many MAs do not use in their respective OPs the definition of ‘older workers’ as defined in the Lisbon Agenda, namely any person of working age between 55 and 64 years old, but instead use different age groups;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Regrets that the data necessary for evaluating the current employment situation for older workers, assessing future development and adopting measures to achieve the established objectives provided by the Member States are unreliable and of unsatisfactory quality; calls for measures to be adopted that will motivate the Member States to submit reliable and high-quality data;
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Notes that the operational programmes contain no provisions which would cover incentives for employers or which would motivate employers to employ older workers, who could be an asset thanks to their many years of experience and practical knowledge;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Welcomes the fact that MAs generally defined the monitoring data they required clearly; recalls, nevertheless, that monitoring and evaluation systems should allow for the timely and periodic verification of progress made towards the established objectives, as well as the possibility of reacting quickly to significant divergences from the established objectives;