6 Amendments of Santiago FISAS AYXELÀ related to 2014/2012(INI)
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a recommendation
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the spectrum of these non- state actors is very broad and encompasses a wide range of identities, motivation and varying degrees of willingness and ability to observe International Humanitarian Law and other international law standards, but all require scrutiny in this regard;
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a recommendation
Recital H a (new)
Recital H a (new)
Ha. Whereas the demobilisation, rehabilitation and reintegration of child soldiers need to be included in any negotiation process and subsequent peace treaty, in addition to being addressed during the actual conflict;
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a recommendation
Recital H b (new)
Recital H b (new)
Hb. Whereas the successful demobilisation and reintegration of child soldiers can help to end the recurring cycle of violence;
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a recommendation
Paragraph 1 (a)
Paragraph 1 (a)
(a) encourage the signing of action plans for the protection of children in armed conflict with the UN Office of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Children and Armed Conflict by concerned states and armed non-state actors;
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a recommendation
Paragraph 1 (d)
Paragraph 1 (d)
(d) reiterate that states and armed non- state actors must comply with international humanitarian law and international humanitarian customary law, and support them in their efforts to take special measures to protect civilians, particularly children;
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a recommendation
Paragraph 1 (da) (new)
Paragraph 1 (da) (new)
(da) reminds that International Humanitarian Law is a legal framework which binds non-state armed groups and that Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions and Second Additional Protocol of 1977 both serve to this end, as do a large number of customary International Humanitarian Law rules; nevertheless suggests that it will be important to examine whether existing rules of International Humanitarian Law are adequate to deal with non-state actors or whether further regulation is needed;