BETA

Activities of Sven GIEGOLD related to 2019/2090(DEC)

Shadow opinions (1)

OPINION on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Banking Authority for the financial year 2018
2020/01/27
Committee: ECON
Dossiers: 2019/2090(DEC)
Documents: PDF(133 KB) DOC(68 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Derk Jan EPPINK', 'mepid': 97133}]

Amendments (7)

Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls that 100 % of the budgetary surplus has been allocated to the Commission whereas Member States consider that 60 % thereof should be refunded to them; calls on the Commission to resolve that issue;deleted
2019/12/09
Committee: ECON
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that as a result of the completed move of its seat to Paris in 2019, the accounts include provisions for related costs amounting to EUR 4,7 million and provisions for remaining future contractual payments for its offices in London amounting to EUR 10,4 million.; suggests that an audit be conducted once all the costs and consequences of the move are clear in order to identify best practices and areas for improvement;
2019/12/09
Committee: ECON
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Recalls the Authority’s new role, tasks and resources in the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing; holds that the effective performance of this role and tasks depends on the support of the Board of Supervisors;
2019/12/09
Committee: ECON
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. Regrets in this context the rejection of a proposal to investigate the Danske Bank money laundering case;
2019/12/09
Committee: ECON
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6 c. Is concerned about the conflict of interest that has arisen as a consequence of the appointment of the Authority’s Executive Director as Chief Executive of AFME from 1 February 2020 which was insufficiently addressed by the restrictions imposed by the Board of Supervisors; is further concerned about the systematic nature of the 'revolving door' phenomenon that has the potential to compromise the integrity of Union institutions and to damage citizens' trust in them;
2019/12/09
Committee: ECON
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 d (new)
6 d. Recalls that the Authority has to date not opened an inquiry into dividend arbitrage trading schemes such as cum-ex or cum-cum as called for by the European Parliament1a; encourages the Authority to inquire together with ESMA dividend Arbitrage schemes in order to stop ongoing and prevent future practices threatening the integrity of Union financial markets; _________________ 1a https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/doc ument/RC-8-2018-0551_EN.html
2019/12/09
Committee: ECON
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 e (new)
6 e. Urges the Authority to deliver its proposals for reducing the supervisory reporting burden for small and non- complex institutions within the timeframe set by the European Parliament and the Council in order to achieve more proportionality1a; calls on the Authority to duly consider the principle of proportionality in its everyday work, including by equally considering the contributions of actors of different sizes in its consultations and accounting for the needs of small actors in its guidelines and its Questions and Answers; asks the Authority to ensure the consistent use of definitions in all regulatory and non- regulatory documents1b; _________________ 1a based on input provided by IHK München and Genossenschaftsverband Bayern 1bbased on input provided by Michael Ikrath, Member of the European Economic and Social Committee
2019/12/09
Committee: ECON