5 Amendments of Sabine WILS related to 2011/2048(INI)
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Stresses that the expenditure of public institutions in the European Union constitutes a considerable part of Europe’s GDP; considers that environmentally-harmful production and consumption patterns might be reduced through the award of public procurement contracts;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Advocates that environmental considerations should be included in all public procurement contracts; stresses that the Public Procurement Directive should be amended to make it clearer that it is both desirable, financially advantageous and possible for public operators to impose environmental conditions and take account of environmental impact when awarding contracts;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Stresses the need to take into account social standards when awarding public procurement contracts;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Maintains that the directive should be amended to make it clearer that it is both possible and desirable to take account of the environmental impact of the subject of the contract throughout its entire life cycle, including the whole production process and its conditions;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Considers that the ‘lowest price’ award criterion should only be used if it can be justified on the grounds that environmental requirements are irrelevant to this specific case and social standards are being maintained or that strict environmental conditions have been imposed in the technical specifications;