14 Amendments of Michèle RIVASI related to 2010/2114(INI)
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for the adoption of European quality and security standards for equipment and the development of a European system for the certification of CBRN security equipment and technologies;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Points out that exposure to any CBRN substance is not without consequence and may pose a risk to health;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion
Point 7 a (new)
Point 7 a (new)
7a. Regrets the lack of measures in the CBRN Action Plan for ensuring the security of radiological and nuclear facilities and materials, and to improve response plans regarding the various types of radiological emergencies and their consequences for the population and the environment;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion
Point 7 b (new)
Point 7 b (new)
7b. Alarmed by the cases where individuals and activists have been able to acquire nuclear waste material from several reprocessing installations in Europe, calls for urgent concerted action to enhance the security of radioactive and nuclear materials and facilities;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission, in categorising lists of CBRN agents, to consider the impact on European industry, in particular in the chemical and biological sectors;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Insists on the need to maintain R&D funding; cCalls for the development of applied research with a European dimension and for the launchconcerning the safety of installations, ing of major demonstration programmesrder to protect local communities and the environment;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion
Point 10 a (new)
Point 10 a (new)
10a. Underlines that counter-terrorism activities must be conducted with full respect for international law, including human rights and the principle of the rule of law; recalls the need to respect the principles of Arhus Convention on public access to information, participation and judicial review in matters relating to the environment;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion
Point 11 a (new)
Point 11 a (new)
11a. Disagrees with the Commission assessment that informing public about the possible dangers in their day-to-day lives and direct environment would have ‘serious negative social effects’, and considers that improving response plans would contribute to increasing public security against the potential criminal or terrorist use of radioactive material;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls on the Member States no longer to produce, test and use uranium and depleted uranium;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls for dual-use civil-military technologies to be exploited as a source of synergiesa clear distinction to be made between civil and military uses of each CBRN substance; encourages, within well- defined strategic collaboration frameworks, cooperation with the European Defence Agency (EDA), the European Space Agency (ESA), NATO and third countries;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Calls for a study on the safety of nuclear power stations, particularly in the event of a terrorist attack;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion
Point 12 a (new)
Point 12 a (new)
12 a. Calls on the Member States to no longer produce, test or use uranium and depleted uranium;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. CNotes that tests with CBRN substances are dangerous for the environment and communities around the test zones and calls for training and public awareness programmes on these risks to be launched at European level; notes with interest the feasibility study for a European nuclear security training centre within the JRC;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion
Point 12 b (new)
Point 12 b (new)
12 b. Calls for an assessment on the security of nuclear power stations in the EU and its vicinity, particularly in the event of a terrorist attack;