BETA

6 Amendments of Arnaud DANJEAN related to 2022/2124(DEC)

Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Notes the drawing up of a fundamental rights strategy and action plan; regretnotes that the obligation included in Article 110(6) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1896 to deploy at least 40 fundamental rights monitors has been met with significant delay; notes that the number of fundamental rights monitors now stands at 46; deeply deplores that despite the significant overall staff increase for the Agency, the Fundamental Rights Officer still lacks adequate human resources; urges the Agency to provide its fundamental rights officer with adequate resources and staffimplemented, and that there are now 46 such fundamental rights monitors;
2023/01/18
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Takes the position that the Management Board should play a proactive role in identifying and preventing serious risk of fundamental rights violations; reiterates the importance to implement the standard operating procedures to withdraw the financing of, or suspend or terminate, or not launch Frontex activities infinancing of Frontex’s activities should be guaranteed in the long term, given the successive extensions of its mandate and the aim of establishing a 10 000-strong permanent European border and coases where such risks ariset guard force by 2027;
2023/01/18
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Reiterates its profound concerns aboutNotes the findings of the OLAF report of 15 February 2022 on investigations into Frontex, and expresses its utter dismay in the behaviour and actions described in the findings and the lack of accountability; considers that the findings of the OLAF report are a matter of public interest and shcould be made public, without further delayhilst upholding the principle of the protection of personal data and the presumption of innocence;
2023/01/18
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Expresses its deep concerns in relation to media revelations that in the context of the expansion of a mass surveillance programme at Europe’s external borders (PeDRA, or ‘Processing of Personal Data for Risk Analysis’), Frontex and the European Commission side-lined their own data protection oversight bodies and pursued an intrusive collection of personal data from migrants and refugees to feed into Europol’s criminal databases;deleted
2023/01/18
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 65 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Notes that Frontex’ structural problems regarding fundamental rights protection of asylum seekers and migrants, transparency, data protection, and alleged sexual harassment within the Agency led the European Parliament to refuse dischargePoints out that the European Parliament refused to grant discharge in respect of the Agency’s 2020 budget;
2023/01/18
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 78 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
11. Recommends that the Committee on Budgetary Control to postpone granting thegrant discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year 2021, until the structural shortcomings related to respect by Frontex of its fundamental rights obligations have been fully addressed.
2023/01/18
Committee: LIBE