Activities of Dennis de JONG related to 2013/0255(APP)
Shadow reports (3)
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council regulation implementing enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (“the EPPO”) PDF (469 KB) DOC (57 KB)
INTERIM REPORT on the proposal for a Council regulation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office PDF (261 KB) DOC (209 KB)
INTERIM REPORT on the proposal for a Council regulation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office PDF (301 KB) DOC (176 KB)
Amendments (8)
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph B a (new)
Paragraph B a (new)
B a. Whereas it is regrettable that until now the Commission has not been able to provide the Parliament with information on the reasons behind the low rate of indictment, and, in particular on the question of how much is due to lack of quality of the information provided by OLAF to Member States, as basis for its judicial recommendations;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Deems it equally important that the position of EPPO in relation to OLAF and Eurojust is further clarified, especially if EPPO will not become operational in all Member States;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on the legislator to ensure streamlined procedures for the EPPO to obtain the authorisation of investigative measures in cross-border cases, in accordance with the law of the Member States where the measure in question is executed;, and with full respect for the procedural guarantees laid down in both European and national legislation.
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on the Council to ensure the admissibility of the evidence gathered by the EPPO with full respect for the relevant European and national legislation throughout the Union, as this is crucial for the effectiveness of the prosecutions;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Affirms that the right to a judicial remedy should be upheld at all times in respect of the EPPO's activity and recognises also the need for the EPPO to operate effectively without undue delay;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19 a. Requests the Commission to ensure that procedural rights in cases investigated by the EPPO are in no way inferior to those established by European law on procedural rights in criminal law cases, and to provide the Parliament with additional information on this matter;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 b (new)
Paragraph 19 b (new)
19 b. Requests the Commission to examine in detail which are the reasons for the low rate of indictment following OLAF's judicial recommendations and to submit proposals for improving the quality of the information provided by OLAF to Member States;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 c (new)
Paragraph 19 c (new)
19 c. Requests the Commission to submit additional information to the Parliament on how OLAF, Eurojust and the EPPO will work together in the future and how the EPPO can make use of the existing expertise in both OLAF and Eurojust;