7 Amendments of Wim van de CAMP related to 2012/0010(COD)
Amendment 284 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15 a (new)
(15a) ‘marking’ means the marking of stored personal data without the aim of limiting their processing in future;
Amendment 312 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Article 4 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Personal data which were originally collected for a different purpose may only be used to prevent, investigate and detect crimes, and to prosecute offenders, on the basis of a statutory instrument which provides adequate safeguards for the protection of the privacy of the data subject.
Amendment 314 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 5
Article 5
Amendment 328 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 a (new)
Article 5 a (new)
Article 5a Authorisation 1. Member States shall provide that the controller must maintain an authorisation system which complies with the requirements of carefulness and proportionality. 2. Personal data shall be processed only by persons who have been authorised for the purpose by the controller with a view to the proper performance of their task and within the limits of the authorisation. 3. The authorisation shall include a clear description of the ways in which the person concerned is authorised to process the data and the elements of the task for the performance of which the processing is to be carried out.
Amendment 337 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that, as far as possible, the differenin processing soft cdategories of personal data undergoing processinga on the involvement of individuals in planning or committing serious offences, other than as a suspect, data are distinguished in accordance with their degree of accuracy and reliability.
Amendment 341 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall ensure that, as far as possible,in the data processing referred to in paragraph 1, as far as possible, a distinction is made between personal data based on facts are distinguished fromnd personal data based on personal assessments.
Amendment 530 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 25 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 25 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The Member States shall lay down that, in the case of a proposal for a law which provides for the processing of personal data which entails serious risks to the rights and freedoms of citizens on account of its nature, scope or purpose, an assessment of the impact of the proposed measure on the protection of personal data shall be performed. The assessment shall at least include a general description of the proposed processing operations, an assessment of the risks to the rights and freedoms of the data subjects, the measures envisaged to address those risks, safeguards, security measures and procedures to ensure the protection of personal data and to demonstrate compliance with the provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive, taking into account the rights and justified expectations of the data subjects and other persons concerned.