Activities of Wim van de CAMP related to 2017/0288(COD)
Plenary speeches (2)
Common rules for access to the international market for coach and bus services (debate) NL
Common rules for access to the international market for coach and bus services (debate)
Amendments (5)
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009
Article 3 a – paragraph 3 – point c a (new)
Article 3 a – paragraph 3 – point c a (new)
(ca) create a record in electronic format for public access in which all the authorized national and international regular services will appear
Amendment 214 #
3a. Regulatory bodies may exclude terminals that are owned and used solely by the terminal operator for its own road passenger transport services from the application of this Article. When considering an application for exclusion, regulatory bodies shall take into account the availability of viable alternatives.
Amendment 252 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009
Article 8 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. In the event that an international regular bus and coach service has compromised the economic equilibrium of a public service contract, due to exceptional reasons which could not have been foreseen at the time of granting the authorisation and which lay not in the responsibility of the owner of the public service contract, the Member State concerned may, with the agreement of the Commission, suspend or withdraw the authorisation to provide the service, after having given six months’ notice to the carrier. The carrier shall have the possibility to appeal such decision.
Amendment 279 #
2a. In the event that an international regular bus and coach service has compromised the economic equilibrium of a public service contract as defined in point (ca) of Article 8c(2), due to exceptional circumstances which could not have been foreseen at the time of granting the authorisation and which lay not in the responsibility of the owner of the public service contract, the Member State concerned may, with the agreement of the Commission, suspend or withdraw the authorisation to provide the service after having given six months’ notice to the carrier. The service provider shall have the possibility to appeal the decision.
Amendment 323 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009
Article 8 c – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point c a (new)
Article 8 c – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point c a (new)
(ca) A regulatory body has established on the basis of an objective economic analysis that the new service proposed by the applicant will compromise the economic equilibrium of at least one existing or planned public service contract provided that: – that contract bundles profitable and unprofitable routes, – the contract operator has not been receiving any significant competition distorting direct public funds, including in the form of regional or municipal subsidies, and – the contract was awarded via a transparent competitive tendering procedure for a period not exceeding 10 years without a possibility of extension.