BETA

5 Amendments of Tiziano MOTTI related to 2008/0028(COD)

Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) Food labels should be clear and understandable to assist consumers wanting to make better-informed food and dietary choices. Studies show that legibility is an important element in maximising the possibility that labelled information can influence its audience and that the small print size is one of the main causes ofconsequently factors such as size, font, colour and contrast should be considered together to ensure consumer dissatisfaction with food labels.
2010/01/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. Without prejudice to specific Community legislation applicable to particular foods as regards to the requirements referred to in Article 9(1)(a) to (k), when appearing on the package or on the label attached thereto, the mandatory particulars listed in Article 9(1) shall be printed on the package or on the label in characters ofwith a font size of at least 3mm and shall be presented in a way soand contrast such as to rensure a significant contrastder them legible between the print and background.
2010/01/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 - paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The mandatory particulars listed in Article 9(1) shall be presented in such a way as to guarantee a significant degree of contrast between print and background and to be clearly legible and indelible.
2010/01/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a regulation
Articolo 34 – paragraph 1 a (new)
In accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 49(3), the Commission shall, by 31 December 2011 at the latest, establish specific criteria on exemptions from mandatory nutrition labelling for small agricultural, craft and commercial enterprises operating in the fields of sales/gastronomy and supply (the hotel and restaurant trade).
2010/01/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 234 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 38
1. In addition to the mandatory particulars referred to in Article 9(1) and in Article 10, Member States may, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 42, require additional mandatory particulars for specific types or categories of foods, justified on grounds of: (a) the protection of public health; (b) the protection of consumers; (c) the prevention of fraud; (d) the protection of industrial and commercial property rights, indications of provenance, registered designations of origin and the prevention of unfair competition. 2. By means of paragraph 1, Member States may introduce measures concerning the mandatory indication of the country of origin or place of provenance of foods only where there is a proven link between certain qualities of the food and its origin or provenance. When notifying such measures to the Commission, Member States shall provide evidence that the majority of consumers attach significant value to the provision of this information.
2010/01/21
Committee: IMCO