4 Amendments of Pablo ZALBA BIDEGAIN related to 2012/2115(INI)
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses, further, the need to obtain a fuller overview of risk transfers by financial institutions, in order to determine who has purchased what from whom and how the transferred risks are supported; invites the Commission, therefore, to undertake a study (in early 2013) and submit a report (by mid-2013) regarding the feasibility of setting up a public non- profit utility as a central registry for risk transfers, which should be able to capture and monitor risk transfer data in real time based on LEI codes;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Stresses the need to ensure that all SB entities having a bank sponsor or linked to a bank are included in the bank's balance sheet for prudential consolidation purposes; invites the Commission to examine, by the beginning of 2013, means of ensuring that entities which are not consolidated from an accounting perspective are consolidated for prudential consolidation purposes in order to improve global financial stability;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Underlines the need to ensure greater transparency in the structure and activities of financial institutions; invites the Commission, taking account of the conclusions of the Liikanen report, to propose legislation to separate commercial and investment banks, in particularcreate the right incentives to less risky business models, in order to avoid the financing of SB activities via savings;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Believes that incentives associated with securitisation need to be adequately addressed; invites the Commission to examine the securitisation market and to submit a legislative proposal at the latest by the beginning of 2013, including the implications of initiatives under way such as Prime Collateralized Securities to assess their impact on transparency and standardisations and to assess the need for limiting the number of times a financial product can be securitised; calls on it to review whether there is a need to update current regulation imposeing particular requirements on suppliers of securitisation (e.g. originators or sponsors) to retain part of the risks associated with securitisation and of measures to achieve transparency, byand consider the introduction of an external valuer of the underlying assets and standardisation of securitisation products as well as resolution processes;