BETA

Activities of Hermann WINKLER related to 2009/2227(INI)

Reports (1)

REPORT Report on Community innovation policy in a changing world PDF (201 KB) DOC (128 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ITRE
Dossiers: 2009/2227(INI)
Documents: PDF(201 KB) DOC(128 KB)

Amendments (14)

Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 a (new)
- having regard to the European Parliament resolution of 10 March 2009 on the Small Business Act,
2010/03/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Points out that in order to counter the emergence of new forms of inequality in society, innovations should in future be measured not only in terms of their environmental and economic benefits but also by the yardstick of social added value; stresses in that regard that a key theme in the new innovation policy should be the social added value of innovation generally, not only in technological but also in social terms;
2010/03/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Wholeheartedly supports the Commission’s assertion that key enabling technologies are vital prerequisites for enhancing the EU’s global competitiveness in a sustainable way; stresses in that regard that key enabling technologies, such as microelectronics and nanoelectronics, photonics, biotechnology and nanotechnology, and new materials, and new and future technologies can offer considerable potential for both process and product innovation;
2010/03/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Points out that specific sectors in which to apply pro-innovation measures must be chosen in cooperation with the business world, including SMEs, and that regional economic-policy objectives must also be taken into account; emphasises that account should be taken here of the results of the high-level expert group on key enabling technologies that is currently being set up;
2010/03/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Considers that the provision of adequate financial resources is vital to the development of innovation and that the EU budget for innovation should therefore be substantially increased; calls for this to be reflected in the upcoming revision of the current financial framework and in the planning process in connection with the 2014-2020 Financial Perspective;
2010/03/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Stresses that, along with bigger budgets, it is essential to achieve a critical mass; emphasises in particular that funding should be directed to those areas where the leverage effect is greatest, in order to generate added value for Europe; emphasises in that regard the need to capitalise on the synergies between the Framework Programmes for Research and Innovation and the Structural Funds;
2010/03/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Considers that, in the interests of user- friendliness and transparency, it is necessary to prevent overlap and duplication of effort between support programmes, resulting from poor coordination of the various operational levels; calls on the Commission to investigate whether the EU aid instruments for SMEs could in future be combined under the umbrella of one Directorate-General such as DG Enterprise; considers that this would make them easier to project and would offer potential beneficiaries a one-stop shop;
2010/03/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Emphasises that the EU bodies’ joint efforts should be directed at bridging the gaps between research and innovation and between product marketability and commercialisation; stresses that the framework programmes need interfaces with each other or cross-programme connectivity between research and innovation-related measures;
2010/03/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. calls on the Commission to adapt the innovation indicators used to compile the European innovation scoreboard so that they do not just give a comparative analysis of the Member States' innovation capacity, but can also better identify both the strengths and weaknesses of EU and Member State innovation measures;
2010/03/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on the Commission to put forward, in the action plan for innovation, practical measures to improve innovative companies’ access to financing; emphasises in that regard the need to take into account the differing funding requirements and innovation intensity of companies during their different start-up and growth phases;
2010/03/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Emphasises the need to create conditions whereby risk capital will be more readily available, taking into account the needs of SMEs, and to extend the EIB’s risk-sharing finance facility (RSFF); calls on the Commission to investigate what steps can be taken to achieve a risk- sharing arrangement that is acceptable for all the actors involved and thus stimulate private investment in the field of innovation;
2010/03/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Calls on the Commission, in accordance with the principles of the single market, to adjust the existing EU rules on state aid so as to support investment in urgently needed new technologies and to secure the Union’s long-term competitiveness; calls in particular on the Commission to work its Communication on key enabling technologies into its aid instruments and thus make it possible for the Member States to create national incentive systems to promote key enabling technologies;
2010/03/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Notes the increasing use of patents as securities for bank financing, but that banks often lack the technical knowledge to be able to correctly assess the value of patents when lending; calls therefore on the Commission to investigate whether the EU should provide support for the development of valuation standards;
2010/03/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Emphastresses that the three sisdes of the need to make conditions in the EUknowledge triangle – education, research and innovation – must not be separated; calls, to that end, for investment in training and further training for skilled staff not to be cut, as this investment is crucially important given the impact of innovation capacity on EU competitiveness; emphasises the need to make conditions as attractive as possible to researchers and their skilled workers, especiallyalso in relation to their mobility, so that the EU can hold its own in global competition;
2010/03/05
Committee: ITRE