BETA

8 Amendments of Peter JAHR related to 2014/2075(DEC)

Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls that other relevant Committees such as Committee on Regional Development or Committee on Development etc. also prepare a thorough discharge opinion; stresses that only through a proper discharge procedure the causes of error rates can be reduced.
2014/12/11
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Acknowledges that for the CAP a system is in place, where the Commission is imposing net financial corrections on Member States to claw back any ineligible expenditures and hence reduces the risk of irregular payments;
2014/12/11
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls for the move of all smaller programmes into the second pillar of the CAP;deleted
2014/12/11
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls for the move of all smaller programmes into the second pillar of the CAP;Notes that small programmes such as the school milk programme have persistently high error rates; therefore calls to simplify those programmes, as less bureaucratic programmes decrease error rates.
2014/12/11
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Calls for a less bureaucratic CAP with a view to reducing the error rates; welcomes therefore the commitment taken by the Commission to make simplification and subsidiarity one of the top priorities in the next five years; calls in extreme cases, that persistent underperforming paying agencies being stripped of their accreditation.
2014/12/11
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Calls for Union officials to be in charge of thegive extra supervision and monitor more closely national paying agencies within the respective Member States, instead of officials of that Member State, in particular for those paying agencies that continuously under-performed over the last three years ;
2014/12/11
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
11. Notes that the error rate indicated by the Commission differs significantly in some areas from the error rate identified by the European Court of Auditors; requests an explanation from the Commission in this respect;calls for greater harmonization in the methods for calculating error rates by the European Court of Auditors and the Commission in order to ensure a greater comparability.
2014/12/11
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 12
12. Welcomes the new rules for the 2014- 2020 programmingfinancial period, including measures such as the designations of audit and certifying authorities, accreditations of audit authorities, audit examination and acceptance of accounts, financial corrections and net financial corrections, proportional control, ex-ante conditionalities that aim to further contribute to the reduction of the level of error; welcomes also the definition of serious deficiencies and the anticipated increased level of corrections for repeated deficiencies;
2014/12/11
Committee: AGRI