BETA

5 Amendments of Monika HOHLMEIER related to 2017/2022(BUD)

Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. ConsiderRegrets that despite the installation of SECure EMail system (SECEM) the Parliament is unable to receive restricted and non-classified briefings from other institutions; notdeplores that Parliament is not in a position to develop its own Classified Information System (CIS) alone and negotiations are ongoing with other institutions on this matter; invites the Secretary-General to present to the Committee on Budgets more information regarding the ongoing negotiations, before the Parliament's reading of the budget in autumn 2017;
2017/03/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Calls for more information on the project to renovate the Paul Henri Spaak (PHS) building, specifically any opinions from external contractors on the necessity to renovate the building, which has had a short 25-year lifespanwhich has had a short lifespan of 25 years; underlines that the existing building doesn't fulfil the static requirements of a public building for parliamentary functions which has higher security and needs to withstand external shocks without collapsing; criticises the fact that the PHS building doesn't fulfil even minimum standards of modern static requirements and notes that several actions have already had to be taken to guarantee its stability; urges therefore the Bureau and the administration of the Parliament to work on future solutions for the new PHS building that secures life and healthy working conditions of the persons present; is therefore in favour of commissioning an independent expert study that should analyse the possible options for the new PHS; calls on the Secretary-General to present the results of such a study to the Committee on Budgets as soon as possible; notes the level of appropriations proposed by the Secretary- General in 2018 concerning studies, preparatory projects and works, and the provision of assistance to the project management team; expresses concern at the possible confusion regarding the amounts to be spent on studies and removals; urgescalls on the Bureau and Secretary- General to inform the Committee on Budgets on all subsequent steps and to provide a clear breakdown of costs as soon as possible;
2017/03/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. In preparation for the ninth legislature, calls on the Secretary-General to submit to the Bureau a more precise list of expenses defrayable under the General Expenditure Allowance (GEA), as well as suggesting measures to improve the accountability of this expenditure, using best practice cases from national delegations in the Parliament and Member St; recalls the principle of the independence of the mandates; believes that Members should also be able to provide links on the Parliament website to places where they currently publish their spending recordunderlines that it is possible for Members who wish to do so to publish their spending record of the GEA on their personal webpages; reiterates that the improved transparency of the GEA should not require additional staff in Parliament's administration;
2017/03/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Considers that the current envelope of EUR 24 164 per month for parliamentary assistance per Member is more than adequate and should not be increased;deleted
2017/03/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 43
43. Continues to question the added value of the LUX Prize, particularly given that the participants in a survey to determine the awareness and perception of the prize were largely limited to Members and film-makers;deleted
2017/03/16
Committee: BUDG