BETA

8 Amendments of Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA related to 2009/0142(COD)

Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) In order to ensure efficient and effective supervision and a balanced consideration of the positions of the competent authorities in different Member States, the Authority should be able to settle disagreements between those competent authorities with binding effect, including within colleges of supervisors. A conciliation phase should be provided for, during which the competent authorities may reach an agreement. The Authority’s competence should cover disagreements on procedural obligations in the cooperation process as well as on the intin that respect should be specified in the sectoral legislation referpretation and application of Community law in supervisory decisionsd to in Article 1(2). Existing conciliation mechanisms provided for in sectoral legislation have to be respected. In the event of inaction by the national supervisory authorities concerned, the Authority should be empowered to adopt, as a last resort, decisions directly addressed to financial institutions in areas of Community law directly applicable to them.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 368 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Within three months of receipt of the draft standards, the Commission shall decide whether to endorse the draft standards. The Commission may extend that period by one month. The Commission may endorse the draft standards only in part or with amendments where the Community interest so requires.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 377 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4
Where the Commission does not endorse the standards or endorses them in part or with amendments, it shall inform the Authority of its reasonsit shall propose reasoned modifications and send the draft standards back to the Authority. The Authority may amend the draft standards on the basis of the Commission’s proposed modifications and resubmit the draft standards to the Commission for endorsement.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 380 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4 a (new)
Within one month of receipt of the amended standards, the Commission shall endorse submitted standards with the amendments suggested by the Authority or reject the standards and inform the European Parliament and the Council of its decision stating the reasons.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 633 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 5
Where the Authority maintains its decision, the Council, acting by qualified majority as defined in Article 205 of the Treaty, shall, within two months, decide whether the Authority's decision is maintained or revoked.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 636 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 6
Where the Council decides to maintain the Authority's decision, or where it does not take a decision within two months, the suspension of that decision shall be immediately terminated.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 638 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 6 a (new)
Where the Council does not take a decision within two months, the decision shall be terminated .
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 644 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
The Council, acting by qualified majority as defined in Article 205 of the Treaty, shall, within ten working days, decide whether the Authority's decision is maintained or revoked.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON