BETA

11 Amendments of Rosa ESTARÀS FERRAGUT related to 2016/0359(COD)

Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
(4) 'stay of individual enforcement actions' means a temporary suspension of the right to enforce a claim by a creditor against a debtor, ordered by a judicial or administrative authority;
2017/11/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10
(10) 'absolute priority rule' means that a dissenting class of creditors must be satisfied in full before a more junior class may receive any distribution or keep any interest under the restructuring plan;deleted
2017/11/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 11
(11) 'new financing' means any new funds, whether provided by an existing or a new creditor, that are necessary to implement a restructuring plan that are agreed upon in that restructuring plan and confirmed subsequently by a judicial or administrative authority;.
2017/11/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall ensure that a stay of individual enforcement actions may be orderedbtained by the debtor in respect of all types of creditors, including secured and preferential creditors. The stay may be general, covering all creditors, or limited, covering one or more individual creditors, in accordance with national law.
2017/11/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 254 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. A general stay covering all creditorny stay of individual enforcement actions shall prevent the opening of insolvency procedures at the request of one or moreany creditors.
2017/11/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 257 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall ensure that, during the stay period, creditors to which the stay applies may not withhold performance or terminate, accelerate or in any other way modify executory contracts to the detriment of the debtor for debts that came into existence prior to the stay, provided the debtor continues to comply with its existing obligations under such contracts. Member States may limit the application of this provision to essential contracts which are necessary for the continuation of the day-to-day operation of the business.
2017/11/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 297 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall ensure that the following restructuring plans which affect the interests of dissenting affected parties can become binding on the parties only if they are confirmed by a judicial or administrative authority:.
2017/11/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 298 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) restructuring plans which affect the interests of dissenting affected parties;deleted
2017/11/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 299 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) restructuring plans which provide for new financing.deleted
2017/11/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 306 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall ensure that judicial or administrative authorities may refuse to confirm a restructuring plan where that plan does not have a reasonable prospect of preventing the insolvency of the debtor and ensuring the viability of the business.
2017/11/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 333 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – title
DutieObligations of directors
2017/11/16
Committee: JURI