Activities of Judith SARGENTINI related to 2018/2009(INI)
Shadow opinions (1)
OPINION on the 2017 EU Justice Scoreboard
Amendments (8)
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion
Recital B
Recital B
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls on the Member States to cooperate actively with the Commission in order to reduce the data gap and to collect accurate, reliable and comparable information fit for the methodology of the Scoreboard;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Calls on the Commission to develop further its methodology, including more qualitative analysis in addition to the quantitative data;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Calls on the Commission to use additional sources of information, including data provided by international organisations and civil society organisations;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the Commission’s efforts to assess, for the first time, certain aspects of criminal justice relating to the fight against money laundering, but deplores the fact that this assessment will last only as long as the relevant judicial proceedings; encourages the Commission to present a wider assessment of criminal justice;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Regrets the Commission decision not to publish a second EU Anti- Corruption Report despite Parliament’s call in its resolution of 25 October 2016 on the fight against corruption and follow-up of the CRIM resolution (P8_TA(2016)0403); calls on the Commission to take into account the fight against corruption in its Justice Scoreboard and to identify areas that could be improved in each Member State;
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Urges the Commission to include into the Scoreboard its country-specific recommendations on the improvement of national justice systems, if the situation does not deserve the Council recommendations in the context of the European semester;
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Remindsiterates its request to the Commission thao submit a Eupropean surveillance mechanism onosal for the conclusion of a Union Pact for democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights needs to be developed, (EU Pact for DRF), as Parliament suggested in its own- initiative report of October 2016.