BETA

Activities of Giovanni LA VIA related to 2011/0288(COD)

Reports (1)

REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy PDF (1 MB) DOC (855 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: AGRI
Dossiers: 2011/0288(COD)
Documents: PDF(1 MB) DOC(855 KB)

Amendments (56)

Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9
1. The certification body shall be a public or private audit body designated by the Member State which shall provide an opinion on the management declaration of assurance covering. Where it is a private audit body, it shall be selected by the Member State by means of a public tendering procedure. The certification body shall provide an opinion, drawn up in accordance with internationally accepted audit standards, on the completeness, accuracy and veracity of the annual accounts of the paying agency, and the proper functioning of its internalthe control system,s put in place as well as the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions, as well as the respect of the principle of sound financial management. This opinion shall state, inter alia, whether the examination calls into question the assertions made in the management declaration of assurance referred to in Article 7(3)(b). It shall be operationally independent from both the paying agency concerned and the authority which has accredited that agency. 2. The Commission shall, by means of implemente empowered to adopt delegated acts, ing actscordance with Article 111, laying down rules concerning the status of the certification bodies, and the specific tasks, including the checks, which they have to carry out as well as the certificates and the reportshall be structured in the most efficient way, relying as far as possible on integrated samples with a view of minimising the administrative burden on farmers and Member States. The Commission shall adopt implementing acts, laying down rules concerning the certificates and reports to be drawn up by the certification bodies, together with the documents accompanying them, to be drawn up by those bodies. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 112(3).
2012/12/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12
1. Member States shall establish a system of advising beneficiaries on land mandagement, farm management (hereinafter referred to as the , and farm risk management (‘farm advisory system’) operated by one or more designaselected bodies. The designaselected bodies may be public and/or private. 2. The farm advisory system shall cover at least: (a) the following: (a) obligations at farm level deriving from the statutory management requirements and the standards for good agricultural and environmental condition of land as laid down in Chapter I of Title VI; (b) the agricultural practices beneficial for the climate and the environment as laid down in Chapter 2 of Title III of Regulation (EU) No xxx/xxx [DP] and the maintenance of the agricultural area as referred to in Article 4(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) No xxx/xxx [DP]; (c) the requirements or actions related to climate change mitigation and adaptation, biodiversity, protection of water, animal and plant disease notification and innovation at minimum as laid down in Annex I to this Regulation; (dca) the sustainable development of the economical activityies of the small farms as defined by the Member States and at least of the farmsfarms in accordance with measures provided for in rural development programmes, including those for farm modernisation, competitiveness building, sectoral integration, innovation and market orientation as well as the promotion and implementation of principles relating to accounting, entrepreneurship and the sustainable management of economic resources; (d) the environmental performance and sustainable development of the economic activity of farms as defined by the Member States, with priority being given to those participating in the small farmers scheme referred to in Title V of Regulation (EU) No xxx/xxx[DP]. 3. The farm advisory system may also cover, in particularter alia, the following: (aa) the sustainable developmentpromotion of conversions of farms and the diversification of their economical activity of holdings other than those referred to in paragraph (2)(d); (b) the minimum, (ab) risk management and the introduction of appropriate preventive actions to address natural disasters, catastrophic events and animal and plant diseases; (ac) advice on integrated pest management and on the use of non chemical alternatives. (b) the requirements established by national legislation, as referred to in Article 29(3) and 30(2) of Regulation (EU) No xxx/xxx [RD]
2012/12/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14
Beneficiaries, whether or not they receive support under the common agricultural policy, including rural development, may use the farm advisory system on a voluntary basis. However Member States may determine, in accordance with objectivebased on environmental, economic and social criteria, the categories of beneficiaries that are to have priority access to the farm advisory system. Member States shall nevertheless ensure that priority is given to, which may include, inter alia: (a) those farmers whose access to an advisory service other than the farm advisory system is most limited; (b) farmers participating in the measures intended to ensure carbon, nutrient and/or energy efficiency described in Chapter 2 of Title III of Regulation (EU) No xxx/xxx[DP]; (c) networks operating with limited resources within the meaning of Articles 53, 61 and 62 of Regulation (EU) (EU) No xxx/xxx [RD]. The farm advisory system shall ensure that beneficiaries have access to advice reflecting the specific situation of their holding.
2012/12/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 — paragraph 2
The measures financed pursuant to point (c) of Article 6 concern the collection or purchase of data needed to implement and monitor the common agricultural policy, including satellite data and meteorological data, the creation of a spatial data infrastructure and a website, the carrying out of specific studies on climatic conditions, the monitoring of soil health and soil functionality and the updating of agri- meteorological and econometric models. Where necessary, those measures shall be carried out in collaboration with national laboratories and bodies.
2012/12/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 56 — paragraph 1
1. For any undue payment following the occurrence of irregularity or negligence, Member States shall request recovery from the beneficiary within one year of the first indication that suchafter the approval and, where applicable, reception, by the paying agency or body responsible for the recovery of a control report or similar document, stating that an irregularity has taken place and. The corresponding amounts shall be record the corresponding amountsed at the same time of the recovery request in the debtors' ledger of the paying agency.
2012/12/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 61
-1. The Commission shall adopt delegated acts, in accordance with Article 111 regarding rules on the minimum level of on-the-spot checks necessary for an effective and proportionate management of risk. Those rules shall specify the circumstances in which Member States have to adjust the number of on-the-spot checks depending on the level of inherent risk, and shall provide for the possibility to reduce the number of checks where the error rates are at an acceptable level and the management and control systems in place work properly; 1. The system set up by the Member States in accordance with Article 60(2) shall include, except where otherwise provided, systematic administrative checking of all aid applications and payment claims and shall be supplemented by on-the-spot checks whose purpose shall be to monitor compliance with the provisions of the aid schemes and the level of inherent risk and whose number shall be adjusted in light of that purpose. 2. As regards the on-the-spot checks, the authority responsible shall draw its check sample from the entire population of applicants comprising, where appropriate, a random part and a risk-based part in order to obtain a representative error rate, while targeting also highest errors. the areas in which the risk of error is highest. To ensure that the checks are proportionate, account needs to be taken of factors including: – the size of the sums involved; – the outcome of earlier audits of the management and control systems; – voluntary participation in management schemes certified on the basis of recognised international standards.
2012/12/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 64
1. In order to ensure correct and efficientthat the application of the checks is correct and efficient and that the verification of the eligibility conditions is carried out in an efficient, coherent and non-discriminatory way which protects the financial interest of the Union, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 111, concerning the, in particular, the following: (-a) the rules concerning situations where beneficiaries or their representatives prevent checks from being carried out. 2. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, adopt the necessary rules aiming at reaching a uniform application of this Chapter in the Union. Those rules may, in particular, relate to the following:; (a) the rules concerning administrative and on-the-spot checks to be conducted by the Member States in accordance with a proportionate and risk-based approach, with regard to the respect of obligations, commitments and eligibility criteria resulting from the application of Union legislation; (bc) the rules on the minimum level ofand methods on- the-spot checks necessary for an effective management reporting of the rischecks, as well as the conditions under which Member States have to increase such checks, or may reduce them where the management and control systems function properly and the error rates are at an acceptable levelnd verification carried out and their results; (cd) the rules and methods on the reporting of the checks and verification carried out and their results; (d)on the designation of the authorities responsible for performing the checks for compliance as well as to the content, the frequency and the marketing stage to which thosesuch checks shall apply; (e) where the specific needs for proper management of the system so requires, rules introducing additional requirements with respect to customs procedures, in particular as laid down in Regulation (EC) No 450/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council; (f) with regard to hemp as referred to in Article 38 of Regulation (EU) No xxx/xxx [DP], rules on the specific control measures and methods for determining tetrahydrocannabinol levels; (g) with regard to cotton as referred to in Article 42 of Regulation (EU) No xxx/xxx [DP], a system for checks on the approved interbranch organisations; (h) with regard to wine as referred to in Regulation (EU) No sCMO/xxx, rules on the measurement of areas, as well as relating to checks and rules governing the specific financial procedures for the improvement of checks; (i) the tests and methods to be applied for establishing the eligibility of products for public intervention and private storage, as well as the use of tendering procedures, both for public intervention and for private storagefor both. 1a. The Commission shall adopt implementing acts laying down time limits by which the Commission is to respond to an indication that the Member State intends to reduce the number of its on- the-spot checks. The implementing acts provided for in the first subparagraph shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 112(3) or in the corresponding Article of Regulation (EU) No xxx/xxx[DP], Regulation (EU) No xxx/xxx[RD] or Regulation (EU) No xxx/xxx[sCMO] respectively.
2012/12/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 65
1. Where it is found that a beneficiary does not comply, in whole or in part, with the eligibility criteria for the commitments relating to the conditions for granting the aid as provided for in the sectoral agricultural legislation thea certain aid scheme, as provided for in the sectoral agricultural legislation, the corresponding part of the aid shall be withdrawn in full. In particular, in the case of non- compliance with eligibility criteria relating to countable units such as hectares of land or number of animals the aid shall be withdrawn in full for those units, for which the eligibility criteria are not fulfilled. 1a. Where aid is linked to the fulfilment of specific commitments and it is found that a beneficiary does not comply with these commitments the corresponding aid shall be withdrawn in full or in part. 2. Where Union law so provides, Member States shall also impose penalties by waylegislative acts within the meaning of Article 289(3) of the Treaty so provide - where relevant, subject to further details laid down in delegated acts- Member States shall also impose administrative penalties in the form of reductions or exclusions of the payment or part of the payment granted or to be granted in respect of which the eligibility criteria or the commitments have been met. The amounts of the reduction of aidwithdrawal referred to in paragraph 1a and the administrative penalties referred to in paragraph 2 shall be graduated according to the nature, severity, extent, duration, and reoccurrence of the non compliance found and may go as far as total exclusion for one or more calendar years from one or several aid schemes or support measures for one or more calendar years. 3. The amounts concerned by the withdrawal referred to in paragraph 1 and by ththat are the subject of the non compliance. 2a. The graduation of penalties shall be based on the following general criteria: - the 'severity' of non-compliance shall depend, in particular, on the importance of the consequences of the non- compliance, in particular the risk it represents for the Union fund concerned, and consistently taking account of the aims of the requirement or standard concerned; - the 'extent' of non-compliance shall be determined taking account, in particular, of whether the non-compliance has a far- reaching impact or whether it is limited to the farm itself; - the 'duration' of non-compliance shall be determined by the competent authority taking account, in particular, of the estimated length of time for which the effect lasts or the potential for terminating those effects by reasonable means; - 'reoccurrence' of non-compliance shall mean that the non-compliance with the same requirement, standard or obligation has been determined more than once within a consecutive period of three calendar years, provided the beneficiary has been informed of a previous non- compliance and, where applicable, has had the possibility to take the necessary measures to terminate that previous non- compliance; 3. The amounts concerned by the withdrawal and by the administrative penalties referred to in the previous paragraph 2s shall be recovered in full.
2012/12/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 68
1. Each Member State shall set up and operate an integrated administration and control system (hereinafter referred to as the ‘integrated system’). 2. The integrated system shall apply to the support schemes listed in Annex I of Regulation (EU) No xxx/xxx [DP] and to the support granted in accordance with Articles 22(1)(a) and (b), 29 to 32, 34 and 35 of Regulation xxx/xxx [RD] and where applicable Article 28(1)(b) of regulation (EU) CR/xxx.. However, this Chapter shall not apply to measures referred to in Article 29(9) of Regulation (EU) No xxx/xxx[RD], as well as to measures under Article 22(1)(a) and (b) of that Regulation as far as the establishment cost is concerned. 3. To the extent necessary, the integrated system shall also apply to the control of cross-compliance as laid down in Title VI. 3a. Member States shall make appropriate use of technology when setting up their integrated system, in order to reduce the administrative burden and ensure that controls are carried out in an efficient and effective manner.
2012/12/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 73 — paragraph 2 and 2a (new)
2. Member States shall provide, inter alia by the use of electronic means, preestablished forms based on the areas determined in the previous year as well as graphic material indicating the location of those areas. A Member State may decide that the aid application needs to contain only changes with respect to the aid application submitted the previous year. However, as concerns the small farmers scheme as provided for in Title V of Regulation (EU) No DP/xxx this possibility shall be given to all farmers concerned. 2a. Member States may decide that an aid application or a payment claim that fulfils the requirements laid down in paragraph 1 is to remain valid for a number of years provided that the beneficiaries concerned are under an obligation to report any change to the information they first submitted. The multiannual application shall however be conditional upon annual confirmation by the beneficiary.
2012/12/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 75
1. In accordance with Article 61, Member States, through the paying agencies or the bodies delegated by them, shall carry out administrative checks on the aid application to verify the eligibility conditions for the aid. Those checks shall be supplemented by on-the-spot checks. 2. For the purpose of on the spot checks Member States shall draw up a sampling plan of agricultural holdings and/or beneficiarie the purpose of which shall be to monitor compliance with the provisions of the aid schemes and the level of inherent risk. 2. For the purpose of on the spot checks Member States shall draw up a sampling plan of beneficiaries comprising both a random part in order to obtain a representative error rate and a risk-based part enabling a primary focus on high- risk claims. 3. Member States may use remote sensing and Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) techniques as a means of carrying out on-the-spot checks on agricultural parcels. 4. In case of non compliance with the eligibility conditions Article 65 shall apply.
2012/12/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 76
1. The payments under the support schemes and measures referred to in Article 68(2) shall be made within the period from 1 December to 30 June of the following calendar year. Payments shall be made in up to two instalments within that period. Payments shall be made in up to two instalments within that period. However Member States may pay advances up to 50 % as regards direct payments and 75% for the support granted under rural development as referred to in Article 68(2) prior to 1 December and not before 16 October. 2. Payments referred to in the paragraph 1 shall not be made before the verification of eligibility conditions, to be carried out by the Member States pursuant to Article 75, has been finalised. Without prejudice to the application of the third subparagraph, the Commission may adopt implementing acts authorising the Member States to increase the percentage of advances to 80% in regions in which farmers face serious financial difficulties due to exceptional conditions. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 112(3). 2. Payments referred to in the paragraph 1 shall not be made before the verification of eligibility conditions, to be carried out by the Member States pursuant to Article 75, has been finalised. 2a. By way of derogation from paragraph 2 of this Article, Member States may decide, taking into account the risk of overpayment, to pay up to 50 % as regards of the applicable payment referred to in Title III of Regulation (EU) xxx/xxx [DP] and 75 % of the support granted under rural development as referred to in Article 68(2) after completion of the administrative checks provided for in Article 61(1). The percentage payment shall be the same for all beneficiaries of the measure or of the set of operations. 2b. The Commission may, at the request of one or more Member State, under exceptional circumstances and where the necessary budgetary resources are available, authorise advances to be paid before 16 October.
2012/12/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 77 — paragraph 2 — point b
(b) provisions required for a harmonised definition of the basis for calculation of aid, including rules on how to deal with certain cases where eligible areas contain landscape features or trees; without prejudice to Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No xxx/xxx [DP], eligibility rules shall be consistent with meeting the challenges of climate change and biodiversity loss, and shall not therefore penalise high nature value farming or grazed agro-forestry systems, or cause decreases in environmental quality; flexibility, justified on agronomic or ecological grounds, shall be allowed on the basis of the customary standards of the Member State or region concerned;
2012/12/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 — paragraph 5
In addition, as regards the years 2014 and 2015, the rules on cross compliance shall also comprisinclude the maintenance of permanent grassland and permanent pasture. The Member States which were Mmembers of the Union at 1 January 2004 shall ensure that land which was under permanent grassland and permanent pasture at the date provided for the area aid applications for 2003 is maintained under permanent grassland and permanent pasture within defined limits. The Member States which became Mmembers of the Union in 2004 shall ensure that land which was under permanent grassland and permanent pasture on 1 May 2004 is maintained under permanent grassland and permanent pasture within defined limits. Bulgaria and Romania shall ensure that land which was under permanent grassland and permanent pasture on 1 January 2007 is maintained under permanent grassland within defined limitsand permanent pasture within defined limits. However a Member State may, in duly justified circumstances, derogate from the first subparagraph, provided that it takes action to prevent a significant decrease in its total permanent grassland and permanent pasture area.
2012/12/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 99
1. The penalty provided for in Article 91 shall be applied by means of reduction or exclusion of the total amount of the payments listed in Article 92 granted or to be granted to that beneficiary related to the calendar year concerned or the years concerned. For the calculation of those reductions and exclusions proportionate account shall be taken of the nature, severity, extent, permanenceduration and reoccurrence of the non- compliance found as well as of the criteria set out in paragraphs 2, 3 and 4. 2. In the case of non -compliance due to negligence, the percentage of reduction shall not exceed 5 % and, in the case of repeated non-compliance, shall not exceed 15 %. In duly justified cases Member States may decide that no reduction shallis to be applied where, given its severity, extent and duration, a case of non-compliance is toshould be considered asto be minor. However, cases of non-compliance which constitute a direct risk to public or animal health shall not be considered as minorto be minor. Furthermore, Member States may set up an early warning system applying to cases of first non-compliance that are not considered to be severe. TWhe finding and the obligation to take remedial action shall be notified to the beneficiary. 3. In the case of intentional non- compliare a Member State decides to make use of this option, the competent authority shall send an initial warning to the beneficiary, notifying it of the finding and of the obligation to take remedial action. The impact of such system shall be limited to holding the beneficiary responsible for the non-compliance. The warning shall be followed by appropriate checks within the following year to verify whether the non- compliance has been remedied. If it has been remedied, no reduction shall be applied. If it has not been remedied, the reduction pursuant to the first subparagraph shall be applied retroactively. However, cases of non- compliance which constitute a direct risk to public or animal health shall always be considered to be severe. 3. In the case of severe non-compliance resulting from gross negligence, the percentage of reduction shall in principle not be less than 20 % and may go as far as total exclusion from one or several aid schemes and apply for one or more calendar years. 4. In any case, the total amount of reductions and exclusions for one calendar year shall not be more than the total amount referred to in the first subparagraph of paragraph 1.
2012/12/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 101
1. In order to ensure a correct distribution of the funds to the entitled beneficiaries, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 111 to establish a harmonised basis for calculation of penalties due to cross compliance, taking into account reductions due to financial discipline. 2. In order to ensure that cross compliance is carried out in an efficient, risk-based and proportionate, coherent and non discriminatory way, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts, in accordance with Article 111, concerning the calculation and application of penalties. Those delegated acts shall in particular contain rules on cases where administrative penalties are not to be imposed for non-compliance which is due to technical failure of the systems for identification and registration of animals, referred to in Annex II, SMR 7 and SMR 8, and does not result from an act or omission directly attributable to the beneficiary concerned.
2012/12/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 106 — paragraph 3
3. Where a direct payment as provided for in Regulation (EU) No DP/xxx is made to a beneficiary in a currency other than the euro, Member States shall convert the amount of aid expressed in euro into the national currency on the basis of the most recentlast monthly average exchange rate set by the European Ccentral Bbank prior to 1 October of the year for which the aid is granted.
2012/12/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 110
1. A common monitoring and evaluation framework shall be established with a view to measuring the performance of the common agricultural policy. It shall include all instruments related to the monitoring and evaluation of common agricultural policy measures, and in particular of: (a) the direct payments provided for in Regulation (EU) No DP/xxx, (b) the market measures provided for in Regulation (EU) No CMO/xxx, (c) the rural development measures provided for in Regulation (EU) No RD/xxx and of, (d) the application of the cross compliance provided for in this Regulation. In order to ensure an effective performanceThe Commission shall monitor these policy measurements on the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated actbasis of reporting by Member States in accordance with Article 111 regardthe rules laid down ing the content and construcis Regulation. The Commission shall establish a multi- annual evaluation plan with periodic evaluations of that frameworkspecific instruments which it will carry out. 2. The impact of the common agricultural policy measures referred to in paragraph 1 shall be measured in relation to the following objectives: (a) viable food production, with a focus on input prices, agricultural income, agricultural productivity and price stability; (b) sustainable management of natural resources and climate action, with a focus on greenhouse gas emissions, biodiversity, soil and water; (c) balanced territorial development, with a focus on rural employment, growth and poverty in rural areas. The Commission shall define, by means of implementing acts, the set of indicators specific to the objectives referred to in the first subparagraph. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 112(3)In order to ensure the efficient application of this paragraph the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts, in accordance with Article 111, regarding the content and construction of the monitoring and evaluation framework, including the set of indicators and the methods for their calculation. 3. Member States shall provide the Commission with all the information necessary to permit the monitoring and evaluation of the measures concerned. As far as possible, such information shall be based on established sources of data, such as the Farm Accountancy Data Network and Eurostat. The Commission shall take into account the data needs and synergies between potential data sources, in particular their use for statistical purposes when appropriate. The Commission shall adopt, by means of implementing acts, laying down rules on the information to be sent by the Member States, without imposing an undue administrative burden on them, as well as rules on the data needs and synergies between potential data sources. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 112(3). 4. The Commission shall present a report on the implementation of this Article to the European Parliament and the Council every four years. The first report shall be presented not later than 31 December 2017.
2012/12/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II — Main issue "Soil and carbon stock" — GAEC 6
Maintenance of soil organic matter level through appropriate practices including ban on burning arable stubble, except for plant health reasons or for pruning residue.
2012/12/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annexe II — Main Issue "Biodiversity" — SMR 2 — last column
Article 3(1), Article 3(2)(b) Article 4(1), (2) and (4), Article 5(a), (b) and (d)
2012/12/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annexe II — Main Issue "Biodiversity" — SMR 3 — last column
Article 6 (1) and (2) and Article 13(1)(a)
2012/12/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annexe II — Main Issue "Landscape, minimum level of maintenance" — GAEC 8
Retention of landscape features, including where appropriate, semi-natural habitats, hedges, ponds, ditches, trees in line, in group or isolated, field margins and terraces, and including a ban on cutting hedges and trees during the bird breeding and rearing season and possible measures for avoiding invasive species and pests.
2012/12/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) In order to help beneficiaries to become more aware of the relationship between agricultural practices and, management and risk management of farms on the one hand, and standards relating to the environment, climate change, good agricultural condition of land, food safety, public health, animal health, plant health and animal welfare on the other, it is necessary that Member States establish a comprehensive farm advisory system offering advice to beneficiaries. That farm advisory system should in any way not affect the obligation and responsibility of beneficiaries to respect those standards. Also a clear separation between advice and checks should be ensured by the Member States.
2012/12/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) The farm advisory system should cover at least the requirements and standards forming the scope of cross compliance at farm level. That system should also cover the requirements to be respected in relation to the agricultural practices beneficial for the climate and the environment for direct payments, as well as the maintenance of the agricultural area under Regulation (EU) No DP/xxx of the European Parliament and of the Council of xxx establishing rules for direct payment to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy. TIn addition, that system should finally cover certain elements related to climate change mitigation and adaptation, biodiversity, protection of water, animal and plant disease notification and innovation as well as the environmental performance and sustainable development of the economical activity of the small farms. activity of farms, including activities for farm modernisation, competitiveness building, sectoral integration innovation and market orientation, as well as the promotion and implementation of principles relating to accounting, entrepreneurship and the sustainable management of economic resources. Finally, Member States may include in their system the promotion of conversions of farms and the diversification of their economic activity and the introduction of appropriate preventive actions to address natural disasters and animal and plant diseases, as well as advice on integrated pest management and use of non chemical alternatives.
2012/12/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) Entry into the farm advisory system should be on a voluntary basis for beneficiaries. All beneficiaries, even if not receiving support under the CAP, should be allowed to participate in the system. However priority criteria may be set by the Member Stathe Member States should be able to determine, on the basis of environmental, economic and social criteria, the categories of beneficiaries that have priority access to the farm advisory systesm. Due to the nature of the system, it is appropriate for the information obtained in the course of the advisory activity to be treated as confidential, except in case of serious infringements of Union or national law. In order to ensure the efficiency of the system, advisors should be suitably qualified and regularly trained.
2012/12/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
(38) Provisions relating to general principles on checks, withdrawals, reductions or exclusions from payments and to the imposition of proportionate administrative penalties are contained in various sectoral agricultural regulations. Those rules should be gathered in the same legal framework at a horizontal level. They should cover the obligations of the Member States as regards administrative and on-the-spot checks including the general principles and criteria applicable, the rules on the recovery, reduction and exclusions of aid. Rules on checks of obligations not necessarily linked to the payment of an aid should be laid down as well. It is necessary to provide for a strong incentive for Member States to reduce the number of on-the-spot checks where the error rate is at an acceptable level, as well as for flexibility on the basis of the customary standards of the Member States or regions concerned, allowing for justified exceptions on agronomic, ecological or environmental grounds.
2012/12/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
(41) The main elements of that integrated system and, in particular, the provisions concerning a computerised database, an identification system for agricultural parcels, aid applications or payment claims and a system for the identification and recording of payment entitlements should be maintained. Member States should make appropriate use of technology when setting up these systems, with a view of reducing administrative burden and ensuring efficient and effective controls.
2012/12/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 - introductory phrase
4. Where, on account of a Member State’s constitutional system, more than one paying agency is accredited, the Member State shall designateselect a body, hereinafter referred to as the "coordinating body", to which it assigns the following tasks:
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 322 #
Proposal for a regulation
Title 4 – chapter 2 – section 4
[...]deleted
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 323 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 38
Article 38 Budget Commitments The Commission Decision adopting the list of the projects to which the Prize for innovative, local cooperation is awarded, as referred to in Article 58(4) of Regulation (EU) No RD/xxx shall constitute a financing decision within the meaning of Article [75(2)] of Regulation (EU) No FR/xxx. Following the adoption of the Decision referred to in the first paragraph, the Commission shall made a budget commitment by Member State for the total amount of the prizes granted to projects in that Member State within the limit referred to in Article 51(2) of Regulation (EU) No RD/xxx.deleted
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 324 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 39
Article 39 Payments to the Member States 1. Within the framework of the interim payments referred to in Article 35, the Commission shall make payments in order to reimburse the expenditure incurred by accredited paying agencies in awarding the Prizes referred to in this Section in the limits of the available budget commitments for the Member States concerned. 2. Each payment shall be subject to the transmission to the Commission of a declaration of expenditure signed by the accredited paying agency, in accordance with Article 102(1)(c). 3. Accredited paying agencies shall establish and forward, either directly or via the intermediary of the coordinating body, where one has been appointed, declarations of expenditure relating to the Prize for innovative, local cooperation to the Commission, within periods set by the Commission by means of implementing acts adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 112(3). Declarations of expenditure shall cover expenditure that the paying agencies have incurred during each of the periods concerned.deleted
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 325 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 40
Article 40 Automatic decommitment for the Prize for innovative, local cooperation The Commission shall automatically decommit the amounts referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 38 that have not been used for reimbursing the Member States as laid down in Article 39 or for which no declaration of expenditure meeting the conditions laid down in that Article has been presented to it in relation to expenditure incurred by 31 December of the second year following that of the budget commitment. Article 37(3), (4) and (5) shall apply mutatis mutandis.deleted
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 510 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 77 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) the basic features, definitions and quality requirements for the computerised database provided for in Article 70;
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 511 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 77 – paragraph 1 – point b b (new)
(bb) the basic features, definitions and quality requirements for the identification system for agricultural parcels provided for in Article 71 and for the identification of the beneficiaries as provided for in Article 74;
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 512 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 77 – paragraph 1 – point b c (new)
(bc) the basic features, definitions and quality requirements for the system for the identification and registration of payment entitlements provided for in Article 72;
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 513 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 77 – paragraph 1 – point b d (new)
(bd) rules on the aid application and payments claims provided for in Article 73, and the application for payment entitlements, including the final date for submission of applications, the requirements as to the minimum amount of information to be included in the application, provisions for amendments to or the withdrawal of aid applications, exemption from the requirement to submit an aid application and provisions which allow Member States to apply simplified procedures or to correct obvious errors;
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 514 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 77 – paragraph 1 – point b e (new)
(be) rules on the carrying out of checks in order to verify compliance with obligations, and the correctness and completeness of the information provided in the aid application or payment claim;
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 521 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 78 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the basic features, definitions and quality requirements for the computerised database provided for in Article 70;deleted
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 522 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 78 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the basic features, definitions and quality requirements for the identification system for agricultural parcels provided for in Article 71 and for the identification of the beneficiaries as provided for in Article 74;deleted
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 523 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 78 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) the basic features, definitions and quality requirements for the system for the identification and registration of payment entitlements provided for in Article 72;deleted
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 524 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 78 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) rules on the aid application and payments claims provided for in Article 73, and the application for payment entitlements, including the final date for submission of applications, the requirements as to the minimum amount of information to be included in the application, provisions for amendments to or the withdrawal of aid applications, exemption from the requirement to submit an aid application and provisions which allow Member States to apply simplified procedures or to correct obvious errors;deleted
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 526 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 78 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) rules on the carrying out of checks in order to verify compliance with obligations, and the correctness and completeness of the information provided in the aid application or payment claim;deleted
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 527 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 78 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) technical definitions needed for the purpose of the uniform implementation of this Chapter;deleted
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 530 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 88 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
The Commission shall, where necessary, by means of implementing acts adopt the provisions aiming at reaching a uniform application of this RegulationChapter in the Union, in particular relating to the following:
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 679 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 111 – paragraph 2
The delegation of power referred to in this Regulation shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of time from the period of five years from …*. _____________ *Date of entry into force of this Regulation.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 682 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 111 – paragraph 2 — subparagraph 1 a (new)
The Commission shall draw up a report in respect of the delegation of power not later than nine months before the end of this five years period. The delegation of power shall be tacitly extended for periods of an identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council opposes such extension not later than three months before the end of each period.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 780 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 70c
(70c) In its judgment, the Court did not contest the legitimacy of the objective of reinforcing public control of the use of the money from the EAGF and the EAFRD. This objective should be analysed in the light of the new financial management and control framework to be applied as from 1 January 2014. In the context of this framework, the controls by the national administrations cannot be exhaustive and, in particular, for almost all schemes only a limited part of the population can be checked on-the-spot. An increase of the minimum control rates beyond the levels currently applied would, in the present context, put additional financial and administrative burden on the national administrations and would not be cost-effective. Moreover, the new framework provides that, under certain conditions, Member States may reduce the number of on-the-spot checks. Against this background, the publication of the name of the beneficiaries of the agricultural funds reinforces the public control of the use of those funds and, therefore, is a useful addition to the existing management and control framework that is necessary to ensure an adequate level of protection of the Union's financial interest. The national authorities, while applying the new rules simplifying the administrative process of the implementation of Union funds and reducing the administrative costs, should be enabled to rely on the public control, notably through its preventive and deterrent effect against fraud and any misuse of the public funds, by discouraging individual beneficiaries from irregular behaviour.
2012/10/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 781 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 70d
(70d) The objective of the public control of the use of the money from the EAGF and the EAFRD pursued with the publication of beneficiaries may be achieved only by ensuring a certain degree of information to be deliveredbrought to the knowledge of the public. That information should cover data on the identity of the beneficiary, the amount awarded and under whieach of the funds, the purpose and the nature of the measure concerned. The publication of that information should be made in such a way as to cause less interference with theIn order to provide an accurate picture of the territorial distribution of CAP support, information on the location of the holdings to which those measures apply should also be provided. In order to safeguard the right of beneficiaries’ right to respect for their private life in general and to protection of their personal data in particular, rights recognised by Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, the beneficiaries names should not be published and the beneficiaries should be identified by a code.
2012/10/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 782 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 70e
(70e) Publishing details about the measure entitling the farmer to receive aid, including the nature and the purpose of the aid would provide concrete knowledgeat aid and the region in which that measure is applied would provide information to the public on the subsidised activity and the purpose for which the subsidy was granted. This would contribute to the preventive and deterrent effect of the public control in the protection of the financial interesta better awareness of the provision of "public goods" by farming and underpin the legitimacy of state support for the agricultural sector.
2012/10/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 783 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 70f
(70f) In order to observe a balance between the pursued objective of the public control of the use of the money from the EAGF and the EAFRD on the one hand and the beneficiaries’ right to respect for their private life in general and to protection of their personal data on the other hand, the importance of the aid should be taken into account. Following the extensive analysis and the consultation with the stakeholders it appeared that in order to reinforce the effectiveness of such publication and to limit the interference with the beneficiaries' rights, a threshold should be set up as regards the amount of aid received below which the name of the beneficiary should not be published.deleted
2012/10/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 784 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 70g
(70g) The threshold should reflect and be based on the level of the support schemes set up within the framework of the CAP. As the structures of the Member States' agricultural economies vary considerably and may differ significantly from the average Union farm structure, the application of different minimum thresholds that reflect the particular situation of the Member States should be allowed. Regulation xxx/xxx [DP] sets out a simple and specific scheme for small farms. Article 49 of that Regulation lays down criteria for calculating the amount of aid. For reasons of consistency, those criteria should also be used for fixing specific thresholds per Member State for the publication of the name of a beneficiary. Except for the name, below that specific threshold the publication should contain all the relevant information in order to allow the taxpayers to have an accurate image of the CAP.deleted
2012/10/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 785 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 110 — paragraph 1 — introductory sentence
1. Member States shall ensure annual ex post publication of the amounts paid to beneficiaries of the EAGF and the EAFRD. The publication shall contain:
2012/10/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 786 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 110 a — paragraph 1 — point a
(a) without prejudice to the first paragraph of Article 110b of this Regulation, the name of the beneficiaries, as follows: (i) the first name and the surname where the beneficiaries are natural persons; (ii) the full legal name as registered where the beneficiaries are legal persons with the autonomous legal personality pursuant to the legislation of the Member State concerned; (iii) the full name of the association as registered or otherwise officially recognised where the beneficiaries are associations without an own legal personalityeach beneficiary shall be identified by a code, the form of which shall be decided by Member States;
2012/10/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 787 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 110 a — paragraph 1 — point d
(d) the nature and the description of the measures financed by the EAGF or the EAFRD and, under which the payment referred to in point (c) is awarded, as well as the regions in which the holdings to which those measures apply are located.
2012/10/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 788 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 110b
Where the amount of aid received in one year by a beneficiary is equal or less than the amount fixed by a Member State pursuant to Article 49 of Regulation (EU) No DP/xxx that Member State shall not publish the name of that beneficiary as provided for in point (a) of the first subparagraph of Article 110a(1) of this Regulation. The amounts fixed by a Member State pursuant to Article 49 of Regulation (EU) No DP/xxx and notified to the Commission under that Regulation shall be made public by the Commission in accordance with the rules adopted under Article 110d. Where the first paragraph of this Article applies the Member States shall publish the information referred to in points (b), (c) and (d) of the first subparagraph of Article 110a(1) and the beneficiary shall be identified by a code. Member States shall decide on the form of that code.Article 110b deleted Threshold
2012/10/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 789 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 110d — Paragraph — -1 (new)
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts, in accordance with Article 111, concerning the definition of the regions referred to in Article 110a(1)d.
2012/10/17
Committee: AGRI