BETA

35 Amendments of Marisa MATIAS related to 2016/2145(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A

A. whereas the Commission's objectives are aligned with those of the US intelligence services7 , which advocate maximum openness for world scientific data in order to maintain their leadership; __________________ 7 Report of the National Commission for the review of the research and development programs of the United States Intelligence Community – FAS 2013 – DO – FASIC2013.deleted

2016/10/25
Committee: ITRE

Motion for a resolution
Recital B

~~B. whereas the bulk of the work produced and published in Europe by scientists exceeds the capacity of peer validation, which prevents an assessment of its strategic importance;~~deleted

2016/10/25
Committee: ITRE

Motion for a resolution
Recital C

C. whereas the registration systems for authors and scientific publications (the ORCID8 and DOI9 systems) are subject to the jurisdiction of the State of Delaware; __________________ 8 Open Researcher and Contributor ID. 9 Digital Object Identifier.deleted

2016/10/25
Committee: ITRE

Motion for a resolution
Recital D

D. whereas the GEANT network already connects national research networks, but with a cloud service which includes Amazon Web Service10 ; __________________ 10https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single- market/en/news/geant-and-amazon-web- services-are-breaking-down-barriers- cloud-services-adoptiondeleted

2016/10/25
Committee: ITRE

Motion for a resolution
Recital E

~~E. whereas the other powers have a digital strategy of limited access to their data; and China requires every cloud operator to have a minimum of 50% of Chinese capital;~~deleted

2016/10/25
Committee: ITRE

Motion for a resolution
Recital F

~~F. whereas High Performance Computing (HPC) is a niche market worth about $ 15 billion a year, compared to $ 350 billion for semiconductors and over $ 400 billion for software;~~deleted

2016/10/25
Committee: ITRE

Motion for a resolution
Recital G

G. whereas the Commission failed to consult the only European producer of microprocessors, the fifth largest worldwide, or Europe's largest cloud computing company, although it did consult their non-European rivals;deleted

2016/10/25
Committee: ITRE

Motion for a resolution
Recital H

H. whereas the free Linux software would not only produce tens of billions of euros in savings, but also allow the European digital sector to play a leading role, but this is not a priority for the Commission;deleted

2016/10/25
Committee: ITRE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1

1. ~~Reject~~Welcomes the Commission communication entitled ‘European Cloud Initiative – Building a competitive data and knowledge economy in Europe’,

2016/10/25
Committee: ITRE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)

1a. Stresses that the added value of this European initiative is based on the sharing of open data, developing a trusted, open environment for the community for storing, sharing and re- using scientific data and results.

2016/10/25
Committee: ITRE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)

1b. Highlights that the European Open Science Cloud should be available for free for the use of the academic and scientific community, industries and SMEs, as well as public services, providing them the access to the resources, data and infrastructures which would be impossible to have access without this collaborative approach;

2016/10/25
Committee: ITRE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 c (new)

1c. Urges the Commission to lead by example and make all the research data and its results, funded by European Programmes, such as Horizon 2020, EFSI, ESI and others to be open by default, based on the findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable (FAIR) principles

2016/10/25
Committee: ITRE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 d (new)

1d. Recommends the Commission to ensure that the European Open Science Cloud to benefits all regions of Europe, exploring the use of regional development funds for the widening of the initiative

2016/10/25
Committee: ITRE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 e (new)

1e. Takes note of the Commission intention to use the European Open Science Cloud and the European Data Infrastructure as stimulus for the development of industrial clouds, innovation centres, start-up ecosystems and enhanced cooperation between universities and industry. Stresses that this goal is only achievable if efforts are made for the "democratisation" of all the Infrastructures, such as HPC (High Performance Computer), making it a public good putting the data and computing within the reach of business, SMEs and researchers;

2016/10/25
Committee: ITRE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 f (new)

1f. Calls on the Commission to incentivize the participation of European SMEs and Industries in the manufacturing of the hardware and software of the European Data Infrastructure, boosting the European economy, sustainable growth and job creation;

2016/10/25
Committee: ITRE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 g (new)

1g. Reiterates that the participation of the European SMEs, Industries, Public and Academic Sector will ensure the compliance with the European Regulations related with General data protection, Labour conditions and high environmental standards;

2016/10/25
Committee: ITRE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 h (new)

1h. Invites the Commission to engage with Member States and with other research funders in the design and implementation of the Roadmap for governance and funding, ensuring that appropriate resources are allocated to the initiative and to facilitate the coordination of national efforts, avoiding unnecessary duplication and spending;

2016/10/25
Committee: ITRE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 i (new)

1i. Supports that interoperability and data portability is a key player to address grand societal challenges that require efficient data sharing and a multidisciplinary and multi actor approach. Notes that the Action Plan foreseen in the Communication is a tool necessary to reduce fragmentation and to ensure the use of the researcher's data under the FAIR principle;

2016/10/25
Committee: ITRE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 j (new)

1j. Asks the Commission to present an Action Plan, based on the principles of full transparency and disclosure, with clear working packages and timelines, defining the results to be achieved, the sources of financing and the stakeholders involved in all the process;

2016/10/25
Committee: ITRE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2

~~2. Invalidates and wishes to review its previous resolutions based on a biased analysis of open mass data, motivated by the interests of non-European powers;~~deleted

2016/10/25
Committee: ITRE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6

~~6. Proposes that the governance of ORCID and DOI be under European jurisdiction with regard to European scientists and their work;~~deleted

2016/10/25
Committee: ITRE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7

~~7. Warns against the risk of research being exploited outside the Union, if there is no support for applied research and venture capital;~~deleted

2016/10/25
Committee: ITRE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8

8. Stresses that the resilience of an information system depends on the security of national systems and of the interconnections between these systems and that data fragmentation can therefore ensure digital resilience;deleted

2016/10/25
Committee: ITRE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9

~~9. Calls for the national security authorities (ANSSI, BSI ...) to be fully involved in securing interconnections;~~deleted

2016/10/25
Committee: ITRE

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 4

~~Public-private partnership contract on High Performance Computing~~deleted

2016/10/25
Committee: ITRE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10

~~10. Proposes that the amounts earmarked for ETP4HPC be re-allocated for the development of digital companies with high added value;~~deleted

2016/10/25
Committee: ITRE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11

~~11. Stresses the existing potential that quantum technologies have for computers and encryption keys;~~deleted

2016/10/25
Committee: ITRE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12

~~12. Believes that the failure to control the European digital industry poses a threat to civil liberties, respect for privacy and the current and future employment;~~deleted

2016/10/25
Committee: ITRE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13

~~13. Calls for an audit of the digital industry in Europe, the investments necessary to face foreign competition and the takeover of European companies;~~deleted

2016/10/25
Committee: ITRE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17

~~17. Considers it essential to invest massively in the semiconductor industry;~~deleted

2016/10/25
Committee: ITRE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18

~~18. Proposes the creation of European computer assembly chains, with robotics enabling them to be competitive;~~deleted

2016/10/25
Committee: ITRE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19

~~19. Demands a European preference for reciprocal trade;~~deleted

2016/10/25
Committee: ITRE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21

~~21. Maintains that it is vital to adopt high encryption standards for the security of all data transfers, together with the implementation of the principle of express consent;~~deleted

2016/10/25
Committee: ITRE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22

22. Calls for a Copernican revolution in the digital economic model: 'all data is the property of the provider' and anyone using these data should remunerate the data provider, with class actions being filed against any company using data without remuneration;deleted

2016/10/25
Committee: ITRE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23

23. Proposes that Member States impose dissuasive fines on companies illegally using data, amounting to four to ten times their turnover, thereby making Europe a safe haven for data storage in the world;deleted

2016/10/25
Committee: ITRE