Activities of Monica MACOVEI related to 2011/2217(DEC)
Reports (2)
SECOND REPORT on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Environment Agency for the financial year 2010 PDF (184 KB) DOC (105 KB)
REPORT on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Environment Agency for the financial year 2010 PDF (194 KB) DOC (119 KB)
Amendments (76)
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. ....Postpones its decision on granting the Executive Director of the European Environment Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency's budget for the financial year 2010;
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. ...Refuses to grant the Executive Director of the European Environment Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency's budget for the financial year 2010;
Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a decision 2
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. ... the closure ofDecides that a proposal to close the accounts of the European Environment Agency for the financial year 2010 shall be submitted at a subsequent part-session;
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. ...Postpones the closure of the accounts of the European Environment Agency for the financial year 2010;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
A a. whereas on 10 May 2012, the European Parliament postponed its decision on the discharge and closure of the accounts of the European Environment Agency for the financial year 2010,
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Recital A b (new)
A b. whereas the Agency provided replies to the discharge authority by letters of 24 May, 15 June and 3 July 2012; whereas the Management Board of the Agency provided the discharge authority with information on the measures undertaken following the postponement of the 2010 discharge by letter of 6 June 2012,
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. BelievNotes that agencies'the Agency's levels of budget execution in terms of committed appropriations and of payment appropriations provide important information to enable the discharge authority to assess their overall performance; notes, however, that in 2010 the Agency failed to provide this information in the documents presented; therefore, urges the Agency to inform the discharge authority of the exact lewere respectively of its budget execution in terms of committed appropriations and of payment appropriations100 % and of 90,75 %;
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B - indent 1
Recital B - indent 1
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B - indent 2
Recital B - indent 2
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Acknowledges from the Agency's Final Accounts that EUR 12 809 551,05 of the 2010 appropriations have been carried forward to 2011; remindstakes note from the Agency that this situation is at odds with the budgetary principle of annuality and can be reduced by correct and proper programming and monitoring of the implementation of its budget to minimise the carryover of appropriations; calls, therefore, on the Agency to take effective action in this respectout of the amount carried forward EUR 8 941 279 refers to external assigned revenue;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B - indent 3
Recital B - indent 3
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Notes from the Agency's Final Accounts that cancellation of unused payment appropriations carried over from the previous year amounted to EUR 585 282,87; understands from the Agency that this amount is lower to the amount cancelled in 2009, i.e. EUR 693 127,02; urges the Agency, nonetheless, to take concrete measures against cancellations of the amounts carried over and to inform the discharge authority by 30 June 2012;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph -1 a (new)
Paragraph -1 a (new)
-1 a. Notes the Executive Director's failure to provide the discharge authority with complete, correct and straightforward answers during the 2010 discharge procedure as shown in paragraphs 15 a(new)and 18 a(new); this raises concerns with regards to the capacity to ensure the proper and correct management of the taxpayers' money as well as full accountability;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph -1 (new)
Paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Points to paragraph 16 of the Common Approach annexed to the Joint Statement of the European Parliament, the Council and the European Commission on decentralised agencies; expects, without prejudice to the Agencies independence, an open and transparent selection procedure regarding the appointment of the Executive Director in June 2013 that guarantees a rigorous evaluation of candidates and a high level of independence; suggests therefore a hearing of the candidates in the competent committees in Parliament to be part of the appointment procedure to the position of Executive Director;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Raises doubts that, concerning canteen services, cleaning services, security services and furniture, the Agency failed to ensure the maximum competition and value-for-money during the procurement procedures but favoured ‘'historical’' contractors even though these contractors changed their official name over time; notes from the Agency that these procurement procedures were audited by the Court of Auditors in October 2011; calls therefore on the Court of Auditors and the Agency to provide the discharge authority with the findings and report prepared following this audit;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Is, moreover, concerned over alleged cases of ‘fictitious employment’ of people whothat some people hired by the Agency might also have been work ing for the private service of some of the Agency's staff members but ; calls on the Agency to assure the discharge paid by the Agencauthority that, if this is indeed the case, the private services are paid separately;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Reminds that for five months from 22 May 2010 to October 2010 the Agency covered its building with a Green Façade at a cost of EUR 294 641 and that no public tender was issued;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. Recalls that in order to cover the costs related to the Green Façade, the budget line '2140 - Fitting-out of premises' has been reinforced by a budget transfer of EUR 180 872 taken from the budget line '2100 - Rent' on 9 April 2010;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 c (new)
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3 c. Calls therefore on the Agency to establish clear internal rules for resorting to Article 126(1) (b) of the implementing rules of the Financial Regulation; notes that the Management Board decided to implement ex-ante controls on exceptional expenditures;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Internal Audit Service (IAS) to investigate immediately the Agency's contracts in the area of canteen services, cleaning services, security services and furniture to establish whether the call preparation, publication, evaluation and contract management phases respect the two following principles: maximum competition and value-for-money and on the allegations of ‘fictitious employment’mentioned in paragraph 7 and to inform the discharge authority in due course on the Court of Auditors findingstime;
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. NoteRecalls that in December 2011 the Agency awarded a Framework Service Contract for the provision of media monitoring for 48 months, for a total value of EUR 250 000, which is much higher than the costs of similar services in the previous years; observes that based upon this contract the Agency will spend on average EUR 62 500 per year for media monitoring and believes that these costs are excessive and contrary to the principle of efficient use of the taxpayers' money; notes that it awarded a similar contract in 2005 for 3 years with an estimated annual budget of EUR 35 000; observes that in 2011 the Agency's ceiling for media monitoring increased by 78% comparing to 2005;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 2
Subheading 2
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Is nevertheless concerned that most recruitmentTakes note from the Agency that it proceeded to 47 recruitments in 2010, out of which 7 hasve been made in-house; takes also notes that this could be a source or a situation of favouritism or conflict of interests, for the last five years, the Agency hosted 12 guest scientists working at its premises; for transparency, calls on the Agency to publish the curriculum vitae – including at least the educational and work background – of the guest scientists in order to increase transparency;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 3
Subheading 3
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Notes that, until very recently,April 2011 the Executive Director of the Agency was a Board Member of Earthwatch and a Mtrustee and a member of the International Advisory Board of Earthwatch and was reported to be a member of the European Advisory Board of Worldwatch Europe, two environmental NGOs, alongside to her activities in the Agency; in accordance with the Executive Director's statement, she stepped down from her positions in Earthwatch in April 2011 following an advice by a member of the Court of Auditors in the context of a possible conflict of interests;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Is seriously concerned that in 2010, while the Executive Director was still directly involved in the Management ofwith Earthwatch, some29 staff members of the Agency, including the Executive Director, went for 5 -up to 10 days of research in different biodiversity projects in the Caribbean or Mediterranean managed by Earthwatch and that the Agency paid to the NGO about EUR 2 000 per participant; understands that this unacceptable situation was repeated in 2011 total of EUR 33 791,28, as stated by the Agency's Executive Director;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Was informed that 7 internal candidates and 40 external applicants were recruited in 2010; acknowledges the split amongst categories of internal candidates of 1 official, 5Takes note that the Agency hosted 12 guest scientists working at its premises without publishing for 11 of themporary agents and 1 contract agent and the split amongst externally recruited staff of 1 official, 13 temporary agents, 29 contract agents and 4 national experts; takes note that, for the last five years, the Agency hosted 12 guest scientists working at its premises; for the sake of their curriculum vitae – including at least the educational and work background; acknowledges the Management Board's statement that rules for the selection and conduct of visiting scientists will be strengthened in order to ensure greater clarity and transparency, calls on and that the Agency to complete publishing the curriculum vitae – including at least the educational and work background – of the guest scientists, in order to increase transparency's current policy on hosting guest scientist is under revision;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 5
Subheading 5
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 6
Subheading 6
Contradictory information, Conflict of interest and Transparency
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Commends the cooperation between the Agency and NGOs working in the environmental area, as it is the case with other specialised agencies, but recalls that even the mere appearance of conflict of interest is damaging the trust in the institutions and raises concerns of the tax payers;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15 a. Recalls that until April 2011, the Executive Director of the Agency was a trustee and a member of the International Advisory Board of Earthwatch; regrets the contradictory information sent by the Executive Director on her relationship with the Earthwatch and that the unclear relationships between the Agency and the NGO give rise to questions: - Earthwatch listed the Executive Director as a member of the International Board of Directors in its annual reports both in 2009 and 2010, - in the letter of 22 February 2012, the Executive Director mentioned her membership to the Advisory Board of Earthwatch from March 2010, - in another document distributed by the Agency in May 2012, it is reported that the Executive Director joined Earthwatch's International Board in June 2010 but took up an active role only in October 2010, - the Executive Director stated that Earthwatch invited her to join them as a trustee and as a member of the International Advisory Board in her letter of 3 March 2012;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 b (new)
Paragraph 17 b (new)
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 b (new)
Paragraph 15 b (new)
15 b. Observes moreover from the Agency's letter of 24 May 2012 that the costs related to the Executive Director's participation at Earthwatch International Board meeting on 29 September-2 October 2010 were covered by the taxpayers;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Is seriouslyRemains concerned that in 2010, while the Executive Director was directly involved with Earthwatch, 29 staff members of the Agency, including the Executive Director, went for up to 10 days of research on different biodiversity projects in the Caribbean or Mediterranean managed by Earthwatch during their working time and that the Agency paid a total of EUR 33 791,28, to the NGO as stated by the Agency's Executive Director;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 – introductory part
Paragraph 22 – introductory part
22. Is nevertheless concerned by the very large number of reports and papers or other related outputs prepared by the Agency; believes that this can be interpreted as a lack of substantial and innovative work from the Agency and that, as a consequence, the financial contribution of the Union to the Agency would be ill- used; callinvites therefore on the Agency to immediately inform in details the bBudget authority, in particular the Budget Control Authorityary Control Committee, of:
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16 a. Acknowledges the decision of the Management Board to implement ex-ante controls on the membership of the Executive Director in external boards and on the Agency's training policy;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 – indent 4
Paragraph 22 – indent 4
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 – indent 5
Paragraph 22 – indent 5
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18 a. Reiterates that Worldwatch Institute Europe used the Agency's premises as its own without any rent to the Agency, thus using premises paid by the EU budget; regrets the contradictions in the Director's statements and the documents indicating different facts; - In the letter of 11 April 2012, the Director stated "when it came to the attention of the EEA that World Watch Institute Europe had published on their own website that a European office had been set up at the EEA premises immediate action was taken..."; - The founding act of World Watch Institute Europe proves that it was established on 5 November 2010 in the premises of the Agency; - Moreover the launch of World Watch Institute Europe took place at the Agency's premises on 25 February 2011 and the Director was a guest speaker as shown by World Watch Institute Europe's website;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 b (new)
Paragraph 18 b (new)
18 b. Takes note that the Agency prepared an updated conflict policy and action plan in line with the European Ombudsman's recommendations; calls on the Agency to make the draft public and foster a debate on the policy and action plan prior their submission to the Management Board;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Calls on the Agency, in an effort to promote greater transparency in terms of preventing and combating conflict of interests, to adopt immediately an action plan to publish on its website the declarations of interest and, when they are not available, the curriculum vitae – including at least the educational and work background – for the management staff, the members of the scientific committee, the experts and theNotes that the curriculum vitae of management staff, members of the scientific committee have been made available on the Agency's website; notes further that the declarations of interest of the members of the scientific committee have also been made available; underlines that contrary to the Agency's statement in letter of 15 June 2012 none of the curriculum vitae of the Management Board members is currently available on its website and observes that only a link to their organisation is provided; calls on the Agency, in an effort to promote greater transparency in terms of preventing and combating conflict of interests, to publish on its website the declarations of interest and curriculum vitae for the experts, future guest scientists and members of the Management Board by 30 June 2012; is of the opinion that such measures would allow the discharge authority and the public to observe their qualifications and to prevent potential conflict of interest;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20 a. Expects to receive information on ongoing administrative investigations related to the Agency;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25 a. Understands that the Agency is currently under a periodic external evaluation which should be delivered to the discharge authority in 2013; takes note of the Management Board's statement that the internal processes of the Agency will be included in the evaluation;
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 8
Subheading 8
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
Paragraph 31
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32