BETA

Activities of Monica MACOVEI related to 2011/2226(DEC)

Reports (2)

SECOND REPORT on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Food Safety Authority for the financial year 2010 PDF (179 KB) DOC (94 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: CONT
Dossiers: 2011/2226(DEC)
Documents: PDF(179 KB) DOC(94 KB)
REPORT on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Food Safety Authority for the financial year 2010 PDF (208 KB) DOC (150 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: CONT
Dossiers: 2011/2226(DEC)
Documents: PDF(208 KB) DOC(150 KB)

Amendments (71)

Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1
1. ...Grants the Executive Director of the European Food Safety Authority discharge in respect of the implementation of the Authority's budget for the financial year 2010;
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1
1. ...Postpones its decision on granting the Executive Director of the European Food Safety Authority discharge in respect of the implementation of the Authority's budget for the financial year 2010;
2012/03/07
Committee: CONT
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a decision 2
Paragraph 1
1. ...Approves the closure of the accounts of the European Food Safety Authority for the financial year 2010;
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas the Court of Auditors has stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the annual accounts for the financial year 2010 are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular,deleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas on 10 May 2012, the European Parliament postponed its decision on the discharge and closure of the accounts of the Authority for the financial year 2010,
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2
Paragraph 1
1. ...Postpones the closure of the accounts of the European Food Safety Authority for the financial year 2010;
2012/03/07
Committee: CONT
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas the Authority provided extensive replies to the discharge authority by letters of 29 June 2012 and 20 August 2012,
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas on 10 May 2011 Parliament granted the Executive Director of the European Food Safety Authority discharge for implementation of the Authority's budget for the financial year 200916, and in its resolution accompanying the discharge decision, inter alia: – called on the Authority to strengthen the budget processes relating to its differentiated appropriations and the planning and monitoring of multiannual implementation, – urged, in addition, the Authority to improve its budget management in order to reduce its high carryover amounts, – invited the Authority to initiate a survey on the potential conflicts of interest of its leading scientists, its Management Board and its panel members, so that possible omissions in the declarations of interest can be detected and followed by action in a timely manner,deleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas the overall budget of the Authority for 2010 was EUR 74 700 000 compared with EUR 71 400 000 in 2009, which represents an increase of 4,6 %; whereas the initial contribution of the Union to the budget of the Authority for 2010 was EUR 69 041 000, which represents an increase of 4,36 % compared with its initial contribution in 200917 ,deleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas the workload continues its growing trend both in volume and in complexity with the adoption of more than 560 scientific outputs;deleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Notes from the Authority that in line with the schedule of the Commission, migration to the accrual-based accounting (ABAC) system was scheduled for September 2011 and implemented accordingly;
2012/03/07
Committee: CONT
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that the initial Union contribution to the Authority for 2010 amounted to EUR 69 041 000; notes however that EUR 3 950 000 coming from the recovery of surplus, was added to that amount which, as a result, makes a total Union contribution of EUR 72 991 000 for 2010;deleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Finds it unacceptable that while the Management Board of the Agency counts only 15 members, each meeting costs in average EUR 92 630, which represents an amount of EUR 6 175 per member; underlines that this amount is nearly three times higher than the second most expensive Management Board of a decentralised Agency; is of the opinion that the Management Board meetings costs are excessive and should be reduced drastically; calls on the Agency and its Management Board to remedy the situation immediately and to inform the discharge authority on the measures undertaken by 30 June 2012;
2012/03/07
Committee: CONT
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Acknowledges from its Annual Activity Report (AAR) that, in 2010, the Authority had a budget execution rate of 98,8 % in terms of committed appropriations and of 83,5 % in terms of payment appropriations; takes note that under Title 1 (Staff) and Title 2 (Infrastructure) the budget was fully executed while under Title 3 (Operations) the execution rate reached 96,5 %;deleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Notes, however, from the AAR that in 2010 the Authority had a budget execution rate of only 83,5 % in terms of payment appropriations, which is 11 % below the target set by the Authority; finds from comments by the Authority that the execution rate in terms of payment appropriations is lower than expected for the following main reasons: – major data processing and IT operational support projects were initiated in November 2010 and therefore triggered payments for an amount of EUR 4 300 000 only in 2011; – delays in contracting scientific cooperation activities and lower payment levels under the existing grant and procurement programme led to an underspend of the related differentiated credits amounting to EUR 1 300 000; – payments for an amount of EUR 1 100 000 for specific projects in administration and communication were postponed to 2011;deleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Acknowledges from the Authority that budget execution was reported to the Management Board on a monthly basis, deviations from the budget execution targets by activity or in relation to the scientific cooperation programme were pointed out and corrective action taken;deleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Urges, however, the Authority to take further action to enable a satisfactory budgeNotes the Authority's statement that measures now adequate have been undertaken to improve financial management and that execution rate in terms of both commitment and payment appropriations and to inform the discharge authority of the progress achievedwas close to 100 % in 2011;
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Notes from the Authority that in line with the schedule of the Commission, migration to the accrual-based accounting (ABAC) system was scheduled for September 2011 and implemented accordingly;deleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. FReminds it unacceptable that while the Management Board of the Authority consists of only 15 members, each meeting costsed on average EUR 92 630 in 2010, which represents an amount of EUR 6 175 per member; underlinwelcomes that, this amount is nearly three times higher than the second most expensive Management Board of a decentralised agency; is of the opinion that the Management Board meetings costs are excessive and should be reduced drastically; calls on the Authority and its Management Board to remedy the situation immediately and to inform the discharge authority of the measures undertaken by 30 Junerough the implementation of a series of measures, the Authority reduced expenditure related to the Management Board by 66 % compared to 20120;
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 2
Carryovers and contract management process
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Acknowledges from the Authority that 6 % (EUR 270 000 000) of commitments for operational activities carried over from 2009 had to be cancelled; notes that this is an improvement compared with the previous year in which 19 % of commitments for operational activities were carried over from 2008, 37 % of such commitments were carried over from 2007 and 26 % of such commitments were carried over from 2006;deleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Urges, once more, the Authority to improve its budget management in order to reduce its high carryover amounts; notes, in particular, that this situation demonstrates weaknesses in the Authority's contract management and monitoring of the remittance of reports and cost statements;deleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Considers, therefore, that a thorough case-by-case analysis of these reports and possible and actual conflicts of interest situations should be carried out in order to evaluate the objectivity and impartiality of the Authority at all levels and the work it conveys; calls, moreover, on the Authority to make a thorough screening of the declarations of interest submitted by its staff, experts and by the Members of the Management Board followed by concrete measures to stop conflicts of interest and provide information to the public; calls on the Authority to inform the discharge authority on the screening process and the concrete measures adopted, by means of a detailed written report by 30 June 2012;
2012/03/07
Committee: CONT
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Calls onTakes note that the Authority to develop and implement a common monitoring system for the management of all its contracts; acknowledges, in particular, the absence of a central and coordinated capacity at directorate level responsible for the monitoring of contracts; underlines that this entails a risk of inefficient use of resources and uncoordinated monitoring of contracts and therefore asks the Authority to centralise these responsibilities at the level of each directorateed a 'Grants and Procurement Tool' to improve the monitoring of tendering process, the contracts management and the payment forecast capacity; notes that the new Database on Procurements and Grants was launched on 28 June 2012;
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Urges, in addition, the Authority to improve the reporting on contract implementation in order to guarantee effective supervision and management of its operational activities;deleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 3
Procurementdeleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Notes from its AAR that, in 2010, the Authority finalised 24 procurement procedures in Communication and Administration for an amount of EUR 48 800 000, as well as 75 procurement contracts and 10 grant agreements as part of the scientific cooperation programme with values of EUR 5 700 000 and EUR 2 100 000 respectively;deleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Notes that the Authority has had a Practical Procurement Guide since 2008 to provide practical guidance to its staff in preparing and implementing procurement procedures and the resulting contracts, and that the Guide is regularly updated; notes moreover that the Guide is being revised to take into account the rules recently adopted by the Commission on public procurement and revision of the Financial Regulation;deleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 4
Human resourcesdeleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Notes from the Authority that 99 % of planned posts were either filled or under offer by the end of 2010;deleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on the Authority to address its weaknesses in recruitment procedures, which put at risk the transparency of the procedures; acknowledges, in particular, from the Court of Auditors that the Authority did not ensure the anonymity of the written tests and decided pass marks for the various stages of the selection process after the evaluation process had already started;deleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Takes note from the Authority that a review of its Policy on Declarations of Interest took place in 2011 and that its Management Board adopted a new policy on Independence and Scientific Decision- Making Processes ;
2012/03/07
Committee: CONT
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Observes that the Authority is repeatedly challenged over alleged cases of conflicts of interest involving members of the experts' panels, especially in the case of the panels 'Food additives and nutrient sources added to food' (ANS) and 'Genetically modified organisms' (GMO); underlines that 8 of the Authority's panels and its scientific committee are up for renewal in March 2012 and the Authority's capability to implement the new policy is under scrutiny; calls therefore the Authority to inform in writing the discharge authority by 30 June 2012 on the steps undertaken to implement the new policy on Independence and Scientific Decision- Making Processes and to conform with the OECD definition of conflict of interest when renewing its panels and scientific committee; at the same time, calls on the Authority to inform the discharge authority on the new composition of the panels and scientific committee by 30 June 2012;
2012/03/07
Committee: CONT
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Is concerned that the Authority delayed for over 12 months the Internal Audit Service (IAS)‘s ’very important' recommendation which called on the Authority to define contract renewal processes and ensure the transparency of decision-making; calls, therefore, on the Authority to explain to the discharge authority the reasons behind this delay and to rapidly address this deficiency;deleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 b (new)
23b. Notes that the Authority has been audited by the Court of Auditors in the framework of the Special Report on conflicts of interest management in the Union agencies and acknowledges from the Court of Auditors that the aforementioned Special Report will be published by the end of June 2012; given the extent of criticisms questioning the independence of the Authority, the findings of the Court of Auditors in the conflict of interest area will be also considered;
2012/03/07
Committee: CONT
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 5
Conflict of interest and ‘revolving door’ casestransparency
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Notes, in particular, that in September 2010 the Chair of the Management Board was reported to have direct links to the food industry, and to be a member of the Board of Directors of the International Life Science Institute (ILSI) - EuropWelcomes the organisation of a mandatory session on ethics and integrity for all members of the Management Board in October 2012 but calls on the Board to enforce effectively its Code of Conduct and adopt provisions preventing and sanctioning revolving door cases in order to avoid similar situations to the one of its former Chairperson in the future;
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Welcomes the Authority's commitment to propose its Management Board to elect its Chairperson by open ballot; believes that a transparent procedure will reinforce the Management Board's accountability;
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 b (new)
17b. Takes note that the Authority's new policy on "independence and scientific decision-making processes" together with its implementing rules entered into force in July 2012 and that the Authority's new definition of conflicts of interests is compatible with the OECD guidelines; notes from the Authority that its practical approach concerning an expert breaching the independence policy rules is an exclusion for a 5-year period; suggests to insert a conclusive set of proportionate sanctions to be part of the implementing rules of the independence policy;
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 c (new)
17c. Notes that the Authority scheduled an evaluation of its independence policy by the end of 2013 and committed to consider, inter alia, the possibility to publish the outcomes of the breach of trust procedures, including the outcomes of the procedure verifying the integrity of the scientific review and to broaden and reinforce the mandate of its Committee on Conflict of Interests, for instance with a similar mandate to the Committee for Ethical Standards and Prevention of Conflict of Interest of the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES); expects the Authority to inform the discharge authority on this matter by the start of the next discharge procedure;
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 d (new)
17d. Encourages the Authority to further strengthen its independence policy and consider adopting rules among others including sanctions and publishing the curriculum vitae and declarations of interest of the in-house experts and scientists;
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 e (new)
17e. Notes the Authority's statement that it adopted a policy on gifts and hospitality on 4 July 2012; commends this initiative and invites the Authority to make the policy available on its website;
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 f (new)
17f. Acknowledges that from 1 October 2012 the Authority will launch its first evaluation of a random sample of declarations of interest to verify their coherence with its newly adopted independence policy and implementing rules; expects the Authority to share the outcomes of the evaluation of all declarations with the discharge authority by 1 March 2013 in order to reflect them in the amendments to the next discharge report;
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Considers that, while a dialogue with industry on product assessment methodologies is legitimate and necessary, this dialogue should not undermine the independence of the Authority nor the integrity of risk assessment procedures; asks therefore the Authority to consider as a conflict of interest the current or recent past participation of its Management Board, panel and working group members or staff in ILSI activities such as taskforces, scientific committees or chairs for conferences;deleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Urges the Court of Auditors to finalise and present its audit of conflict of interest in the Authority;deleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Recalls that the current Chair of the Management Board failed, in 2010, to declare her membership of the Board of Directors of the ILSI; notes that ILSI is financed by firms in the food, chemical and pharmaceutical sectors;deleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Considers, therefore, that a thorough case-by-case analysis of these reports and of possible and actual conflicts of interest should be carried out in order to evaluate the objectivity and impartiality of the Authority at all levels and the work it carries out; calls, moreover, on the Authority to undertake a thorough screening of the declarations of interest submitted by its staff, experts and members of the Management Board, followed by concrete measures to end conflicts of interest and to provide information to the public; calls on the Authority to inform the discharge authority of the screening process and the concrete measures adopted, by means of a detailed written report by 30 June 2012;deleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Notes that the Court of Auditors has observed that the review process of the declarations of interests of the members of the Management Board is insufficiently rigorous and detailed and puts the completeness and transparency of the procedure at risk;deleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Considers that product assessment should not be based solely on industry data, but should duly take into account independent scientific literature published in peer-reviewed journals; stresses that extra caution should be exercised in relation to industry influence in the development of guiAcknowledges the Authority's commitment to work with the European Commission in order to delfines and assessment methodologies, which should not favour industry-sponsored studies on speculative grounds and which should be developed in an open, transparent and balanced manner the modalities of full public access to unpublished raw data;
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Reminds the Authority that the rules governing declarations of interests should be accompanied by a set of consequences applied when those rules are breached; further, notes that the Authority should, in addition, focus on public interest in its independent decision-making by taking into account all relevant data and information;deleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Notes that in March 2010 a German NGO turned to the European Ombudsman, complaining that the Authority did not adequately address a potential conflict of interest concerning the move of its Head of Genetically Modified Organisms Unit to a biotechnology company in 2008 less than two months after the staff member in question left the Authority, without a ‘cooling off’ period;deleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Underlines that the Ombudsman concluded that the Authority had not carried out a thorough assessment of the alleged potential conflict of interest and called on the Authority to improve the way in which it applies its rules and procedures in future ‘revolving door’ cases; stresses, moreover, that the Ombudsman also observed that negotiations by a serving member of staff concerning a future job which could amount to a ‘revolving door’ situation would themselves constitute a conflict of interest and recommended that the Authority should strengthen its rules and procedures accordingly; calls on the Authority to inform the discharge authority of the concrete measures adopted, and their respective deadlines, to properly address the conclusions of the Ombudsman;deleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Once more, urges the Authority to take appropriate measures in cases of conflict of interests and ‘revolving door’ cases, including when cases occur within the Management Board, and to inform both the discharge authority and the public promptly of the measures taken;deleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Notes from its AAR that in 2010 the Authority took several initiatives in the area of prevention and management of conflict of interests: – the commissioning of an independent report to assess the implementation by the Authority of its 2007 policy on declaration of interests; – the commissioning of an independent report to benchmark the Authority's independence system against those of both national and international peer organisations; – the conclusion of an external independent review of its declaration of interest assessments;deleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Welcomes the fact that the Authority has adopted a new definition of conflicts of interests, based on the OECD definition, but warns that further improvements are necessary to strengthen the Authority's policy on independence; stresses in particular that the criteria that define a conflict of interests should be clarified and widened, and include current and recent past activities;deleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
30. Takes note from the Authority that a review of its policy on declarations of interest took place in 2011 and that its Management Board adopted a new policy on independence and scientific decision- making processes;deleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
31. Observes that the Authority is repeatedly challenged over alleged cases of conflicts of interest involving members of the experts' panels, especially in the case of the panels on ‘Food additives and nutrient sources added to food’ (ANS) and ‘Genetically modified organisms’ (GMO); underlines that eight of the Authority's pPanels and its sScientific cCommittee were due forhave been renewaled in March 2012 and that the Authority's capability of implementing the new policy is under scrutiny; calls therefore on the Authority to inform the discharge authority in writing by 30 June 2012 of the steps undertaken to implement the new policy on independence and scientific decision- making processes and to conform to the OECD definition of conflict of interest when renewing its panels and its scientific committee; at the same time, calls on the Authority to inform the discharge authority of the new composition of the panels and of the scientific committee by 30 JuneJune 2012; welcomes the publication of the declarations of interest of the newly appointed experts on the Authority's website but observes that some of the curriculum vitae are not yet available; invites the Authority to publish all of them by 1 January 2012;
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31 a (new)
31a. Notes that 37 experts of two Panels have been appointed in 2011, prior to the adoption of the Authority's new policy on independence and scientific decision- making processes; agrees therefore with the Authority's initiative to screen by 31 October 2012 their declarations of interest against the newly adopted policy and implementing rules; invites the Authority to inform the discharge authority of the outcomes of the screening process by the start of the next discharge procedure;
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31 b (new)
31b. Calls on the Authority to introduce in its annual activity reports a special section describing the actions taken to prevent and manage conflict of interest, which shall include inter alia: - the number of conflict-of-interest cases verified, - the number of revolving door cases, - the measures taken in each category of cases, - the number of breach of trust procedures launched and their outcomes; - the sanctions applied;
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. Takes note of the revision of the Authority's procedures in December 2010 to ensure the implementation of the obligations deriving from Articles 16(2), 17 and 19 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union, laid down in Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/6818 ; was informed that in 2010, 20 staff members left the Authority, all of whom received a letter on departure reminding them of their obligations vis-à-vis the Authority; calls on the Authority to further improve the way in which it applies its rules and procedures to avoid the ‘revolving door’ cases recently highlighted by the European Ombudsman; considers that any problems with the enforcement of staff rules and declarations of interests undermine the Authority's credibility;deleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
33. Notes that the Authority has been audited by the Court of Auditors in the framework of the Special Report on conflicts of interest management in the Union Agencies and acknowledges from the Court of Auditors that the Special Report is due to be published by the end of June 2012;deleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
34. Acknowledges from the Special Report that the Commission is considering a modification of the future funding of the Authority and proposed that the discharge authority and the Council consider a partial fee-based financing structure for the Authority; notes that the Commission is conducting an impact assessment on the matter; expresses, however, concerns that the new funding scheme proposed by the Commission could affect the independence of the Authority;deleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 6
Performancedeleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35
35. Notes from its AAR that a review of its efficiency, led by external consultants, began in 2010 with the launch of the e3 programme; acknowledges that the inception phase of the programme concerned the establishment of the programme portfolio, structure and governance in preparation for the structural reorganisation that would be implemented in 2011; invites the Authority to inform the discharge authority of the conclusions drawn by the review and of the measures it has adopted and implemented to address them;deleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
36. Welcomes the Authority's plans to enhance its medium-term planning with a view to better involving the Member States in the Authority's work and better pool its resources across Europe; supports the Authority in strengthening its cooperation with Member States in the area of risk assessment;deleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37
37. Underlines the need for the Authority to ensure that its advice is of a high quality and is independent, in order to guarantee compliance with Union safety standards, scientific excellence and independence on all matters with a direct or indirect impact on food and feed safety, and plant protection; recommends, particularly in the interests of transparency, measures to further foster and monitor internal rules on declarations of interest by staff of the Authority and by experts working for the Authority;deleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38
38. Considers that the main tasks of the Authority are the provision of independent scientific advice on matters with a direct or indirect impact on food safety, the conduct of risk assessments to provide Union institutions, Member States and policy-making bodies with a sound scientific basis for defining policy-driven legislative or regulatory measures and the collection and analysis of scientific data;deleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 7
Internal Auditdeleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39
39. Acknowledges that six ‘very important’ recommendations from the IAS still need to be implemented and that three of them have already been delayed for over 12 months; notes in particular that these delays concern: information security management, the contract renewal process and transparency of decision-making, and filing and archiving policy; calls, therefore, on the Authority to rapidly address these deficiencies, and to inform the discharge authorities of the results achieved;deleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40
40. Draws attention to its recommendations from previous discharge reports, as set out in the Adeleted (The deletion of this paragraph leads to the deletion of the table annexed to this resolution;e draft report.)
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41
41. Refers, in respect of the other observations accompanying its Decision on discharge, which are of a horizontal nature, to its resolution of 10 May 201219 on the performance, financial management and control of the Agencies.deleted
2012/09/10
Committee: CONT