BETA

Activities of Norica NICOLAI related to 2011/2008(INI)

Plenary speeches (1)

Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2008(INI)

Shadow reports (1)

REPORT on the state of implementation of the EU Strategy for Central Asia PDF (272 KB) DOC (176 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: AFET
Dossiers: 2011/2008(INI)
Documents: PDF(272 KB) DOC(176 KB)

Amendments (34)

Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas the importance of fostering good relations between the European Union and the five countries of Central Asia is paramount for the mutual development of both sides,
2011/09/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A c (new)
Ac. whereas Central Asia holds significant importance for the European Union in terms of trade potential and energetic security and whereas the region has been affected by the recent global financial and economic crisis,
2011/09/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A d (new)
Ad. whereas some Member States have strong bilateral relations with the Central Asian states, being leading sources of investment and trade and whereas the EU needs a concerted and coherent approach towards the region in order to avoid misunderstandings, doubling of tasks and most importantly, sending mixed signals,
2011/09/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that the level and nature of the EU’s engagement must be differentiated and conditional, depending on measurable progressEU needs to maintain a high level of engagement in Central Asia, tailoring its strategies to the progress of the states in the region in the fields of human rights, good governance, sustainable development, the rule of law and the fight against corruption, offering its assistance where needed to help foster this progress, following lines similar to the principles of the EU’s neighbourhood policy;
2011/09/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Considers that the revision of the Central Asia Strategy needs to take into account the need to back its objectives with sufficient financial resources and to establish adequate distribution patterns that reflect on the realities of every country in the region; considers that given the financial restraints, a focus should be given to those medium and long-term programs that can make the biggest impact on the development of the region, notably youth and education, technical assistance on economic development and promotion of small and medium sized businesses, as well as water security and combating drug trafficking;
2011/09/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Supports the opening of fully-fledged EU delegations in all the countries of Central Asia as a vital means of increasing the presence and visibility of the EU in the region and long-term cooperation and engagement with all sectors of society and fostering progress towards better understanding and the emergence of the rule of law and respect for human rights; notes with concern that failure to open delegations contradicts the objectives of the strategy and EU interests in the region;
2011/09/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. DeploresNotes with concern the difficulty encountered by the EU in engaging with independent civil society in the area of human rights and good governance in the context of, deploring the continued harassment of NGOs in the region; calls for support for genuinely independent NGOs so as to help them play an effective role in the development and consolidation of civil societyto redouble efforts directed at independent civil society NGOs; considers that the continued promotion by the EU of programmes targeted at the Central Asian countries is an important trans-border tool for fostering understanding and cooperation between the states of the region;
2011/09/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Regrets that, although some positive developments have taken place in the region (abolition of the death penalty in Uzbekistan, freeing of prisoners in Turkmenistan, some constitutional and judicial procedure reforms, etc.), the overall situation in the fields of human rights and the rule of law remains worryingtroubling despite the new institutions set up and constitutional or legal changes designed to improve it;
2011/09/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 3
Energy, wWater and the environment
2011/09/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Regards it as of the utmost importance that energy cooperation projects include long-term supply agreements, enshrining the principles of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative; calls for the promotion of EITI and other such initiatives by the EU in all the states of the region that have significant extractive resources;
2011/09/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 3 a (new)
Trade and energy
2011/09/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Stresses the importance of energy in the relations with Central Asian countries, as a major source of revenue for the states, as well as a potential source of energy security for the EU; welcomes the signing of memorandums of understanding with Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan, as well as the steps taken in the development of the Southern Corridor, notably in the shape of the Nabucco Project; calls on the EEAS and the Commission to continue supporting energy projects, as well as fostering communication towards important goals such as the Trans-Caspian route; welcomes the participation of all the Central Asian countries in the Baku Initiative;
2011/09/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 c (new)
11c. Notes with concern the adverse effect had in Central Asia by the global financial crisis and the increasing levels of poverty; considers that the path towards a healthy social and political life is tied to economic prosperity and that the EU needs to address the development of Central Asia economies as a major part of its strategy for the region; calls for enhanced support for poverty alleviation programs and notes the importance of EIB investment;
2011/09/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 d (new)
11d. Underlines the unbalanced nature of some of the Central Asian economies, which overly rely on natural resources and considers that diversification is a major goal for the medium and long term in the region; notes in this area the importance of the Central Asia Invest programme and calls for it to be applied in all the five countries;
2011/09/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Reaffirms its support for actions aimed at fostering regional cooperation as the only way to address the many cross-border security, resource management, ethnic, environmental and development problems of the states concerned; considers that the continuation of the Border Management Programme is a very important tool of assistance;
2011/09/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Calls for the inclusion of cross-border cooperation with Afghanistan, in particular with its border provinces, inStresses the need for coherence between the EU’s approach to Afghanistan and the Central Asia Strategy, in particular in relation with transport, energy, trade and development actions and programmes;
2011/09/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Calls on the EU to focus its assistance on combating drug and human trafficking, issues that represent the main source of instability in Central Asia which can be targeted by EU efforts; notes with concern the development of this issue in all the region and calls for trans-border efforts to be suggested and promoted by the EU; supports the organisation of Central Asian fora for combating narco- crime;
2011/09/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 b (new)
19b. Is concerned at the dual issue of rising fundamentalist views and movements as a spill-over effect from Afghanistan but also as an reaction to the problematic human rights and democratic record of the governments in the region; notes that the fight against terrorism is an important element for the EU’s Central Asia strategy;
2011/09/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 e (new)
19e. Deplores that an agreement over the status of the Caspian Sea has yet to be found and considers that the EU should be consistent in promoting that the Central Asian countries bordering the sea, Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan, take an active and open part in the negotiations;
2011/09/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 5
Kazakhstandeleted
2011/09/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Calls on the HR/VP to keep up the pressure on the Kazakh authorities to fulfil the promises to improve elections and media freedom which they announced in the run-up to their 2010 OSCE chairmanship, in accordance with the core commitments of OSCE member states and with the National Plan for Human Rights adopted in 2009 by the Kazakh Government;deleted
2011/09/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Welcomes the aspirations of Kazakhstan towards closer and enhanced relations with the EU and takes note of the recent launching of negotiations on a new enhanced EU-Kazakhstan PCA but stresses that economic cooperation must go hand in hand with political cooperation and be based on the political will to implement common values; looks forward, in this context, to tangible progress in the fields of freedom of the media, freedom of association and assembly, and to improvements in the conduct of the electoral process in the upcoming legislative elections in 2012;deleted
2011/09/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 6
Kyrgyzstandeleted
2011/09/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Commends Kyrgyzstan for its efforts to pursue democratic reforms and shift to a genuine multi-party system; hopes that further progress will be accomplished in the conduct of the upcoming presidential elections scheduled later this year; points out, nevertheless, that sustained efforts are needed to develop a fully functioning democracy, and calls in this regard on the HR/VP to assist the Kyrgyz authorities in the area of institution-building, consolidation of democratic practices and the fight against corruption and the infiltration of organised crime in Kyrgyz administration;deleted
2011/09/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Welcomes the decision of the Kyrgyz Government to establish a Special Commission to implement and monitor the recommendations of the International Independent Commission (IIC) for investigation into the June 2010 events in South Kyrgyzstan, and calls on the Kyrgyz authorities to adopt the measures necessary to defuse interethnic tension and stabilise the situation and to promote cultural dialogue and respect for minority rights and the fight against all forms of discrimination; calls on the EU to design and implement EU assistance programmes together with the Kyrgyz authorities and NGOs aiming at conflict prevention, reconciliation and prevention of impunity;deleted
2011/09/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 7
Tajikistandeleted
2011/09/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Expresses its concern at the inefficiency of EU development aid in the country resulting from the high level of corruption and the looming regional fragmentation fuelled by the dire economic and social conditions; calls, therefore, for an alternative approach based on human security through alternative channels of assistance;deleted
2011/09/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Calls on the EU to promote and help, by means of feasibility studies, technical expertise and, where necessary, appropriate EIB loans, the development of smaller-scale hydroelectric plant projects distributed along the course of rivers, and of alternative renewable energies;deleted
2011/09/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 8
Turkmenistandeleted
2011/09/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Takes note of the legislation adopted in the political, economic, social and educational field and expects words to be followed by deeds; urges, in this regard, the Council and the HR/VP to encourage the Turkmen authorities to implement fully the new legislation and to continue the process of engagement with international and regional organisations;deleted
2011/09/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Deplores, however, the fact that none of the conditions set by the European Parliament in February 2008 in order to move ahead with the Interim Agreement have been fulfilled, in particular free and unfettered access for the International Committee of the Red Cross, the release of all political prisoners and prisoners of conscience, the abolition of all government impediments to travel, and the possibility for NGOs to operate in the country;deleted
2011/09/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 9
Uzbekistandeleted
2011/09/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Takes note of the Council Conclusions of October 2010 that put an end to all sanctions on Uzbekistan and confirmed the willingness of the EU to strengthen relations with that country in a comprehensive manner; recalls that the level of the engagement depends on progress by Uzbekistan in the fields of human rights, democratisation and the rule of law, and expects the EEAS and the Council to develop a policy of critical, conditional and coherent European engagement with Uzbekistan;deleted
2011/09/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 186 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Deplores the recent decision of the Uzbek authorities to close down the office of Human Rights Watch in Tashkent, and calls on them to allow unhindered access and operations by national and international NGOs throughout the country;deleted
2011/09/13
Committee: AFET