13 Amendments of Enikő GYŐRI related to 2023/2063(INI)
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas EU funding has proven to be an essential questionable tool to provide macroeconomic stabilisation at EU level and increase its internal and external resilience in times of crisis while supporting Member States in financing necessary investments in EU priorities to tackle current and future challenges;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Recalls that the original objective of the European Semester iwas the established framework for coordinating theon of budgetary, and economic, social and employment policies across the Union in accordance with the Treaties, including the European Pillar of Social Rights, thereby safeguarding its macroeconomic stability and its social cohesion;
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Expresses its concerns that the EU economic governance framework as a whole is losing its original focus as over the years the European Semester has been overloaded by policies out of its original scope, leading to debates of non-economic nature.
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Shares the view that the 2024 CSRs need to be focused on a limited set of challenges; underlines that CSRs must equallyshould serve to enhance competitiveness, and promote the green and digital transitions and ensure social fairness; stresses that CSRs need to take account of social vulnerabilities;
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. At the same time, highlights the need for better focusing the country specific recommendations by remaining within the remit of EU competences and avoiding double standards. Emphasises the importance of pursuing genuine dialogue between the Commission and the Member States during the entire semester process. This is a pre-condition of ownership and better implementation.
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Supports streamlining EU cohesion policy programmes with investment needs identified under the RRF and in CSRs; recalls that cohesion policy serves a broader set of objectives than the RRF; cCalls for a comparable incorporation of stakeholder participation in the drafting and implementation of national RRPs as it is for cohesion policy programmes;
Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Underlines that the reform must lead to a simplification of the framework, be more country-specific allowing bigger national ownership, and strengthen its enforceability, andwhile enable Member States to meetfind the right balance between the public investment needs for the green and digital transitions of their economies without underminingeconomic growth and the sustainability of government debt;
Amendment 180 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
Amendment 220 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Welcomes the fact that the Commission negotiates with the Member States their individual fiscal-structural plans; underlines that such an increase in discretionary power for the Commission must be accompanied by increased accountability towards the European Parliamentemphasizes the importance of equal treatment of Member States;
Amendment 230 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Considers the stronger involvement of national parliaments in determining the content and voting on fiscal structural plans to be a meaningful way to increase national ownership of fiscal structural plans;
Amendment 236 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
Amendment 243 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17 a. Stresses that all the EU institutions shall act within the remit of their competences in the field of economic governance, as laid down in the Treaties.