4 Amendments of Jens GEIER related to 2009/2127(DEC)
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 – indent 2
Paragraph 2 – indent 2
- Communication within the secretariat: the lack of communication and trust between the director and the staff led to prolonged disputes, focussed in large part on the failure to establish a correct claiming system for legitimate staff travel and mobile phone costs associated with the work of the agency,
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Suggests, therefore, attaching the College to Europol as a concrete solution to the College's structural and chronic problemthat the Court of Auditors carry out a comprehensive review of regulatory agencies to examine, inter alia, the proportion of operating, governance and operational costs and assess ways of addressing structural or other problems, with a view to complementing the Commission´s own evaluation of regulatory agencies;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that, at the request of the Parliament to adopt an Action Plan, the director of the College and its Governing Board have estimated a realistic four-year period (i.e. from 2010 to 2014) in which to meet the objectives set out in the Annex to the Parliament's abovementioned resolution of 5 May 2010; is, therefore, not ready to accept that the College needs four more years to reach an acceptable standard of good administration as expected from a regulatory agency, and welcomes the cooperation signalled by the new Director´s consultation of the Commission´s Internal Audit Service during the course of production of the Action Plan;
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Regrets that Urges that a decision to commission any further external audit on usinge of appropriations to finance private expenditure announced by CEPOL and to be carried out by an external company, has not been launched yet; is, therefore, concerned about this delay which certainly will not facilitate the work of the external companyby an external company should take into consideration the need for value for money, and that the expectation of amounts to be recovered should exceed the likely audit and legal costs involved;